| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
GarethAyres
n00b
Joined: 17 Aug 2005
Posts: 28
Location: wales
|
 Posted: Thu Mar 02, 2006 11:27 am Post subject: firefox beaten to death by oom-killer |
 |
|
Hi. I have had gentoo running at my box at work now for a month or so, and life has been good. I am running KDE: 3.4.3 on 2.6.15-gentoo-r1. I have 8 virtual desktops on KDE, and use them all for a variety of different tasks. I generally have an instance of Mozilla Firefox 1.0.7 running in them all, with a few tabs maybe.
Everythign was going grand, until i came in to work today to find all my FireFox instances had gone! Everything else appears fine. After looking through my /var/log/messages i found this:
| Code: |
Mar 2 06:15:27 lsayregj oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x201d2, order=0
Mar 2 06:15:27 lsayregj oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x201d2, order=0
Mar 2 06:15:27 lsayregj Mem-info:
Mar 2 06:15:27 lsayregj DMA per-cpu:
Mar 2 06:15:27 lsayregj cpu 0 hot: low 0, high 0, batch 1 used:0
Mar 2 06:15:27 lsayregj cpu 0 cold: low 0, high 0, batch 1 used:0
Mar 2 06:15:27 lsayregj DMA32 per-cpu: empty
Mar 2 06:15:27 lsayregj Normal per-cpu:
Mar 2 06:15:27 lsayregj cpu 0 hot: low 0, high 186, batch 31 used:158
Mar 2 06:15:27 lsayregj cpu 0 cold: low 0, high 62, batch 15 used:14
Mar 2 06:15:27 lsayregj HighMem per-cpu: empty
Mar 2 06:15:27 lsayregj Free pages: 4804kB (0kB HighMem)
Mar 2 06:15:27 lsayregj Active:56395 inactive:56109 dirty:0 writeback:0 unstabl
e:0 free:1201 slab:3925 mapped:111579 pagetables:723
Mar 2 06:15:27 lsayregj DMA free:2032kB min:88kB low:108kB high:132kB active:54
12kB inactive:5192kB present:16384kB pages_scanned:18009 all_unreclaimable? yes
Mar 2 06:15:27 lsayregj lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 486 486
Mar 2 06:15:27 lsayregj DMA32 free:0kB min:0kB low:0kB high:0kB active:0kB inac
tive:0kB present:0kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no
Mar 2 06:15:27 lsayregj lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 486 486
Mar 2 06:15:27 lsayregj Normal free:2772kB min:2776kB low:3468kB high:4164kB ac
tive:220168kB inactive:219244kB present:498208kB pages_scanned:589847 all_unrecl
aimable? yes
Mar 2 06:15:27 lsayregj lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 0
Mar 2 06:15:27 lsayregj HighMem free:0kB min:128kB low:128kB high:128kB active:
0kB inactive:0kB present:0kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no
Mar 2 06:15:27 lsayregj lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 0
Mar 2 06:15:27 lsayregj DMA: 0*4kB 0*8kB 1*16kB 3*32kB 0*64kB 1*128kB 1*256kB 1
*512kB 1*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 2032kB
Mar 2 06:15:27 lsayregj DMA32: empty
Mar 2 06:15:27 lsayregj Normal: 55*4kB 35*8kB 10*16kB 2*32kB 0*64kB 0*128kB 0*2
56kB 0*512kB 0*1024kB 1*2048kB 0*4096kB = 2772kB
Mar 2 06:15:27 lsayregj HighMem: empty
Mar 2 06:15:27 lsayregj Swap cache: add 308372, delete 308372, find 81803/10062
6, race 0+0
Mar 2 06:15:27 lsayregj Free swap = 0kB
Mar 2 06:15:27 lsayregj Total swap = 506036kB
Mar 2 06:15:27 lsayregj Free swap: 0kB
Mar 2 06:15:27 lsayregj 128648 pages of RAM
Mar 2 06:15:27 lsayregj 0 pages of HIGHMEM
Mar 2 06:15:27 lsayregj 2197 reserved pages
Mar 2 06:15:27 lsayregj 14482 pages shared
Mar 2 06:15:27 lsayregj 0 pages swap cached
Mar 2 06:15:27 lsayregj 0 pages dirty
Mar 2 06:15:27 lsayregj 0 pages writeback
Mar 2 06:15:27 lsayregj 111579 pages mapped
Mar 2 06:15:27 lsayregj 3925 pages slab
Mar 2 06:15:27 lsayregj 723 pages pagetables
Mar 2 06:15:27 lsayregj Out of Memory: Killed process 29080 (firefox-bin).
Mar 2 06:15:27 lsayregj Out of Memory: Killed process 15864 (firefox-bin).
Mar 2 06:15:27 lsayregj Out of Memory: Killed process 15865 (firefox-bin).
Mar 2 06:15:27 lsayregj Out of Memory: Killed process 15866 (firefox-bin).Mar 2 06:15:27 lsayregj oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x201d2, order=0
Mar 2 06:15:27 lsayregj Mem-info:
Mar 2 06:15:27 lsayregj DMA per-cpu:
Mar 2 06:15:27 lsayregj cpu 0 hot: low 0, high 0, batch 1 used:0
Mar 2 06:15:27 lsayregj cpu 0 cold: low 0, high 0, batch 1 used:0
Mar 2 06:15:27 lsayregj DMA32 per-cpu: empty
Mar 2 06:15:27 lsayregj Normal per-cpu:
Mar 2 06:15:27 lsayregj cpu 0 hot: low 0, high 186, batch 31 used:158
Mar 2 06:15:27 lsayregj cpu 0 cold: low 0, high 62, batch 15 used:14
Mar 2 06:15:27 lsayregj HighMem per-cpu: empty
Mar 2 06:15:27 lsayregj Free pages: 4804kB (0kB HighMem)
Mar 2 06:15:27 lsayregj Active:56395 inactive:56109 dirty:0 writeback:0 unstable:0 free:1201 slab:3925 mapped:111580 pagetables:723
Mar 2 06:15:27 lsayregj DMA free:2032kB min:88kB low:108kB high:132kB active:5412kB inactive:5192kB present:16384kB pages_scanned:18009 all_unreclaimable? yes
Mar 2 06:15:27 lsayregj lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 486 486
Mar 2 06:15:27 lsayregj DMA32 free:0kB min:0kB low:0kB high:0kB active:0kB inactive:0kB present:0kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no
Mar 2 06:15:27 lsayregj lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 486 486
Mar 2 06:15:27 lsayregj Normal free:2772kB min:2776kB low:3468kB high:4164kB active:220168kB inactive:219244kB present:498208kB pages_scanned:589847 all_unreclaimable? yes
Mar 2 06:15:27 lsayregj lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 0
Mar 2 06:15:27 lsayregj HighMem free:0kB min:128kB low:128kB high:128kB active:0kB inactive:0kB present:0kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no
Mar 2 06:15:27 lsayregj lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 0
Mar 2 06:15:27 lsayregj DMA: 0*4kB 0*8kB 1*16kB 3*32kB 0*64kB 1*128kB 1*256kB 1*512kB 1*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 2032kB
Mar 2 06:15:27 lsayregj DMA32: empty
Mar 2 06:15:27 lsayregj Normal: 55*4kB 35*8kB 10*16kB 2*32kB 0*64kB 0*128kB 0*256kB 0*512kB 0*1024kB 1*2048kB 0*4096kB = 2772kB
Mar 2 06:15:27 lsayregj HighMem: empty
Mar 2 06:15:27 lsayregj Swap cache: add 308372, delete 308372, find 81803/100626, race 0+0
Mar 2 06:15:27 lsayregj Out of Memory: Killed process 15868 (firefox-bin).
|
This is repeated a few times in the log. It appears that ive run out of swap space? and firefoz has been killed as a result? Am i right in thinking this?
