View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
NetKege n00b
Joined: 30 Jan 2006 Posts: 3 Location: The Netherlands
|
Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2006 7:46 pm Post subject: Installing gentoo 2004.3 problem getting grub or lilo |
|
|
I am installing Gentoo 2004.3 on my server. I booted with the minimal live cd and downloaded the stage 3 tarball. Al works fine until now, installation of grub. When i want to emerge grub (grub-0.94-r1) i get al http 404 errors. The file its looking for (grub-0.94-splash.patch.bz2) isn;t propably anymore on the servers. The same goes for lilo which i tried after this. How to fix this?
(I'm using gentoo 2004.3 because the 2005.x releases don;t even boot the install cd. The server has a VIA C3 cpu, which i blame for the reboot after a few seconds when i boot from the 2005.x cd's. Any sollutions for this problem is even more welcome!) _________________ ===========================================================
"The generation of random numbers is too important to be left to chance." - Robert Coveyou |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nixnut Bodhisattva
Joined: 09 Apr 2004 Posts: 10974 Location: the dutch mountains
|
Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2006 7:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Try an emerge sync first if you have a working internet connection.
btw if you need an x86 cd/stagefile. The c3 is an i586 processor as it does not fully support the i686 instruction set. That's probably why your 2005.x cd's didn't work. _________________ Please add [solved] to the initial post's subject line if you feel your problem is resolved. Help answer the unanswered
talk is cheap. supply exceeds demand |
|
Back to top |
|
|
NetKege n00b
Joined: 30 Jan 2006 Posts: 3 Location: The Netherlands
|
Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2006 6:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Tried the emerge sync. It ended with the following error:
>>> Updating Portage cache... \!!! Cannot resolve a virtual package name to an ebuild.
!!! This is a bug, please report it. (virtual/libintl-0)
Tried emerge grub after that, gave the following error:
!!! ARCH is not set... Are you missing the /etc/make.profile symlink?
!!! Is the symlink correct? Is your portage tree complete?
/etc/make.profile does not exist (i'm still doing the installation). I think my portage tree is now broken(?)
I know the VIA C3 is not completely I686 compatible, but the 2005.x cd's are not only for 686 and up, are they? (i downloaded teh x86 version) _________________ ===========================================================
"The generation of random numbers is too important to be left to chance." - Robert Coveyou |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cyrillic Watchman
Joined: 19 Feb 2003 Posts: 7313 Location: Groton, Massachusetts USA
|
Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2006 2:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think the 2005.1 release was compiled for i686 by mistake ... and not many people noticed. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
NetKege n00b
Joined: 30 Jan 2006 Posts: 3 Location: The Netherlands
|
Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2006 4:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
only the 2005.1 release or the 2005.0 release also? They give the same result when trying to boot. _________________ ===========================================================
"The generation of random numbers is too important to be left to chance." - Robert Coveyou |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|