| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
vanten
n00b
Joined: 08 Jan 2006
Posts: 44
Location: Sweden
|
 Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2006 7:12 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
Dont seems like im going to get my ati-drivers:
| Code: | # ./ati-driver-installer-8.22.5-i386.run
Creating directory fglrx-install
Verifying archive integrity... All good.
Uncompressing ATI Proprietary Linux
Driver-8.22.5..................................................................$
==================================================
ATI Technologies Linux Driver Installer/Packager
==================================================
tail: `-1' option is obsolete; use `-n 1' since this will be removed in
the future
Detected configuration:
Architecture: i686 (32-bit)
X Server: Xorg 7.0.0
Detected version of X does not have a matching 'x700' directory
You may override the detected version using the following syntax:
X_VERSION=<xdir> ./ati-driver-installer-<ver>-<arch>.run
[--install]
The following values may be used for <xdir>:
x410 XFree86 4.1.x
x420 XFree86 4.2.x
x430 XFree86 4.3.x
x680 X.Org 6.8.x
x690 X.Org 6.9.x
Removing temporary directory: fglrx-install |
I should try some older drivers now... 
_________________
.: GNU/Linux :: Gentoo :: Fluxbox :.
.: BSD :: OpenBSD :: Fluxbox :. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
zietbukuel
l33t
Joined: 30 Dec 2005
Posts: 607
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2006 7:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| vanten wrote: | Square one again.  Is there any one out there with latest ati-drivers and X11R7 working?  |
me  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
vanten
n00b
Joined: 08 Jan 2006
Posts: 44
Location: Sweden
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2006 8:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| zietbukuel wrote: | | vanten wrote: | | Square one again. Is there any one out there with latest ati-drivers and X11R7 working? |
me |
come on please tell me how you did.
_________________
.: GNU/Linux :: Gentoo :: Fluxbox :.
.: BSD :: OpenBSD :: Fluxbox :. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
taipan67
l33t
Joined: 04 Dec 2004
Posts: 866
Location: England (i'm told...)
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2006 8:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| vanten wrote: | | Code: | Detected version of X does not have a matching 'x700' directory
You may override the detected version using the following syntax:
X_VERSION=<xdir> ./ati-driver-installer-<ver>-<arch>.run
[--install]
The following values may be used for <xdir>:
x410 XFree86 4.1.x
x420 XFree86 4.2.x
x430 XFree86 4.3.x
x680 X.Org 6.8.x
x690 X.Org 6.9.x
|
|
I might be wrong about this, but i think X11R7 is the same as what ATI are calling 'X.Org 6.9.x', it's just that version-6.9 is the whole thing, while 7.0 is modular...
_________________
"Anyone who goes to see a psychiatrist should have their head examined!" |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Kamp
n00b
Joined: 15 May 2005
Posts: 33
Location: Gdynia - Poland
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2006 8:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| taipan67 wrote: |
My guess would be that you've emerged 'ati-drivers' against a differently-configured source-tree, & the module isn't where your current kernel is looking for it.
I'd suggest re-emerging 'ati-drivers' after first making certain that the kernel source-tree matches the kernel you're using, & that the /usr/src/linux symlink points to it correctly.
|
Okey, I re-emerged 'ati-drivers'. I made sure that /usr/scr/linux points to the kernel I'm using now. But still fglrx is not loading.
| Code: |
$ ls /lib/modules/2.6.15-gentoo-r5/video/
fglrx.ko
$ cat /etc/modules.autoload.d/kernel-2.6
agpgart
nvidia_agp
fglrx
|
[/code] |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
vanten
n00b
Joined: 08 Jan 2006
Posts: 44
Location: Sweden
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2006 8:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| taipan67 wrote: |
I might be wrong about this, but i think X11R7 is the same as what ATI are calling 'X.Org 6.9.x', it's just that version-6.9 is the whole thing, while 7.0 is modular... |
It is like you say. I hav tried the X_VERSION=x690 option too. I'm trying all the ways i have encountered
_________________
.: GNU/Linux :: Gentoo :: Fluxbox :.