How can i have run out of swap space when i have 512Mb Memory and my swap is:
| Code: | | /dev/sda2 6 68 506047+ 82 Linux swap |
I have conky running and i keep an eye on things and the swap was never above half full, as i woulf have notcied. I have run top now and there are no processes running using any significant ammount of memory.
Whats happened?
_________________
--------------------------
www.GarethAyres.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
adaptr
Watchman
Joined: 06 Oct 2002
Posts: 6730
Location: Rotterdam, Netherlands
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 02, 2006 1:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Speaks for itself.
Run
to determine your memory load.
If you're running separate instances of firefox this will consume more memory than running one with multiple tabs.
_________________
>>> emerge (3 of 7) mcse/70-293 to /
Essential tools: gentoolkit eix profuse screen |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
GarethAyres
n00b
Joined: 17 Aug 2005
Posts: 28
Location: wales
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 02, 2006 1:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I assumed that the swap and memory run out, but i cant see how nearly a Gb of it could be used by 10 or so firefox borwsers!?1?
Is this normal?
| Code: |
lsayregj ~ # free -m
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 493 343 150 0 38 89
-/+ buffers/cache: 215 278
Swap: 494 154 339
|
I had 5 fire fox instances running when i run that command.
So... are you saying i need to increase my swap size or get more memory to run more than 10 fire fox instances?
Sounds a bit weird to me.
_________________
--------------------------
www.GarethAyres.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
adaptr
Watchman
Joined: 06 Oct 2002
Posts: 6730
Location: Rotterdam, Netherlands
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 02, 2006 2:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Not necessarily, although it is my experience there are very few programs that eat more memory than fireFox.
It'll gladly take over 200MB when I've been browsing for a few hours, using 10+ tabs, on Windows.. no reason it should be any different on Linux.
That ouput shows you are using only 215MB of main memory at that point, so it should certainly not cause FF to get hit by OOM.
_________________
>>> emerge (3 of 7) mcse/70-293 to /
Essential tools: gentoolkit eix profuse screen |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
GarethAyres
n00b
Joined: 17 Aug 2005
Posts: 28
Location: wales
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 02, 2006 2:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
thats a bit disapointing then, if firefox can so easily drain my system of resources with only 10 instances of itself and a few tabs.
Is there any kind of memory management application i could use that would warn me when somthing like this is going to happen again, as lossing all the firefox windows is a right pain at work. Perhaps i should use another browser instead of fire fox, but i really like firefox  Or i should double the size of the swap space, but thsi will slow things down then won it?
bah 
_________________
--------------------------
www.GarethAyres.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
lesourbe
l33t
Joined: 24 Nov 2005
Posts: 710
Location: Champagne !
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 02, 2006 3:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I stick to Opera ... you could try it.
_________________
Is that a banhammer ?
LeSourbe, Member of EPowerforce. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
erikm
l33t
Joined: 08 Feb 2005
Posts: 634
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My firefox (1.0.7) has been running for weeks without restart here, generally one instance with 5 - 15 tabs. At the moment it is using 63 MB (six tabs). It would not add up to a GB with another ten similar sessions running, that is.
You most likely have a memory leak, in firefox itself, one of its dependencies or an added extension. Verify by checking if the memory usage of a firefox session increases over time without user interaction.
If yes, I would backup my ~/.mozilla directory, then wipe it and uninstall extensions. If the problem persists, I would ensure the sanity of my toolchain, and then 'emerge -e firefox'. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
GarethAyres
n00b
Joined: 17 Aug 2005
Posts: 28
Location: wales
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I like firefox, and dont want to swap to another browser, so i will keep an eye on memory usage. My feeling is that there is a memory leak with one of the extentions. But, i only have 2 extentions: Colour Tabs and Google Toolbar for Fire Fox. Still, ill monitor it tonight and see what its like tomorrow.
