View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
KayZee Apprentice
![Apprentice Apprentice](/images/ranks/rank_rect_2.gif)
![](images/avatars/194391865542f50f3ddad89.gif)
Joined: 15 Oct 2003 Posts: 202 Location: Arlington, VA
|
Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2005 10:50 pm Post subject: Device naming shown in /proc/mdstat |
|
|
I am trying to understand what the output of
is telling me. I have two Dell PowerEdge servers with SATA drives in software RAID-1.
On Server A, cat /proc/mdstat shows this
Code: | md2 : active raid1 ide/host0/bus1/target0/lun0/part2[1] ide/host0/bus1/target0/lun0/part2[0] |
On Server B, cat /proc/mdstat shows this
Code: | md2 : active raid1 sdb2[1] sdb2[0] |
I know that the RAID-1 is healthy. I am trying to understand why on Server A the devices are shown in such detail while Server B the devices are so simple.
Server A runs a 2.4.x kernel. Server B runs a 2.6.x kernel. The hardware on both servers is the same.
Is this just a differece between the 2.4.x and 2.6.x kernels? Or did I miss something somewhere?
I do note that on Server A in /dev I do not have any sd* devices while on Sever B /dev shows sda-sda10, sdb-sdb10, etc. |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/gentoo/images/spacer.gif) |
Dlareh Advocate
![Advocate Advocate](/images/ranks/rank-G-1-advocate.gif)
![](images/avatars/gallery/BaldursGate/baldursgate_minsc.gif)
Joined: 06 Aug 2005 Posts: 2102
|
Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2005 10:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's not unusual for 2.4 kernels to use such explicit paths for device names. devfs and the backported udev suck.
Get used to this kind of thing, or use 2.6. _________________ "Mr Thomas Edison has been up on the two previous nights discovering 'a bug' in his phonograph." --Pall Mall Gazette (1889)
Are we THERE yet? |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/gentoo/images/spacer.gif) |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|