.: BSD :: OpenBSD :: Fluxbox :. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Runefox
n00b
Joined: 20 Feb 2006
Posts: 3
Location: NL, Canada
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2006 8:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm using xorg 6.8, and I've got my Radeon 9600 Pro set up and working with hardware acceleration and framebuffer/splash. However, I've been experiencing a similar problem to one of the previous posters - Every time I log out of Gnome, CTRL-ALT-BKSP, and so on, I'm greeted with a blank screen, no resolution switch, nothing. I'm able to hit the numlock key, and it lights up, indicating it's not locked. The video's just gone. CTRL-ALT-Fn works just fine while in X, but once X is supposed to go down for any reason, it completely blanks the screen.
It didn't happen with the "radeon" driver, and seems to only affect X when HW-accel is working. I've got my AGPgart set up as a module, and after going over it numerous times, I can't see any glaring errors in my xorg.conf file.
Has anyone troubleshot anything like this before? Google searches reveal pretty much nothing. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Kamp
n00b
Joined: 15 May 2005
Posts: 33
Location: Gdynia - Poland
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2006 3:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hmmm.... I'm sick with this ATI
When I try (after re-emeging xorg-x11 and ati-drivers) modprobe fglrx I get
| Code: |
FATAL: Module fglrx not found
|
:/
Any idea what is happing ?
BTW should it be like this :
| Code: | CONFIG_AGP=y
CONFIG_AGP_AMD64=y
CONFIG_AGP_INTEL=y |
or
| Code: | CONFIG_AGP=m
CONFIG_AGP_AMD64=m
CONFIG_AGP_INTEL=m
|
?? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Kamp
n00b
Joined: 15 May 2005
Posts: 33
Location: Gdynia - Poland
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2006 3:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Runefox wrote: | I'm using xorg 6.8, and I've got my Radeon 9600 Pro set up and working with hardware acceleration and framebuffer/splash. However, I've been experiencing a similar problem to one of the previous posters - Every time I log out of Gnome, CTRL-ALT-BKSP, and so on, I'm greeted with a blank screen, no resolution switch, nothing. I'm able to hit the numlock key, and it lights up, indicating it's not locked. The video's just gone. CTRL-ALT-Fn works just fine while in X, but once X is supposed to go down for any reason, it completely blanks the screen.
|
A minute ago I found something like this /*at gentoo wiki web page*/ :
| Quote: | Blank screen or monitor turning off after startx
Versions of ati-drivers >= 8.16.20 have an issue with this that's easily corrected by inserting:
File: xorg.conf
Option "ForceMonitors" "notv"
in the device section of xorg.conf (discussed here: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103028) |
Did you try this ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
taipan67
l33t
Joined: 04 Dec 2004
Posts: 866
Location: England (i'm told...)
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2006 4:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Kamp, i don't think it matters whether you set the kernel's AGPGart-options to built-in or modular - that only means that the fglrx-module won't be able to use it's own internal-version (which in my experience, it can't anyway)...
...But i'm afraid i'm completely stumped as to why you're unable to build & load your module - sorry. 
_________________
"Anyone who goes to see a psychiatrist should have their head examined!" |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Shadow r00fler
n00b
Joined: 17 Feb 2004
Posts: 39
Location: Rochester, New York, USA
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2006 4:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Well, I switched drivers and had even more problems at first, but emerging the latest ~x86 ati-drivers seemed to solve them. I don't even know if this is related, but it seems like every time now I try to use my bttv tv card (ati tv wonder, if relevant), I get a kernel panic. This wasn't happening before. Should I have expected this? ...... I should probably feel grateful though that this is the only thing screwing up on me atm XD |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mrspam
n00b
Joined: 10 Aug 2004
Posts: 63
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2006 4:39 pm Post subject: Radeon X1400 *gnn* |
|
|
Hi there. I have a new notebook with a ATI Mobility Radeon X1400 and I can't get my X to work. I have installed the latest driver from ati, I ran
| Code: | aticonfig --initial
aticonfig --resolution 1280x800 |
and all I get is a black screen. I noticed, that I'm back in the shell, but anything is black on black. When I reboot, I can see in my Xorg.log.0, that the chipset 0x7145 is not supported by the fglrx. Is there any way to get that card working? I tried to use vga as the driver, but I only get the unbelievable resulution of 320x200 pixels *whooooo*...
Can I use i.e. to override my chip id?
