Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
monitor properties (+ X trouble )
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours
View posts from last 7 days

 
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Desktop Environments
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
tony11235
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 15 May 2006
Posts: 198

PostPosted: Sun Dec 31, 2006 1:08 am    Post subject: monitor properties (+ X trouble ) Reply with quote

Are there any tools that can tell me my monitor's capabilites, i.e vertical sync range? Laptop monitor that is.

Last edited by tony11235 on Mon Jan 01, 2007 7:10 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dforsyth
n00b
n00b


Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 26
Location: College Park, Murdaland

PostPosted: Sun Dec 31, 2006 4:39 am    Post subject: Re: monitor properties Reply with quote

tony11235 wrote:
Are there any tools that can tell me my monitor's capabilites, i.e vertical sync range? Laptop monitor that is.


google?
_________________
O
4~ <-- me, fapping to Palin.
/\ `_
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tony11235
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 15 May 2006
Posts: 198

PostPosted: Sun Dec 31, 2006 4:44 pm    Post subject: Re: monitor properties Reply with quote

Ha1f wrote:
tony11235 wrote:
Are there any tools that can tell me my monitor's capabilites, i.e vertical sync range? Laptop monitor that is.


google?


I'm talking built in tools smarts.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tony11235
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 15 May 2006
Posts: 198

PostPosted: Sun Dec 31, 2006 5:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ok thats it, I'm sick of the combo of gentoo+ATI+laptop. Even when you do get ATI drivers to work, they still suck. Until they get better, I'm only using gentoo for desktops+NVIDIA.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Peace Frog
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 12 Dec 2006
Posts: 185

PostPosted: Sun Dec 31, 2006 6:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think google was a legit suggestion. You should have the model number, its not different from googling random numbers off of a miscellaneous bit of PCB to try and figure out who made it and what it can do for you.

THat being said I almost always go to google before I post, unless its a VERY specific question google can probably answer it in short order.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tony11235
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 15 May 2006
Posts: 198

PostPosted: Sun Dec 31, 2006 6:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I agree about google as a prereq, but when you've done that for a while you might get pissed when someone suggests google again.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wynn
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 01 Apr 2005
Posts: 2421
Location: UK

PostPosted: Sun Dec 31, 2006 7:16 pm    Post subject: Re: monitor properties Reply with quote

tony11235 wrote:
Are there any tools that can tell me my monitor's capabilites, i.e vertical sync range? Laptop monitor that is.
There is read-edid http://john.fremlin.de/programs/linux/read-edid/, for information on what EDID, and its partner DDC2, are, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EDID and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Display_Data_Channel.

This information is also displayed by X in the Xorg.0.log and, if you don't have X working, running
Code:
Xorg -configure
or
Code:
xorgconfig
or
Code:
xorgcfg
may create an Xorg.0.log with the information you require in it.

However, laptops have LCD/TFT screens and these only have one resolution (pardon me if you already know this) so something like this
Code:
(--) NVIDIA(0): Connected display device(s) on GeForce 6600 at PCI:1:0:0:
(--) NVIDIA(0):     Iiyama PLE481S (CRT-0)
(--) NVIDIA(0): Iiyama PLE481S (CRT-0): 400.0 MHz maximum pixel clock
(II) NVIDIA(0): Assigned Display Device: CRT-0
(II) NVIDIA(0): Validated modes:
(II) NVIDIA(0):     "1280x1024"
(II) NVIDIA(0): Virtual screen size determined to be 1280 x 1024
(--) NVIDIA(0): DPI set to (85, 86); computed from "UseEdidDpi" X config
(--) NVIDIA(0):     option
may be all you'll get.

Another possibility is to look for the Windows .inf file for the screen which should have these numbers in the section for your screen.
_________________
The avatar is jorma, a "duck" from "Elephants Dream": the film and all the production materials have been made available under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License, see orange.blender.org for details.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tony11235
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 15 May 2006
Posts: 198

PostPosted: Sun Dec 31, 2006 7:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

One of my problems is that I can't even generate an xorg.conf. The only drivers that support my card are vesa and fglrx.

Quote:

X Window System Version 7.1.1
Release Date: 12 May 2006
X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 7.1.1
Build Operating System: UNKNOWN
Current Operating System: Linux Qubit 2.6.18-gentoo-r6 #4 SMP Fri Dec 29 17:39:
4 EST 2006 i686
Build Date: 29 December 2006
Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.x.org
to make sure that you have the latest version.
Module Loader present
Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting,
(++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational,
(WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown.
(==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Fri Dec 29 23:49:35 2006
List of video drivers:
fglrx
vesa

Backtrace:
0: X(xf86SigHandler+0x85) [0x80c0858]
1: X(DoConfigure+0x209) [0x80b2f8b]
2: X(InitOutput+0x65f) [0x809e47a]

Fatal server error:
Caught signal 11. Server aborting

Aborted


And I'm waiting to for my machine to finish updating to go with xorgconfig and guess some safe specifications.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tony11235
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 15 May 2006
Posts: 198

PostPosted: Sun Dec 31, 2006 11:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I can't even get the vesa driver to work.

