| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Joffer
Guru
Joined: 10 Sep 2002
Posts: 585
Location: Arendal, Norway
|
 Posted: Sat Mar 18, 2006 12:34 am Post subject: |
 |
|
When I get "Metalshark's gcc-4.1.0 Overlay" and "install" it in my overlay folder, portage wants to emerge gcc-4.2:
| Code: | | [ebuild NS ] sys-devel/gcc-4.2.0.20060304 USE="fortran multislot nls -bootstrap -build -gcj -gtk -hardened -ip28 -mudflap -nocxx -objc -objc++ -objc-gc -vanilla" |
How "safe" is 4.2? This guide says I'd have a gcc-4.a system following this guide, but the output above says I'd have a v4.2... comments? What to do?
_________________
As of April 2006 - Athlon64 X2 4200+ 1GB RAM - amd64-2006.0 profiled system with portage 2.1_preX, ck-sources-2.6.16, glibc-2.4-r1 (overlay w/-Bdirect&-hashvals), binutils-2.16.91.0.6 (overlay), gcc-4.1, Xorg 7 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aldo_a
n00b
Joined: 08 Nov 2004
Posts: 37
Location: I am out there!
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 18, 2006 12:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
| markdd wrote: | Hi, per your directions, I did this:
wget http://metalshark.co.uk/gcc-4.1.0-piepatches-8.7.8.tar.bz2
mv gcc-4.1.0-piepatches* /usr/portage/distfiles
then continued on,
Got as far as:
>>> sys-devel/binutils-2.16.91.0.6 merged.
but now get:
>>> Emerging (3 of 7) sys-devel/gcc-4.1.0-r1 to /
!!! Security Violation: A file exists that is not in the manifest.
!!! File: gcc-4.1.0-piepatches-v8.7.8.tar.bz2 |
Just delete the gcc-4.1.0-piepatches-v8.7.8.tar.bz2 (the compressed file u downloaded) from the overlay dir |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nesl247
Veteran
Joined: 15 Jun 2004
Posts: 1614
Location: Florida
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 18, 2006 1:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
| _Zero wrote: | gettin an error when attempting to start X
| Code: | Could not init font path element /usr/share/fonts/misc, removing from list!
Could not init font path element /usr/share/fonts/100dpi, removing from list!
Could not init font path element /usr/share/fonts/TTF, removing from list!
Could not init font path element /usr/share/fonts/Type1, removing from list!
Fatal server error:
could not open default font 'fixed' |
Someone said it had something to do with the -Bdirect in the forums but I don't know. I took it out and tried to reemerge xorg but it was done in like 2 seconds, I don't think it did anything and I still got the same error.
So.......could someone tell me how to fix this prob or how to properly reemerge xorg so i can try it without that flag? |
I don't know if cheater included a bashrc entry, so just do
| Code: | | # LDFLAGS="" emerge --oneshot libXfont |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
_Zero
n00b
Joined: 04 Mar 2006
Posts: 23
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2006 4:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
fyi for anyone else its in the bashrc. too bad i formated already and his new overlay is broke  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
markdd
n00b
Joined: 08 Mar 2006
Posts: 7
Location: Apex, NC
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2006 4:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ok, starting again from scratch (blank drive), at step 8.2- Upgrading Portage, " Emerge Portage" and "emerge --metadata", get msg saying : !!! Invalid PORTDIR_OVERLAY (not a dir): /usr/local/portage
If I make dir /usr/local/portage, then no longer get above msg w/ emerge portage and --metadata, but then at step 8.4, "gcc-config -l", no 4.1.0 at #6, and "binutils-config -l " no 2.16.91xxx at #2.
Seems like each time I start from scratch over the past 3 days, I get different failures at different steps, see (past posts). From a blank drive, following the steps exactly, in the exact stated order, has anyone beeen able to build the kernel w/o some sort of step modification or hack? A few weeks ago, using the "Install Guide 2.0.3", I was successful on the first attempt.
athlon-xp 2600
512Mb memory
Nvidia GeForce 4
40Gb WD drive |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cheater1034
Veteran
Joined: 09 Sep 2004
Posts: 1558
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 20, 2006 4:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You need to follow the directions "as-directed"
Don't skip any steps, I explain the creation of the overlay, etc.