Is there any other driver that I could use? 3D is not that important to me (though it would be nice). I just want to get my x working.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Runefox
n00b
Joined: 20 Feb 2006
Posts: 3
Location: NL, Canada
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | A minute ago I found something like this /*at gentoo wiki web page*/ :
...
Did you try this ? |
I hadn't come across that article, but I went ahead and added the line to my xorg.conf file. However, nothing's changed; I still get the blank screen when X goes down.
I've tried rearranging the module startup order, tried using the internal gart, the kernel gart, all sorts of things, but it still doesn't seem to like logging out of X. Now that I think about it, it does seem odd that it would go blank on my monitor but still enable me to apply input (or still go about its tasks, like shutdown/reboot), so it seems reasonable to assume that the driver's switching the VGA-out to the TV-out or DVI-out. But I don't see why that would happen, especially since every possible option turning off TV-out has been set. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Pythagoras1
Guru
Joined: 29 Jul 2002
Posts: 352
Location: Burgas, Bulgaria
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
after updating my ati-drivers i get this:
| Code: | fglrx: Unknown symbol inter_module_unregister
fglrx: Unknown symbol inter_module_get_request
fglrx: Unknown symbol inter_module_put
fglrx: Unknown symbol inter_module_register |
i know that these symbols are depricated. they are implemented in the kernel source file intermodule.c which doesn't even get built at my machine (and i don't see an option how to enable it).
the fglrx can't load anymore and i did not change the kernel. falling back to the previous version didn't work too. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CloudBolt
Apprentice
Joined: 04 Feb 2006
Posts: 192
Location: The Netherlands
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2006 7:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Code: | gentoobox vince # dmesg | grep fglrx
fglrx: module license 'Proprietary. (C) 2002 - ATI Technologies, Starnberg, GERMANY' taints kernel.
[fglrx] Maximum main memory to use for locked dma buffers: 415 MBytes.
[fglrx] module loaded - fglrx 8.22.5 [Feb 7 2006] on minor 0
gentoobox vince # fglrxinfo
Xlib: extension "XFree86-DRI" missing on display ":0.0".
display: :0.0 screen: 0
OpenGL vendor string: Mesa project: www.mesa3d.org
OpenGL renderer string: Mesa GLX Indirect
OpenGL version string: 1.2 (1.5 Mesa 6.4.2)
gentoobox vince #nano -w /var/log/Xorg.0.log
[b](WW) Warning, couldn't open module dri
(II) UnloadModule: "dri"
(EE) Failed to load module "dri" (module does not exist, 0)[/b] |
I have selected the important part of X's log. I am using Modular X.org 7.0.0
does anyone know why I can't load the dri module? DRM in the kernel is disabled, I can load the fglrx module fine, the only problem is the dri
_________________
GNU/Linux is an operating system.
IBM OS/2 is half an operating system.
Windows is a shell.
DOS is a boot partition virus. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Kamp
n00b
Joined: 15 May 2005
Posts: 33
Location: Gdynia - Poland
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2006 12:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
Okey, I spent few more hours "playing" with ATI drivers
I've made some discovers.
| Code: |
Configuring search environment for revdep-rebuild
Checking reverse dependencies...
Packages containing binaries and libraries broken by a package update
will be emerged.
Collecting system binaries and libraries...done.
(/root/.revdep-rebuild.1_files)
mCollecting complete LD_LIBRARY_PATH... done.
(/root/.revdep-rebuild.2_ldpath)
Checking dynamic linking consistency...
broken //usr/lib32/opengl/ati/lib/libGL.so.1.2 (requires libX11.so.6 libXext.so.6)
broken /usr/lib32/modules/dri/atiogl_a_dri.so (requires libX11.so.6 libXext.so.6 libstdc++.so.5)
broken /usr/lib32/modules/dri/fglrx_dri.so (requires libX11.so.6 libXext.so.6 libstdc++.so.5)
broken /usr/lib32/opengl/ati/lib/libGL.so.1.2 (requires libX11.so.6 libXext.so.6)
done.
(/root/.revdep-rebuild.3_rebuild)
Assigning files to ebuilds... done.
(/root/.revdep-rebuild.4_ebuilds)
Evaluating package order...done.
(/root/.revdep-rebuild.5_order)
All prepared. Starting rebuild...
emerge --oneshot =x11-drivers/ati-drivers-8.22.5
|
// it emerges those drivers and gives
| Code: |
Build finished correctly. Removing temporary files...