Gareth.
_________________
--------------------------
www.GarethAyres.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TheRAt
Veteran
Joined: 03 Jun 2002
Posts: 1580
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 02, 2006 8:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
post results..
very interested..
_________________
All reality is the construct of the observer.
Get Firefox and rediscover the web!
BOFH Excuse #295:
The Token fell out of the ring. Call us when you find it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
GarethAyres
n00b
Joined: 17 Aug 2005
Posts: 28
Location: wales
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 03, 2006 9:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
I did some check throught the night and memory usage went up, but i do have other things running on the box. How can i monitor just the FIreFox pids? top -p x is the only way i know, and im not sure if thats what you want?
Gareth.
_________________
--------------------------
www.GarethAyres.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
erikm
l33t
Joined: 08 Feb 2005
Posts: 634
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 03, 2006 11:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I personally use xrestop (emerge xrestop). It's a 'top' like program for your X processes only. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pilo
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 31 Jan 2003
Posts: 90
Location: Sweden
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2006 4:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I know this is not a fix, but have you considered using a the extension SessionSaver?
_________________
"A stroll through a lunatic asylum shows that faith does not prove anything." |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
GarethAyres
n00b
Joined: 17 Aug 2005
Posts: 28
Location: wales
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2006 8:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
I have come back to my gentoo box after a weekend away, and the memory usage has increased significantly. Nothing has been going on with the machine during this time, so somthing certainly a miss.
I have emerged xrestop and also used top, but cant figure out how to get the output written to file. As they update themselfs, i guess this cant be done the usual way of piping. Anyone know how i can get a memory usage readng from firefox into a file? Once i know this ill set a cronjob going with it every 15 mins over night and see what happens.
SessionSaver looks good, ill look into it more later.
Gareth.
_________________
--------------------------
www.GarethAyres.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
GarethAyres
n00b
Joined: 17 Aug 2005
Posts: 28
Location: wales
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 10, 2006 11:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
OK, this isnt funny now :/ Look at my swap / mem usage....
| Code: |
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 493 482 11 0 4 64
-/+ buffers/cache: 413 80
Swap: 494 493 0
|
