View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
bos_mindwarp Apprentice
Joined: 19 Oct 2002 Posts: 275 Location: stockholm, sweden
|
Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2005 12:11 am Post subject: gnome-2.10.1 - disabling epiphany/mozilla |
|
|
How to prevent portage from emerging mozilla? I removed epiphany line from gnome ebuild, but I still get mozilla. 'emerge -upv world' doesnt give me any clues what emerges mozilla. I am perfectly happy with firefox, I don't need 2 more packages that do basically the same thing. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
meax Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 21 Jul 2004 Posts: 88 Location: Babylon
|
Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2005 1:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi,
maybe gnome-light suits your needs? Quote from the ebuild:
gnome-light-2.10.ebuild wrote: | # Note to developers:
# This is a wrapper for the 'light' Gnome2 desktop,
# This should only consist of the bare minimum of libs/apps needed
# It is basicly the gnome-base/gnome without all extra apps
# This is currently in it's test phase, if you feel like some dep
# should be added or removed from this pack file a bug to
# gnome@gentoo.org on bugs.gentoo.org
|
hth,
meax _________________ Bullshit makes the flowers grow and that's beautiful. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bos_mindwarp Apprentice
Joined: 19 Oct 2002 Posts: 275 Location: stockholm, sweden
|
Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2005 4:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
yeah I might try it. I just find it stupid that epiphany exists in the first place. It means +3 hours of compiling stuff, just to use firefox-bin anyway... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
CNaylor n00b
Joined: 03 Sep 2004 Posts: 53 Location: Central Illinois (USA)
|
Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2005 2:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Epiphany exists because while many people will use Firefox, it doesn't behave like a GNOME app. It's not HIG compliant and it doesn't use gtk widgets. If you don't want Epiphany/Mozilla then gnome-light is almost certainly the way to go, but Epiphany is a great browser and certainly has a reason to exist (I use it almost exclusively). I though with newer versions it could be built against Firefox instead of Mozilla though. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bos_mindwarp Apprentice
Joined: 19 Oct 2002 Posts: 275 Location: stockholm, sweden
|
Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2005 2:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
thing is, I already have gnome-2.10 AND firefox without mozilla at all. It is only now when updating my system that it wants to emerge mozilla. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
CNaylor n00b
Joined: 03 Sep 2004 Posts: 53 Location: Central Illinois (USA)
|
Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2005 2:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
Maybe because it's firefox-bin. I think I heard that Epiphany will compile against firefox, but maybe not the binary version. I also just noticed that there is a "firefox" USE flag associated with Epiphany, but I've never tried it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
guni Apprentice
Joined: 18 May 2003 Posts: 193 Location: Belgium lommel
|
Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2005 3:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Adding firefox to use flags solves the mozilla problem... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
thewally l33t
Joined: 12 May 2005 Posts: 703 Location: Genova
|
Posted: Sat Aug 13, 2005 8:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
guni wrote: | Adding firefox to use flags solves the mozilla problem... |
Negative |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mArrAtoN n00b
Joined: 16 Jun 2005 Posts: 27 Location: Poland
|
Posted: Sat Aug 13, 2005 9:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
thewally wrote: | guni wrote: | Adding firefox to use flags solves the mozilla problem... |
Negative |
First you have to emerge Firefox, then Gnome:
emerge mozilla-firefox && emerge gnome
Mozilla Suite should disappear |
|
Back to top |
|
|
guni Apprentice
Joined: 18 May 2003 Posts: 193 Location: Belgium lommel
|
Posted: Sat Aug 13, 2005 2:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
thewally wrote: | guni wrote: | Adding firefox to use flags solves the mozilla problem... |
Negative |
Thats strange, First I had mozilla in list, after I added firefox to my USE flags it changed in firefox...
Perhaps this doesnt apply for gnome, but only for gnome-light |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|