You can re-run revdep-rebuild to verify that all libraries and binaries
are fixed. If some inconsistency remains, it can be orphaned file, deep
dependency, binary package or specially evaluated library.
|
When I re-run revdep-rebuild it gives me the same message every time
I also downloaded drivers from oficial ATI.com web page. I installed it, and victory ! fglrx works and it's being loaded. BUT agpgart and nvidia_agp/amd64-agp still can't be found. Another problem is when I try fglrxinfo or glxinfo, it screams that it wants some libraries |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
taipan67
l33t
Joined: 04 Dec 2004
Posts: 866
Location: England (i'm told...)
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2006 1:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
CloudBolt, did you emerge xorg-server with the 'dri' USE-flag enabled?
Kamp, those missing libraries look like you're running xorg-7.0 as well. I looked through your earlier posts & noticed the 'dri' flag in your make.conf, but no mention of which version of X you have installed. Can you use the 'equery belongs' command to find out which package any of those libs are part of? Or maybe 'equery depgraph'...
_________________
"Anyone who goes to see a psychiatrist should have their head examined!" |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Kamp
n00b
Joined: 15 May 2005
Posts: 33
Location: Gdynia - Poland
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2006 11:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
| taipan67 wrote: |
Kamp, those missing libraries look like you're running xorg-7.0 as well. I looked through your earlier posts & noticed the 'dri' flag in your make.conf, but no mention of which version of X you have installed. Can you use the 'equery belongs' command to find out which package any of those libs are part of? Or maybe 'equery depgraph'... |
Nope, I'm using the last stable version in portage -> 6.8.2. I added dri USE flag into make.conf just in case 
I'm starting to think that maybe there is some option in kernel (about modules or something) I didn't checked  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Pythagoras1
Guru
Joined: 29 Jul 2002
Posts: 352
Location: Burgas, Bulgaria
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2006 12:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Pythagoras1 wrote: | after updating my ati-drivers i get this:
| Code: | fglrx: Unknown symbol inter_module_unregister
fglrx: Unknown symbol inter_module_get_request
fglrx: Unknown symbol inter_module_put
fglrx: Unknown symbol inter_module_register |
i know that these symbols are depricated. they are implemented in the kernel source file intermodule.c which doesn't even get built at my machine (and i don't see an option how to enable it).
the fglrx can't load anymore and i did not change the kernel. falling back to the previous version didn't work too. |
looks like chuck norris round house kicked out that old stuff from the kernel  (should have been done for a long time)
i had to change the line
| Code: | | obj-$(CONFIG_OBSOLETE_INTERMODULE) += intermodule.o |
into
| Code: | | obj-y += intermodule.o |
in the file /usr/src/linux-2.6.16-rc1-mm4/kernel/Makefile to get these functions back. ugly workaround, but it works for now. i hope the ati devs switch to the newer api soon since it looks like 2.6.16 will not use intermodules at all, there might be even no option to enable this from menuconfig. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
theneb
n00b
Joined: 07 Jan 2005
Posts: 38
Location: UK
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2006 1:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've just done a full reinstall of gentoo and everything thing is upto date as per portage tree, Running an athlon 2800 with 1gb ram and a radeon 9800.
Initially I had problems getting fglrx to work, it'll compile the module and everything fine, just would do no 3d rendering and glxinfo was purely MGI.
So I read through the wiki and did the kernel changes (On 2.6.15 kernel) and it worked! Yay.
However it's still not 100%, I've yet to be able to try a game on it, but....
I tried glxgears and it gets the fps of over 3000, however when I ctrl-c interrupt, the glxgears window closes but it doesn't return my console back to me.
Neither does glxinfo return my console after displaying the info, it just hangs.
Also tried to use wine but it hangs on 'creating directory .wine'.
xsreensaver won't work either and my pc won't shut down.
I'm using the latest version out of the portage tree, I'll try them off the ati site later but I was assuming the portage tree was meant to be stable?
I do appoligse if this stuff has been covered before but there are about four threads plus others to search through, no more help on the wiki. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CloudBolt
Apprentice
Joined: 04 Feb 2006
Posts: 192
Location: The Netherlands
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2006 2:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| taipan67 wrote: | CloudBolt, did you emerge xorg-server with the 'dri' USE-flag enabled?
Kamp, those missing libraries look like you're running xorg-7.0 as well. I looked through your earlier posts & noticed the 'dri' flag in your make.conf, but no mention of which version of X you have installed. Can you use the 'equery belongs' command to find out which package any of those libs are part of? Or maybe 'equery depgraph'... |
no I didn't, I'll do that right now, should I remerge ati-drivers after that?
all right, everything works fine, and I don't get anymore errors, but running glxgears only gives me about 1900 fps. 
_________________
GNU/Linux is an operating system.
IBM OS/2 is half an operating system.
Windows is a shell.
DOS is a boot partition virus. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
wsuetholz
n00b
Joined: 23 Nov 2002
Posts: 4
Location: Wisconsin, USA
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 7:52 pm Post subject: Re: ATI AIW-8500DV X11 7.0 using Xorg driver |
|
|
| taipan67 wrote: | | wsuetholz wrote: | ...My problem is: If I do a simple change resolution (C-A-+ or -), usually it takes two, my machine will lock up. NumLock and CapsLock no longer lighting the indicators locked up. C-A-Del doesn't work as well.
......
Thanks for any pointers, on what I should do.. not what lake I should jump into please.
Bill |
It's probably keyboard-related rather than graphics-card-related. Try searching the forums for posts with the keyword 'XKeysymDB' - there's lots of talk about that over on the Modular Xorg thread (i'm up to page 30). |
Since I can't even ssh into the box. It seems to be completely locked up. I don't believe it has anything to do with the XKeysymDB.
I was hoping that I would get additional messages that made more sense.
Bill |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
taipan67
l33t
Joined: 04 Dec 2004
Posts: 866
Location: England (i'm told...)
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 9:19 pm Post subject: Re: ATI AIW-8500DV X11 7.0 using Xorg driver |
|
|
| wsuetholz wrote: | | ...I don't believe it has anything to do with the XKeysymDB. I was hoping that I would get additional messages that made more sense... |
You're probably right about it not being 'XKeysymDB' - i was getting my X11R7-issue's mixed up, sorry about that.
I installed 'xorg-x11-7.0-r1' on a freshly-built system last night, & i've spent all of today trying to iron out the wrinkles in the keyboard configuration. I don't get the hard-locks that you & several others have experienced, but i do get a warning in 'Xorg.0.log' that's cropped up on that other thread :- | Code: | The XKEYBOARD keymap compiler (xkbcomp) reports:
> Warning: Type "ONE_LEVEL" has 1 levels, but <RALT> has 2 symbols
> Ignoring extra symbols |
...Some of the fixes i've tried have rendered the 'CTRL-ALT-F*' keys unusable, like the other users i meant to point you in the direction of in my previous post.
I've also noticed that as soon as i touch any modifier-key (like 'CTRL' when i'm about to press 'CTRL-C' to stop 'glxgears'), the 'scroll-lock' LED lights up, which is an indication that the keyboard-configuration has 'switched groups', whatever that means.
I'm still trying to get my head round the way the various files in /usr/share/X11/kbd interact with each-other, as i'm convinced it can be resolved by configuring 'xorg.conf' suitably.
Fortunately, i have two systems installed on this PC on separate partitions, & the one i'm writing this from runs 'xorg-x11-6.8.2-r2', so i've got the older style of configuration (that works) to use as a reference.
If you haven't already seen it, have a look at the Gentoo Modular X HOWTO - the last section touches on the new keyboard-format, & may help an American more than it's helped me, so far... 
If i find the fix, i'll be sure & let you know, & i hope you'll do likewise if you find it first.
_________________
"Anyone who goes to see a psychiatrist should have their head examined!" |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
loki99
Advocate
Joined: 10 Oct 2003
Posts: 2056
Location: Vienna, €urope
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 9:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi all!
I lost my 3d acceleration on my pentiumIII/ati7500 box after updating world and fail to figure out by myself how to fix it.
