Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
WPA - Netgear ma401 - Not working [solved]
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours

 
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Kernel & Hardware
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
dlublink
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 30 Sep 2006
Posts: 146

PostPosted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 5:07 pm    Post subject: WPA - Netgear ma401 - Not working [solved] Reply with quote

I am trying to install WPA for my netgear ma401. It gives me this message:

* Service net.eth1 starting
ioctl[SIOCSIWAUTH]: Operation not supported
WEXT auth param 7 value 0x1 - ioctl[SIOCSIWENCODEEXT]: Operation not supported
ioctl[SIOCSIWENCODEEXT]: Operation not supported
ioctl[SIOCSIWENCODE]: Invalid argument
ioctl[SIOCSIWENCODEEXT]: Operation not supported
ioctl[SIOCSIWENCODE]: Invalid argument
ioctl[SIOCSIWENCODEEXT]: Operation not supported
ioctl[SIOCSIWENCODE]: Invalid argument
ioctl[SIOCSIWAUTH]: Operation not supported
WEXT auth param 4 value 0x0 - ioctl[SIOCSIWAUTH]: Operation not supported
WEXT auth param 5 value 0x1 - * WARNING: net.eth1 has started but is inactive


Now I found a document on the internet that says I cannot use a orinoco driver with WPA.

In dmesg I see :

[ 6.657000] eth1: Hardware identity 800c:0000:0001:0000
[ 6.657000] eth1: Station identity 001f:0006:0001:0003
[ 6.657000] eth1: Firmware determined as Intersil 1.3.6
[ 6.657000] eth1: Ad-hoc demo mode supported
[ 6.657000] eth1: IEEE standard IBSS ad-hoc mode supported
[ 6.657000] eth1: WEP supported, 104-bit key
[ 6.657000] eth1: MAC address 00:11:22:33:44:55
[ 6.657000] eth1: Station name "Prism I"
[ 6.658000] eth1: ready
[ 6.658000] eth1: orinoco_cs at 1.0, irq 11, io 0x2100-0x213f

orinoco_cs, that means it's using orinoco driver?

But, when I compiled my kernel, I had selected Hermes (not orinoco).

Is Hermes really Orinoco? If that's the case, than what Kernel options do I need to make my setup work?

Thanks,

David


Last edited by dlublink on Tue Feb 06, 2007 12:32 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dlublink
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 30 Sep 2006
Posts: 146

PostPosted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 5:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I did some further research and it was suggested that I use the Host AP drivers:

<*> IEEE 802.11 for Host AP (Prism2/2.5/3 and WEP/TKIP/CCMP)
[ ] Support downloading firmware images with Host AP driver
< > Host AP driver for Prism2/2.5/3 in PLX9052 PCI adaptors
< > Host AP driver for Prism2.5 PCI adaptors
<*> Host AP driver for Prism2/2.5/3 PC Cards

But I am not sure this is correct, because without WPA_SUPPLICANT enabled in conf.d/net (modules=wpa_supplicant). It gives this error (network on WEP):

compaq david # /etc/init.d/net.eth1 restart
* Caching service dependencies ... [ ok ]
* Service net.eth1 stopping
* Service net.eth1 stopped
* Service net.eth1 starting
Error, dhcpStart: interface eth1 is not Ethernet or 802.2 Token Ring
[ !! ]
* ERROR: net.eth1 failed to start

With WPA active on the router and wpa_supplicant enabled in conf.d/net I get this:

compaq conf.d # /etc/init.d/net.eth1 restart
* Caching service dependencies ... [ ok ]
* Service net.eth1 stopping
* Service net.eth1 stopped
* Service net.eth1 starting
ioctl[SIOCSIWAUTH]: Operation not supported
WEXT auth param 7 value 0x1 - * WARNING: net.eth1 has started but is inactive


So with this upgrade, not only am I not able to connect to WPA, but I can no longer connect with WEP.

Thoughts?

David
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dlublink
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 30 Sep 2006
Posts: 146

PostPosted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 5:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Some more information from dmesg:

compaq conf.d # dmesg | grep host
[ 20.049712] hostap_cs: 0.4.4-kernel (Jouni Malinen <jkmaline@cc.hut.fi>)
[ 6.311000] hostap_cs: setting Vcc=33 (constant)
[ 6.311000] hostap_cs: Registered netdevice wifi0
[ 6.351000] hostap_cs: index 0x01: , irq 11, io 0x2100-0x213f
[ 6.652000] wifi0: defaulting to host-based encryption as a workaround for firmware bug in Host AP mode WEP
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dlublink
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 30 Sep 2006
Posts: 146

PostPosted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 5:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hmm,

I think I may have misunderstood Host AP. It looks like Host AP is to be the access point, not a computer on the network. (correct me if I am wrong).

David
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dlublink
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 30 Sep 2006
Posts: 146

PostPosted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 5:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

[quote="dlublink"]Hmm,

I think I may have misunderstood Host AP. It looks like Host AP is to be the access point, not a computer on the network. (correct me if I am wrong).

David[/quote]

Alright, I am back to my original drivers. WEP is table, but I am unable to work with WPA.

Anyone have any ideas?


Thanks,

David
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dlublink
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 30 Sep 2006
Posts: 146

PostPosted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 12:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

resolved, see thread : https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-527558-highlight-.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Kernel & Hardware All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum