View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
wuno Apprentice
Joined: 17 May 2005 Posts: 193 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2006 10:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
volkmar wrote: | Firefox 1.5.0.1 is out. | as of yet only the binary updates are available |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Anarchy Developer
Joined: 29 Jun 2005 Posts: 140
|
Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2006 1:07 pm Post subject: delay |
|
|
XenoTerraCide wrote: | speaking of releases wasn't anarchy supposed to put 1.5-r10 in portage? on sunday? |
Sorry for the delay had to finish nss/nspr first I will try and get it added when I get up this afternoon before i go to work. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
StringCheesian l33t
Joined: 21 Oct 2003 Posts: 887
|
Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2006 6:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
XenoTerraCide wrote: | and StringCheesian I was just looking through the ebuild in the overlay. where did you get that we were getting official branding from? |
Wow, I swear I saw it in the -r9 ebuild from his overlay. I didn't save it and now it's been replaced by r10. Oh well. I already have an officially branded build anyway. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
XenoTerraCide Veteran
Joined: 18 Jan 2004 Posts: 1418 Location: MI, USA
|
Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2006 1:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
so we aren't getting branding then? _________________ I don't hang out here anymore, try asking on http://unix.stackexchange.com/ if you want my help. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
emrys404 n00b
Joined: 18 Oct 2004 Posts: 50
|
Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2006 7:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So any word on when 1.5 gets marked stable? How does this work, is it a specific period of time before a package gets marked stable or are we just waiting for something in this case? Just curious...
Thanks
-emrys _________________ -blar |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mallow005 n00b
Joined: 15 Nov 2002 Posts: 49 Location: CA
|
Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2006 12:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
Code: | !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy ">=dev-libs/nss-3.10" have been masked.
!!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your request:
- dev-libs/nss-3.11 (masked by: package.mask)
# Jory A. Pratt <anarchy@gentoo.org> (30 Jan 2006)
# masked for testing
For more information, see MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man page or
refer to the Gentoo Handbook.
(dependency required by "www-client/mozilla-firefox-1.5-r11" [ebuild]) |
I want upgrades! _________________ Desktop: Athlon 2600+, 1gig RAM, SATA HD, Geforce 6800GS 256M, Chaintec V710+ Sound Card
Laptop: Inspiron 8200, 1.6Ghz P4, 256M RAM. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nesl247 Veteran
Joined: 15 Jun 2004 Posts: 1614 Location: Florida
|
Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2006 12:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Firefox 1.5.0.1 is now released according to Mozilla.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SAngeli l33t
Joined: 16 Apr 2004 Posts: 904 Location: Italy
|
Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2006 5:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
someone forgot about me?
I have still not resolved my issue with firefox and flash.
So, what do I have to do to get things working?
Please see above threds for details.
Thanks for your help,
Spiro |
|
Back to top |
|
|
XenoTerraCide Veteran
Joined: 18 Jan 2004 Posts: 1418 Location: MI, USA
|
Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2006 5:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
I didn't forget I just can't help. maybe you can convince anarchy too. he seems to know something. but I know flash didn't work in a 64-bit firefox before, so whatever you need to do is probably experimental.
What's with the Firefox 1.5-r11 ebuild in portage? why is it hard masked? _________________ I don't hang out here anymore, try asking on http://unix.stackexchange.com/ if you want my help. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
skellr l33t
Joined: 18 Jun 2005 Posts: 976 Location: The Village, Portmeirion
|
Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2006 10:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
spitefulcrow wrote: | This goes back to my old question - how the hell do I get the old filepicker back? I absolutely hate this piece of GTK crap. |
I just ran across this... There is something in the last post of the first page.
http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?t=318860 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
XenoTerraCide Veteran
Joined: 18 Jan 2004 Posts: 1418 Location: MI, USA
|
Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 11:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
I finally got around to creating a petition for us to get official branding on mozilla's bugzilla. here's the link. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=325969 and it's in my signature for the time being. Please sign and vote so we can get it. We'll probably need the entire community to do it, to convince mozilla but I say we should. _________________ I don't hang out here anymore, try asking on http://unix.stackexchange.com/ if you want my help. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
XenoTerraCide Veteran
Joined: 18 Jan 2004 Posts: 1418 Location: MI, USA
|
Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 12:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ANARCHY!!! a littly help Quote: | Resolving INVALID. Bugzilla is not the place for petitions and such like.