So any help is very welcome! 
| Quote: | valhalla loki # glxinfo
name of display: :0.0
display: :0 screen: 0
direct rendering: No
server glx vendor string: SGI
server glx version string: 1.2
server glx extensions:
GLX_ARB_multisample, GLX_EXT_visual_info, GLX_EXT_visual_rating,
GLX_EXT_import_context, GLX_OML_swap_method, GLX_SGI_make_current_read,
GLX_SGIS_multisample, GLX_SGIX_fbconfig
client glx vendor string: SGI
client glx version string: 1.4
client glx extensions:
GLX_ARB_get_proc_address, GLX_ARB_multisample, GLX_EXT_import_context,
GLX_EXT_visual_info, GLX_EXT_visual_rating, GLX_MESA_allocate_memory,
GLX_MESA_swap_control, GLX_MESA_swap_frame_usage, GLX_OML_swap_method,
GLX_OML_sync_control, GLX_SGI_make_current_read, GLX_SGI_swap_control,
GLX_SGI_video_sync, GLX_SGIS_multisample, GLX_SGIX_fbconfig,
GLX_SGIX_pbuffer, GLX_SGIX_visual_select_group
GLX extensions:
GLX_ARB_get_proc_address, GLX_ARB_multisample, GLX_EXT_import_context,
GLX_EXT_visual_info, GLX_EXT_visual_rating, GLX_SGIS_multisample
OpenGL vendor string: Mesa project: www.mesa3d.org
OpenGL renderer string: Mesa GLX Indirect
OpenGL version string: 1.2 (1.5 Mesa 6.2.1)
OpenGL extensions:
GL_ARB_depth_texture, GL_ARB_imaging, GL_ARB_multitexture,
GL_ARB_point_parameters, GL_ARB_point_sprite, GL_ARB_shadow,
GL_ARB_shadow_ambient, GL_ARB_texture_border_clamp,
GL_ARB_texture_cube_map, GL_ARB_texture_env_add,
GL_ARB_texture_env_combine, GL_ARB_texture_env_crossbar,
GL_ARB_texture_env_dot3, GL_ARB_texture_mirrored_repeat,
GL_ARB_transpose_matrix, GL_ARB_window_pos, GL_EXT_abgr, GL_EXT_bgra,
GL_EXT_blend_color, GL_EXT_blend_func_separate, GL_EXT_blend_logic_op,
GL_EXT_blend_minmax, GL_EXT_blend_subtract, GL_EXT_clip_volume_hint,
GL_EXT_copy_texture, GL_EXT_draw_range_elements, GL_EXT_fog_coord,
GL_EXT_multi_draw_arrays, GL_EXT_packed_pixels, GL_EXT_point_parameters,
GL_EXT_polygon_offset, GL_EXT_rescale_normal, GL_EXT_secondary_color,
GL_EXT_separate_specular_color, GL_EXT_shadow_funcs,
GL_EXT_stencil_two_side, GL_EXT_stencil_wrap, GL_EXT_subtexture,
GL_EXT_texture, GL_EXT_texture3D, GL_EXT_texture_edge_clamp,
GL_EXT_texture_env_add, GL_EXT_texture_env_combine,
GL_EXT_texture_env_dot3, GL_EXT_texture_lod_bias, GL_EXT_texture_object,
GL_EXT_texture_rectangle, GL_EXT_vertex_array, GL_APPLE_packed_pixels,
GL_ATI_texture_env_combine3, GL_ATI_texture_mirror_once,
GL_ATIX_texture_env_combine3, GL_IBM_texture_mirrored_repeat,
GL_INGR_blend_func_separate, GL_MESA_pack_invert, GL_MESA_ycbcr_texture,
GL_NV_blend_square, GL_NV_point_sprite, GL_NV_texgen_reflection,
GL_NV_texture_rectangle, GL_SGIS_generate_mipmap,
GL_SGIS_texture_border_clamp, GL_SGIS_texture_edge_clamp,
GL_SGIS_texture_lod, GL_SGIX_depth_texture, GL_SGIX_shadow,
GL_SGIX_shadow_ambient, GL_SUN_multi_draw_arrays
glu version: 1.3
glu extensions:
GLU_EXT_nurbs_tessellator, GLU_EXT_object_space_tess
visual x bf lv rg d st colorbuffer ax dp st accumbuffer ms cav
id dep cl sp sz l ci b ro r g b a bf th cl r g b a ns b eat
----------------------------------------------------------------------
0x23 16 tc 0 16 0 r y . 5 6 5 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 None
0x24 16 tc 0 16 0 r y . 5 6 5 0 0 16 8 16 16 16 0 0 0 None
0x25 16 tc 0 24 0 r y . 5 6 5 8 0 16 8 16 16 16 16 0 0 None
0x26 16 tc 0 24 0 r . . 5 6 5 8 0 16 8 16 16 16 16 0 0 None
0x27 16 dc 0 16 0 r y . 5 6 5 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 None
0x28 16 dc 0 16 0 r y . 5 6 5 0 0 16 8 16 16 16 0 0 0 None
0x29 16 dc 0 24 0 r y . 5 6 5 8 0 16 8 16 16 16 16 0 0 None
0x2a 16 dc 0 24 0 r . . 5 6 5 8 0 16 8 16 16 16 16 0 0 None
|
| Xorg.o.log wrote: | ABI class: X.Org ANSI C Emulation, version 0.2
(II) RADEON(0): Page flipping disabled
(!!) RADEON(0): For information on using the multimedia capabilities
of this adapter, please see http://gatos.sf.net.
