OpenOffice.org 2.0 overlay archive

robmoss

Mod edit: Split off from OpenOffice.org 2.0 mxyz overlay. --kallamej

Is your hard disk going mad when it stops? Don't forget that there's probably a gig's worth of stuff being shifted around after that line appears.
_________________
Reality is for those who can't face Science Fiction.

emerge -U will kill your Gentoo
ecatmur, Lord of Portage Bash Scripts

geki · Posted: Fri Jul 09, 2004 10:03 am Post subject:

nope CPU 0%
HDD 0%
ETH0 0cps

great? yeah definitive!

I switch over to: http://ooo.ximian.com/hackers-guide.html

lets see if that cvs works... ill redo openoffice-ximian ebuild

robmoss · Posted: Fri Jul 09, 2004 1:57 pm Post subject:

Might have a look myself later on too. Just so I can keep tabs on what's happening with it.
_________________
Reality is for those who can't face Science Fiction.

emerge -U will kill your Gentoo
ecatmur, Lord of Portage Bash Scripts

geki · Posted: Fri Jul 09, 2004 3:00 pm Post subject:

hey thanks,

but nevermind: using oo.o milestone for oo.o 2.0 dev with gcc 3.4 fixes
cvs worked! now i have to check how far it gets without probs... the ebuild

ADD: do you know how to give cvs.eclass a checkout option?

ECVS_CO_OPT="-r milestone" does not work - what i do atm is:

ECVS_MODULE="-r cws_src680_gcc340fixes01 OpenOffice"

and that is not fine!

ADD: dunno what i did but ECVS_CO_OPT works as it should now! :lol:

geki · Posted: Fri Jul 09, 2004 3:10 pm Post subject:

actual changes as of first version above:
ADD: CO OPT fix

irf2003 · Veteran Joined: 10 Sep 2003 Posts: 1078

geki,
don't waste your time, OOo will not compile with gcc-3.4.x
also, don't use gcc-3.4.x on your main box, it just not there yet.
althought some http://funroll-loops.org/ characters in the gentoo
community would swear that it is ready for a production environment.
i don't know whether you built OOo before, but,
judging by http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=28294
they have a long way to go before even the 680 branch (that is OOo 2.x) will
ever build with gcc-3.4.x
hth

geki · Posted: Fri Jul 09, 2004 3:33 pm Post subject:

oh boy, you are totally wrong here

- this thread ... how did rob said it with gcc 3.5 ... mildly INSANE

not meant in bad way but here is a full system on stable gcc-3.4.1

and whats wrong supporting OOo with gcc-3.4.x patches if this (ebuild) is going to work soon?

they are working on OOo 2.0 with gcc 3.4 compatibility and more ppl try and patch the faster it will be done...

or am I missing sth out?!? o.O

dont think so... :twisted:

ADD: do you see this milestone ?!? -r cws_src680_gcc340fixes01 yeah? gcc 3.4 FIXES jejejeje SORRY

irf2003 · Veteran Joined: 10 Sep 2003 Posts: 1078

geki · Posted: Fri Jul 09, 2004 4:46 pm Post subject:

please, just post if you want to help with the ebuild. ok?

I know about gcc 3.4 and that OOo 2.0 is DEVELOPMENT.
There are other threads for that. ok?

PS milestone 02 will be released somewhen... one Dev wondered why it was not in cvs yet.

geki · Posted: Fri Jul 09, 2004 6:19 pm Post subject:

may anyone explain me why this cvs.eclass saves the directories from the module in the ECVS_TOP_DIR and not in ECVS_TOP_DIR/ECVS_MODULE ?

fetching works but if it wants to copy to the workdir it does not find the right directory

Example:

ECVS_MODULE="OpenOffice"
ECVS_TOP_DIR="${DISTDIR}/cvs-src"

it is fetching into: ECVS_TOP_DIR/*
and after fetching it wants to copy from ECVS_TOP_DIR/ECVS_MODULE/*

this is bugged

geki · Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2004 4:19 am Post subject:

well, after fixing some basic things - difficult for me as noob without help - and at 6am over here with headache - it is not easy...

it started compiling finally but like I expected, it breaks

..gets more far then OOo 1.1.2 ! so there are gcc 3.4 fixes damn...

tomorrow (today) after sleep ill update cvs and wait for next milestones... :twisted:

... and sorry again that i got pissed... but topic is: need help with ebuild and no religion talk about using gcc-3.4.1 or stable gcc-3.3.3

I know to use OOo 1.1.2 with gcc-3.3.3 if i want it compiles.

I want to see how far it gets and I see it now and with this ebuild it will be easy in future to see how far they get...

Thanks all out there... for the ones that helped :twisted:

...or not for the rest :evil:

ADD: 680 will never compile with gcc 3.4 because there is an extra version for gcc 3.4 hehe ... well never ... may be somewhen but atm its like that! greets...

ADD2: CVS is nearly never stable dunno why some think I think/want/would like it works - lol - I know what I do - I try to destroy my box but atm its not possible with gcc-3.4.1, ok? just to clearify

ADD3: funroll-loops.org -> without these insane ppl trying betas, alphas -> you would never get a STABLE ONE hehehe oh damn...

