View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Xandão n00b
![n00b n00b](/images/ranks/rank_rect_0.gif)
Joined: 20 Apr 2005 Posts: 16 Location: São Carlos - SP
|
Posted: Wed Oct 25, 2006 8:09 pm Post subject: NFS slow write speed with sync option |
|
|
Hi All
I have a NFS server that exports its /home partition.
When I mount this partition using sync option in client I have a normal read speed but a VERY SLOW write speed like I show below:
Code: |
read:
floyd asaraujo # time dd if=testfile of=/dev/null bs=16k count=4096
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
67108864 bytes (67 MB) copied, 5,65682 seconds, 11,9 MB/s
real 0m5.665s (FIVE SECONDS... NORMAL)
user 0m0.002s
sys 0m0.115s
write:
floyd asaraujo # time dd if=/dev/zero of=testfile bs=16k count=4096
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
67108864 bytes (67 MB) copied, 365,004 seconds, 184 kB/s
real 6m6.412s (SIX MINUTES!!!)
user 0m0.023s
sys 0m1.292s
|
The fstab entry for this mount is:
Code: | myserver.mynetwork:/home /home/asaraujo/teste_nfs nfs sync,hard,intr,rw,nolock,rsize=32768,wsize=32768,timeo=7,retrans=3 0 0 |
When I mount the same with async option I have good read and write rates like this:
Code: |
read:
floyd asaraujo # time dd if=testfile of=/dev/null bs=16k count=4096
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
67108864 bytes (67 MB) copied, 5,6147 seconds, 12,0 MB/s
real 0m5.621s
user 0m0.004s
sys 0m0.109s
write:
floyd asaraujo # time dd if=/dev/zero of=testfile bs=16k count=4096
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
67108864 bytes (67 MB) copied, 5,92363 seconds, 11,3 MB/s
real 0m7.339s
user 0m0.001s
sys 0m0.191s
|
In this case, the fstab entry is:
Code: | myserver.mynetwork:/home /home/asaraujo/teste_nfs nfs async,hard,intr,rw,nolock,rsize=32768,wsize=32768,timeo=7,retrans=3 0 0 |
The only change is sync by async.
Is this a normal behavior of NFS??? When I use sync I have extreme confidence but a great loss of speed???? Or probably is something wrong????
If I use async instead of sync it can be considered that my system is much less confident than when I use sync or am I being paranoic???
Thanks!!! _________________ []s
Xandão |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/gentoo/images/spacer.gif) |
desultory Bodhisattva
![Bodhisattva Bodhisattva](/images/ranks/rank-bodhisattva.gif)
![](images/avatars/15563850365c4d454383627.gif)
Joined: 04 Nov 2005 Posts: 9410
|
Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2006 7:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
Though perhaps not quite to the extent described, I would expect such behavior.
Setting the sync option on a filesystem is supposed to keep the data present in the filesystem synchronized with the data cached by the kernel regarding that filesystem. Considering that NFS is, obviously, using a network connection (even if it is accessed over a loopback device) using the sync option when mounting an NFS share would be expected to introduce significant latency in all write operations as buffering is largely (at the filesystem level) removed from the filesystem.
Note that mounting local storage with the sync option active also causes increased write latency though it is typically less obvious. |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/gentoo/images/spacer.gif) |
Xandão n00b
![n00b n00b](/images/ranks/rank_rect_0.gif)
Joined: 20 Apr 2005 Posts: 16 Location: São Carlos - SP
|
Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2006 11:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks desultory
I´d expect an increase of latency with sync option, but not with that magnitude (6 seconds to 6 minutes to write the same amount of data). This could be considered "normal"??? If yes, the use of sync option makes impracticable its use in most of current network applications, in my opinion.
If I use async option, I can consider my system unsafe or, like I said initially, am I being paranoic?
Thanks! _________________ []s
Xandão |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/gentoo/images/spacer.gif) |
mounty1 l33t
![l33t l33t](/images/ranks/rank_rect_4.gif)
![](images/avatars/1712346425513d4025c4059.png)
Joined: 06 Jul 2006 Posts: 942 Location: Queensland
|
Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 3:27 am Post subject: Belated reply, HTH |
|
|
Adding Code: | rsize=1024,wsize=1024 | to the /etc/fstab mount options solved it for me. I think that the problem is if your packets exceed the MTU of your network device. _________________ Michael Mounteney |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/gentoo/images/spacer.gif) |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|