emerge --sync problem // etwas nervtötend

wandra · n00b Joined: 24 May 2005 Posts: 25

plötzlich funktioniert emerge --sync nicht mehr ...

bin ich da mit ban beleg oder was ist da ...
wie findet man das raus ?

dank für tipps
---

receiving file list ...
1 file to consider

Number of files: 1
Number of files transferred: 0
Total file size: 32 bytes
Total transferred file size: 0 bytes
Literal data: 0 bytes
Matched data: 0 bytes
File list size: 32
File list generation time: 0.001 seconds
File list transfer time: 0.000 seconds
Total bytes sent: 181
Total bytes received: 472

sent 181 bytes received 472 bytes 145.11 bytes/sec
total size is 32 speedup is 0.05
Welcome to cockatoo.gentoo.org

Server Address : 65.19.163.230
Contact Name : mirror-admin@gentoo.org
Hardware : 2 x Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz, 1024MB RAM

Please note: common gentoo-netiquette says you should not sync more
than once a day. Users who abuse the rsync.gentoo.org rotation
may be added to a temporary ban list.

MOTD brought to you by motd-o-matic, version 0.3

receiving file list ...
142198 files to consider
>>> retry ...

>>> Starting retry 1 of 3 with rsync://140.211.166.165/gentoo-portage
>>> checking server timestamp ...
rsync error: received SIGINT, SIGTERM, or SIGHUP (code 20) at rsync.c(242) [receiver=2.6.8]
rsync error: received SIGINT, SIGTERM, or SIGHUP (code 20) at rsync.c(242) [receiver=2.6.8]

dakjo · Veteran Joined: 31 Jan 2004 Posts: 1544

Versuch doch bitte mal ein

wandra · n00b Joined: 24 May 2005 Posts: 25

auch über diesen weg abbruch

receiving file list ...
142193 files to consider
>>> retry ...

Exiting on signal 2
typo3 sbin # rsync error: received SIGINT, SIGTERM, or SIGHUP (code 20) at rsync.c(242) [receiver=2.6.8]
rsync error: received SIGINT, SIGTERM, or SIGHUP (code 20) at rsync.c(242) [receiver=2.6.8]

typo3 sbin #

das kernel log wirft aus:

May 31 14:59:01 [kernel] EIP: 0060:[<c0160ba2>] Not tainted VLI
May 31 14:59:01 [kernel] EFLAGS: 00010202 (2.6.16-gentoo-r6 #1)
May 31 14:59:01 [kernel] <6>note: rsync[19628] exited with preempt_count 1
May 31 14:59:20 [kernel] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000001
May 31 14:59:20 [kernel] printing eip:
May 31 14:59:20 [kernel] c0160ba2
May 31 14:59:20 [kernel] *pde = 00000000
May 31 14:59:20 [kernel] Modules linked in: xt_CLASSIFY xt_CONNMARK xt_connmark xt_conntrack ipt_TTL ipt_ttl ipt_tos ipt_TCPMSS ipt_SAME ipt_REDIRECT ipt_recent ipt_policy ipt_owner ipt_NETMAP ipt_MASQUERADE ipt_iprange ipt_hashlimit ipt_esp ipt_ECN ipt_ecn ipt_DSCP ipt_dscp ipt_ah ipt_addrtype ip_nat_irc ip_nat_tftp ip_nat_ftp ip_conntrack_irc ip_conntrack_tftp ip_conntrack_ftp nfsd exportfs iptable_raw ipt_REJECT xt_pkttype xt_state ipt_LOG ipt_multiport iptable_filter ipt_TOS xt_tcpudp iptable_mangle iptable_nat ip_nat ip_tables x_tables quota_v2 snd_seq_midi snd_emu8000_synth snd_emux_synth snd_seq_virmidi snd_util_mem snd_opl3_synth snd_seq_instr snd_seq_midi_emul snd_ainstr_fm snd_pcm_oss snd_mixer_oss snd_seq_dummy snd_seq_oss snd_seq_midi_event snd_seq snd_sbawe snd_opl3_lib snd_sb16_dsp snd_sb16_csp snd_sb_common snd_hwdep snd_mpu401_uart snd_rawmidi snd_seq_device snd_pcm snd_timer snd soundcore snd_page_alloc matroxfb_base matroxfb_DAC1064 matroxfb_accel cfbcopyarea cfbimgblt cfbfillrect matroxfb_Ti3026 matroxfb_g450 g450_pll matroxfb_misc intel_agp agpgart 3c59x mii aic7xxx raid1 dm_mod sbp2 ohci1394 ieee1394 ohci_hcd uhci_hcd usb_storage usbhid ehci_hcd usbcore
May 31 14:59:20 [kernel] EIP: 0060:[<c0160ba2>] Not tainted VLI
May 31 14:59:20 [kernel] EFLAGS: 00010202 (2.6.16-gentoo-r6 #1)
May 31 14:59:20 [kernel] <6>note: rsync[19693] exited with preempt_count 1

bitte was soll das heissen ... ?

Anarcho · Advocate Joined: 06 Jun 2004 Posts: 2970 Location: Germany

Das klingt sehr nach

a) Hardwaredefekt

b) Kernelbug

Ich würde mal den Speicher testen (memtest) und falls übertaktet wieder runtertakten
_________________
...it's only Rock'n'Roll, but I like it!

dakjo · Veteran Joined: 31 Jan 2004 Posts: 1544

/me tippt auf eine defekte NIC.

wandra · n00b Joined: 24 May 2005 Posts: 25

gibts eigentlich einen weg, emerge --sync manuell durchzuführen ?

müsste doch azch irgendwie gehen ..

Inte · Posted: Wed May 31, 2006 4:50 pm Post subject:

Was meinst Du mit manuell? :roll:

Alternativ kannst Du mal ein emerge-webrsync versuchen.
_________________
Gentoo Linux - Die Metadistribution

franzf · Advocate Joined: 29 Mar 2005 Posts: 4565

Oder den Portage-Snapshot runterladen und entpacken...