If the maintainer of the ebuild wishes to file such a request, they are welcome
to do so. | you are the maintainer. Even though this is a cosmetic issue only, it is important. If I remember correctly you are the one on this thread who said report upstream. So I did. They say this. Care to step in and Help? _________________ I don't hang out here anymore, try asking on http://unix.stackexchange.com/ if you want my help. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SimonKellett Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 17 Dec 2003 Posts: 88 Location: Darmstadt, Germany
|
Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 6:52 pm Post subject: What is "official branding" |
|
|
I keep reading about "official branding" but I can not seem to see what it is !! I tried Googling, and the quoted bug report does no help me.
I use mozilla-firefox-bin and I see on Help / About Mozilla Firefox "Firefox 1.5". Is the issue only related to user builds ? Is it about the Help / Name, the User Agent string, or the colour of the icon ?
Just curious !! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Vlad.Sharp Guru
Joined: 08 Dec 2004 Posts: 337 Location: Cambridgeshire, UK
|
Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 8:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's only the source builds that are affected.
What I don't understand is why not a new USE flag to be added to mozilla-firefox that is disabled by default, and all it does is use the "--enable-official-branding" configure option? Or at least Gentoo should provide a script to add such an ebuild into a portage overlay where branding is enabled - a choice of the user, not gentoo! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
XenoTerraCide Veteran
Joined: 18 Jan 2004 Posts: 1418 Location: MI, USA
|
Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 9:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tell mozilla that. because that's not what they say. I agree though. _________________ I don't hang out here anymore, try asking on http://unix.stackexchange.com/ if you want my help. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Varean Guru
Joined: 03 Jul 2005 Posts: 436 Location: California, USA
|
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 4:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Has anyone else had speed troubles in gmail with 1.5? When I type, the browser lags and I have to wait for the text to catch up with my typing. This has only started with 1.5, not with 1.0.7. BTW-my typing isn't so fast that my comp cant keep up with me. _________________ Registered Linux User #387568
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gergan Penkov Veteran
Joined: 17 Jul 2004 Posts: 1464 Location: das kleinste Kuhdorf Deutschlands :)
|
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 5:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Read the whole second bug in my sig, excerpt:
Quote: | ------- Comment #25 From J. Paul Reed 2006-01-09 11:38 PST [reply] -------
(In reply to comment #23)
> I haven't noticed the slowness that you have seen with this patch. The patch
> no longer applies cleanly though so it needs to be updated.
I have noticed this pango-related slowdown; it's in the seconds+ range for
sites with lots of dynamic stuff (Gmail was especially noticeably slow); this
was actually a showstopper for FF 1.5 for me, it was so bad (the rendering
would block other things, and then for some reason, mouse clicks would queue
up, and it would interpret them as me wanting to move the tab, as opposed to
just selecting it).
I didn't do a full rebuild, but the MOZ_DISABLE_PANGO trick made it at least
usable again.
|
and before someone starts bashing about enabling/disabling pango by default, first read the bug thouroghly and note that this bug is in existence long before firefox-1.5 was released. _________________ "I knew when an angel whispered into my ear,
You gotta get him away, yeah
Hey little bitch!
Be glad you finally walked away or you may have not lived another day."
Godsmack |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SimonKellett Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 17 Dec 2003 Posts: 88 Location: Darmstadt, Germany
|
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 7:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Vlad.Sharp wrote: | It's only the source builds that are affected. |
OK: thanks.