---
I have not been available because my sister just recently passed away, and it has been very tough
_________________
IRC!: #zen-sources on irc.rizon.net
zen-kernel.org
--
Lost in android development land. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
__g_blade
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 13 Jan 2006
Posts: 101
Location: paderborn, germany
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 20, 2006 4:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Code: |
...
SHLIB_LINK=' ./xgcc -B./ -B/usr/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ -isystem /usr/i686-pc-linux-gnu/include -isystem /usr/i686-pc-linux-gnu/sys-include -L/var/tmp/portage/gcc-4.1.0/work/build/gcc/../ld -O2 -O2 -O2 -march=k8 -pipe -DIN_GCC -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wold-style-definition -isystem ./include -fPIC -g -DHAVE_GTHR_DEFAULT -DIN_LIBGCC2 -D__GCC_FLOAT_NOT_NEEDED -shared -nodefaultlibs -Wl,--soname=@shlib_base_name@.so.1 -Wl,--version-script=@shlib_map_file@ -o @multilib_dir@/@shlib_base_name@.so.1.tmp @multilib_flags@ @shlib_objs@ -lc && rm -f @multilib_dir@/@shlib_base_name@.so && if [ -f @multilib_dir@/@shlib_base_name@.so.1 ]; then mv -f @multilib_dir@/@shlib_base_name@.so.1 @multilib_dir@/@shlib_base_name@.so.1.backup; else true; fi && mv @multilib_dir@/@shlib_base_name@.so.1.tmp @multilib_dir@/@shlib_base_name@.so.1 && ln -s @shlib_base_name@.so.1 @multilib_dir@/@shlib_base_name@.so' \
SHLIB_INSTALL='$(mkinstalldirs) $(DESTDIR)$(slibdir)@shlib_slibdir_qual@; /bin/install -c -m 644 @multilib_dir@/@shlib_base_name@.so.1 $(DESTDIR)$(slibdir)@shlib_slibdir_qual@/@shlib_base_name@.so.1; rm -f $(DESTDIR)$(slibdir)@shlib_slibdir_qual@/@shlib_base_name@.so; ln -s @shlib_base_name@.so.1 $(DESTDIR)$(slibdir)@shlib_slibdir_qual@/@shlib_base_name@.so' \
SHLIB_EXT='.so' \
SHLIB_MULTILIB='' \
SHLIB_MKMAP='/var/tmp/portage/gcc-4.1.0/work/gcc-4.1.0/gcc/mkmap-symver.awk' \
SHLIB_MKMAP_OPTS='' \
SHLIB_MAPFILES='/var/tmp/portage/gcc-4.1.0/work/gcc-4.1.0/gcc/libgcc-std.ver /var/tmp/portage/gcc-4.1.0/work/gcc-4.1.0/gcc/config/libgcc-glibc.ver' \
SHLIB_NM_FLAGS='-pg' \
MULTILIB_OSDIRNAMES='' \
ASM_HIDDEN_OP='' \
GCC_FOR_TARGET=' ./xgcc -B./ -B/usr/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ -isystem /usr/i686-pc-linux-gnu/include -isystem /usr/i686-pc-linux-gnu/sys-include -L/var/tmp/portage/gcc-4.1.0/work/build/gcc/../ld' \
mkinstalldirs='/bin/sh /var/tmp/portage/gcc-4.1.0/work/gcc-4.1.0/gcc/../mkinstalldirs' \
/bin/sh mklibgcc > tmp-libgcc.mk
mv tmp-libgcc.mk libgcc.mk
TARGET_CPU_DEFAULT="" \
HEADERS="auto-host.h ansidecl.h" DEFINES="USED_FOR_TARGET " \
/bin/sh /var/tmp/portage/gcc-4.1.0/work/gcc-4.1.0/gcc/mkconfig.sh tconfig.h
./xgcc -B./ -B/usr/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ -isystem /usr/i686-pc-linux-gnu/include -isystem /usr/i686-pc-linux-gnu/sys-include -L/var/tmp/portage/gcc-4.1.0/work/build/gcc/../ld -O2 -O2 -O2 -march=k8 -pipe -DIN_GCC -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wold-style-definition -isystem ./include -I. -I. -I/var/tmp/portage/gcc-4.1.0/work/gcc-4.1.0/gcc -I/var/tmp/portage/gcc-4.1.0/work/gcc-4.1.0/gcc/. -I/var/tmp/portage/gcc-4.1.0/work/gcc-4.1.0/gcc/../include -I/var/tmp/portage/gcc-4.1.0/work/gcc-4.1.0/gcc/../libcpp/include -g0 -finhibit-size-directive -fno-inline-functions -fno-exceptions -fno-zero-initialized-in-bss -fno-unit-at-a-time -fno-omit-frame-pointer \
-c /var/tmp/portage/gcc-4.1.0/work/gcc-4.1.0/gcc/crtstuff.c -DCRT_BEGIN \
-o crtbegin.o
cc1: internal compiler error: Illegal instruction
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <URL:http://bugs.gentoo.org/> for instructions.
make[2]: *** [crtbegin.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/gcc-4.1.0/work/build/gcc'
make[1]: *** [stage1_build] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/gcc-4.1.0/work/build/gcc'
make: *** [profiledbootstrap] Error 2
!!! ERROR: sys-devel/gcc-4.1.0 failed.
Call stack:
ebuild.sh, line 1557: Called dyn_compile
ebuild.sh, line 966: Called src_compile
ebuild.sh, line 1272: Called toolchain_src_compile
toolchain.eclass, line 24: Called gcc_src_compile
toolchain.eclass, line 1482: Called gcc_do_make
!!! emake failed with profiledbootstrap
!!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call stack if relevant.
|
_________________
--eof-- |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cheater1034
Veteran
Joined: 09 Sep 2004
Posts: 1558
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 20, 2006 4:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
g-blade, something tells me you aren't using the gcc in my overlay.
Just do this
# wget bfgraphics.net/portage-overlay.tar.bz2
# cd /; tar jxvf portage-overlay.tar.bz2
# wget the piepatches
# mv gcc-4.1.0-piepatched-8.7.8.tar.bz2 /usr/portage/distfiles
# ebuild /usr/local/portage/sys-devel/gcc-4.1.0-r1.ebuild digest
I am sorry, I am really distrought with all that happened, it all happens at once, and now my monitor is broken and is all blue.
_________________
IRC!: #zen-sources on irc.rizon.net
zen-kernel.org
--
Lost in android development land. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cheater1034
Veteran
Joined: 09 Sep 2004
Posts: 1558
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 20, 2006 5:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I will release guide 2.5.1 once I get back into graphical, things have been tougher than anyone can imagine lately. It just seems it all happens at once.
The overlays aren't broken, you just need to copy the piepatches and re-digest the ebuild.
_________________
IRC!: #zen-sources on irc.rizon.net
zen-kernel.org
--
Lost in android development land. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
__g_blade
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 13 Jan 2006
Posts: 101
Location: paderborn, germany
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 20, 2006 6:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Code: |
omerta / # wget http://metalshark.co.uk/gcc-4.1.0-piepatches-8.7.8.tar.bz2
--18:21:15-- http://metalshark.co.uk/gcc-4.1.0-piepatches-8.7.8.tar.bz2
=> `gcc-4.1.0-piepatches-8.7.8.tar.bz2'
Resolving metalshark.co.uk... 217.69.38.185
Connecting to metalshark.co.uk|217.69.38.185|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Object Not Found
18:21:20 ERROR 404: Object Not Found.
|
i'm usin your portage overlays like described in the guide 2.5.0 on a stable gentoo (without your iso linux), perhaps it's something in my own USE
my previous gcc (3.4.5-r1) makes some trouble, too..
