View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
thestick Guru
Joined: 07 Apr 2006 Posts: 531 Location: /dev/urandom
|
Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2007 11:22 am Post subject: BitTyrant ebuild anyone? |
|
|
it is a modified azureus. could anyone make an ebuild for it?
here is the webpage http://bittyrant.cs.washington.edu/
..
Quote: | Familiar â BitTyrant is based on modifications to Azureus 2.5, currently the most popular BitTorrent client. All of our changes are under the hood. Youâll find the GUI identical to Azureus, with optional additions to display statistics relevant to BitTyrantâs operation. |
:> pls help |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lenk Apprentice
Joined: 08 Mar 2004 Posts: 211
|
Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 12:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
I've always just downloaded azureus and install in /opt. The portage ebuild has too many dependencies. Just download and unzip it to /opt and set correct permissions. _________________ E6300 Gigabyte GA-965P-DS3 2GB Corsair 320GB Seagate 7200.10 XFX 7600GT Gentoo
Dell M1330 T7500 2GB 160GB 13.3" WXGA Gentoo
Sharp Zaurus SL-C760 Cacko ROM 1.21b / pdaXrom 1.10rc5 512MB CF + 512MB SD
Sun Ultra5 Gentoo |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Conan Guru
Joined: 02 Nov 2004 Posts: 360
|
Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 3:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
Bittyrant is a horrible idea. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
zietbukuel l33t
Joined: 30 Dec 2005 Posts: 607
|
Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 4:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Conan wrote: | Bittyrant is a horrible idea. |
Why |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rmh3093 Advocate
Joined: 06 Aug 2003 Posts: 2138 Location: Albany, NY
|
Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 5:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
because if everyone starts using it then people with fast connections will get faster and people with slow connection will get slower until no one uses torrents _________________ Do not meddle in the affairs of wizards, for they are subtle and quick to anger. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Conan Guru
Joined: 02 Nov 2004 Posts: 360
|
Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 5:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
it defeats the whole share-and-share-alike principal of bittorrent.
Then again the "ethical" uses of bittoreent are few and far between, so I don't know if condemming someone for bad manners really makes sense |
|
Back to top |
|
|
micr0c0sm Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 29 Oct 2005 Posts: 148 Location: New York
|
Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 5:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
People misunderstand bittyrant, try reading into a little bit.
bittyrant speeds up your downloads, BUT NOT at the expense of your uploading capacity.
It simply makes some smart decisions to make sure everyone is uploading as much as possible, and the HIGHEST ratio'd uploaders get the best download speeds. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
thestick Guru
Joined: 07 Apr 2006 Posts: 531 Location: /dev/urandom
|
Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 9:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | Bittyrant is a horrible idea. |
no dude , it is not . it just optimizes the download algorithm. i still seed with it after i finish my downloads |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pse Apprentice
Joined: 01 Mar 2005 Posts: 188 Location: by the plate river
|
Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2007 7:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
There's quite a bit of a discussion surrounding the whole BitTorrent vs. BitTyrant matter. Personally, I just thought BitTorrent actually DID what BitTyrant claims to do now. It never came to my mind BitTorrent clients were not assigning more bandwidth to faster seeders. In any case, I actually believe this is a good idea, as long as seeders remain on the network for a while, dowloads should go faster for everyone, as higher bandwidth seeders will be able to share faster to many others with lower bandwidth. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
reiman Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 29 May 2004 Posts: 108 Location: sweden
|
Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2007 12:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
maybe worth a shot, how is it compared to rtorrent? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
broken_chaos Guru
Joined: 18 Jan 2006 Posts: 370 Location: Ontario, Canada
|
Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2007 12:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
reiman wrote: | maybe worth a shot, how is it compared to rtorrent? |
It's based on Azeureus.... Which means it's a bloated, slow memory hog compared to rtorrent. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
reiman Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 29 May 2004 Posts: 108 Location: sweden
|
Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2007 1:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
broken_chaos wrote: | reiman wrote: | maybe worth a shot, how is it compared to rtorrent? |
It's based on Azeureus.... Which means it's a bloated, slow memory hog compared to rtorrent. |
thanks for the information, I will stick to rtorrent then |
|
Back to top |
|
|
XAvAX n00b
Joined: 31 Dec 2004 Posts: 24
|
Posted: Wed Jan 10, 2007 4:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
I have one that I made by editing the most recent azureus ebuild. Just replace the SRC_URI with the URI on the UW page for the 32-bit one, change the date there to ${PV}, and rename the ebuild to bittyrant-date_of_package_here.ebuild. It digests okay, I'm emerging it now.
EDIT: I forgot to say why I didn't just upload one: I only have lynx right now. I have X, but no GUI browser.
EDIT2: I have firefox-bin now, but the ebuild was a bust. The jar's it made were broken. _________________ That which we do not ask will never be learned |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|