Vlad.Sharp wrote: | ...branding is enabled - a choice of the user, not gentoo! |
I would guess it is not a Gentoo controlled isssue. I assume that the "Firefox" name and the Icons etc (I assume that is what is meant by "official branding") are Copyrighted and/or Trademarked owned by someone, possible Mozilla. And I guess they have the right to control their use. (Just as Linus owns the trademark "Linux".) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
JaQoB n00b
Joined: 31 Mar 2005 Posts: 28
|
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 8:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have problems with firefox crashing. (At random times, i think. Sometimes after 5 min, sometime after 2 hours)
If i start it in a console, i get some output, similar to this
Code: |
jaqob@p238 ~ $ firefox
No running windows found
(firefox-bin:18782): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: invalid unclassed pointer in cast to `GtkWidget'
(firefox-bin:18782): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: invalid unclassed pointer in cast to `GObject'
(firefox-bin:18782): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_get_data: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed
/usr/libexec/mozilla-launcher: line 119: 18782 Segmentation fault "$mozbin" "$@"
firefox-bin exited with non-zero status (139)
|
Using Kde 3.5.1, and firefox 1.5.0.1, from portage.
Emerge info gives this
Code: |
p238 jaqob # emerge info
Portage 2.0.54 (default-linux/x86/2005.1, gcc-3.4.5, glibc-2.3.6-r2, 2.6.15-nitro3 i686)
=================================================================
System uname: 2.6.15-nitro3 i686 AMD Athlon(tm)
Gentoo Base System version 1.12.0_pre15
ccache version 2.4 [disabled]
dev-lang/python: 2.3.5-r2, 2.4.2
sys-apps/sandbox: 1.2.12
sys-devel/autoconf: 2.13, 2.59-r6
sys-devel/automake: 1.4_p6, 1.5, 1.6.3, 1.7.9-r1, 1.8.5-r3, 1.9.6-r1
sys-devel/binutils: 2.16.1
sys-devel/libtool: 1.5.22
virtual/os-headers: 2.6.11-r2
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86"
AUTOCLEAN="yes"
CBUILD="i686-pc-linux-gnu"
CFLAGS="-O2 -march=athlon-xp -mtune=athlon-xp -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -pipe -fforce-addr"
CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gnu"
CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/kde/2/share/config /usr/kde/3.3/env /usr/kde/3.3/share/config /usr/kde/3.3/shutdown /usr/kde/3.5/env /usr/kde/3.5/share/config /usr/kde/3.5/shutdown /usr/kde/3/share/config /usr/lib/X11/xkb /usr/share/config /var/qmail/control"
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/gconf /etc/terminfo /etc/env.d"
CXXFLAGS="-O2 -march=athlon-xp -mtune=athlon-xp -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -pipe -fforce-addr"
DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles"
FEATURES="autoconfig distlocks sandbox sfperms strict"
GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://mirror.pudas.net/gentoo ftp://mirror.pudas.net/gentoo http://trumpetti.atm.tut.fi/gentoo/"
LDFLAGS="-Wl,-O1"
MAKEOPTS="-j2"
PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages"
PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/arkiv/temp"
PORTDIR="/usr/portage"
PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/usr/local/portage"
SYNC="rsync://rsync.europe.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage"
USE="x86 3dnow X alsa apache2 apm audiofile avi bash-completion berkdb bitmap-fonts bzip2 cdb cdr crypt cups curl dvd dvdr emboss encode exif expat fam ffmpeg firefox foomaticdb fortran gd gdbm gif glut gmp gphoto2 gpm gstreamer gtk gtk2 gtkhtml idn imagemagick imlib ipv6 java jpeg kde lcms libg++ libwww logitech-mouse lua mad mhash mikmod mmx mng motif mp3 mpeg mplayer ncurses nls nptl nptlonly ogg oggvorbis opengl oss pam pcre pdflib perl pic png prelink python qt quicktime readline recode samba sdl spell sqlite sse ssl svg svga tcpd tiff truetype truetype-fonts type1-fonts udev usb vorbis win32codecs xml2 xmms xv xvid zlib userland_GNU kernel_linux elibc_glibc"
Unset: ASFLAGS, CTARGET, LANG, LC_ALL, LINGUAS
|
Anyone have a clue about whats wrong?
