View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
doublehp Guru
Joined: 11 Apr 2005 Posts: 473 Location: FRANCE
|
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2006 10:19 pm Post subject: How much time to compile OOo on Pentium 3 800: exactly 48h. |
|
|
Pentium 3 800MHz, 133MHz, 256k, 256MB
dhp@moon_gen:~$ sudo hdparm -tT /dev/hda
/dev/hda:
Timing cached reads: 104 MB in 2.04 seconds = 50.99 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 34 MB in 3.13 seconds = 10.85 MB/sec
dhp@moon_gen:~$ sudo hdparm -tT /dev/hda
/dev/hda:
Timing cached reads: 132 MB in 2.05 seconds = 64.24 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 42 MB in 3.32 seconds = 12.65 MB/sec
HDD is P-IDE 120G likely 4MB cache, with ext3.
Human time was exactly 48h, but consider I used the box 2 or 3h fro browsing and reading emails: E17+FF+TB+Gaim. HDD access time is ages due to bad integrated IDE chipset (the same drive can do 18 to 21MB/s in other computers), and 256MB RAM are way not enough for FF+TB+Gaim.
I was using make -j1, and CGLAGS -pipe.
(dont ask why my make.conf was on -j1 instead of -j2 on that day ...) _________________ DEMAINE Benoît-Pierre (aka DoubleHP ) http://www.demaine.info/
>o_/ Coin coin coin \_o<
to contact me (MSN,ICQ, JABBER, Skype ... ) http://benoit.demaine.info/contact.png |
|
Back to top |
|
|
vladgrigorescu Guru
Joined: 11 Jan 2005 Posts: 360
|
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2006 12:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Wow those hdparms are slow... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Q-collective Advocate
Joined: 22 Mar 2004 Posts: 2076
|
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2006 1:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
vladgrigorescu wrote: | Wow those hdparms are slow... |
Faster then mine, but then again, I don't have dma |
|
Back to top |
|
|
aidy l33t
Joined: 07 Apr 2005 Posts: 915
|
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2006 11:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Q-collective wrote: | vladgrigorescu wrote: | Wow those hdparms are slow... |
Faster then mine, but then again, I don't have dma |
O_o Why not? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
seank l33t
Joined: 08 Jul 2004 Posts: 686
|
Posted: Mon Jan 16, 2006 1:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Q-collective wrote: | vladgrigorescu wrote: | Wow those hdparms are slow... |
Faster then mine, but then again, I don't have dma | That must suck. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Parasietje Apprentice
Joined: 25 Jan 2004 Posts: 194
|
Posted: Mon Jan 16, 2006 2:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Some disks and chipset combinations freak out on dma. I can't enable dma on my Western Digital 80Gb disk, or it gets read errors. So I put it on a seperate channel and use it for music storage (that doesn't require fast access times or a lot of data transfer). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|