Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
XGL (Part 4)
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 30, 31, 32 ... 38, 39, 40  Next  
This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Unsupported Software
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
nesl247
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 15 Jun 2004
Posts: 1614
Location: Florida

PostPosted: Thu May 25, 2006 10:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

That is strange. I just ebuild ... unpack'ed it just fine. Can you post the output of that .out file?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
faugusztin
n00b
n00b


Joined: 15 May 2005
Posts: 47

PostPosted: Thu May 25, 2006 10:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

nesl247 wrote:
That is strange. I just ebuild ... unpack'ed it just fine. Can you post the output of that .out file?



Here is it :

Code:

***** compiz-intel-copy-pixel-issue-workaround-1.diff *****

===========================================================

PATCH COMMAND:  patch -p0 -g0 -E --no-backup-if-mismatch < /usr/portage/local/layman/portage-xgl/x11-wm/compiz-vanilla/files/compiz-intel-copy-pixel-issue-workaround-1.diff

===========================================================
patching file src/display.c
Hunk #2 FAILED at 1323.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 1360 (offset -2 lines).
1 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file src/display.c.rej
===========================================================

PATCH COMMAND:  patch -p1 -g0 -E --no-backup-if-mismatch < /usr/portage/local/layman/portage-xgl/x11-wm/compiz-vanilla/files/compiz-intel-copy-pixel-issue-workaround-1.diff

===========================================================
can't find file to patch at input line 3
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- src/display.c.orig   2006-05-23 20:39:35.616238785 -0400
|+++ src/display.c   2006-05-23 20:39:11.006136441 -0400
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
3 out of 3 hunks ignored
===========================================================

PATCH COMMAND:  patch -p2 -g0 -E --no-backup-if-mismatch < /usr/portage/local/layman/portage-xgl/x11-wm/compiz-vanilla/files/compiz-intel-copy-pixel-issue-workaround-1.diff

===========================================================
missing header for unified diff at line 3 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 3
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- src/display.c.orig   2006-05-23 20:39:35.616238785 -0400
|+++ src/display.c   2006-05-23 20:39:11.006136441 -0400
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
3 out of 3 hunks ignored
===========================================================

PATCH COMMAND:  patch -p3 -g0 -E --no-backup-if-mismatch < /usr/portage/local/layman/portage-xgl/x11-wm/compiz-vanilla/files/compiz-intel-copy-pixel-issue-workaround-1.diff

===========================================================
missing header for unified diff at line 3 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 3
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- src/display.c.orig   2006-05-23 20:39:35.616238785 -0400
|+++ src/display.c   2006-05-23 20:39:11.006136441 -0400
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
3 out of 3 hunks ignored
===========================================================

PATCH COMMAND:  patch -p4 -g0 -E --no-backup-if-mismatch < /usr/portage/local/layman/portage-xgl/x11-wm/compiz-vanilla/files/compiz-intel-copy-pixel-issue-workaround-1.diff

===========================================================
missing header for unified diff at line 3 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 3
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- src/display.c.orig   2006-05-23 20:39:35.616238785 -0400
|+++ src/display.c   2006-05-23 20:39:11.006136441 -0400
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
3 out of 3 hunks ignored
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nesl247
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 15 Jun 2004
Posts: 1614
Location: Florida

PostPosted: Thu May 25, 2006 10:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have to get to school now, but I will be out in a few hours (last final so I only am there for 2 hours). Once I am back home, I will fix the patch. I had to delete cvs-src/* and now it does fail.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
faugusztin
n00b
n00b


Joined: 15 May 2005
Posts: 47

PostPosted: Thu May 25, 2006 12:38 pm    Post subject: Swing ? Reply with quote

Maybe i overseen something, but is there a solution for Swing applications in Xgl ? I use few of them and all have problems displaying their contents (ie i get a window with background color of app, but without controls, menu etc). Of course i can start them in Xnest, where they run fine, but Xnest is too much unstable for me (it crashes for example when i move to another "desktop" via Ctrl+Alt+Left or Right - not allways, but often).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BlackBelt
Guru
Guru


Joined: 27 Nov 2004
Posts: 369
Location: Messina/Pisa

PostPosted: Thu May 25, 2006 1:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi guys,

Today I have upgrade xgl a version 0.0.1_p20060515 and compiz_quinnstorm at version 0.0.11.2. I have upgrade gdm at 2.14.5 also. When I start with xgl I can't see any border window. Somebody know haw can I fix it?

thanks
_________________
"Sulla strada per l'inferno c'e' sempre un sacco di gente,
ma è comunque una via che si percorre in solitudine."

Charles Bukowski
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sternklang
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 10 Sep 2005
Posts: 1641
Location: Somewhere in time and space

PostPosted: Thu May 25, 2006 1:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

nesl247, I know you haven't updated the xgl CVS ebuild lately but I just built the latest with a renamed xgl ebuild. The xgl-wrap-sdk.patch failed with that update, so I simply commented that epatch out of the ebuild. Later I looked at the patch and the source, and it looks like the patch has been included upstream, so next time you update this you can drop that patch from the ebuild entirely.