(II) do I need RAC? No, I don't.
(II) resource ranges after preInit:
[0] 0 0 0xed000000 - 0xed00ffff (0x10000) MX[B]
[1] 0 0 0xe0000000 - 0xe7ffffff (0x8000000) MX[B]
[2] -1 0 0xffe00000 - 0xffffffff (0x200000) MX[B](B)
[3] -1 0 0x00100000 - 0x3fffffff (0x3ff00000) MX[B]E(B)
[4] -1 0 0x000f0000 - 0x000fffff (0x10000) MX[B]
[5] -1 0 0x000c0000 - 0x000effff (0x30000) MX[B]
[6] -1 0 0x00000000 - 0x0009ffff (0xa0000) MX[B]
[7] -1 0 0xee000000 - 0xee0000ff (0x100) MX[B]
[8] -1 0 0xe8000000 - 0xe7ffffff (0x0) MX[B]O
[9] -1 0 0xed000000 - 0xed00ffff (0x10000) MX[B](B)
[10] -1 0 0xe0000000 - 0xe7ffffff (0x8000000) MX[B](B)
[11] 0 0 0x000a0000 - 0x000affff (0x10000) MS[B](OprU)
[12] 0 0 0x000b0000 - 0x000b7fff (0x8000) MS[B](OprU)
[13] 0 0 0x000b8000 - 0x000bffff (0x8000) MS[B](OprU)
[14] 0 0 0x0000c000 - 0x0000c0ff (0x100) IX[B]
[15] -1 0 0x0000ffff - 0x0000ffff (0x1) IX[B]
[16] -1 0 0x00000000 - 0x000000ff (0x100) IX[B]
[17] -1 0 0x0000e000 - 0x0000e03f (0x40) IX[B]
[18] -1 0 0x0000dc00 - 0x0000dcff (0x100) IX[B]
[19] -1 0 0x0000d800 - 0x0000d8ff (0x100) IX[B]
[20] -1 0 0x0000d400 - 0x0000d41f (0x20) IX[B]
[21] -1 0 0x0000d000 - 0x0000d00f (0x10) IX[B]
[22] -1 0 0x0000c000 - 0x0000c0ff (0x100) IX[B](B)
[23] 0 0 0x000003b0 - 0x000003bb (0xc) IS[B](OprU)
[24] 0 0 0x000003c0 - 0x000003df (0x20) IS[B](OprU)
(==) RADEON(0): Write-combining range (0xe0000000,0x4000000)
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0
drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device)
drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device)
drmOpenDevice: Open failed
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0
drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device)
drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device)
drmOpenDevice: Open failed
drmOpenByBusid: Searching for BusID pci:0000:01:00.0
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0
drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device)
drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device)
drmOpenDevice: Open failed
drmOpenByBusid: drmOpenMinor returns -1023
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card1
drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device)
drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device)
drmOpenDevice: Open failed
drmOpenByBusid: drmOpenMinor returns -1023
-
-
-
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card13
drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device)
drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device)
drmOpenDevice: Open failed
drmOpenByBusid: drmOpenMinor returns -1023
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card14
drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device)
drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device)
drmOpenDevice: Open failed
drmOpenByBusid: drmOpenMinor returns -1023
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0
drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device)
drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device)
drmOpenDevice: Open failed
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0
drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device)
drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device)
drmOpenDevice: Open failed
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card1
drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device)
drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device)
drmOpenDevice: Open failed
-
-
-
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card14
drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device)
drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device)
drmOpenDevice: Open failed
(II) RADEON(0): [drm] drmOpen failed
(EE) RADEON(0): [dri] DRIScreenInit failed. Disabling DRI.