thanks
_________________
--eof-- |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
__g_blade
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 13 Jan 2006
Posts: 101
Location: paderborn, germany
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 20, 2006 6:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
my fault 
extracted your overlays to wrong path, "/portage", now it's in "/usr/local/portage/ & "/etc/portage/", like described
i'm sorry 
good luck @ your new guide & graphical www
_________________
--eof-- |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
arkaine
n00b
Joined: 23 Jun 2004
Posts: 62
Location: Ohio
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 4:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
cheater, I'm compiling gcc for the first time in your guide, and it couldn't seem to find a certain file: gcc-4.1.0-uclibc-patches-1.0.tar.bz2 . So I checked some mirrors, and they all have a newer one: gcc-4.1.0-uclibc-patches-1.1.tar.bz2.
I changed this line in the gcc ebuild:
to
and now it picks up the new version, and I'm back on track.
EDIT: Forgot to mention you have to digest the ebuild first  ... and I had to copy gcc-4.1.0-piepatches-v8.7.8.tar.bz2 from the overlay to distfiles. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
VoVaN
l33t
Joined: 02 Jul 2003
Posts: 701
Location: The Netherlands
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 9:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
2 conrad
| Quote: | 9.6 - Choosing an IO Scheduler
We are going to use the "DEADLINE" cpu scheduler. It is friendly with reiser4 and works considerably well, if you are using ext3 filesystem, I reccomend CFQ, NEVER with reiser4 use cfq. NEVER!. If you have an older hard drive, I reccomend anticapatory here. Anticapatory and Deadline are the most reasonable for reiser4.
GO TO MENUCONFIG... |
Why is that? I'm using reiser4 & CFQ for a few years (root is reiser4 too) and don't have ANY issues... Where this came from??? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
whitesouls
Guru
Joined: 19 Nov 2004
Posts: 358
Location: In Front of My Laptop
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 1:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| bigbob73 wrote: | binutils died on the second toolchain build...
checking for gcc... gcc
checking whether the C compiler (gcc -O2 -march=pentium4 -pipe -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--sort-common -Wl,-Bdirect -Wl,-hashvals -Wl,-zdynsort) works... no
configure: error: installation or configuration problem: C compiler cannot create executables.
!!! ERROR: sys-devel/binutils-2.16.91.0.6 failed.
Call stack:
ebuild.sh, line 1557: Called dyn_compile
ebuild.sh, line 966: Called src_compile
ebuild.sh, line 1272: Called toolchain-binutils_src_compile
!!! configure failed
!!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call stack if relevant. |
I'm stuck at this point too..but i can proceed without having the LDFLAGS turned on.. Please help me on this.. 
_________________
whitesouls
Please insert the [SOLVED] tag if your problem is solved in your respective thread. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
whitesouls
Guru
Joined: 19 Nov 2004
Posts: 358
Location: In Front of My Laptop
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 6:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I guess I have to continue without the great "LDFLAGS".
_________________
whitesouls
Please insert the [SOLVED] tag if your problem is solved in your respective thread. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cheater1034
Veteran
Joined: 09 Sep 2004
Posts: 1558
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 7:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| VoVaN wrote: | 2 conrad
| Quote: | 9.6 - Choosing an IO Scheduler
We are going to use the "DEADLINE" cpu scheduler. It is friendly with reiser4 and works considerably well, if you are using ext3 filesystem, I reccomend CFQ, NEVER with reiser4 use cfq. NEVER!. If you have an older hard drive, I reccomend anticapatory here. Anticapatory and Deadline are the most reasonable for reiser4.
GO TO MENUCONFIG... |
Why is that? I'm using reiser4 & CFQ for a few years (root is reiser4 too) and don't have ANY issues... Where this came from??? |
You've been making quite a big mistake for a few years :-p
CFQ is terrible, more terrible than belief with reiser4. latency will go up beyond belief. If you don't believe me you can always ask someone such as tiger.
