View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
apberzerk Apprentice
Joined: 11 Jan 2004 Posts: 278 Location: kansas...
|
Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 1:55 pm Post subject: ps freezes |
|
|
Every now and then my computer will start doing this until I reboot it. When I type "ps a", it freezes. For example:
Code: | PID TTY STAT TIME COMMAND
7883 tty1 Ss 0:00 /bin/login --
7884 tty2 Ss 0:00 /bin/login --
7885 tty3 Ss 0:00 /bin/login --
7886 tty4 Ss+ 0:00 /sbin/agetty 38400 tty4 linux
7887 tty5 Ss+ 0:00 /sbin/agetty 38400 tty5 linux
7888 tty6 Ss+ 0:00 /sbin/agetty 38400 tty6 linux
15821 tty7 RLs+ 26:40 /usr/bin/X -br -nolisten tcp :0 vt7 -auth /var/run/xauth/A:0-pDe7EV
27648 pts/3 Ss+ 0:00 -/bin/zsh
27652 pts/4 Ss+ 0:00 -/bin/zsh
27656 pts/5 Ss+ 0:00 -/bin/zsh
27668 pts/6 Ss 0:00 -/bin/zsh
27672 pts/7 Ss 0:00 -/bin/zsh
27676 pts/8 Ss 0:00 -/bin/zsh
27685 pts/6 Sl+ 0:30 /usr/local/lib/ghc-6.6/ghc-6.6 -B/usr/local/lib/ghc-6.6 --interactive Eval.hs
27690 pts/7 S+ 0:07 emacs -nw Eval.hs
27692 pts/9 Ss 0:00 -/bin/zsh
28383 pts/9 S+ 0:04 emacs -nw Parser.hs
30246 pts/8 S+ 0:03 emacs -nw Common.hs
30248 pts/12 Ss+ 0:00 -/bin/zsh |
And it just sits there, stuck. I cannot kill it, not even with sudo killall -9 ps. If I spawn or kill some processes and then run "ps a" again, the last entry in the chart will be different. Also, KDE SystemGuard will not display any processes.
Last time it did this, it started with amarok freezing first, and I could not kill it in any way.
Nothing unusual in /var/log/messages, but here is something interesting in dmesg:
Code: | Process amarokapp (pid: 14512, ti=c4370000 task=e7112ad0 task.ti=c4370000)
Stack: 00000003 eb473f1c 00000000 c4370000 00000000 00000246 c4371ebc c010fdf1
00000000 00000000 eb473f14 00000000 c4370000 0827a228 c01255d4 00000000
c041c7f8 c0126982 c4371f04 00000286 00000001 00000001 00000000 f122a400
Call Trace:
[<c010fdf1>] __wake_up+0x1f/0x48
[<c01255d4>] wake_futex+0x3a/0x44
[<c0126982>] do_futex+0x6ec/0xba7
[<f99d5b5e>] _nv003285rm+0x12/0x1c [nvidia]
[<c011a67a>] do_timer+0x795/0x8c8
[<f99d971c>] _nv002549rm+0xa8/0xb4 [nvidia]
[<f99d96fe>] _nv002549rm+0x8a/0xb4 [nvidia]
[<f8837382>] snd_timer_user_read+0x14f/0x1e3 [snd_timer]
[<c0126f17>] sys_futex+0xda/0xef
[<c0147ccc>] sys_read+0x5b/0x63
[<c010269f>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
Code: 8b 30 eb 29 8d 58 f4 8b 40 f4 8b 55 e8 ff 75 0c 8b 4d 08 89 45 f0 89 d8 ff 53 08 85 c0 5a 74 09 f6 45 f0 01 74 03 4f 74 09 89 f0 <8b> 36 3b 45 ec 75 d2 8d 65 f4 5b 5e 5f c9 c3 55 b9 01 00 00 00
EIP: [<c010ec13>] __wake_up_common+0x3e/0x4d SS:ESP 0068:c4371e88
<6>note: amarokapp[14512] exited with preempt_count 3
BUG: warning at kernel/futex.c:973/unqueue_me()
[<c012553f>] unqueue_me+0x58/0xb3
[<c012645f>] do_futex+0x1c9/0xba7
[<c011a67a>] do_timer+0x795/0x8c8
[<c010fa20>] default_wake_function+0x0/0xc
[<c0119c2e>] run_timer_softirq+0x12/0x163
[<c01199d2>] do_gettimeofday+0x2c/0xc4
[<c0126f17>] sys_futex+0xda/0xef
[<c0102635>] sysenter_past_esp+0x56/0x79 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
moocha Watchman
Joined: 21 Oct 2003 Posts: 5722
|
Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 7:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Which kernel version and branch, exactly? _________________ Military Commissions Act of 2006: http://tinyurl.com/jrcto
"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-- attributed to Benjamin Franklin |
|
Back to top |
|
|
apberzerk Apprentice
Joined: 11 Jan 2004 Posts: 278 Location: kansas...
|
Posted: Sat Feb 03, 2007 12:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
I was using 2.6.18-r6-gentoo, but I just upgraded to 2.6.19-r5-gentoo. Maybe the problem will go away!
- Phil |
|
Back to top |
|
|
moocha Watchman
Joined: 21 Oct 2003 Posts: 5722
|
Posted: Sat Feb 03, 2007 9:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
If it doesn't, I'd also try a different NVidia driver version. _________________ Military Commissions Act of 2006: http://tinyurl.com/jrcto
"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-- attributed to Benjamin Franklin |
|
Back to top |
|
|
apberzerk Apprentice
Joined: 11 Jan 2004 Posts: 278 Location: kansas...
|
Posted: Sat Feb 03, 2007 5:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah I am running the latest ~x86 version of nvidia-drivers because I need a certain dual-monitor option that they provide.
- Phil |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|