View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
papabean Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 26 Oct 2002 Posts: 130 Location: Sacramento, California
|
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2003 3:34 am Post subject: Nvidia + glibc-2.3.1-r4 |
|
|
After a recent 'emerge sync' and 'emerge -uUpl world', I noticed there is an upgrade to glibc. I've read in the changelog that glibc-2.3.1 updates do not work with the Nvidia drivers.
First question: Is the upgrade to glibc-2.3.1 vital? (I saw the security posting, but I'm not sure it applies to me.)
Second question: Have any other Nvidia users already upgraded and have they experienced any problems?
Thanks in advance. _________________ -- The world is full of tough guys. It doesn't need me to be one too. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
barlad l33t
Joined: 22 Feb 2003 Posts: 673
|
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2003 6:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
I am using glibc 2.3.2 (~ tree) and I got no problem with nvidia 4191-r2 drivers.
I am not sure about 2.3.1 though. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jufoa Apprentice
Joined: 10 Dec 2002 Posts: 213 Location: Rovaniemi, Finland
|
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2003 6:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
i have 2.3.1 and nvidia drivers.. no problems at all.. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
papabean Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 26 Oct 2002 Posts: 130 Location: Sacramento, California
|
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2003 6:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ok.
So, glibc-2.3.2 (~x86, in my case) seems to work with the 4191 drivers for you. Any other issues that may be related and is it necessary to re-emerge everything after upgrading glibc? _________________ -- The world is full of tough guys. It doesn't need me to be one too. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
barlad l33t
Joined: 22 Feb 2003 Posts: 673
|
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2003 12:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
no I don't think you need to reemerge anything. It is supposed to be "backward" compatible I guess.
There may be a few programs not working with the latest glibc and that are being fixed though... Winex is the only program with which I have encountered such problems. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
papabean Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 26 Oct 2002 Posts: 130 Location: Sacramento, California
|
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2003 12:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Okay. Thank you, barlad.
Jufoa wrote:
Quote: | i have 2.3.1 and nvidia drivers.. no problems at all |
Which release of the 2.3.1? I have 2.3.1-r2 and the nvidia drivers work.
This is what prompted the question:
Code: | *glibc-2.3.2_pre1
24 Feb 2003; Martin Schlemmer <azarah@gentoo.org> glibc-2.3.2_pre1.ebuild :
Update version to official pre1 of 2.3.2. Add NPTL support .. note that
this is extremely experimental and does not work with the nvidia drivers
among things. Many other tweak and updates.
|
So I've been leery of upgrading. Now that there's a security advisory, I feel I should upgrade but I wanted to know if others had been able to do so without difficulties. _________________ -- The world is full of tough guys. It doesn't need me to be one too. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
CoronaLover Retired Dev
Joined: 20 Jun 2002 Posts: 163 Location: Rosh-ha'ayin, Israel
|
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2003 2:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ah, It will only b0rk the NVIDIA drivers if you use the expiremental NPTL support (USE=nptl), otherwise you should be fine. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lowspirit Apprentice
Joined: 31 Jul 2002 Posts: 258 Location: Northern Sweden
|
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2003 9:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Actually NPTL works fine with NVIDIA, it's GLX it doesn't work with, so if you (like me) don't use the OpenGL part of your nvidia you can simply comment out the loading of the glx module in your xf86config file and your nvidia drivers will work perfectly fine.
If you emerge without nptl (which is default) glx will still work ofcourse, and using NPTL is not recommended at this time either way unless your feeling extremely experimental (like me). _________________ Gentoo | AMD X2 3800+ 2GB RAM | Kernel 2.6.30 . ReiserFS . CFQ . GCC4.3.3 | Firefox 3.5 | Gnome 2.26 w/ Compiz-Fusion
"Penguins are the only fish that can fly" |
|
Back to top |
|
|
papabean Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 26 Oct 2002 Posts: 130 Location: Sacramento, California
|
Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2003 5:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thank you all.
I can handle not using NPTL until there is support in GLX.
Does NPTL break anything else?
Never mind. That's why it's EXPERIMENTAL. _________________ -- The world is full of tough guys. It doesn't need me to be one too. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
meteo Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 10 Feb 2003 Posts: 136 Location: Warsaw, Poland
|
Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2003 10:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | i have 2.3.1 and nvidia drivers.. no problems at all.. |
neither do I (w/ NVidia GeForce2 MX) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jeffbuttars Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 23 May 2003 Posts: 79 Location: Boise, ID
|
Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2003 10:02 pm Post subject: GLX problems & resolution |
|
|
I recompilled glibc 2.3.2-r3 with NPTL support. This completely borked the graphics system( I'm using the Nvidia drivers, GLX). I run xdm on boot, when xdm would come up it would hang the whole machine on the Nvidia splash screen. I was locked out of the system and my 2.4 kernels panicked because I altered the system to much for them to boot, I'm on 2.6 now. I will also mention that Apache(2) failed to boot up with the system, choosing to segfault instead. Within arms reach was a MandrakeMove CD. Using this I re-named the xdm script to xdmm so it wouldn't run on boot. This alowed me to boot into my system and get a console. I then simply re-emerged the nvidia-glx and nvidia-kernel. This Fixed the video problem. I'm currently recompiling Apache to see if that help Apache's issues. So, apperantly if you compile the nividia-glx against glibc with NPTL your o.k.
Awaiting long term testing to be sure.
.....
Apache2 just finished compiling, it started right back up . Same issue as the GLX then.
Hope this helps someone. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|