_________________
IRC!: #zen-sources on irc.rizon.net
zen-kernel.org
--
Lost in android development land. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Kollin
Veteran
Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Posts: 1139
Location: Sofia/Bulgaria
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 11:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
OMG just upgraded to 2.03 and wxGTK compilled without complaining. Is this miracle or just hell froze  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nesl247
Veteran
Joined: 15 Jun 2004
Posts: 1614
Location: Florida
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2006 12:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Lord Vader wrote: | | bigbob73 wrote: | binutils died on the second toolchain build...
checking for gcc... gcc
checking whether the C compiler (gcc -O2 -march=pentium4 -pipe -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--sort-common -Wl,-Bdirect -Wl,-hashvals -Wl,-zdynsort) works... no
configure: error: installation or configuration problem: C compiler cannot create executables.
!!! ERROR: sys-devel/binutils-2.16.91.0.6 failed.
Call stack:
ebuild.sh, line 1557: Called dyn_compile
ebuild.sh, line 966: Called src_compile
ebuild.sh, line 1272: Called toolchain-binutils_src_compile
!!! configure failed
!!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call stack if relevant. |
I'm stuck at this point too..but i can proceed without having the LDFLAGS turned on.. Please help me on this.. |
Please do the following:
binutils-config -l - Please make sure that binutils-2.16.91.0.6 is selected.
Conrad: You can remove any of the fixes for glibc-2.4 in your overlay and upgrade the guides glibc to 2.4 because almost everything has been patched as far as I know. Also you might want to include -C /usr/local/ in the command to untar the portage overlay.
To everyone: Conrad has been going through some rough times lately. If you do not get an immediate reply, he is sorry but you must understand. Until he is back to normal, I will try to provide as much support as I can to help him out. Thank you all for listening. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
VoVaN
l33t
Joined: 02 Jul 2003
Posts: 701
Location: The Netherlands
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2006 6:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
| cheater1034 wrote: | | VoVaN wrote: | 2 conrad
| Quote: | 9.6 - Choosing an IO Scheduler
We are going to use the "DEADLINE" cpu scheduler. It is friendly with reiser4 and works considerably well, if you are using ext3 filesystem, I reccomend CFQ, NEVER with reiser4 use cfq. NEVER!. If you have an older hard drive, I reccomend anticapatory here. Anticapatory and Deadline are the most reasonable for reiser4.
GO TO MENUCONFIG... |
Why is that? I'm using reiser4 & CFQ for a few years (root is reiser4 too) and don't have ANY issues... Where this came from??? |
You've been making quite a big mistake for a few years :-p
CFQ is terrible, more terrible than belief with reiser4. latency will go up beyond belief. If you don't believe me you can always ask someone such as tiger. |
Could you point me to the information about that? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mbar
Veteran
Joined: 19 Jan 2005
Posts: 1990
Location: Poland
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2006 9:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Or some tests for that matter... I also use CFQ with RR4... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
VoVaN
l33t
Joined: 02 Jul 2003
Posts: 701
Location: The Netherlands
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2006 9:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
| mbar wrote: | | Or some tests for that matter... I also use CFQ with RR4... |
Are you using AMD? I've P4 and as I can remember year ago I've done some test on a desktop pc and CFQ have been doing better then any other on root RR4 partition... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mbar
Veteran
Joined: 19 Jan 2005
Posts: 1990
Location: Poland
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2006 12:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Pentium-M on my laptop and two AMD64 in my home. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
whitesouls
Guru
Joined: 19 Nov 2004
Posts: 358
Location: In Front of My Laptop
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2006 2:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| nesl247 wrote: | | Lord Vader wrote: | | bigbob73 wrote: | binutils died on the second toolchain build...
checking for gcc... gcc
checking whether the C compiler (gcc -O2 -march=pentium4 -pipe -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--sort-common -Wl,-Bdirect -Wl,-hashvals -Wl,-zdynsort) works... no
configure: error: installation or configuration problem: C compiler cannot create executables.
!!! ERROR: sys-devel/binutils-2.16.91.0.6 failed.
