View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
aidy l33t
Joined: 07 Apr 2005 Posts: 915
|
Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2005 3:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
But how do they get to use all that power? I mean with, say, Linux, you can do all that vista stuff with a third or fourth of those specs?? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
John-Boy Guru
Joined: 23 Jun 2004 Posts: 446 Location: Desperately seeking moksha in all the wrong places
|
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 11:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Luddy Nora.
What's interesting is that generally there are the stated specs and what everybody accepts that you need to run something. Remember NT4 ? What was the minimum stated spec from Microsoft at the time - something fairly low-end if I recall. _________________ Like the Roman, I seem to see "the River Tiber foaming with much blood" |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mikkoloo Apprentice
Joined: 04 Nov 2003 Posts: 159 Location: .se and .nl
|
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 1:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hooi
I think,
To keep up with Windows usershare (not inovations) Linux NEEDS to make some specific things better.
I look at my mates, my girlfriend, parents etc. and i see what needs to be done, with their demands in consideration.
They are USERS, not anyone here, we are GEEKS, its a major difference. Both in how we use a computer,
how we want our systems to work and what we want to do with it.
Most people want a computer to do every day services for them, like:
Write a report for school (in ms word cause they know it works with the school computers)
Play some music
Download some new music
Play games
- Users wont change because of security, they know Linux is more secure, yet they use Windows despite the fact there are hundreds of thousands of viruses and scriptZ etc. They download an antivirus/firewall app and feel secure.
- Users wont change because of stability, Reboots is the average users daily routine, crashes too. Or at least they cope with it.
- Users wont change because of usabillty, KDE is the choise in linux, any other WM that ive came across lacks so much of the many small supports (like sepparate buttons on the laptop) that its just appaling to the average user.
- Users wont change because of hardware, Almost all hardware besides soundcards and other considerable basic stuff is really hard or impossible to get to work in Linux. In windows you put a CD in and connects the hardware. Im talking about devices such as tv-cards, bluetooth or tv-out)
- Users wont change because of price, We all pay the M$ tax anyways. If we dont, just download it and burn it and install. That's how its done.
What Linux Needs:
A unified desktop enviroment, more than one makes any user confused.
Plug and Play, as it should have been.
Game support (this is in the hands of the authors too, yes)
Easy hardware settings, for example printing.. cups is a joke! (no offence)
Do this and throw some effects like looking glass and luminocity for eyecandy to make it more attracting. I also think we need to get rid of all the myths of linux. Many users discard it because "it's for geeks". I mean its getting better and users are needed to bring it forward. Another aspect is to cover all the users. I would not dream of using an os where I couldnt compile apps myself or change configfiles by hand. My mother on the other hand would not be able to open the file in a hundred years.
Imagine a Linux where we both are satisfied. Imagine a simple Linux. Imagine a complicated (yet powerful and extremly configurable) Linux, like it is today, but together. A Linux you would put in the hands of your mother, your 6 year old nephew or little brother. and use yourself.
It needs to get there. _________________ ----
AMD 64 4000+, nforce4 mobo, 2GB RAM, 200Gb SATA HDD, xfx Geforce 7900GT XE
----
HP pavilion zv5470EA: AMD 64 3400+, 512 Mb RAM, 80 Gb HDD, nvidia GeForce4 440 Go 64M, Cabletron RoamAbout 802.11 DS (orinoco gold) WiFi. Creative Webcam Pro (ov511) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
petrjanda Veteran
Joined: 05 Sep 2003 Posts: 1557 Location: Brno, Czech Republic
|
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 1:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mikkoloo wrote: |
A unified desktop enviroment, more than one makes any user confused.
|
No
Quote: |
Easy hardware settings, for example printing.. cups is a joke! (no offence)
|
and No
If Linux is to move mainstream like Windows(anything more than 15% market share) and a billion of users that cannot do more than point and click or drag and drop, Im off to DragonFly. _________________ There is, a not-born, a not-become, a not-made, a not-compounded. If that unborn, not-become, not-made, not-compounded were not, there would be no escape from this here that is born, become, made and compounded. - Gautama Siddharta |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mikkoloo Apprentice
Joined: 04 Nov 2003 Posts: 159 Location: .se and .nl
|
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 1:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
petrjanda wrote: | mikkoloo wrote: |
A unified desktop enviroment, more than one makes any user confused.
|
No
Quote: |
Easy hardware settings, for example printing.. cups is a joke! (no offence)
|
and No
If Linux is to move mainstream like Windows(anything more than 15% market share) and a billion of users that cannot do more than point and click or drag and drop, Im off to DragonFly. |
The point with an excellent os is that you could choose to do both, matching to your skill.
