| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
aminalshmu
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 13 Sep 2004
Posts: 78
Location: TX, USA
|
 Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2005 7:38 pm Post subject: portage-2.1_pre1 dramatic speed improvement |
 |
|
is this psychosomatic, or was there a ridiculous speed increase in the general speed of portage with this update?
someone must have been doing some python voodoo, methinks. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cokey
Advocate
Joined: 23 Apr 2004
Posts: 3355
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2005 7:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
no, ferringb just fed it steroids
_________________
https://otw20.com/ OTW20 The new place for off the wall chat |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
omp
Retired Dev
Joined: 10 Sep 2005
Posts: 1018
Location: Glendale, California
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2005 7:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
For me all it did was break portage. 
_________________
meow. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
omp
Retired Dev
Joined: 10 Sep 2005
Posts: 1018
Location: Glendale, California
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2005 8:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
...and the portage rescue file fixed it. 
_________________
meow. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ferringb
Retired Dev
Joined: 03 Apr 2003
Posts: 357
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2005 12:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
| omp wrote: | | For me all it did was break portage. |
Bad ebuild I'm afraid- initial ebuild that got commited was just a revbump lacking installing of pym subdirs (bad thing), that was corrected sometime last night (window of 30-60 minutes or so), corrected a nasty emerge --metadata trigger that was sitting in postinst earlier today also...
So... should be good to go. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nmbrthry
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 21 Jun 2005
Posts: 80
Location: Urbana-Champaign, IL
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2005 5:42 am Post subject: Re: portage-2.1_pre1 dramatic speed improvement |
|
|
| aminalshmu wrote: | is this psychosomatic, or was there a ridiculous speed increase in the general speed of portage with this update?
someone must have been doing some python voodoo, methinks. |
I feel like I'm seeing a dramatic speed up too. I'm watching modular X.org upgrade to RC4 (73 packages in this world update) and everything is just going so much more quickly: the patching, the installing, the removing old versions of packages... and the elog support is really nice too. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Cintra
Advocate
Joined: 03 Apr 2004
Posts: 2111
Location: Norway
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2005 6:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
How about equery, does that speed up too?
*
_________________
"I am not bound to please thee with my answers" W.S. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
omp
Retired Dev
Joined: 10 Sep 2005
Posts: 1018
Location: Glendale, California
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2005 9:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
| ferringb wrote: | | omp wrote: | | For me all it did was break portage. |
Bad ebuild I'm afraid- initial ebuild that got commited was just a revbump lacking installing of pym subdirs (bad thing), that was corrected sometime last night (window of 30-60 minutes or so), corrected a nasty emerge --metadata trigger that was sitting in postinst earlier today also...
So... should be good to go. |
Yep, works fine now... Thanks.
_________________
meow. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
amne
Bodhisattva
Joined: 17 Nov 2002
Posts: 6378
Location: Graz / EU
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2005 10:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Cintra wrote: | | How about equery, does that speed up too? |
| Code: | | # emerge app-portage/portage-utils |
They are faster than equery on reiser4 with -omg-optimized CFLAGS. 
_________________
Dinosaur week! (Ok, this thread is so last week) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pjp
Administrator
Joined: 16 Apr 2002
Posts: 20485
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2005 6:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Is there a version considered "most stable" (for a pre version)?
_________________
Quis separabit? Quo animo? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
omp
Retired Dev
Joined: 10 Sep 2005
Posts: 1018
Location: Glendale, California
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2005 8:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Just to let others know, when I tried it with python cdb it gave an error. 
_________________
meow. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Lepaca Kliffoth
l33t
Joined: 28 Apr 2004
Posts: 737
Location: Florence, Italy
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2005 9:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm confirming that the python-cdb hack doesn't work anymore.
_________________
It isn't enough to win - everyone else must lose, and you also have to rub it in their face (maybe chop off an arm too for good measure).
Animebox! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
amne
Bodhisattva
Joined: 17 Nov 2002
Posts: 6378
Location: Graz / EU
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2005 10:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Seems to be discussed already in the other thread.
_________________
Dinosaur week! (Ok, this thread is so last week) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Lepaca Kliffoth
l33t
Joined: 28 Apr 2004
Posts: 737
Location: Florence, Italy
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2005 10:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
eix is dead too. Reports garbage instead of the homepage and description.
_________________
It isn't enough to win - everyone else must lose, and you also have to rub it in their face (maybe chop off an arm too for good measure).
Animebox! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pjp
Administrator
Joined: 16 Apr 2002
Posts: 20485
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2005 10:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What about esearch (app-portage/esearch), equery (app-portage/gentoolkit), q (app-portage/portage-utils)?
_________________
Quis separabit? Quo animo? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
96140
Retired Dev
Joined: 23 Jan 2005
Posts: 1324
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2005 11:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Lepaca Kliffoth wrote: | | eix is dead too. Reports garbage instead of the homepage and description. |
This is a workaround I had to implement when I switched to ~x86 2.0.53, but it may work here.
Add the line PORTDIR_CACHE_METHOD=none to /etc/eixrc:
| Code: | | # echo "PORTDIR_CACHE_METHOD=none" >> /etc/eixrc |
Afterward, you will definitely need to do another update-eix (you might need to run emerge --metadata before that).
Yes, this means that eix will take longer to build its database after each emerge --sync, as it no longer uses its cache and has to build the database from scratch every time. Eix upstream needs to update their code, but it looks like development has stopped...
Last edited by 96140 on Mon Dec 19, 2005 2:43 am; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cokey
Advocate
Joined: 23 Apr 2004
Posts: 3355
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2005 1:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
| amne wrote: | | Seems to be discussed already in the other thread. |
well every time anything remotely like that happens pjp locks the thread.
_________________
https://otw20.com/ OTW20 The new place for off the wall chat |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pjp
Administrator
Joined: 16 Apr 2002
Posts: 20485
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2005 5:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
| cokehabit wrote: | | amne wrote: | | Seems to be discussed already in the other thread. |
well every time anything remotely like that happens pjp locks the thread. |
Huh, wha?
_________________
Quis separabit? Quo animo? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cokey
Advocate
Joined: 23 Apr 2004
Posts: 3355
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2005 1:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| pjp wrote: | | cokehabit wrote: | | amne wrote: | | Seems to be discussed already in the other thread. |
well every time anything remotely like that happens pjp locks the thread. |
Huh, wha? |
you lock interesting threads because smeone has discussed them before 
_________________
https://otw20.com/ OTW20 The new place for off the wall chat |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cokey
Advocate
Joined: 23 Apr 2004
Posts: 3355
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2005 1:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
actualy thats not strictly true, they have started to be merged alot more recently
_________________
https://otw20.com/ OTW20 The new place for off the wall chat |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Genone
Retired Dev
Joined: 14 Mar 2003
Posts: 9612
Location: beyond the rim
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2005 2:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Lepaca Kliffoth wrote: | | eix is dead too. Reports garbage instead of the homepage and description. |
To be expected (now people may see why we consider eix as broken by design)
| pjp wrote: | | What about esearch (app-portage/esearch), equery (app-portage/gentoolkit), q (app-portage/portage-utils)? |
esearch and equery should work as usual, don't know what interfaces portage-utils are using but I'd guess they still work. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
amne
Bodhisattva
Joined: 17 Nov 2002
Posts: 6378
Location: Graz / EU
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2005 6:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Genone wrote: | | esearch and equery should work as usual, don't know what interfaces portage-utils are using but I'd guess they still work. |
I can confirm esearch and portage-utils still work.
The greatest feature hasn't been mentioned yet: | Code: | PORTAGE_ELOG_CLASSES="info warn error log"
PORTAGE_ELOG_SYSTEM="save mail"
PORTAGE_ELOG_MAILURI="amne@gentoo.org amne:SEKRIT@mailrelay.tugraz.at:100025" |
Thanks guys for that one. 
_________________
Dinosaur week! (Ok, this thread is so last week) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mikegpitt
Advocate
Joined: 22 May 2004
Posts: 3224
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2005 6:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| When is portage-2.1 suppose to go stable? I don't like to run ~x86 core utilities. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Genone
Retired Dev
Joined: 14 Mar 2003
Posts: 9612
Location: beyond the rim
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2005 7:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| mikegpitt wrote: | | When is portage-2.1 suppose to go stable? I don't like to run ~x86 core utilities. |
Will take some time, a wild guess would be 3-4 months (that's really just a guess, not even an estimate). |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
amne
Bodhisattva
Joined: 17 Nov 2002
Posts: 6378
Location: Graz / EU
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2005 7:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I also noticed this version of portage notices if no ebuild is present and complains about it. So masking/removing stuff from the tree makes sense now.
_________________
Dinosaur week! (Ok, this thread is so last week) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Gentoo Chat
