View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
jesse_kahtava n00b
Joined: 30 Nov 2004 Posts: 66 Location: Ontario, Canada
|
Posted: Thu Jan 25, 2007 3:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yes, within a chroot. the nfs mount contains a complete filesystem (with /lib and all) that i had created for the computer before deciding i wanted it diskless. After mounting the nfs volume i was able to chroot into it and execute init. It fails with a timeout, not because it can't be found or because of any sort of seg fault which gives me a good idea that it's there and should be working under normal circumstances. and as i said before, it is in the standard location (/sbin/init) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jesse_kahtava n00b
Joined: 30 Nov 2004 Posts: 66 Location: Ontario, Canada
|
Posted: Thu Jan 25, 2007 7:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I found the problem! It seems that Reiser4 and NFS don't cooperate well when mounting NFS root. I made a new partition, formatted it with Reiser3, copied the full root contents from the Reiser4 partition over, set up /etc/exports to point to the new mount point with Reiser3 and everything works fine. After realizing this was a problem I googled around a bit and found a handful of references to Reiser4 not working 100%.
!!!As of this writing Reiser4 does not work being exported and used as a NFS root!!!
(Well, not for me anyway) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
erik258 Advocate
Joined: 12 Apr 2005 Posts: 2650 Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota, USA
|
Posted: Thu Jan 25, 2007 7:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
that explains it. I have mine on reiser3. I've thought about switching my workstation over, what do you think? _________________ Configuring a Firewall? Try my iptables configuration
LinuxCommando.com is my blog for linux-related scraps and tidbits. Stop by for a visit! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mgiese Veteran
Joined: 23 Mar 2005 Posts: 1630 Location: indiana
|
Posted: Thu Feb 01, 2007 10:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hi there,
just a short question, i finished the setup of my first diskless pc (pentium4-256mb) but now i just wonder why unpacking GCC4.1.1 took nearly 30 minutes or even more, to apply all the patches already took 30 minutes so far and its not even finished... any suggestions ? how do i speed up that ? thx a lot _________________ I do not have a Superman complex, for I am God not Superman
Ryzen9 7950x (powersave governor) ; Radeon 7900XTX ; kernel 6.11.3 ; XFCE |
|
Back to top |
|
|
erik258 Advocate
Joined: 12 Apr 2005 Posts: 2650 Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota, USA
|
Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 5:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
your network is probably maxing out at 12.5mb/sec one way through much of that time.
of course, gcc is one of the biggest packages you're likely to install. _________________ Configuring a Firewall? Try my iptables configuration
LinuxCommando.com is my blog for linux-related scraps and tidbits. Stop by for a visit! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
wimalopaan n00b
Joined: 06 Jul 2005 Posts: 15
|
Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 6:04 am Post subject: aufs: another union fs |
|
|
To all how are using unionfs for building diskless clients:
actual versions of unionfs produce various kernel-oopses.
aufs (another unionfs) is a direct replacement for unionfs, but cleanly built from scratch.
If you want to give it a try, heres an ebuild:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160065 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mgiese Veteran
Joined: 23 Mar 2005 Posts: 1630 Location: indiana
|
Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 1:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
is it possible to use nvidia-drivers on a diskless node ? the xorg modul "nv" is working fine, but i can not "modprobe nvidia". when installing the diskless pc i have read i should put all modules into kernel, because i am unable to load them later. but i need dri on the diskless node. i am not using grub for the diskless pc. thanks in advance _________________ I do not have a Superman complex, for I am God not Superman
Ryzen9 7950x (powersave governor) ; Radeon 7900XTX ; kernel 6.11.3 ; XFCE |
|
Back to top |
|
|
erik258 Advocate
Joined: 12 Apr 2005 Posts: 2650 Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota, USA
|
Posted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 8:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
I don't see any reason why you wouldn't be able to load any module you wanted. Nothing cares as far as i can tell whether the root fs is on nfs or a disk, usb or anything else. _________________ Configuring a Firewall? Try my iptables configuration
LinuxCommando.com is my blog for linux-related scraps and tidbits. Stop by for a visit! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mgiese Veteran
Joined: 23 Mar 2005 Posts: 1630 Location: indiana
|
Posted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 6:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
thanks for your info.. i compiled now agpgart and i2c modules into the kernel, lets see if it helps
when setting up the client i used the following guide : http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/diskless-howto.xml
Code: | About the slave kernel
It is recommended that you compile the slave kernel without any modules, since loading and setting them up via remote boot is a difficult and unnecessary process. Additionally, the slave kernel should be as small and compact as possible in order to efficiently boot from the network. We are going to compile the slave's kernel in the same place where the master was configured.
|
so i maybe just misinterpreted that info : its not impossible - its just difficult... THX A LOT !! _________________ I do not have a Superman complex, for I am God not Superman
Ryzen9 7950x (powersave governor) ; Radeon 7900XTX ; kernel 6.11.3 ; XFCE |
|
Back to top |
|
|
conbart n00b
Joined: 14 Feb 2007 Posts: 1
|
Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 11:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
There is now an ebuild for aufs at the gentoo-sunrise overlay |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Rumit n00b
Joined: 14 Feb 2007 Posts: 1
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
mbar Veteran
Joined: 19 Jan 2005 Posts: 1991 Location: Poland
|
Posted: Thu May 31, 2007 7:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sorry for digging up this thread, but I did not want to create new one
I'm planning to connect diskless node (i686 architecture, namely P3) to my x86_64 server. Gentoo diskless guide assumes that both (master and slave) architectures are the same.
Are there any quirks or incompatibilities when trying to connect i686 slave to x86_64 master? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
erik258 Advocate
Joined: 12 Apr 2005 Posts: 2650 Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota, USA
|
Posted: Thu May 31, 2007 8:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't forsee any such difficulties. _________________ Configuring a Firewall? Try my iptables configuration
LinuxCommando.com is my blog for linux-related scraps and tidbits. Stop by for a visit! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
WereCatf n00b
Joined: 26 Jul 2007 Posts: 1
|
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 10:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
mbar wrote: | Sorry for digging up this thread, but I did not want to create new one
I'm planning to connect diskless node (i686 architecture, namely P3) to my x86_64 server. Gentoo diskless guide assumes that both (master and slave) architectures are the same.
Are there any quirks or incompatibilities when trying to connect i686 slave to x86_64 master? |
Just remember that the files being served to the slave must be compiled as 32-bit binaries, not 64-bit ones |
|
Back to top |
|
|
brot Guru
Joined: 06 Apr 2004 Posts: 322
|
Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 11:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
As requested in the howto, thank you (the author ) for that howto, that is exactly what i was searching... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
selig Guru
Joined: 31 Jul 2005 Posts: 425 Location: Prague, Czech Republic
|
Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 7:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nice... thanks a lot for the quick (not counting compile time but hey, it's Gentoo ) & easy diskless setup. The only glitch I've run into is that my "client does not accept options" so I had to issue the commands in pxegrub manually, it does not display a menu. But since I am using this as a rescue solution (so far it looks like at least the partition table got wiped out, along with GRUB - maybe more) for my laptop which has not got a CD-drive, it is not a problem. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|