Thanks again!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nesl247
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 15 Jun 2004
Posts: 1614
Location: Florida

PostPosted: Thu May 25, 2006 1:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Svn up, and try it now. (talking about the failed compiz patch)

Last edited by nesl247 on Thu May 25, 2006 2:32 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
faugusztin
n00b
n00b


Joined: 15 May 2005
Posts: 47

PostPosted: Thu May 25, 2006 2:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

nesl247 wrote:
Svn up, and try it now.


Now it builds and works.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
akb
Guru
Guru


Joined: 25 Jan 2003
Posts: 314
Location: Wolfenbüttel/Germany

PostPosted: Thu May 25, 2006 3:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

arghl, why doesnt this work any more? :-(

since i upgraded my kernel few days before nothing fglrx related works any more. my suspend to ram is not working any more, no Xgl works (screen freezes so i cannot see what happens and have to restart my pc) and no restart of a normal x session. everything messed up by upgrading from 2.6.15-r[dont know] to 2.6.16-r8 :-(

anyone out there who can help me with this? :-/

i took the same sources (gentoo-sources) and used oldconfig to build my kernel, so it should not be that great change in graphical things... i thought :-(

edit: atm i am using the radeon driver, which works much better. but i still cannot use suspend to ram any more and i cannot make use of my cards powerstates, what is possible with the fglrx
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kuhndog86
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 20 Jul 2004
Posts: 271
Location: Minnesota

PostPosted: Thu May 25, 2006 3:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yup, I saw that yesterday too. I didn't have the time to file a bug report though. I worked around it by commenting that line out in the ebuild (there is nothing intel in my system). I got a similar problem emerging gdm from the overlay applying the timeout patch (which is already included in the release in portage) so I used the GDM from portage. If nobody else has already, I'll look for a place to file a bug report.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nesl247
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 15 Jun 2004
Posts: 1614
Location: Florida

PostPosted: Thu May 25, 2006 3:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

sternklang wrote:
nesl247, I know you haven't updated the xgl CVS ebuild lately but I just built the latest with a renamed xgl ebuild. The xgl-wrap-sdk.patch failed with that update, so I simply commented that epatch out of the ebuild. Later I looked at the patch and the source, and it looks like the patch has been included upstream, so next time you update this you can drop that patch from the ebuild entirely.

Thanks again!


Bumped mesa and xgl. And I removed that patch from the 20060524 ebuild.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kuhndog86
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 20 Jul 2004
Posts: 271
Location: Minnesota

PostPosted: Thu May 25, 2006 3:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

OK, good, I guess you guys beat me to it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sternklang
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 10 Sep 2005
Posts: 1641
Location: Somewhere in time and space

PostPosted: Thu May 25, 2006 3:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

akb wrote:
since i upgraded my kernel few days before nothing fglrx related works any more. my suspend to ram is not working any more, no Xgl works (screen freezes so i cannot see what happens and have to restart my pc) and no restart of a normal x session. everything messed up by upgrading from 2.6.15-r[dont know] to 2.6.16-r8

While there may be people in this forum thread who can help you, this sounds like it's not related to Xgl since completely unconnected things (suspend, power management) have gone wrong and xorg-server has problems as well. You might try posting this to Kernel and Hardware to get more expert help.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nesl247
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 15 Jun 2004
Posts: 1614
Location: Florida

PostPosted: Thu May 25, 2006 3:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kuhndog86 wrote:
Yup, I saw that yesterday too. I didn't have the time to file a bug report though. I worked around it by commenting that line out in the ebuild (there is nothing intel in my system). I got a similar problem emerging gdm from the overlay applying the timeout patch (which is already included in the release in portage) so I used the GDM from portage. If nobody else has already, I'll look for a place to file a bug report.


It is deffinitely included? I need to know because if it is, I will remove gdm from xgl-coffee.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
akb
Guru
Guru


Joined: 25 Jan 2003
Posts: 314
Location: Wolfenbüttel/Germany

PostPosted: Thu May 25, 2006 3:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

sternklang wrote:
akb wrote:
since i upgraded my kernel few days before nothing fglrx related works any more. my suspend to ram is not working any more, no Xgl works (screen freezes so i cannot see what happens and have to restart my pc) and no restart of a normal x session. everything messed up by upgrading from 2.6.15-r[dont know] to 2.6.16-r8

While there may be people in this forum thread who can help you, this sounds like it's not related to Xgl since completely unconnected things (suspend, power management) have gone wrong and xorg-server has problems as well. You might try posting this to Kernel and Hardware to get more expert help.


well, i thought it would be a good place to post here, since there should be especially fglrx-users and therefor many Xgl users that have had to handle with these issues... :-) but you're right, i'll search and maybe ask in the kernel subforums again
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sternklang
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 10 Sep 2005
Posts: 1641
Location: Somewhere in time and space

PostPosted: Thu May 25, 2006 3:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

nesl247 wrote:
It is deffinitely included? I need to know because if it is, I will remove gdm from xgl-coffee.

Not as far as I can see:
Code:
jdaluz@joehome ~ $ ls /usr/portage/gnome-base/gdm/files/
2.2.5                  digest-gdm-2.8.0.7                      gdm-2.13.0.4-esperanto.patch         gdm-2.8-CVE-2006-1057.patch
digest-gdm-2.14.5      digest-gdm-2.8.0.7-r1                   gdm-2.13.0.7-gdm-dmx-intllibs.patch
digest-gdm-2.2.5.4-r5  gdm-2.13.0.1-selinux-remove-attr.patch  gdm-2.4.4-selinux_remove_attr.patch

jdaluz@joehome ~ $ ls /usr/local/xgl-coffee/gnome-base/gdm/files
digest-gdm-2.14.5                       gdm-2.13.0.4-esperanto.patch         gdm-2.14.0-xserver-timeout.patch
gdm-2.13.0.1-selinux-remove-attr.patch  gdm-2.13.0.7-gdm-dmx-intllibs.patch  gdm-2.4.4-selinux_remove_attr.patch

Interestingly, I have never had a problem with gdm from portage so I never used the patched version. I'm now on gdm 2.15.3 and there's still no problem.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kuhndog86
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 20 Jul 2004
Posts: 271
Location: Minnesota

PostPosted: Thu May 25, 2006 3:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I set the timeout in my config file and it worked. I beleive it was included as of 2.14.1. See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=337670.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kuhndog86
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 20 Jul 2004
Posts: 271
Location: Minnesota

PostPosted: Thu May 25, 2006 3:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

sternklang wrote:
nesl247 wrote:
It is deffinitely included? I need to know because if it is, I will remove gdm from xgl-coffee.

Not as far as I can see:
Code:
jdaluz@joehome ~ $ ls /usr/portage/gnome-base/gdm/files/
2.2.5                  digest-gdm-2.8.0.7                      gdm-2.13.0.4-esperanto.patch         gdm-2.8-CVE-2006-1057.patch
digest-gdm-2.14.5      digest-gdm-2.8.0.7-r1                   gdm-2.13.0.7-gdm-dmx-intllibs.patch
digest-gdm-2.2.5.4-r5  gdm-2.13.0.1-selinux-remove-attr.patch  gdm-2.4.4-selinux_remove_attr.patch

jdaluz@joehome ~ $ ls /usr/local/xgl-coffee/gnome-base/gdm/files
digest-gdm-2.14.5                       gdm-2.13.0.4-esperanto.patch         gdm-2.14.0-xserver-timeout.patch
gdm-2.13.0.1-selinux-remove-attr.patch  gdm-2.13.0.7-gdm-dmx-intllibs.patch  gdm-2.4.4-selinux_remove_attr.patch

Interestingly, I have never had a problem with gdm from portage so I never used the patched version. I'm now on gdm 2.15.3 and there's still no problem.


This is because the patch is now included in the official upstream release.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nesl247
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 15 Jun 2004
Posts: 1614
Location: Florida

PostPosted: Thu May 25, 2006 3:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah, it is most likely included as 2.14.5 is in portage, and that bug was closed way back in april.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sternklang
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 10 Sep 2005
Posts: 1641
Location: Somewhere in time and space

PostPosted: Thu May 25, 2006 3:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kuhndog86 wrote:
I set the timeout in my config file and it worked. I beleive it was included as of 2.14.1. See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=337670.
Gotcha, included upstream rather than as a portage patch.

I guess this problem must be dependent on hardware speed or the like as I have never had to set the timeout.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Xamindar
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 03 Oct 2004
Posts: 1155
Location: California

PostPosted: Fri May 26, 2006 1:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I just did an svn up on the coffee overlay and I get an error with missing mesa when I try to do an emerge -uDav world

Code:
Would you like to merge these packages? [Yes/No] y
>>> Emerging (1 of 21) media-libs/mesa-6.5.1_alpha20060524 to /
>>> checking ebuild checksums
!!! A file listed in the Manifest could not be found: '/usr/local/portage/xgl-coffee/media-libs/mesa/mesa-6.5.1_alpha20060421.ebuild'


Anyone know why?

Should I just clear it out and redownload the overlay?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nesl247
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 15 Jun 2004
Posts: 1614
Location: Florida

PostPosted: Fri May 26, 2006 1:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes I would. I don't see that on my computer (not even in my work dir)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Xamindar
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 03 Oct 2004
Posts: 1155
Location: California

PostPosted: Fri May 26, 2006 2:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

cool, it worked. it's compiling now. :P
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
younker
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 18 Feb 2004
Posts: 280
Location: China

PostPosted: Fri May 26, 2006 2:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just a curious, when will compiz support application mode, I enabled trailfocus plugin, but when I use gimp, when I open an effective dialog, the main editor window will be set transparent, I can't view the preview clearly.

So is there a plan to support application mode in compiz?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Xamindar
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 03 Oct 2004
Posts: 1155
Location: California

PostPosted: Fri May 26, 2006 2:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
application mode


hmm, what's that? Never heard of it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Unsupported Software All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 30, 31, 32 ... 38, 39, 40  Next
Page 31 of 40

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum