View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
andrewd18 Guru
Joined: 11 Apr 2004 Posts: 364 Location: Wisconsin, USA
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kaste Guru
Joined: 21 Dec 2005 Posts: 546 Location: /home Sweet /home
|
Posted: Mon Oct 23, 2006 8:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
This is so great. No Overlays needed anymore. YES! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nesl247 Veteran
Joined: 15 Jun 2004 Posts: 1614 Location: Florida
|
Posted: Mon Oct 23, 2006 3:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Overlay is still required if you want to use xgl, or want the shortcuts for moving windows to a new viewport via the window decorations as libwnck is patched in the overlay, not in portage. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hoschi Advocate
Joined: 19 Jul 2003 Posts: 2517 Location: Ulm, Germany, Europe
|
Posted: Mon Oct 23, 2006 6:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Still doesn't work. Just fu**ing white screen. _________________ Just you and me strogg! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nesl247 Veteran
Joined: 15 Jun 2004 Posts: 1614 Location: Florida
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ricky Guru
Joined: 30 May 2003 Posts: 341
|
Posted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 8:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I was initially excited to see beryl included in portage, as compiz hardlocks my system, but unfortunately beryl does the same thing. Beryl gets to "Xgl not detected, trying nvidia. Nvidia not detected, trying AIGLX." (or something along those lines) and then the only thing my computer will respond to is is Alt-SysReq or a kick to the reset button.
I have an ATI All-in-Wonder Radeon 9000 (RV250) using the open source drivers and AIGLX, and I'm running a completely ~x86 system. My quest for help in the compiz threads has yeilded little, so hopefully beryl enthusiasts have some additional information. If there's any specifics about my set up that would be helpful, just let me know. Thanks. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
VanDan Guru
Joined: 30 Sep 2002 Posts: 586 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2006 4:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
It seems to be overly sensitive to timing at the moment.
Here's my .xinitrc:
Code: | export LIBGL_ALWAYS_INDIRECT=1
gnome-panel &
/usr/libexec/gnome-settings-daemon &
nautilus -n --sync &
xterm
|
I type:
... and then wait for everything to load up. I get rid of the nautilus window ( file ==> close ), and then in the xterm in the top left corner, I hit [Enter] a couple of times so I can see WTF is going on ( it's underneath the gnome bar ), and then type:
... and then hit ALT and SySRq and S ( together ) to do an emergency disk sync ( yeah it still locks up ), delete the garbage character ( a funny looking O ), and then hit enter.
If I'm lucky, beryl starts without locking my system hard F'n yay! Hope they sort this stuff out soon. _________________ David Hicks' plea. Was it:
a) I plead guilty, or
b) Please let me out of here and end the torture |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Havin_it Veteran
Joined: 17 Jul 2005 Posts: 1266 Location: Edinburgh, UK
|
Posted: Wed Nov 01, 2006 11:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Interesting! I've been doggedly sticking with compiz vanilla, but now these are in portage I might just have to give'em a whirl. It would be good to get rid of some of the Gnome dependencies.
Just wondering: can I leave compiz installed while I try out beryl, or should I quickpkg and unmerge it just to be safe? Also, am I likely to have to rebuild Mesa, libdrm and xf86-video-i810 again? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
albright Advocate
Joined: 16 Nov 2003 Posts: 2588 Location: Near Toronto
|
Posted: Wed Nov 01, 2006 12:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | If I'm lucky, beryl starts without locking my system hard F'n yay! Hope they sort this stuff out soon. |
Me too! Beryl locked up my little centrino notebook twice yesterday.
It also seems to randomly lock up my desktop (nvidia).
The potential for embarrassment when showing off to windows users is
too great -- and so far as I can see that's the main point of compiz and
beryl
(what I mean is that, there is no doubt whatsoever that linux+beryl/compiz
is less stable than win XP, and that hurts - but it is alpha software after all) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jmbsvicetto Moderator
Joined: 27 Apr 2005 Posts: 4735 Location: Angra do Heroísmo (PT)
|
Posted: Wed Nov 01, 2006 12:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi.
Havin_it wrote: | Just wondering: can I leave compiz installed while I try out beryl, or should I quickpkg and unmerge it just to be safe? Also, am I likely to have to rebuild Mesa, libdrm and xf86-video-i810 again? |
Yes, you can have both installed at the same time. Beryl doesn't overwrite compiz. _________________ Jorge.
Your twisted, but hopefully friendly daemon.
AMD64 / x86 / Sparc Gentoo
Help answer || emwrap.sh
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Doogman Apprentice
Joined: 24 Sep 2004 Posts: 244
|
Posted: Wed Nov 01, 2006 9:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Not only can you have them both installed at the same time, but you can actually switch between Beryl and Compiz with the Beryl Setting Manager. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
-BarneY- Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 03 Oct 2005 Posts: 91
|
Posted: Wed Nov 01, 2006 9:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have to say, that I am not very happy about the situation now. Ok, we don't need an overlay any longer, but the portage-xgl overlay had weekly snapshots and ebuilds that provide direct svn-checkouts. Now they are gone and beryl is getting older and older. There are some cool new features, but I don't think, that the pre-releases will find their way into gentoo and we have to wait until the next "stable" release. What a pity... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nesl247 Veteran
Joined: 15 Jun 2004 Posts: 1614 Location: Florida
|
Posted: Wed Nov 01, 2006 9:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
No, you can simply use the 9999 versions of the packages from the xeffects overlay. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
-BarneY- Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 03 Oct 2005 Posts: 91
|
Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 12:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ah, ok, tyvm. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Havin_it Veteran
Joined: 17 Jul 2005 Posts: 1266 Location: Edinburgh, UK
|
Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 1:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Went ahead and installed beryl, and my initial impression is: compiz ON CRACK!
It seems reasonably stable, and the same setup-tricks I used to get compiz working did the trick again. Memory-usage doesn't seem significantly greater than with compiz. Also there are no artifacts on video playback. But my dear lord, too many choices! I hardly know where to start with it all, and honestly I think maybe too much stuff is turned on by default. At first I was overwhelmed by all the unexpected things happening on certain mouse-movements etc. though I've got it a bit better under control now.
While I'm here, I wonder if anyone can tell me how to:
- turn off all annoying wibbly effects on menus and tooltips;
- Deactivate the expose-type effects from triggering when the mouse goes to the top-left or bottom-left corners;
- Stop maximized windows from unmaximizing when I peel them back;
- Prevent SuperKaramba themes from minimizing when Show Desktop is clicked?
Last edited by Havin_it on Thu Nov 02, 2006 1:24 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
scoobydu Veteran
Joined: 16 Feb 2003 Posts: 1076 Location: 'Mind the Gap'
|
Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 1:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hoschi wrote: | Still doesn't work. Just fu**ing white screen. |
Arrh, my sentiments entirely, tried the 'fix' a couple of times, with no success.
Using 9999 ebuilds of everything and its still not working.
As for the 100's of differant ways to start it! its getting me very confused! (is there a definative way to start it without gnome, kde, or xfce4 installed pls?)
The positive of trying so many differant howtos and faqs is that I have glxgears up from 250 to 2700! which is very nice.
So I'm salivating at the thought of a stable beryl working _________________ Tyan Tiger K8W, 2xOpteron 240,Powerbook5,6 15" 1.5g, Macbook Black 2g, Mac Mini 1g, Ipod P60g.
| Linux - From a windows user perspective| |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Havin_it Veteran
Joined: 17 Jul 2005 Posts: 1266 Location: Edinburgh, UK
|
Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 1:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
scoobydu wrote: | As for the 100's of differant ways to start it! its getting me very confused! (is there a definative way to start it without gnome, kde, or xfce4 installed pls?) |
Well there is no 'definitive' method really, because for every DE there is a different procedure for replacing that DE's normal window manager (although if you invoke it with "--replace" it just replaces whatever WM is currently running). I guess if you have NO DE running, that is moot, so you just start manually once twm or whatever has loaded, or maybe you can put it in your ~/.xinitrc file to load on login. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
roderick l33t
Joined: 11 Jul 2005 Posts: 908 Location: St. John's, NL CANADA
|
Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 1:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
albright wrote: | Quote: | If I'm lucky, beryl starts without locking my system hard F'n yay! Hope they sort this stuff out soon. |
Me too! Beryl locked up my little centrino notebook twice yesterday.
It also seems to randomly lock up my desktop (nvidia).
