| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
n0rbi666
l33t
Joined: 04 Mar 2005
Posts: 707
Location: \Poland\Krakow
|
 Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 12:58 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
Even with binutils 2.16.1-r2 from portage and binutils from portage I have the same error 
I removed /etc/portage/bashrc (per package ld/c/cxx flags) - recompiled binutils, and now everything works strange, very strange ... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hetfield666
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 28 Feb 2004
Posts: 99
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 9:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i'm using 2.3.6 with bdirect, hashvals and madvise patches.
seems dropped in the overlay (madvice should be upstream now).
any way to port? old patches don't apply |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nxsty
Veteran
Joined: 23 Jun 2004
Posts: 1556
Location: .se
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 10:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Hetfield666 wrote: | i'm using 2.3.6 with bdirect, hashvals and madvise patches.
seems dropped in the overlay (madvice should be upstream now).
any way to port? old patches don't apply |
I got your message! Yes they are still included and I'm going to continue maintaining them until they are in portage. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Hetfield666
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 28 Feb 2004
Posts: 99
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 9:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
| you're right, i just checked the ebuild and saw no bdirect patches and i didn't think they were in the bz2 package |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nxsty
Veteran
Joined: 23 Jun 2004
Posts: 1556
Location: .se
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 10:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I added a bugfix from the gentoo bugzilla so hardened on amd64 should work now. Please test if you have such a setup! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
weedy
Apprentice
Joined: 24 Jun 2005
Posts: 247
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 11:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| if im using the /usr/portage/profiles/hardened/x86/2.6 make.profile is it this overlay compatible? what else would i need to do to retain my hardened toolchain. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nesl247
Veteran
Joined: 15 Jun 2004
Posts: 1614
Location: Florida
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 17, 2006 6:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Glibc-2.4 was updated to glibc-2.4-r1 just now. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nxsty
Veteran
Joined: 23 Jun 2004
Posts: 1556
Location: .se
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 17, 2006 8:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
| nesl247 wrote: | | Glibc-2.4 was updated to glibc-2.4-r1 just now. |
Updated! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nxsty
Veteran
Joined: 23 Jun 2004
Posts: 1556
Location: .se
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 17, 2006 8:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
| weedy wrote: | | if im using the /usr/portage/profiles/hardened/x86/2.6 make.profile is it this overlay compatible? what else would i need to do to retain my hardened toolchain. |
It should work with the latest changes. Make sure you use the 2.4-r1 version though. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
weedy
Apprentice
Joined: 24 Jun 2005
Posts: 247
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 17, 2006 9:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
| is there a gcc-4.1 hardened? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Xake
Guru
Joined: 11 Feb 2004
Posts: 588
Location: Göteborg, the rainy part of scandinavia
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 17, 2006 9:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
| weedy wrote: | | is there a gcc-4.1 hardened? |
There is at least a hardned-flag... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nxsty
Veteran
Joined: 23 Jun 2004
Posts: 1556
Location: .se
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 17, 2006 10:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
| weedy wrote: | | is there a gcc-4.1 hardened? |
No you have to use a overlay for that. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
piwacet
Guru
Joined: 30 Dec 2004
Posts: 486
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 18, 2006 5:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
| nxsty wrote: | | nesl247 wrote: | | Glibc-2.4 was updated to glibc-2.4-r1 just now. |
Updated! |
If someone who speaks ebuild knows what the differences are, if they're important?
TIA |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Joffer
Guru
Joined: 10 Sep 2002
Posts: 585
Location: Arendal, Norway
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 18, 2006 10:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
binutils-2.16.91.0.7.ebuild is out in portage. Will there be a new overlay?
_________________
As of April 2006 - Athlon64 X2 4200+ 1GB RAM - amd64-2006.0 profiled system with portage 2.1_preX, ck-sources-2.6.16, glibc-2.4-r1 (overlay w/-Bdirect&-hashvals), binutils-2.16.91.0.6 (overlay), gcc-4.1, Xorg 7 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mbar
Veteran
Joined: 19 Jan 2005
Posts: 1990
Location: Poland
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 18, 2006 11:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
Is it just me, or the glibc 2.4-r1 ebuild in portage was changed overnight? I was installing a new AMD64 system yesterday and left it in emerge -e world state. In the morning I wanted to make second emerge -e world pass just for the sake of it. But i emerge --sync'ed first, then after emerge -pve world I can see it wants to download several more (like ~800 kB) data for the same glibc version. I tried to do emerge -e world afterwards and it failed on glibc ofcourse.
It complains about undefined reference to __stack_chk_guard when compiling nscd subdirectory of glibc. Now I cannot finish my install goddammit.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nxsty
Veteran
Joined: 23 Jun 2004
Posts: 1556
Location: .se
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 18, 2006 1:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Joffer wrote: | | binutils-2.16.91.0.7.ebuild is out in portage. Will there be a new overlay? |
I tried to resync the patches but it wouldn´t compile with tons of errors. I guess we´re stuck with .6 until Michael updates his patches.
Anyway yesterday after some extensive compiling my main computer decided it had enough and broke down. So I'll probably not update my overlays for a couple of days until my new motherboard arrives. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
weedy
Apprentice
Joined: 24 Jun 2005
Posts: 247
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 18, 2006 1:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
:/ | Code: | gcc -shared .libs/archive.o .libs/archures.o .libs/bfd.o .libs/bfdio.o .libs/bfdwin.o .libs/cache.o .libs/coffgen.o .libs/corefile.o .libs/format.o .libs/init.o .libs/libbfd.o .libs/opncls.o .libs/reloc.o .libs/section.o .libs/syms.o .libs/targets.o .libs/hash.o .libs/linker.o .libs/srec.o .libs/binary.o .libs/tekhex.o .libs/ihex.o .libs/stabs.o .libs/stab-syms.o .libs/merge.o .libs/dwarf2.o .libs/simple.o .libs/bfdsort.o .libs/archive64.o .libs/elf32-i386.o .libs/elf-vxworks.o .libs/elf32.o .libs/elf.o .libs/elflink.o .libs/elf-strtab.o .libs/elf-eh-frame.o .libs/dwarf1.o .libs/i386linux.o .libs/aout32.o .libs/efi-app-ia32.o .libs/peigen.o .libs/cofflink.o .libs/elf64-x86-64.o .libs/elf64.o .libs/elf64-gen.o .libs/elf32-gen.o .libs/cpu-i386.o .libs/trad-core.o -L/var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.16.91.0.6/work/build/libiberty/pic -liberty -Wl,-soname -Wl,libbfd-2.16.91.0.6.so -o .libs/libbfd-2.16.91.0.6.so
(cd .libs && rm -f libbfd.so && ln -s libbfd-2.16.91.0.6.so libbfd.so)
i586-pc-linux-gnu-ar cru .libs/libbfd.a archive.o archures.o bfd.o bfdio.o bfdwin.o cache.o coffgen.o corefile.o format.o init.o libbfd.o opncls.o reloc.o section.o syms.o targets.o hash.o linker.o srec.o binary.o tekhex.o ihex.o stabs.o stab-syms.o merge.o dwarf2.o simple.o bfdsort.o archive64.o elf32-i386.o elf-vxworks.o elf32.o elf.o elflink.o elf-strtab.o elf-eh-frame.o dwarf1.o i386linux.o aout32.o efi-app-ia32.o peigen.o cofflink.o elf64-x86-64.o elf64.o elf64-gen.o elf32-gen.o cpu-i386.o trad-core.o
i586-pc-linux-gnu-ranlib .libs/libbfd.a
creating libbfd.la
(cd .libs && rm -f libbfd.la && ln -s ../libbfd.la libbfd.la)
libtooldir=`/bin/sh ./libtool --config | sed -n -e 's/^objdir=//p'`; \
if [ -f $libtooldir/libbfd.a ]; then \
cp $libtooldir/libbfd.a libbfd.tmp; \
i586-pc-linux-gnu-ranlib libbfd.tmp; \
/bin/sh /var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.16.91.0.6/work/binutils-2.16.91.0.6/bfd/../move-if-change libbfd.tmp libbfd.a; \
else true; fi
touch stamp-lib
make[4]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.16.91.0.6/work/build/bfd'
make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.16.91.0.6/work/build/bfd'
make[2]: *** [all] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.16.91.0.6/work/build/bfd'
make[1]: *** [all-bfd] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.16.91.0.6/work/build'
make: *** [all] Error 2
!!! ERROR: sys-devel/binutils-2.16.91.0.6 failed.
Call stack:
ebuild.sh, line 1557: Called dyn_compile
ebuild.sh, line 966: Called src_compile
ebuild.sh, line 1272: Called toolchain-binutils_src_compile
!!! emake failed
!!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call stack if relevant.
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ViRgiLiO
n00b
Joined: 18 Jan 2005
Posts: 17
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 18, 2006 3:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have the same error here... Seems to be a serious problem  Maybe anyone have a solution? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ViRgiLiO
n00b
Joined: 18 Jan 2005
Posts: 17
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 18, 2006 3:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Compiling binutils-2.16.91.0.6 from a broken ebuild, gives this error:
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.././bfd -I. -DTRAD_CORE -I. -I.././bfd -I.././bfd/../include -I.././bfd/../intl -I../intl -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -O2 -mtune=athlon-xp -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -ftracer -c bfdsort.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/bfdsort.o
bfdsort.c:96: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before 'bfd_qsort_closure_func'
bfdsort.c:97: warning: no previous prototype for 'bfd_qsort'
bfdsort.c: In function 'bfd_qsort':
bfdsort.c:128: error: 'cmp' undeclared (first use in this function)
bfdsort.c:128: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
bfdsort.c:128: error: for each function it appears in.)