Call stack:
ebuild.sh, line 1557: Called dyn_compile
ebuild.sh, line 966: Called src_compile
ebuild.sh, line 1272: Called toolchain-binutils_src_compile
!!! configure failed
!!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call stack if relevant. |
I'm stuck at this point too..but i can proceed without having the LDFLAGS turned on.. Please help me on this.. |
Please do the following:
binutils-config -l - Please make sure that binutils-2.16.91.0.6 is selected.
Conrad: You can remove any of the fixes for glibc-2.4 in your overlay and upgrade the guides glibc to 2.4 because almost everything has been patched as far as I know. Also you might want to include -C /usr/local/ in the command to untar the portage overlay.
To everyone: Conrad has been going through some rough times lately. If you do not get an immediate reply, he is sorry but you must understand. Until he is back to normal, I will try to provide as much support as I can to help him out. Thank you all for listening. |
Ok..I understand that cheater is busy..Sorry.. but then i'm using the latest binutils which is the 2.16.91.0.7 and i did selected tht one.. I've already took out the other binutils.. Is there anything i need to submit so that you could help us out? Thanks in advance..
_________________
whitesouls
Please insert the [SOLVED] tag if your problem is solved in your respective thread. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cheater1034
Veteran
Joined: 09 Sep 2004
Posts: 1558
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2006 5:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Lord Vader wrote: | | nesl247 wrote: | | Lord Vader wrote: | | bigbob73 wrote: | binutils died on the second toolchain build...
checking for gcc... gcc
checking whether the C compiler (gcc -O2 -march=pentium4 -pipe -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--sort-common -Wl,-Bdirect -Wl,-hashvals -Wl,-zdynsort) works... no
configure: error: installation or configuration problem: C compiler cannot create executables.
!!! ERROR: sys-devel/binutils-2.16.91.0.6 failed.
Call stack:
ebuild.sh, line 1557: Called dyn_compile
ebuild.sh, line 966: Called src_compile
ebuild.sh, line 1272: Called toolchain-binutils_src_compile
!!! configure failed
!!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call stack if relevant. |
I'm stuck at this point too..but i can proceed without having the LDFLAGS turned on.. Please help me on this.. |
Please do the following:
binutils-config -l - Please make sure that binutils-2.16.91.0.6 is selected.
Conrad: You can remove any of the fixes for glibc-2.4 in your overlay and upgrade the guides glibc to 2.4 because almost everything has been patched as far as I know. Also you might want to include -C /usr/local/ in the command to untar the portage overlay.
To everyone: Conrad has been going through some rough times lately. If you do not get an immediate reply, he is sorry but you must understand. Until he is back to normal, I will try to provide as much support as I can to help him out. Thank you all for listening. |
Ok..I understand that cheater is busy..Sorry.. but then i'm using the latest binutils which is the 2.16.91.0.7 and i did selected tht one.. I've already took out the other binutils.. Is there anything i need to submit so that you could help us out? Thanks in advance.. |
0.7 is not patched with Bdirect, so I suggest masking it and using the 0.6 one in the overlay. (don't try to build the older one with Bdirect)
_________________
IRC!: #zen-sources on irc.rizon.net
zen-kernel.org
--
Lost in android development land. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nxsty
Veteran
Joined: 23 Jun 2004
Posts: 1556
Location: .se
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2006 7:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Joffer wrote: | When I get "Metalshark's gcc-4.1.0 Overlay" and "install" it in my overlay folder, portage wants to emerge gcc-4.2:
| Code: | | [ebuild NS ] sys-devel/gcc-4.2.0.20060304 USE="fortran multislot nls -bootstrap -build -gcj -gtk -hardened -ip28 -mudflap -nocxx -objc -objc++ -objc-gc -vanilla" |
How "safe" is 4.2? This guide says I'd have a gcc-4.a system following this guide, but the output above says I'd have a v4.2... comments? What to do? |
Gcc 4.2 is still in stage1 development so I wouldn't recomend using it.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
Unsupported Software