Linux got one part of that vision, windows got the other. _________________ ----
AMD 64 4000+, nforce4 mobo, 2GB RAM, 200Gb SATA HDD, xfx Geforce 7900GT XE
----
HP pavilion zv5470EA: AMD 64 3400+, 512 Mb RAM, 80 Gb HDD, nvidia GeForce4 440 Go 64M, Cabletron RoamAbout 802.11 DS (orinoco gold) WiFi. Creative Webcam Pro (ov511) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Q-collective Advocate
Joined: 22 Mar 2004 Posts: 2076
|
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 2:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mikkoloo wrote: | What Linux Needs:
A unified desktop enviroment, more than one makes any user confused. |
Nonsense, you just choose 1 DE/WM, or let the distro choose for you (Ubuntu)
Quote: | Plug and Play, as it should have been. |
examples?
Quote: | Game support (this is in the hands of the authors too, yes) |
We have SDL, OpenGL and more, developers have plenty of choice.
Quote: | Easy hardware settings, for example printing.. cups is a joke! (no offence) |
I guess improvement could be made here. More examples? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dolio l33t
Joined: 17 Jun 2002 Posts: 650
|
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 2:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Cups itself may be hard to use, but if you use the KDE front end (does Gnome have one too?), it's roughly as easy as installing a printer on Windows, depending on what kind you're installing, exactly.
I'd also point out that plenty of people put Linux in the hands of their mothers and young nephews today. That sort of nearly-computer-illiterate person isn't a problem when it comes to Linux. You just set everything up for them, and let them go. They can't do anything complex in Windows, either, so they're in the same boat either way.
I think the place where Linux has trouble is with the average, semi-power user from Windows. They have a basic understanding of how to twiddle things in Windows, but they're adverse to poking in config files under Linux, and it's hard to guarantee that everything is GUI accessible in Linux, at least right now. They've also probably learned specifically how to accomplish/fix certain things in Windows, and that's not the same in Linux.
The problem isn't people who are total computer novices. You can stick them in front of anything that's set up to accomplish their specific tasks, and that can already be done in Linux. The problem is people who know enough to go poking a little below the surface, and Linux isn't always as refined at that level as people want. One of your examples shows that clearly, since you talk about hardware settings. Grandma/your 6-year-old won't be installing a printer, in Linux or Windows. _________________ They don't have a good bathroom to do coke in. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Naib Watchman
Joined: 21 May 2004 Posts: 6065 Location: Removed by Neddy
|
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 3:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes GNOEM does have a CUPS front end and you just go "add printer"
in other news
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20050910-5298.html
looks like MS are going to release 7 different version of Windows:Vista WTF!!!!!! _________________
Quote: | Removed by Chiitoo |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
mikkoloo Apprentice
Joined: 04 Nov 2003 Posts: 159 Location: .se and .nl
|
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 3:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Q-collective wrote: | mikkoloo wrote: | What Linux Needs:
A unified desktop enviroment, more than one makes any user confused. |
Nonsense, you just choose 1 DE/WM, or let the distro choose for you (Ubuntu)
Quote: | Plug and Play, as it should have been. |
examples?
Quote: | Game support (this is in the hands of the authors too, yes) |
We have SDL, OpenGL and more, developers have plenty of choice.
Quote: | Easy hardware settings, for example printing.. cups is a joke! (no offence) |
I guess improvement could be made here. More examples? |
I didnt mean that _changing_ the WM was hard, I ment that basically all WM's are not made for the normal user. KDE works with drag and drop where its supposed to and that kind of behaviour. Gnome is close and very easy for normal things too, but imo KDE is the only DE/WM that could be a hit.
I mean that when I plug a tv-card in I want to see TV after 5 minutes maximum. That's just not done in linux atm. First you have to look for compatible hardware, normally the chipset. Then you have to ask a not understanding hardware dealer which chipset his cards use. Ok maybe Im making it a big problem, but I know that when I moved abroad they didnt have the normal hardware I saw on the internet that was compatible so I had to search around for ages, and even then It wasnt 100% sure it was that chipset etc. More examples would be printers that just doesnt work with linux. Webcams are known to have issues, wifi cards etc etc.