make[4]: *** [bfdsort.lo] Error 1
make[4]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.16.91.0.6/work/binutils-2.16.91.0.6/bfd'
make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.16.91.0.6/work/binutils-2.16.91.0.6/bfd'
make[2]: *** [all] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.16.91.0.6/work/binutils-2.16.91.0.6/bfd'
make[1]: *** [all-bfd] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.16.91.0.6/work/binutils-2.16.91.0.6'
make: *** [all] Error 2 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nesl247
Veteran
Joined: 15 Jun 2004
Posts: 1614
Location: Florida
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 18, 2006 3:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| nxsty wrote: | | Joffer wrote: | | binutils-2.16.91.0.7.ebuild is out in portage. Will there be a new overlay? |
I tried to resync the patches but it wouldn´t compile with tons of errors. I guess we´re stuck with .6 until Michael updates his patches.
Anyway yesterday after some extensive compiling my main computer decided it had enough and broke down. So I'll probably not update my overlays for a couple of days until my new motherboard arrives. |
nxsty: Do you have any messengers or an irc client? I would like to talk to you about fixing the binutils patches. I see where the problem lies, but I am not the greatest with diff files.
Last edited by nesl247 on Sat Mar 18, 2006 7:06 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ViRgiLiO
n00b
Joined: 18 Jan 2005
Posts: 17
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 18, 2006 6:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Please, is there any solution to the binutils upgrade and broken toolchain mentioned above? I feel that i've broke my system, and I don't want to reinstall all again. Some of my files are more than five years old! and moving all the data to another system is bored and tired. So, please, if there is any solution to this problem, please tell us. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
rhill
Retired Dev
Joined: 22 Oct 2004
Posts: 1629
Location: sk.ca
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 18, 2006 10:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| mbar wrote: | | Is it just me, or the glibc 2.4-r1 ebuild in portage was changed overnight? |
yes, the patchset was bumped to 1.3 which includes the x86_64 string/math doodahs (disabled by default).
_________________
by design, by neglect
for a fact or just for effect |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
weedy
Apprentice
Joined: 24 Jun 2005
Posts: 247
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2006 4:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
WTH, why does it need less then gcc-4.1 | Code: | !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy ">=sys-devel/gcc-3.4.4" have been masked.
!!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your request:
- sys-devel/gcc-3.4.6 (masked by: package.mask, missing keyword)
- sys-devel/gcc-3.4.5-r1 (masked by: package.mask)
- sys-devel/gcc-3.4.4-r1 (masked by: package.mask)
- sys-devel/gcc-4.1.0 (masked by: package.mask)
# Mark Loeser <halcy0n@gentoo.org> (02 Mar 2006)
# Will be in flux for the next week or so while we get issues straightened out
- sys-devel/gcc-4.0.2-r3 (masked by: package.mask, missing keyword)
- sys-devel/gcc-3.4.5 (masked by: package.mask)
- sys-devel/gcc-4.0.3 (masked by: package.mask, missing keyword)
For more information, see MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man page or
refer to the Gentoo Handbook.
(dependency required by "sys-libs/glibc-2.4-r1" [ebuild])
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nxsty
Veteran
Joined: 23 Jun 2004
Posts: 1556
Location: .se
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2006 8:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
| nesl247 wrote: | | nxsty: Do you have any messengers or an irc client? I would like to talk to you about fixing the binutils patches. I see where the problem lies, but I am not the greatest with diff files. |
Check PM! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nxsty
Veteran
Joined: 23 Jun 2004
Posts: 1556
Location: .se
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2006 8:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
| weedy wrote: | WTH, why does it need less then gcc-4.1 | Code: | !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy ">=sys-devel/gcc-3.4.4" have been masked.
!!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your request:
- sys-devel/gcc-3.4.6 (masked by: package.mask, missing keyword)
- sys-devel/gcc-3.4.5-r1 (masked by: package.mask)
- sys-devel/gcc-3.4.4-r1 (masked by: package.mask)
- sys-devel/gcc-4.1.0 (masked by: package.mask)
# Mark Loeser <halcy0n@gentoo.org> (02 Mar 2006)
# Will be in flux for the next week or so while we get issues straightened out
- sys-devel/gcc-4.0.2-r3 (masked by: package.mask, missing keyword)
- sys-devel/gcc-3.4.5 (masked by: package.mask)
- sys-devel/gcc-4.0.3 (masked by: package.mask, missing keyword)
For more information, see MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man page or
refer to the Gentoo Handbook.
(dependency required by "sys-libs/glibc-2.4-r1" [ebuild])
|
|
It doesn't need gcc 3.4.4 but anything above it. And those versions isn't masked in portage so perhaps you've doe something wrong with your /etc/portage/package.mask? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Unsupported Software
