View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
BleXXon n00b
Joined: 13 Aug 2004 Posts: 14 Location: Italia / Alto Adige / Sesto
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
ectospasm l33t
Joined: 19 Feb 2003 Posts: 711 Location: Mobile, AL, USA
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
dol-sen Retired Dev
Joined: 30 Jun 2002 Posts: 2805 Location: Richmond, BC, Canada
|
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 2:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
It runs from a local user directory without the need for a root type install. I downloaded and started it a few weeks back. I haven't actually tried making a call yet though. _________________ Brian
Porthole, the Portage GUI frontend irc@freenode: #gentoo-guis, #porthole, Blog
layman, gentoolkit, CoreBuilder, esearch... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ectospasm l33t
Joined: 19 Feb 2003 Posts: 711 Location: Mobile, AL, USA
|
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 12:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dol-sen wrote: | It runs from a local user directory without the need for a root type install. I downloaded and started it a few weeks back. I haven't actually tried making a call yet though. |
I used it in testing my Asterisk system at my last job. It's really a neat program, it's just a little strange setting it up. Oh, and the SIP protocol sucks ass. If you're behind a NAT, good luck in getting it working right. _________________ Join the adopt an unanswered post initiative today
Join the EFF!
Join the Drug Policy Alliance! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
batistuta Veteran
Joined: 29 Jul 2005 Posts: 1384 Location: Aachen
|
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 12:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | If you're behind a NAT, good luck in getting it working right. |
What type of problems can we expect? I've used it behind my firewall without trouble, both for send and receive. Is this what the STUN is used for? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ectospasm l33t
Joined: 19 Feb 2003 Posts: 711 Location: Mobile, AL, USA
|
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 2:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
batistuta wrote: | Is this what the STUN is used for? |
Yes, that's what STUN is used for. The main problem comes when your SIP phone (soft or hard) is behind a NAT, and your VoIP SIP service provider is somewhere else. The SIP protocol doesn't properly account for NAT, but it does work sometimes without using STUN (I think, it's been a while since I've looked at this stuff). I just remember having problems getting my Asterisk server talking to our VoIP provider through a NAT. And if you've got a SIP<==>NAT<--->Internet<--->NAT<==>SIP connection, it's even more difficult. IAX2 does not have this limitation, but I haven't heard of many phones that can speak IAX2, and it's primarily an Asterisk protocol (Inter-Asterisk eXchange v2)... _________________ Join the adopt an unanswered post initiative today
Join the EFF!
Join the Drug Policy Alliance! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|