(II) RADEON(0): Memory manager initialized to (0,0) (1408,8191)
(II) RADEON(0): Reserved area from (0,1050) to (1408,1052)
(II) RADEON(0): Largest offscreen area available: 1408 x 7139
(II) RADEON(0): Render acceleration enabled
(II) RADEON(0): Using XFree86 Acceleration Architecture (XAA)
Screen to screen bit blits
Solid filled rectangles
8x8 mono pattern filled rectangles
Indirect CPU to Screen color expansion
Solid Lines
Scanline Image Writes
Offscreen Pixmaps
Setting up tile and stipple cache:
32 128x128 slots
32 256x256 slots
16 512x512 slots
(II) RADEON(0): Acceleration enabled
(==) RADEON(0): Backing store disabled
(==) RADEON(0): Silken mouse enabled
(II) RADEON(0): Using hardware cursor (scanline 1052)
(II) RADEON(0): Largest offscreen area available: 1408 x 7133
(II) RADEON(0): Direct rendering disabled
(==) RandR enabled
(II) Initializing built-in extension MIT-SHM
(II) Initializing built-in extension XInputExtension
(II) Initializing built-in extension XTEST
(II) Initializing built-in extension XKEYBOARD
(II) Initializing built-in extension LBX
(II) Initializing built-in extension XC-APPGROUP
(II) Initializing built-in extension SECURITY
(II) Initializing built-in extension XINERAMA
(II) Initializing built-in extension XFIXES
(II) Initializing built-in extension XFree86-Bigfont
(II) Initializing built-in extension RENDER
(II) Initializing built-in extension RANDR
(II) Initializing built-in extension COMPOSITE
(II) Initializing built-in extension DAMAGE
(II) Initializing built-in extension XEVIE
(**) Option "Protocol" "auto"
|
| Quote: | valhalla loki # lsmod
Module Size Used by
visor 17324 0
usbserial 24416 1 visor
lp 8484 0
parport_pc 22212 1
snd_cmipci 29216 2
snd_opl3_lib 9056 1 snd_cmipci
snd_hwdep 6976 1 snd_opl3_lib
snd_mpu401_uart 6112 1 snd_cmipci
snd_rawmidi 20768 1 snd_mpu401_uart
via_rhine 18948 0
radeon 76096 0
drm 65784 1 radeon
via_agp 7264 1
agpgart 29384 2 drm,via_agp |
Kernel config did not change, so everything seems to be set, but it still fails. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
taipan67
l33t
Joined: 04 Dec 2004
Posts: 866
Location: England (i'm told...)
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 11:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
| loki99 wrote: | | ...I lost my 3d acceleration on my pentiumIII/ati7500 box after updating world and fail to figure out by myself how to fix it. |
To my eyes, you have no 3d because the Xinit-process is unable to open the graphics-card's DRI-device. This could be for only two reasons that i can think of; The device doesn't exist, or the user starting X doesn't have read/write permission to access it. So based on that premise, here are some questions, in no particular order :-
Do you have a reasonably good idea of which packages were included in the update? Have you run 'revdep-rebuild -p' to see if any libraries are no longer linking correctly?
Do the entries in 'dmesg' contain anything regarding 'radeon', 'drm' or 'agpgart' that doesn't look right?
Do you use the in-kernel DRM-support, or do you use 'x11-base/x11-drm' - if the latter, & a kernel-update was performed, or 'x11-drm' was updated, did you re-emerge 'x11-drm' against the new kernel source-tree?
Did 'udev' get updated? If so, does it now set the permissions or the device-name differently to before?
I'm sure there were other questions when i started writing this, but the ones above are all that are occurring to me right now. Let us know if they highlight any clues to get you back up & running...
_________________
"Anyone who goes to see a psychiatrist should have their head examined!" |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
Desktop Environments
