Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
Starting Bitpim [solved]
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours

 
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Kernel & Hardware
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
KWhat
l33t
l33t


Joined: 04 Sep 2005
Posts: 660
Location: Los Angeles

PostPosted: Wed Jan 25, 2006 3:56 am    Post subject: Starting Bitpim [solved] Reply with quote

I am currently getting the following message after starting bitpim does anyone have any ideas?

bitpim
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/opt/cx_Freeze-3.0.1/initscripts/ConsoleSetLibPath.py", line 30, in ?
File "bp.py", line 75, in ?
File "gui.py", line 28, in ?
File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/wx-2.6-gtk2-unicode/wx/__init__.py", line 42, in ?
File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/wx-2.6-gtk2-unicode/wx/_core.py", line 4, in ?
File "ExtensionLoader.py", line 12, in ?
ImportError: /usr/lib/bitpim-0.8.04/libwx_gtk2ud-2.6.so.0: undefined symbol: XineramaIsActive

Thanks


Last edited by KWhat on Mon Feb 06, 2006 4:20 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jarhead
Guru
Guru


Joined: 26 Mar 2004
Posts: 474

PostPosted: Thu Feb 02, 2006 5:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I just got the same error when I upgraded to 0.8.07.
_________________
Hats off to everyone in leadership, developmental, or administrative capacities for Gentoo Linux. Your hard work is very much appreciated.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
KWhat
l33t
l33t


Joined: 04 Sep 2005
Posts: 660
Location: Los Angeles

PostPosted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 4:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The problem was gtk 2.8.10 mask it back up and emerge gtk 2.8.8 solves the problem.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kinkos
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 07 Feb 2005
Posts: 235
Location: Hoboken, NJ

PostPosted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 2:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Arg, i get same error after gtk got bumped to 2.8.13; going back to 2.8.8. Is BitPim aware of the issue? Is there even a place to submit bugs for them?
_________________
Open Source, Open Mind
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
KWhat
l33t
l33t


Joined: 04 Sep 2005
Posts: 660
Location: Los Angeles

PostPosted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 4:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The softwares got more bugs than you can shake a stick at. Dont even try it under amd64 =P
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
djm
Arch/Herd Tester
Arch/Herd Tester


Joined: 12 Apr 2004
Posts: 690
Location: Wadham College, Oxford

PostPosted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 1:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I wouldn't call having to downgrade gtk+ a 'solution'

https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127079
_________________
the forums.gentoo.org poster formally known as metal leper
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pdouble
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 24 Aug 2002
Posts: 89
Location: USA

PostPosted: Thu Mar 30, 2006 3:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

djm wrote:
I wouldn't call having to downgrade gtk+ a 'solution'

https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127079


I have posted a source based ebuild for bitpim 0.8.10. See it at https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127966. That should fix the problem. Note there are three packages not in portage you will need to put into your overlay.

I am very interested to hear if this works for others.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Kernel & Hardware All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum