View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Konsti l33t
Joined: 10 Dec 2002 Posts: 691
|
Posted: Thu May 26, 2005 8:43 pm Post subject: older kernels doesn't compile anymore |
|
|
concerned are
linux-2.6.10-gentoo-r7
linux-2.6.9-gentoo
Code: |
CHK include/linux/version.h
make[1]: `arch/x86_64/kernel/asm-offsets.s' is up to date.
CHK include/linux/compile.h
CHK usr/initramfs_list
AS arch/x86_64/kernel/entry.o
arch/x86_64/kernel/entry.S: Assembler messages:
arch/x86_64/kernel/entry.S:81: Error: Macro with this name was already defined
arch/x86_64/kernel/entry.S:100: Error: Macro with this name was already defined
make[1]: *** [arch/x86_64/kernel/entry.o] Error 1
make: *** [arch/x86_64/kernel] Error 2
|
What are the oldest 2.6.x series kernel one can install?
Why are gentoo-sources-2.6.7-r19 masked?
Code: |
gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 3.4.3-20050110 (Gentoo 3.4.3.20050110-r2, ssp-3.4.3.20050110-0, pie-8.7.7)
Copyright (C) 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
|
Konsti |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gridmark n00b
Joined: 11 Mar 2005 Posts: 22 Location: Dallas
|
Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2005 1:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm having this same issue with 2.6.10-vanilla and gcc 3.4.4
Currently im still chrooted into my box and am unable to compile a kernel at all (Including current sync of gentoo sources, but thats another issue methinks)...
I was using the unstable ~athlon64 packages, i have commented that out, and am remerging everything (emerge -ev system) and see where that takes me.
Looking at your error, it seems your running and athlon64 system. Perhaps its related as thats what im trying to build... _________________ If it aint broke, fix it till it is. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Konsti l33t
Joined: 10 Dec 2002 Posts: 691
|
Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2005 4:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The from me above quoted error message is caused by the new gcc (or was it binutils?) which handle some cases of code more strict... What error do you get on 2.6.10? Thats weird and probably something else...
Yes, its amd64 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
scoobydu Veteran
Joined: 16 Feb 2003 Posts: 1076 Location: 'Mind the Gap'
|
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2005 10:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Is there a solution to this?
I'm having the same problem trying to build a 2.6.7 kernel, using gcc 3.4.4 on amd64.
scooby _________________ Tyan Tiger K8W, 2xOpteron 240,Powerbook5,6 15" 1.5g, Macbook Black 2g, Mac Mini 1g, Ipod P60g.
| Linux - From a windows user perspective| |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Konsti l33t
Joined: 10 Dec 2002 Posts: 691
|
Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2005 6:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
IIRC there is a solution, there has to be some code changed to make newer binutils happy.
I did not test ist though, I saw a patch somewhere but I don't know where anymore... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
scoobydu Veteran
Joined: 16 Feb 2003 Posts: 1076 Location: 'Mind the Gap'
|
Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2005 12:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Konsti wrote: | IIRC there is a solution, there has to be some code changed to make newer binutils happy.
I did not test ist though, I saw a patch somewhere but I don't know where anymore... |
Ok, thanks, I'll do some digging around.
scooby _________________ Tyan Tiger K8W, 2xOpteron 240,Powerbook5,6 15" 1.5g, Macbook Black 2g, Mac Mini 1g, Ipod P60g.
| Linux - From a windows user perspective| |
|
Back to top |
|
|
unplug n00b
Joined: 28 Jul 2004 Posts: 19
|
Posted: Fri Mar 10, 2006 6:04 am Post subject: same here |
|
|
I am having same problem when I tried to compile 2.6.15-gentoo-r7 with gcc 3.3.4 for x86_64
Any solution? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
its1louder Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 03 Jul 2003 Posts: 75 Location: Santa Barbara CA
|
Posted: Thu May 04, 2006 5:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'd like to bump this, I need to support some hardware not working on kernel 2.6.15 but tested working on 2.6.9. The oldest I could "emerge" was vanilla 2.6.10 so I was trying to compile that.
here is my GCC
Code: |
# equery uses gcc
[ Searching for packages matching gcc... ]
[ Colour Code : set unset ]
[ Legend : Left column (U) - USE flags from make.conf ]
[ : Right column (I) - USE flags packages was installed with ]
[ Found these USE variables for sys-devel/gcc-3.4.4-r1 ]
U I
- - altivec : Adds support for optimizations for G4 and G5/ppc970 processors
- - bootstrap : !!internal use only!! DO NOT SET THIS FLAG YOURSELF!, used during original system bootstrapping
+ - boundschecking : Adds the bounds checking patch by Haj Ten Brugge, this will DISABLE the hardened PIE+SSP patches
- - build : !!internal use only!! DO NOT SET THIS FLAG YOURSELF!, used for creating build images and the first half of bootstrapping.
+ + fortran : Adds support for fortran (formally f77)
- - gcj : Enable building with gcj (The GNU Compiler for the Javatm Programming Language)
+ + gtk : Adds support for x11-libs/gtk+ (The GIMP Toolkit)
- - hardened : activate default security enhancements for toolchain (gcc, glibc, binutils)
- - ip28 : Enable building a compiler capable of building a kernel for SGI Indigo2 Impact R10000 (IP28)
- - multilib : On 64bit systems, if you want to be able to compile 32bit and 64bit binaries
- - multislot : Allow for SLOTs to include minor version (3.3.4 instead of just 3.3)
- - n32 : Enable n32 ABI support on mips
- - n64 : Enable n64 ABI support on mips
+ + nls : Adds Native Language Support (using gettext - GNU locale utilities)
- - nocxx : Disable support for C++ (DON'T USE THIS UNLESS YOU KNOW WHAT YOU'RE DOING)
- - nopie : Disable PIE support (NOT FOR GENERAL USE)
- - nossp : Disable SSP support (NOT FOR GENERAL USE)
- - objc : Build support for the Objective C code language
- - vanilla : Do not add extra patches which change default behaviour; DO NOT USE THIS ON A GLOBAL SCALE as the severity of the meaning changes drastically
|
Code: |
# uname -a
Linux hyhats 2.6.15-gentoo-r7 #6 SMP Wed May 3 05:50:07 PDT 2006 x86_64 Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.00GHz GNU/Linux
|
Code: |
CC arch/x86_64/kernel/process.o
CC arch/x86_64/kernel/semaphore.o
CC arch/x86_64/kernel/signal.o
AS arch/x86_64/kernel/entry.o
arch/x86_64/kernel/entry.S: Assembler messages:
arch/x86_64/kernel/entry.S:81: Error: Macro with this name was already defined
arch/x86_64/kernel/entry.S:100: Error: Macro with this name was already defined
make[1]: *** [arch/x86_64/kernel/entry.o] Error 1
make: *** [arch/x86_64/kernel] Error 2
|
my plan is to try some other gcc-glibc-binutils right now . . . See if 4.1 makes a difference, I was planning on trying it out anyway.
If that fails I will try going to kernel.org to get a 2.6.9 kernel the old fashioned way.
Actually, the hardware is verified with redhat 2.6.9. Is there an easy place to get that kernel source or is it just the same as vanilla? _________________ These go to eleven. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
its1louder Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 03 Jul 2003 Posts: 75 Location: Santa Barbara CA
|
Posted: Wed May 10, 2006 5:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
What I did was, I went to the offending source code document and editted out the two offending macros. The kernel then compiled and ran. _________________ These go to eleven. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
its1louder Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 03 Jul 2003 Posts: 75 Location: Santa Barbara CA
|
Posted: Wed May 10, 2006 5:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
the 2.6.9 kernel I got at kernel.org. _________________ These go to eleven. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|