For the gaming I know dev's have much to choose from, what they dont have in linux is a company called Microsoft putting millions of dollars into the gaming api called DirectX to make it easy for them.
Other examples of hardware configuration is tv-out. How can that be done with clicks like in windows?
-
Dolio:
Yea, thats true they wont install a printer in either one. Im just pissed of at cups cause I cant print to a network printer here and windows can without a noice ;( But yea I get your points, at every home computer theres always someone doing those things, like installing printers, new cameras and stuff. The thing is if there are enough of those knowing linux for a major change. _________________ ----
AMD 64 4000+, nforce4 mobo, 2GB RAM, 200Gb SATA HDD, xfx Geforce 7900GT XE
----
HP pavilion zv5470EA: AMD 64 3400+, 512 Mb RAM, 80 Gb HDD, nvidia GeForce4 440 Go 64M, Cabletron RoamAbout 802.11 DS (orinoco gold) WiFi. Creative Webcam Pro (ov511) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dolio l33t
Joined: 17 Jun 2002 Posts: 650
|
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 3:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mikkoloo wrote: | I mean that when I plug a tv-card in I want to see TV after 5 minutes maximum. |
Heh, does Windows work that way for you? To install my TV card in windows, I had to run 3 or 4 separate installers, each requiring a reboot. I don't know about a general Linux setup, though (I compile my kernel specifically for my hardware, so I don't really have a reference point).
mikkoloo wrote: | But yea I get your points, at every home computer theres always someone doing those things, like installing printers, new cameras and stuff. The thing is if there are enough of those knowing linux for a major change. |
Yeah, the answer is that there definitely aren't enough Linux people for a major change. The thing is, in most cases, the people setting things up for the novices are the semi-power users, I think. Somebody who "knows computers" because they can go through a windows install, or install printer drivers or something. Those people aren't going to be particularly interested in learning Linux, though. They're just ordinary people who've poked a little deeper into Windows, and don't care about whatever advantages Linux might have for them.
Naib wrote: | looks like MS are going to release 7 different version of Windows:Vista WTF!!!!!! |
Yeah, that's crazy. <slashdot>Windows will never make it on the desktop unless they eliminate this excess of distributions. They need to have one version for all people. Choice is scary.</slashdot>
In seriousness, I do think it's overkill. _________________ They don't have a good bathroom to do coke in. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mikkoloo Apprentice
Joined: 04 Nov 2003 Posts: 159 Location: .se and .nl
|
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 4:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dolio wrote: | mikkoloo wrote: | I mean that when I plug a tv-card in I want to see TV after 5 minutes maximum. |
Heh, does Windows work that way for you? To install my TV card in windows, I had to run 3 or 4 separate installers, each requiring a reboot. I don't know about a general Linux setup, though (I compile my kernel specifically for my hardware, so I don't really have a reference point).
|
I.... uhm.... had to run it twice but I hope you get my point, hardware on linux can be hell sometimes. More hell than in windows mostly.
(Though it always feel good to make something work in linux, but again, im a geek) _________________ ----
AMD 64 4000+, nforce4 mobo, 2GB RAM, 200Gb SATA HDD, xfx Geforce 7900GT XE
----
HP pavilion zv5470EA: AMD 64 3400+, 512 Mb RAM, 80 Gb HDD, nvidia GeForce4 440 Go 64M, Cabletron RoamAbout 802.11 DS (orinoco gold) WiFi. Creative Webcam Pro (ov511) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
aidy l33t
Joined: 07 Apr 2005 Posts: 915
|
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 4:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oww... Th most hardware hell thing I ever got has allways been on windows... BTW, thing's like SuSE are really easy for hardware, everything works right away. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Naib Watchman
Joined: 21 May 2004 Posts: 6065 Location: Removed by Neddy
|
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 4:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mikkoloo wrote: | Dolio wrote: | mikkoloo wrote: | I mean that when I plug a tv-card in I want to see TV after 5 minutes maximum. |
Heh, does Windows work that way for you? To install my TV card in windows, I had to run 3 or 4 separate installers, each requiring a reboot. I don't know about a general Linux setup, though (I compile my kernel specifically for my hardware, so I don't really have a reference point).
|
I.... uhm.... had to run it twice but I hope you get my point, hardware on linux can be hell sometimes. More hell than in windows mostly.