Excuse my poor english |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sannin Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 09 Jan 2006 Posts: 85 Location: Greece
|
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 10:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hello
It seems that there is a conflict between mozilla-firefox and swt (a dependancy needed by azureus):
Code: |
[blocks B ] >=www-client/mozilla-firefox-1.5 (is blocking dev-java/swt-3.2_pre1) |
I need them both, so is there any solution to that? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
placeholder Advocate
Joined: 07 Feb 2004 Posts: 2500
|
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 11:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sannin wrote: | Hello
It seems that there is a conflict between mozilla-firefox and swt (a dependancy needed by azureus):
Code: |
[blocks B ] >=www-client/mozilla-firefox-1.5 (is blocking dev-java/swt-3.2_pre1) |
I need them both, so is there any solution to that? |
If you installed azureus via emerge, then unemerge it along with any dependencies it pulled it. Back when I used Gentoo, it had tons of dependencies in portage yet all it needs is a jre, such as the official one from Sun. Just get azureus from the azureus website, then slap it in /opt and a symlink to the executable for it in /opt/bin and you should be rolling. If you are some crazy fan of compiling everything, just remember that compiling java applications yourself does not really make them any faster. (Not that compiling everything on your own makes your programs faster anyway, as long as they are compiled for your CPU's architecture.) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sannin Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 09 Jan 2006 Posts: 85 Location: Greece
|
Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2006 1:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
keevn wrote: | Sannin wrote: | Hello
It seems that there is a conflict between mozilla-firefox and swt (a dependancy needed by azureus):
Code: |
[blocks B ] >=www-client/mozilla-firefox-1.5 (is blocking dev-java/swt-3.2_pre1) |
I need them both, so is there any solution to that? |
If you installed azureus via emerge, then unemerge it along with any dependencies it pulled it. Back when I used Gentoo, it had tons of dependencies in portage yet all it needs is a jre, such as the official one from Sun. Just get azureus from the azureus website, then slap it in /opt and a symlink to the executable for it in /opt/bin and you should be rolling. If you are some crazy fan of compiling everything, just remember that compiling java applications yourself does not really make them any faster. (Not that compiling everything on your own makes your programs faster anyway, as long as they are compiled for your CPU's architecture.) |
Found the solution... I just removed the firefox use from swt. Thanx anyway! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gergan Penkov Veteran
Joined: 17 Jul 2004 Posts: 1464 Location: das kleinste Kuhdorf Deutschlands :)
|
Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2006 6:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | Back when I used Gentoo, it had tons of dependencies in portage yet all it needs is a jre, such as the official one from Sun. |
strange do you know what swt really is?
your logic is a little bit flawed here:(
It is the same to say that firefox-bin needs only libc, because you are using static build.
And here you are again wrong because the speed of the static build will not be the same, at least the memory usage will be different. _________________ "I knew when an angel whispered into my ear,
You gotta get him away, yeah
Hey little bitch!
Be glad you finally walked away or you may have not lived another day."
Godsmack |
|
Back to top |
|
|
frenkel Veteran
Joined: 13 May 2003 Posts: 1034 Location: .nl
|
Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2006 2:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Today I updated to Firefox 1.5.0.1 and now when I click a (http) link in thunderbird (old version, not 1.5) I get this error:
Quote: |
/usr/lib/mozilla-firefox/firefox-bin: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/mozilla-firefox/components/libdocshell.so: undefined symbol: PR_GetPhysicalMemorySize
|
Anybody know what's wrong? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gergan Penkov Veteran
Joined: 17 Jul 2004 Posts: 1464 Location: das kleinste Kuhdorf Deutschlands :)
|
Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2006 2:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Could you update thunderbird? Is there such a problem when browsing? _________________ "I knew when an angel whispered into my ear,
You gotta get him away, yeah
Hey little bitch!
Be glad you finally walked away or you may have not lived another day."
Godsmack |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|