Quote:

Build Date: 30 December 2006
Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.x.org
to make sure that you have the latest version.
Module Loader present
Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting,
(++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational,
(WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown.
(==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Sun Dec 31 18:17:22 2006
(++) Using config file: "/etc/X11/xorg.conf"
(EE) VESA(0): unknown type(0xffffffff)=0xff
(EE) Screen(s) found, but none have a usable configuration.

Fatal server error:
no screens found
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Element Dave
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 10 Nov 2006
Posts: 82

PostPosted: Mon Jan 01, 2007 3:05 am    Post subject: Re: monitor properties Reply with quote

tony11235 wrote:
Are there any tools that can tell me my monitor's capabilites, i.e vertical sync range? Laptop monitor that is.


Code:
emerge ddcxinfo-knoppix


See whether that works.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tony11235
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 15 May 2006
Posts: 198

PostPosted: Mon Jan 01, 2007 3:51 am    Post subject: Re: monitor properties Reply with quote

Element Dave wrote:
tony11235 wrote:
Are there any tools that can tell me my monitor's capabilites, i.e vertical sync range? Laptop monitor that is.


Code:
emerge ddcxinfo-knoppix


See whether that works.


Thats the tool I was referring to. Thanks. Although I think the problem I'm experiencing is independent of monitor specifications.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wynn
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 01 Apr 2005
Posts: 2421
Location: UK

PostPosted: Mon Jan 01, 2007 12:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

tony11235 wrote:
I can't even get the vesa driver to work.
Code:

Build Date: 30 December 2006
        Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.x.org
        to make sure that you have the latest version.
Module Loader present
Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting,
        (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational,
        (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown.
(==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Sun Dec 31 18:17:22 2006
(++) Using config file: "/etc/X11/xorg.conf"
(EE) VESA(0): unknown type(0xffffffff)=0xff
(EE) Screen(s) found, but none have a usable configuration.
http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/3/13/128 seems to imply that
Code:
CONFIG_VM86=y
in the kernel is required for the vesa driver to work
Code:
Symbol: VM86 [=y]
Prompt: Enable VM86 support
  Defined at arch/i386/Kconfig:341
  Depends on: EMBEDDED
  Location:
    -> Processor type and features

_________________
The avatar is jorma, a "duck" from "Elephants Dream": the film and all the production materials have been made available under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License, see orange.blender.org for details.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
erik258
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 12 Apr 2005
Posts: 2650
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota, USA

PostPosted: Mon Jan 01, 2007 6:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ATI drivers can be tricky, but lots of people have them working. They certainly aren't incompatible with gentoo, but ATI doesn't do an excellent job like Nvidia does.

You have configured VIDEO_CARDS to only include 'vesa' and 'fglrx'; that's why those are the only two driver modules you have. Expanding your VIDEO_CARDS settings will give you more such driver modules. There are Radeon drivers, as well as older ATI drivers that are open-souce as well.
_________________
Configuring a Firewall? Try my iptables configuration
LinuxCommando.com is my blog for linux-related scraps and tidbits. Stop by for a visit!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tony11235
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 15 May 2006
Posts: 198

PostPosted: Mon Jan 01, 2007 7:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well I finally have the fglrx driving working after banging my head for a day. Just more ATI driver experience I guess.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tony11235
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 15 May 2006
Posts: 198

PostPosted: Mon Jan 01, 2007 7:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

erik258 wrote:
ATI drivers can be tricky, but lots of people have them working. They certainly aren't incompatible with gentoo, but ATI doesn't do an excellent job like Nvidia does.

You have configured VIDEO_CARDS to only include 'vesa' and 'fglrx'; that's why those are the only two driver modules you have. Expanding your VIDEO_CARDS settings will give you more such driver modules. There are Radeon drivers, as well as older ATI drivers that are open-souce as well.


Normally I would go with the open-source drivers, but I think the only drivers that currently work with the Mobility Radeon X1300 are vesa and fglrx.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
abhidg
n00b
n00b


Joined: 11 Feb 2006
Posts: 15

PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 7:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

In the latest gentoo-sources (2.6.19-r5) there's no option to "Enable VM86 support".
But when I do zcat /proc/config.gz | grep VM86
I get: CONFIG_VM86=y

Does anyone know why there's no option anymore?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
miroR
l33t
l33t


Joined: 05 Mar 2008
Posts: 826

PostPosted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 11:43 am    Post subject: CONFIG_VM86=? (how to enable?) Reply with quote

abhidg wrote:
In the latest gentoo-sources (2.6.19-r5) there's no option to "Enable VM86 support".
But when I do zcat /proc/config.gz | grep VM86
I get: CONFIG_VM86=y
Does anyone know why there's no option anymore?