This has grown over the last week, and is not the result of having many additional (if any) firefox borwsers open. I currently (when the above info was taken) have 6 firefox instances running, with a total of 17 tabs spread amoungt them. This is not unreasonable surely?
here is a dump i took of xrestop.
| Code: |
[(B^[)0^[[?1049h^[[1;34r^[[m^O^[[4l^[[?7h^[[H^[[2Jxrestop - Display: localhost:0^[[2;11HMonitoring 30 clients. XErrors: 0^[[3;11HPixmaps: 71481K total, Other: 257K total, All: 71738K total^M
^[[0;1;7m^Ores-base Wins GCs Fnts Pxms Misc Pxm mem Other Total PID Identifier ^M
^[[m^O1200000 1570 34 1 1259 296 61845K 45K 61891K ? AtlasChoice: Discount Hotels, Ca^[[7;1H1600000 71 122 3 107 152 5270K 11K 5281K ? KDE Desktop^M
1000000 145 122 1 231 474 1546K 18K 1565K ? kwin^M
3600000 1367 126 3 1063 551^[[40G852K 50K 903K ? file:///var/www/localhost/htdocs^[[10;1H1a00000 175 125 3 554 475^[[40G601K 21K 622K ? kicker^M
3800000 51 124 3 80 72^[[40G234K^[[50G8K 243K ? root@uws-radiator1: /usr/local/e^[[12;1H2400000 51 124 3 77 71^[[40G196K^[[50G8K 205K ? lsayregj:/var/www/localhost/htdo^[[13;1H2e00000 49 124 3 74 71^[[40G190K^[[50G8K 199K ? lsayregj:~ - Shell - Konsole^M
3a00000 53 99 3 80 63^[[40G149K^[[50G8K 157K ? [New Document] [modified] - KEdi^[[15;1H2600000 48 124 3 206 175^[[40G135K 11K 146K ? lsayregj:~ - Shell - Konsole^M
2a00000 48 124 3 132 110^[[40G101K^[[50G9K 111K ? lsayregj:/ - Shell - Konsole^M
2800000 49 118 3 62 50^[[41G64K^[[50G8K 72K ? lsayregj:/var/www/localhost/htdo^[[18;1H0600000 19 107 1 8 42^[[41G65K^[[50G4K 70K 10196 kded^M
3200000 35 115 3 50 48^[[41G46K^[[50G7K 54K ? lsayregj:~ - Shell - Konsole^M
1800000 35 115 3 50 46^[[41G46K^[[50G7K 54K ? lsayregj:/var/www/localhost/htdo^[[21;1H2200000 35 114 3 50 40^[[41G46K^[[50G7K 54K ? lsayregj:~ - Shell - Konsole^M
1c00000 13 50 3 40 36^[[41G35K^[[50G5K 40K ? klipper^M
1e00000 21 7 1 11 9^[[41G19K^[[50G1K 21K ? KDE Wallet Manager^M
2000000 6 7 1 12 9^[[41G17K^[[50G1K 19K ? KOrganizer Alarm Daemon^M
3400000 34 4 1 16 9^[[41G14K^[[50G2K 16K 30149 kio_uiserver^M
2c00000 38 13 3 0 12^[[26;42H0B^[[50G4K^[[58G4K ? <unknown>^M
0e00000 3 1 1 0 4^[[27;42H0B^[[50G1K^[[58G1K 10209 kaccess^M
1400000 2 1 1 0 4^[[28;42H0B^[[50G1K^[[58G1K 10215 knotify^M
0c00000 2 1 1 0 4^[[29;42H0B^[[50G1K^[[58G1K 10212 ksmserver^M
3000000 0 2 0 0 17^[[30;42H0B 456B 456B ? <unknown>^M
|
I feel like its abotu to blow! What can i do to resolve this? Is removinf firefox 1.0.7 and risking 1.5 a good idea?
_________________
--------------------------
www.GarethAyres.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
erikm
l33t
Joined: 08 Feb 2005
Posts: 634
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 10, 2006 1:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| GarethAyres wrote: | OK, this isnt funny now :/ Look at my swap / mem usage....
| Code: |
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 493 482 11 0 4 64
-/+ buffers/cache: 413 80
Swap: 494 493 0
|
This has grown over the last week, and is not the result of having many additional (if any) firefox borwsers open. I currently (when the above info was taken) have 6 firefox instances running, with a total of 17 tabs spread amoungt them. This is not unreasonable surely?
here is a dump i took of xrestop.
