View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Erdie Advocate
![Advocate Advocate](/images/ranks/rank-G-1-advocate.gif)
![](images/avatars/17561033924c7a8ef6316cf.jpg)
Joined: 20 May 2004 Posts: 2656 Location: Heidelberg - Germany
|
Posted: Fri Sep 29, 2006 10:29 pm Post subject: Scanner: USB device wird nicht gelöscht beim disconnect |
|
|
Hallo,
ich habe einen Medion Scanner erfolgreich zum Laufen bekommen mit udev rule und etc.
Bei jedem Disconnect wird einneues USB device angelegt:
Code: |
ohci_hcd 0000:00:02.1: wakeup
usb 2-3: new full speed USB device using ohci_hcd and address 2
usb 2-3: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice
usb 2-3: USB disconnect, address 2
ohci_hcd 0000:00:02.1: wakeup
usb 2-3: new full speed USB device using ohci_hcd and address 3
usb 2-3: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice
usb 2-3: USB disconnect, address 3
ohci_hcd 0000:00:02.0: wakeup
usb 1-3: new full speed USB device using ohci_hcd and address 2
usb 1-3: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice
usb 1-3: USB disconnect, address 2
ohci_hcd 0000:00:02.1: wakeup
usb 2-3: new full speed USB device using ohci_hcd and address 4
usb 2-3: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice
usb 2-3: USB disconnect, address 4
ohci_hcd 0000:00:02.1: wakeup
usb 2-3: new full speed USB device using ohci_hcd and address 5
usb 2-3: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice
usb 2-3: USB disconnect, address 5
ohci_hcd 0000:00:02.0: wakeup
usb 1-3: new full speed USB device using ohci_hcd and address 3
usb 1-3: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice
usb 1-3: USB disconnect, address 3
ohci_hcd 0000:00:02.1: wakeup
usb 2-3: new full speed USB device using ohci_hcd and address 6
usb 2-3: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice
|
Wie kann man bewirken, dass das device gelöscht und nicht immer ein neues angelegt wird?
-Erdie _________________ Desktop AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 32GB RAM, Asus GF GTX 1060.
Notebook Tuxedo Pulse 15 Gen1 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H mit Radeon Vega 7
Raspberry Pi 1 + 2 + 3B+ + Zero W |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/gentoo/images/spacer.gif) |
DieselPower Apprentice
![Apprentice Apprentice](/images/ranks/rank_rect_2.gif)
![](images/avatars/1032843475456b136e8922d.jpg)
Joined: 26 Oct 2005 Posts: 216 Location: TN
|
Posted: Sat Sep 30, 2006 12:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Nicht ist dieses erwartete Verhalten? Ich denke nicht, daß es jede mögliche Weise des Haltens einer Vorrichtung auf einer Adresse gibt. Ist dieses, das ein Problem für Sie verursacht?
Traurig für meinen armen Deutschen!
In English:
Is not that expected behavior? I do not think there is any way of keeping a device on one address. Is this creating a problem for you?
Sorry for my poor german!
Lawrence _________________ I have it my way no matter what, and I build it every time, 'cause they don't sell them that way. A genius is always has what he wants, but a rich person does not. I'm a rich kid with no money! That's why I chose Gentoo... |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/gentoo/images/spacer.gif) |
Erdie Advocate
![Advocate Advocate](/images/ranks/rank-G-1-advocate.gif)
![](images/avatars/17561033924c7a8ef6316cf.jpg)
Joined: 20 May 2004 Posts: 2656 Location: Heidelberg - Germany
|
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 8:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
DieselPower wrote: |
In English:
Is not that expected behavior? I do not think there is any way of keeping a device on one address. Is this creating a problem for you?
Lawrence |
In my opinion this could be an issue if you plug-in and plug-out the device frequently without rebooting the machine. What is about the address namespace? Is it limited? Using other USB devices the there is no behavior like this ..
thanks
Erdie _________________ Desktop AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 32GB RAM, Asus GF GTX 1060.
Notebook Tuxedo Pulse 15 Gen1 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H mit Radeon Vega 7
Raspberry Pi 1 + 2 + 3B+ + Zero W |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/gentoo/images/spacer.gif) |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|