ADD4: funroll-loops.org -> they talk about cars if i remember well -> just one thing -> car indutry copies tuning car parts -> Audi A3 has bad looking eyes, for example so Audi is a lamer?! wow... go tell them hehehe

Good night all...

robmoss · Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2004 7:52 pm Post subject:

geki, do you have any webspace? If so, could you please put your ebuild somewhere for me to download? The OOo ebuild is not one to copy and paste (newline problems).
_________________
Reality is for those who can't face Science Fiction.

emerge -U will kill your Gentoo
ecatmur, Lord of Portage Bash Scripts

geki · Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2004 8:59 pm Post subject:

I am running apache 2 webserver where I can put my ebuild on a vhost.

But first, I have to do "emerge -e system" and "emerge -e world". Somehow wxGTK headers are not found. See GCC 3.4 thread.

I hope after this it will. GCC 3.4.1-r1 issue.

Second, I have to do some patches for the sources and

third, if there is a horrible C++ code error I will do that vhost with ebuild. I will post the link here.

I just know basic C++ (9 months school). :twisted:

May be someone can help?

Posting with links2 is great

hehehe

geki · Posted: Thu Jul 15, 2004 11:35 am Post subject:

well, actually it compiles great until dev-java/ant package -> /usr/bin/ant tries to compile...

EDIT #1
at first sight it seems to be fixed.

the java-config calls are bugged in /usr/bin/ant of dev-java/ant-1.6.1-r1 package. there is even a bug report stated as new. where is the dev to fix it in portage?

luckily there is the ${JAVA_HOME} variable to use instead.

geki · Posted: Thu Jul 15, 2004 3:02 pm Post subject:

For anyone who wants to test this:
ftp://ftp:test@geki.ath.cx:3674/openoffice-cvs-20040709.ebuild

I hope this link works. :roll:

Here it failed last time because unicode.hxx was missing.

If you did not build your system with USE-Flag: java... it won't find a JDK on configure. blackdown-jdk does not set a system variable or whatever... someone could open a bugreport for that...

"emerge dev-java/ant" wants 21 packages to install although dev-java/ant is the first of the list. Stop installing the other 20 packages after it is merged!

dev-java/ant-1.6.1-r1 has a buggy /usr/bin/ant - fix it!

I think that is all... happy trying and waiting until OOo Devs did their work

robmoss · Posted: Thu Jul 15, 2004 3:39 pm Post subject:

geki · Posted: Thu Jul 15, 2004 4:17 pm Post subject:

TimeOutNoTransfer 10 (seconds)

is may be to radical hehe

now up to 30... also my full bandwidth is in use... so lets see

Edit #1
If you want to fetch from my server you have to be directly connected to internet with open ports for data connection

If you are behind a router or with firewall that blocks... bad luck

TheCoop · Posted: Thu Jul 15, 2004 7:18 pm Post subject:

geki · Posted: Thu Jul 15, 2004 7:27 pm Post subject:

ah, i forgot to add that you have to fix cvs.eclass.

it stores the data of checkout in cvs-src/* and wants to copy afterwards from cvs-src/OpenOffice/*

happy fixing

geki · Posted: Thu Jul 15, 2004 7:32 pm Post subject:

another link for download:
http://sn4ip3r.dyn.ee/openoffice-cvs-20040709.ebuild

to that unicode.hxx issue:

checkout SRC680_m48 in a temporary directory, copy i18nutil over to ...OpenOffice/ directory...

well, just copying does not help... do a tar.bz2 or how you like and edit ebuild to extract and copies it over...

may be it finds its unicode.hxx

edit #1
talked to one OOo Dev - I hope they tag that i18nutil module for this branch soon

geki · Posted: Thu Jul 15, 2004 9:32 pm Post subject:

To get the latest i18nutil module - until it is implemented in cws_680_gcc340fixes01 branch

irf2003 · Veteran Joined: 10 Sep 2003 Posts: 1078

there has been a lot of activity lately at http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=28294
the target compiler is gcc-3.4.1, and the milestone is OOo 2.x.
geki, not sure how far you have gone with the cws_680_gcc340fixes01,
but, this may be rather old.
i do hope that the gcc-3.4.x fixes will be integrated in the next 680 snapshots
as i can't cvs on dial-up.
as i recall not all the fixes have been commited to the cws_680_gcc340fixes01
branch, so you should follow the dependency tree for the relevent branch(es)
hth
happy gentooing

geki · Posted: Thu Jul 15, 2004 10:16 pm Post subject:

It says version: OOo 1.1.1 ?! :roll:

i will ask OOo Devs again what branch or milestone to use for OOo 2.0 with GCC 3.4.x support. but they told me to use cws_680_gcc340fixes01 for GCC 3.4.x support...

last try went 50mins compiling... then it recognized that "rpm" was missing

that i installed now...

irf2003 · Veteran Joined: 10 Sep 2003 Posts: 1078

geki · Posted: Thu Jul 15, 2004 11:13 pm Post subject:

two fixes of ebuild:

rpm dep
fetch restriction for i18nutil module

same old link new ebuild here:
http://sn4ip3r.dyn.ee/openoffice-cvs-20040709.ebuild

also mailed to TheCoop - he will add it soon... i hope

edit #1
irf2k3: if u wanna know why compile