The potential for embarrassment when showing off to windows users is
too great -- and so far as I can see that's the main point of compiz and
beryl
(what I mean is that, there is no doubt whatsoever that linux+beryl/compiz
is less stable than win XP, and that hurts - but it is alpha software after all) |
Funny, I have latest Beryl/Emerald from CVS (was also running 0.1.0/0.1.1) and never had it lock up. I am also using a lapop with an Intel video card (completely open source drivers) and using AIGLX.
It's stable. I use it constantly. The only thing is I have not had the KDE startup to use it by default. Instead, I run beryl-manager from system tray. This allows me to turn it on/off when I need to (i.e. playing NWN requires I turn it off). I think (at least KDE) that this is the best/safest approach.
Try it that way and let us know. _________________ If God were a pickle, I'd still say "no pickle on my burger".
http://roderick-greening.blogspot.com/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
scoobydu Veteran
Joined: 16 Feb 2003 Posts: 1076 Location: 'Mind the Gap'
|
Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 2:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Havin_it wrote: | scoobydu wrote: | As for the 100's of differant ways to start it! its getting me very confused! (is there a definative way to start it without gnome, kde, or xfce4 installed pls?) |
Well there is no 'definitive' method really, because for every DE there is a different procedure for replacing that DE's normal window manager (although if you invoke it with "--replace" it just replaces whatever WM is currently running). I guess if you have NO DE running, that is moot, so you just start manually once twm or whatever has loaded, or maybe you can put it in your ~/.xinitrc file to load on login. |
Thanks for the input.
I do start it from xinitrc, but I've read some say it must be started using dbus, some just beryl, or bery-start ... ?
Cheers
scooby _________________ Tyan Tiger K8W, 2xOpteron 240,Powerbook5,6 15" 1.5g, Macbook Black 2g, Mac Mini 1g, Ipod P60g.
| Linux - From a windows user perspective| |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sonicbhoc Veteran
Joined: 24 Oct 2005 Posts: 1805 Location: In front of the computer screen
|
Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 2:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So is it better to emerge beryl through CVS? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nesl247 Veteran
Joined: 15 Jun 2004 Posts: 1614 Location: Florida
|
Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 4:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sonicbhoc I would say no. If you don't follow the commits and hang out in -dev, you'll never know when a problem arises and what not. I'd stick with 0.1.1 unless you have a bug fixed in svn. (Beryl doesn't use CVS) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
roderick l33t
Joined: 11 Jul 2005 Posts: 908 Location: St. John's, NL CANADA
|
Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 7:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
nesl247 wrote: | sonicbhoc I would say no. If you don't follow the commits and hang out in -dev, you'll never know when a problem arises and what not. I'd stick with 0.1.1 unless you have a bug fixed in svn. (Beryl doesn't use CVS) |
Nesl247, would it be beneficial to put weekly snapshots in the overlay based on date? Or should we leave it as is with the 9999 svn downloader? _________________ If God were a pickle, I'd still say "no pickle on my burger".
http://roderick-greening.blogspot.com/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nesl247 Veteran
Joined: 15 Jun 2004 Posts: 1614 Location: Florida
|
Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 8:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'll think about it. I dislike snapshots because the source changes so often. What I think I might do is make a wrapper script to just re-emerge all the beryl stuff. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bianco n00b
Joined: 21 Jun 2005 Posts: 54
|
Posted: Fri Nov 03, 2006 10:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Great! I've solved following that HOWTO but
No windows decoration!!
1- seems that beryl-plugins is going to be re-emerged ... no...
2- If i give:
Code: | $DISPLAY=":0" beryl-xgl |
i get a white screen...
3- If i give:
Code: | #DISPLAY=":0" beryl-xgl |
It's all ok!
Using normal INPUT and VIDEO="nvidia fbdev vesa"
Code: |
USE="aiglx xorg" emerge -Dv mesa xorg-server XXXX-drivers xgl beryl-core compiz; |
May be a permission problem?! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
albright Advocate
Joined: 16 Nov 2003 Posts: 2588 Location: Near Toronto
|
Posted: Fri Nov 03, 2006 11:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
"$DISPLAY" =! "DISPLAY"
it's the latter that tells X where to play so that's why it works
that's how it looks to me at least |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|