No, I don't where that option should be. But I think there lies the reason why I can't install the ati-drivers.
With any of these kernels:
linux-2.6.25-rc3-git6
linux-2.6.24-zen3
But grepping:
grep -ri vm86 /usr/src/linux*/.config
returns an empty string. Nada. Null.
Vim style "/" and then "vm86" searching in /usr/src/linux-2.6.25-rc3-git6 once "make menuconfig" is fired up returns:
Symbol: VM86 [=n]
│ Prompt: Enable VM86 support
│ Defined at arch/x86/Kconfig:620
│ Depends on: X86_32 && EMBEDDED
│ Location:
│ -> Processor type and features

and "/" for "X86_32" returns overwhelming info:
Symbol: X86_32 [=n]
│ Symbol: X86_32_SMP [=n]

Where's that? My arch is based on Athlon 3500+, so x86_64
So much for now... Still stuck..


Last edited by miroR on Thu Mar 06, 2008 12:51 pm; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
miroR
l33t
l33t


Joined: 05 Mar 2008
Posts: 826

PostPosted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 12:50 pm    Post subject: no vm86 option, git-sources, ati-drivers Reply with quote

Does anyone know which of the latest from among:
http://gentoo-portage.com/sys-kernel/git-sources
work with ati-drivers?
I guess the latest:
git-sources-2.6.25_rc3-r6
and
ati-drivers-8.40.4
just don't mix...
Thanx.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
miroR
l33t
l33t


Joined: 05 Mar 2008
Posts: 826

PostPosted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 2:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I put:
x11-drivers/ati-drivers ~amd64
into /etc/portage/package.keywords
I followed the guide:
http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_ATI_on_amd64
But emerging ati-drivers-8.455.2-r1 fails.
It's probably not worth putting all the (topmost first) errors in here, if I am heading in the wrong direction...
am I?
I'll try and see if the author of the HOWTO_ATI_on_amd64 is available...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
realbuzz
n00b
n00b


Joined: 15 Feb 2004
Posts: 13
Location: Netherlands

PostPosted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 7:49 pm    Post subject: Re: monitor properties (+ X trouble ) Reply with quote

tony11235 wrote:
Are there any tools that can tell me my monitor's capabilites, i.e vertical sync range? Laptop monitor that is.


emerge sys-apps/ddcxinfo-knoppix and run ddcprobe
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
miroR
l33t
l33t


Joined: 05 Mar 2008
Posts: 826

PostPosted: Fri Mar 07, 2008 12:03 am    Post subject: vm86 option, git-sources, ati-drivers Reply with quote

This:
miroR wrote:
git-sources-2.6.25_rc3-r6
ati-drivers-8.40.4

as well as
miroR wrote:
x11-drivers/ati-drivers ~amd64
into /etc/portage/package.keywords

in the case of little-care-for-Linux_and_NDA-and-things_by_bigMoney-ati-drivers...
is wrong...
This guide:
http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_ATI_Drivers
warns clearly against. So my:
miroR wrote:
...emerging ati-drivers-8.455.2-r1
(which failed) was:
miroR wrote:
...heading in the wrong direction...
am I?

Sure!
miroR wrote:

...if the author of the HOWTO_ATI_on_amd64 is available...

No need anymore. But thanks for the guide.
I reverted to two days old backup. Had I not had it, I'm afraid I'd have to reinstall.
Thanks God. That would've killed me...
Now I have:
2.6.24-zen3
ati-drivers-8.40.4
And I finally fixed DMA which I wrote about in another post somewhere on Gentoo forums.
I'd like to draw kind readers' attention that in my case:
# zcat /proc/config.gz | grep -i VM86
#
returns no string. No such thing in my configuration, and my conf produced a fine working kernel ...
(in the HOWTO_ATI_Drivers there's the suggestion to:
Processor type and features --->
[*] Enable VM86 support
but it's only for x86 and some other archs maybe, I guess.)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
knue
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 13 Oct 2004
Posts: 139

PostPosted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 3:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

miroR wrote:

I'll try and see if the author of the HOWTO_ATI_on_amd64 is available...


Hi, I got your message. My howto is pretty outdated. It is 3 years old. I'm using nvidia now and a couple of things I did that time aren't necessary anymore. I didn't even know that someone has put my howto on the wiki.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Desktop Environments All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum