View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
aanund Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 29 Aug 2002 Posts: 147
|
Posted: Mon Mar 03, 2003 3:08 pm Post subject: dc-gui / dc-gui2 |
|
|
It used to work, not it doesnt:=)
Problem:
Every time I try to actually dl a file (all legit mind you;), I get the GDL, and then it just hangs on "waiting", no matter what I do, I just cannot get the dl to start. In the error log, I sometimes get errors referring to "bad param", and others seem to be some font-type problem.
What I have done to solve this:
unmerged, emerged again, emerged newer versions, removed all files referring to dctc or dc-gui, enabled Utf-8, disabled Utf-8, changed my locale settings.
Result:
ARGHLH! Nothing works! *cry* I am now working out from the assumption that there is a combination of this I have to find.
So, if anyone has been through something similar and have gotten it to work, or have some educated guesses. Bring them on!
Regards |
|
Back to top |
|
|
taveren Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 24 Jul 2002 Posts: 145 Location: London, Ontario
|
Posted: Mon Mar 03, 2003 4:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DC is a farce most times. I'm going to guess that the problem is with the client, and the underlaying protocol. The fact that two "passive" clients can't connect to each other in DC is an indication of a poorly thought out P2P infrastructure. I remember back in the day when you couldn't stop P2P apps from transferring files.
Try setting your client up in Active mode, and forward ports through your firewall if need be. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
aanund Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 29 Aug 2002 Posts: 147
|
Posted: Mon Mar 03, 2003 5:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This is a copy of the errors msgs I get:
Quote: |
Mon 03 Mar 2003 06:19:13 PM CET: bad param
$SR [berg]helenehare DC\Leif Rogers 3/3Snabbhubben Jr (129.241.87.230)
|
*notice* the is actually a different sign, like this:
http://www.stud.ntnu.no/~aanund/Screenshot-1.png
Tried both passive and active mode, nothing seemed to help. I am quite sure It has something todo with my locale settings, but I cannot figure out just what.
As for the "dc is a farse" statement, that the client is the problem, quite possibly, but I doubt it has anything todo with the protocol itself.
After all, dc works beautifully on my windows box, but then again, most things work when I install them there:-P I have tried getting dc++ to run under wine, no luck, vmware install, but net did not work, and im now trying to get dc++ to compile under linux:=) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
xenon Guru
Joined: 25 Dec 2002 Posts: 432 Location: Europe
|
Posted: Mon Mar 03, 2003 9:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
taveren wrote: | The fact that two "passive" clients can't connect to each other in DC is an indication of a poorly thought out P2P infrastructure. . |
Since passive basically means "I can't accept incoming connections", how do you think the two passive peers could connect to each other? Passing all the data through a common server? Now *that* would be a poorly thought infrastructure. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
darookee Apprentice
Joined: 02 Jan 2003 Posts: 162 Location: Long Beach, CA.
|
Posted: Tue Mar 04, 2003 11:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
aanund wrote: |
[...] and im now trying to get dc++ to compile under linux:=)
|
could you post here, if you got it to compile and tell everyone how you did it? i also tried dc++ under wine but had no luck :'( |
|
Back to top |
|
|
aanund Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 29 Aug 2002 Posts: 147
|
Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2003 1:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
noooooo, if I get it to work I will be the only one to use it!!!
as I said, I am trying, I am however, not making much progress as of yet:-(
dc++ under wine, well, supposedly it works if you use a REAL win98 install instead of the fake files from wine, however I cannot verify this. I have just read it in a lot of forums.
Aanund |
|
Back to top |
|
|
darookee Apprentice
Joined: 02 Jan 2003 Posts: 162 Location: Long Beach, CA.
|
Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2003 8:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
humm... :-P
I tried some apps with a REAL win2k installed and '--winver win2k' with winex... but it seem that the results are the same... : /
I think I only got one app really working under wine... it was 'ms solitaire'... why wine has to be so... uuhm... complex? 0_o |
|
Back to top |
|
|
xenon Guru
Joined: 25 Dec 2002 Posts: 432 Location: Europe
|
Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2003 2:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, not always so complex. eMule, for example, works decently right out of the box: emerge Wine, unzip emule, wine emule and there you go. But now there's lmule! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|