| Code: |
[(B^[)0^[[?1049h^[[1;34r^[[m^O^[[4l^[[?7h^[[H^[[2Jxrestop - Display: localhost:0^[[2;11HMonitoring 30 clients. XErrors: 0^[[3;11HPixmaps: 71481K total, Other: 257K total, All: 71738K total^M
^[[0;1;7m^Ores-base Wins GCs Fnts Pxms Misc Pxm mem Other Total PID Identifier ^M
^[[m^O1200000 1570 34 1 1259 296 61845K 45K 61891K ? AtlasChoice: Discount Hotels, Ca^[[7;1H1600000 71 122 3 107 152 5270K 11K 5281K ? KDE Desktop^M
1000000 145 122 1 231 474 1546K 18K 1565K ? kwin^M
3600000 1367 126 3 1063 551^[[40G852K 50K 903K ? file:///var/www/localhost/htdocs^[[10;1H1a00000 175 125 3 554 475^[[40G601K 21K 622K ? kicker^M
3800000 51 124 3 80 72^[[40G234K^[[50G8K 243K ? root@uws-radiator1: /usr/local/e^[[12;1H2400000 51 124 3 77 71^[[40G196K^[[50G8K 205K ? lsayregj:/var/www/localhost/htdo^[[13;1H2e00000 49 124 3 74 71^[[40G190K^[[50G8K 199K ? lsayregj:~ - Shell - Konsole^M
3a00000 53 99 3 80 63^[[40G149K^[[50G8K 157K ? [New Document] [modified] - KEdi^[[15;1H2600000 48 124 3 206 175^[[40G135K 11K 146K ? lsayregj:~ - Shell - Konsole^M
2a00000 48 124 3 132 110^[[40G101K^[[50G9K 111K ? lsayregj:/ - Shell - Konsole^M
2800000 49 118 3 62 50^[[41G64K^[[50G8K 72K ? lsayregj:/var/www/localhost/htdo^[[18;1H0600000 19 107 1 8 42^[[41G65K^[[50G4K 70K 10196 kded^M
3200000 35 115 3 50 48^[[41G46K^[[50G7K 54K ? lsayregj:~ - Shell - Konsole^M
1800000 35 115 3 50 46^[[41G46K^[[50G7K 54K ? lsayregj:/var/www/localhost/htdo^[[21;1H2200000 35 114 3 50 40^[[41G46K^[[50G7K 54K ? lsayregj:~ - Shell - Konsole^M
1c00000 13 50 3 40 36^[[41G35K^[[50G5K 40K ? klipper^M
1e00000 21 7 1 11 9^[[41G19K^[[50G1K 21K ? KDE Wallet Manager^M
2000000 6 7 1 12 9^[[41G17K^[[50G1K 19K ? KOrganizer Alarm Daemon^M
3400000 34 4 1 16 9^[[41G14K^[[50G2K 16K 30149 kio_uiserver^M
2c00000 38 13 3 0 12^[[26;42H0B^[[50G4K^[[58G4K ? <unknown>^M
0e00000 3 1 1 0 4^[[27;42H0B^[[50G1K^[[58G1K 10209 kaccess^M
1400000 2 1 1 0 4^[[28;42H0B^[[50G1K^[[58G1K 10215 knotify^M
0c00000 2 1 1 0 4^[[29;42H0B^[[50G1K^[[58G1K 10212 ksmserver^M
3000000 0 2 0 0 17^[[30;42H0B 456B 456B ? <unknown>^M
|
I feel like its abotu to blow! What can i do to resolve this? Is removinf firefox 1.0.7 and risking 1.5 a good idea? |
I've gone crosseyed trying to make sense out of your dump. Would you mind explaining which processes use the most memory, and how much they use? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
GarethAyres
n00b
Joined: 17 Aug 2005
Posts: 28
Location: wales
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 10, 2006 2:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sorry,
Fire Fox > 61891K
FireFox is currently using 46.5% of mem according to top:
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
31415 root 16 0 468m 229m 12m S 0.0 46.5 254:39.67 firefox-bin
Im guessing thats there is amemory leak, and that top wont spot that.
Any advice on how i can better work out memory or swap allocation would be great.
_________________
--------------------------
www.GarethAyres.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
wjb
l33t
Joined: 10 Jul 2005
Posts: 611
Location: Fife, Scotland
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 10, 2006 9:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| GarethAyres wrote: | I like firefox, and dont want to swap to another browser, so i will keep an eye on memory usage. My feeling is that there is a memory leak with one of the extentions. But, i only have 2 extentions: Colour Tabs and Google Toolbar for Fire Fox. Still, ill monitor it tonight and see what its like tomorrow.
Gareth. |
Have you tried living without the extensions - for a little while, anyway? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
chunderbunny
Veteran
Joined: 31 May 2004
Posts: 1281
Location: 51°24'27" N, 0°57'15" W
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 11, 2006 12:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Firefox has known memory leak issues and there's not much anyone can do about it. Your best option is to just restart it once a day. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Other Things Gentoo
