View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
lefsha Veteran
Joined: 30 Aug 2004 Posts: 1235 Location: Burgas, Bulgaria
|
Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 8:01 pm Post subject: linux-headers-2.6.20-r1 |
|
|
is broken!!!
file asm/page.h is absent.
So please check the package before release it...
Thanks _________________ Lefsha |
|
Back to top |
|
|
loki_val Retired Dev
Joined: 13 Nov 2006 Posts: 418 Location: Denmark
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
lefsha Veteran
Joined: 30 Aug 2004 Posts: 1235 Location: Burgas, Bulgaria
|
Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 11:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I expected everything but known bugs!
In any other reliable system I would expected to get a new dependence for perl etc.
But it seems that Gentoo is none of them.
I'm really sorry to see the way Gentoo go...
Hint: ~x86 is NOT something what has bugs by default... _________________ Lefsha |
|
Back to top |
|
|
loki_val Retired Dev
Joined: 13 Nov 2006 Posts: 418 Location: Denmark
|
Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 11:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Holy moly, don't get your panties in a twist. There's a workaround at this bug. And you're mistaken. ~x86 is expected to break at times. That is where breakage occurs. Because otherwise breakage would occur in x86 and that would be bad. Because x86 is STABLE. ~x86 is... not. If you want something where you can do emerge -e world&&emerge -e world&&emerge -e world and see no breakage, x86 is where you want to be.
From http://devmanual.gentoo.org/keywording/ : Quote: | arch (x86, ppc-macos)
Both the package version and the ebuild are widely tested, known to work and not have any serious issues on the indicated platform.
~arch (~x86, ~ppc-macos)
The package version and the ebuild are believed to work and do not have any known serious bugs, but more testing is required before the package version is considered suitable for arch. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
loki_val Retired Dev
Joined: 13 Nov 2006 Posts: 418 Location: Denmark
|
Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 2:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
lefsha,
I have now provided a patch for perl and a new ebuild in bug 168312. Please try it out so it'll come into the tree sooner. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lefsha Veteran
Joined: 30 Aug 2004 Posts: 1235 Location: Burgas, Bulgaria
|
Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 9:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Second answer is much better.
I've masked this version of headers. This solution works for me.
Cause Gentoo is not binary based system, one have to take a look on package building
before release something even under ~x86 ARCH.
That was my statement. Nothing else.
Thanks. _________________ Lefsha |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|