(Though it always feel good to make something work in linux, but again, im a geek) |
BUT how is that linux's fault? the linux kernel hackers are some of the best reverse engineers and coders out there
Windows has the joy of propietory drivers released with the hardware, only a few ppl release a driver for linux hardware (nvidia, ...)
It is hardware venders that need to really start supporting linux (just like game writers)
All the best distos packagers put together in a room with the best computers for a whole year would not solve that problem
Equally I have no end of hardware problems in windows, Linux seems alot better at dealing with hardware _________________
Quote: | Removed by Chiitoo |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
mikkoloo Apprentice
Joined: 04 Nov 2003 Posts: 159 Location: .se and .nl
|
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 4:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Its not linux fault, excuse me if I said that somewhere.
What I ment was that there are just not enough drivers, no matter who's the fault is. (and yes, of course its the hardware vendors, all they need is release the specs which makes it so much easier to write a driver and if they dont feel comfortable with that they just have to write on themselves) _________________ ----
AMD 64 4000+, nforce4 mobo, 2GB RAM, 200Gb SATA HDD, xfx Geforce 7900GT XE
----
HP pavilion zv5470EA: AMD 64 3400+, 512 Mb RAM, 80 Gb HDD, nvidia GeForce4 440 Go 64M, Cabletron RoamAbout 802.11 DS (orinoco gold) WiFi. Creative Webcam Pro (ov511) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kensai Guru
Joined: 09 Mar 2004 Posts: 569 Location: Puerto Rico
|
Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2005 11:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mikkoloo wrote: | KDE is the choise in linux |
Who told you that? Are you smocking weed? _________________ Gentoo: Gigabyte: nFORCE 2: nVIDIA GeForce 6600: AMD Athlon XP 3200+
Leaving the above specs to immortalize the first system I Installed Gentoo on! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mikkoloo Apprentice
Joined: 04 Nov 2003 Posts: 159 Location: .se and .nl
|
Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2005 8:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
well, i do live in Holland, but nah
Weell to be honest I tried it out. I let my gf and a pal try the different ones I had installed and asked them which one they would wanna use on a computer they owned. KDE was the only one that both could imagine working with. I understand them. The other ones was labeled "too you" aka "too geeky" _________________ ----
AMD 64 4000+, nforce4 mobo, 2GB RAM, 200Gb SATA HDD, xfx Geforce 7900GT XE
----
HP pavilion zv5470EA: AMD 64 3400+, 512 Mb RAM, 80 Gb HDD, nvidia GeForce4 440 Go 64M, Cabletron RoamAbout 802.11 DS (orinoco gold) WiFi. Creative Webcam Pro (ov511) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jeremy_Z l33t
Joined: 05 Apr 2004 Posts: 671 Location: Shanghai
|
Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2005 3:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Agreed, KDE seems to have better acceptance by the non geek public, second would obviously be Gnome. And well, if you have *box, an outsider would think the computer is running a screensaver or something (but this is a good way to prevent your mother / gf from playing with your computer ) _________________ "Because two groups of consumers drive the absolute high end of home computing: the gamers and the porn surfers." /.
My gentoo projects, Kelogviewer and a QT4 gui for etc-proposals |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kensai Guru
Joined: 09 Mar 2004 Posts: 569 Location: Puerto Rico
|
Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2005 10:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well... is just a matter of opinion but Gnome is more simple and user friendly than that piece of bloat they call a DE. I'll try and ask my GF to see which she likes better. _________________ Gentoo: Gigabyte: nFORCE 2: nVIDIA GeForce 6600: AMD Athlon XP 3200+
Leaving the above specs to immortalize the first system I Installed Gentoo on! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dolio l33t
Joined: 17 Jun 2002 Posts: 650
|
Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2005 2:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Kensai wrote: | Well... is just a matter of opinion but Gnome is more simple and user friendly than that piece of bloat they call a DE. I'll try and ask my GF to see which she likes better. |
That's why we have both, because I don't like Gnome.
Anyone who argues that Gnome and KDE need to merge, or we need to eliminate one is crazy. _________________ They don't have a good bathroom to do coke in. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Shadow Skill Veteran
Joined: 04 Dec 2004 Posts: 1023
|
Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2005 4:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
Dolio wrote: | Kensai wrote: | Well... is just a matter of opinion but Gnome is more simple and user friendly than that piece of bloat they call a DE. I'll try and ask my GF to see which she likes better. |
That's why we have both, because I don't like Gnome.
Anyone who argues that Gnome and KDE need to merge, or we need to eliminate one is crazy. | I don't think a merger would be bad in the sense that there are concepts both could take from the other. _________________ Ware wa mutekinari.
Wa ga kage waza ni kanau mono nashi.
Wa ga ichigeki wa mutekinari.
"First there was nothing, so the lord gave us light. There was still nothing, but at least you could see it." |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kensai Guru
Joined: 09 Mar 2004 Posts: 569 Location: Puerto Rico
|
Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2005 2:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Shadow Skill wrote: | I don't think a merger would be bad in the sense that there are concepts both could take from the other. |
For once, I agree with you. . I don't want to see them merge but there are thinks one can take form the other and make it better. _________________ Gentoo: Gigabyte: nFORCE 2: nVIDIA GeForce 6600: AMD Athlon XP 3200+
Leaving the above specs to immortalize the first system I Installed Gentoo on! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
msimplay Apprentice
Joined: 20 Jun 2004 Posts: 161
|
Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2005 8:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Kensai wrote: | Shadow Skill wrote: | I don't think a merger would be bad in the sense that there are concepts both could take from the other. |
For once, I agree with you. . I don't want to see them merge but there are thinks one can take form the other and make it better. |
Na I don't like Gnome every application is like a seperate piece of work to me Gnome itself feels like a collection of 3rd party apps however for me the KDE interoperability is what makes me keep it as my desktop of choice. It also makes me realise why KDE is the way it is in fact the more i use KDE native applications even if they don't have X kind of features they work so well together.
Kaddress + Kopete + Kontact + Konqueror I've never seen a system so tight knitted.
I personally could not use anything other than KDE as my desktop because I've become reliant on its excellent features in terms of how well everything works together. It also seems to acomodate for none native apps reasonably well in terms of gtk/qt curve which allows for gtk themes to mimic the qt ones and with implementation of kprinter dialog can be bought up even by none kde native apps like Open Office.org.
Its also the only reason that I use linux because i personally don't believe that Gnome does anything better than Windows however in my Experience just by using KDE its shown me that it does many things as a desktop better than windows.
However to those that may get offended by what i said its reasonable to say that this is my opinion and experiences are subjective |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mikkoloo Apprentice
Joined: 04 Nov 2003 Posts: 159 Location: .se and .nl
|
Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2005 9:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I agree to the fullest. Just switched to kopete because of the "interoperability". I dont really care if people say its slow and bloated, I have not had that experience on my comp. Sure some are faster, much faster, but then I prefer functionallity and flexibillity over that. _________________ ----
AMD 64 4000+, nforce4 mobo, 2GB RAM, 200Gb SATA HDD, xfx Geforce 7900GT XE
----
HP pavilion zv5470EA: AMD 64 3400+, 512 Mb RAM, 80 Gb HDD, nvidia GeForce4 440 Go 64M, Cabletron RoamAbout 802.11 DS (orinoco gold) WiFi. Creative Webcam Pro (ov511) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
msimplay Apprentice
Joined: 20 Jun 2004 Posts: 161
|
Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2005 9:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mikkoloo wrote: | I agree to the fullest. Just switched to kopete because of the "interoperability". I dont really care if people say its slow and bloated, I have not had that experience on my comp. Sure some are faster, much faster, but then I prefer functionallity and flexibillity over that. |
No idea on that front KDE has always seemed faster and more responsive than gnome and other gtk based Desktops even on my old amd 1.7 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
malone Apprentice
Joined: 19 Feb 2004 Posts: 159 Location: The p-n junction.
|
Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2005 2:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
msimplay wrote: | mikkoloo wrote: | I agree to the fullest. Just switched to kopete because of the "interoperability". I dont really care if people say its slow and bloated, I have not had that experience on my comp. Sure some are faster, much faster, but then I prefer functionallity and flexibillity over that. |
No idea on that front KDE has always seemed faster and more responsive than gnome and other gtk based Desktops even on my old amd 1.7 |
When I first started using linux I was a gnome user. Then somewhere around kde3.2 I tried it and although I hated having to admit it, kde just ran faster on my system. _________________ malone |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|