Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
Mozilla to be removed from Portage
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours

 
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Other Things Gentoo
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Beetle B.
Guru
Guru


Joined: 01 Mar 2003
Posts: 524

PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 4:30 am    Post subject: Mozilla to be removed from Portage Reply with quote

As per the Gentoo Weekly Newsletter.

This sucks - someone please volunteer to maintain it.
_________________
Beetle B.

Please update the table of equivalents.
A Firefox guide.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
davidgurvich
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 23 Apr 2004
Posts: 1063

PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 4:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The seamonkey project has continued from the mozilla codebase. The browser is quite good and accepts firefox plugins.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
AllenJB
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 02 Sep 2005
Posts: 1285

PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 9:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

O V E R L A Y S

Use them. Stop whining.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Torangan
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 21 Mar 2003
Posts: 178

PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 12:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If you really need it and seamonkey doesn't help you - maintain it yourself?
I got bitten by this removal as well as I use monodevelop which had a runtime dependency on mozilla. First I hacked it to work with seamonkey, then I created a local ebuild for the latest version which I happily found to not require it anymore. Now seamonkey is gone as well as the hack and I'm happy. Took some of my time in between but well, such is life. Gentoo at least makes such things easy to do.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mark_alec
Bodhisattva
Bodhisattva


Joined: 11 Sep 2004
Posts: 6066
Location: Melbourne, Australia

PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 12:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mozilla is dead, that is why it is being removed. The Mozilla Corporation develops Firefox and Thunderbird, while the community maintains Seamonkey (replacement for the mozilla suite.)
_________________
www.gentoo.org.au || #gentoo-au
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Carlo
Developer
Developer


Joined: 12 Aug 2002
Posts: 3356

PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 3:00 pm    Post subject: Re: Mozilla to be removed from Portage Reply with quote

Beetle B. wrote:
This sucks - someone please volunteer to maintain it.

Upstream doesn't maintain it anymore. Mozilla is vulnerable to many of the issues fixed with the recent Firefox/Seamonkey updates. Please inform yourself before starting whining.
_________________
Please make sure that you have searched for an answer to a question after reading all the relevant docs.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Beetle B.
Guru
Guru


Joined: 01 Mar 2003
Posts: 524

PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 8:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Use them. Stop whining.


Quote:
Please inform yourself before starting whining.


Wow. I had heard of the legendary friendliness of the Gentoo forums. Now I can experience it firsthand.

What, pray tell, made you think I was whining? Do you know what "This sucks" means?

For the record, I did not know about Seamonkey. Thanks for letting me know about it, and also letting me know that the Gentoo forums is not the place to ask such things - it must be for those who already know things.

There are probably no shortage of packages in Portage that are not maintained upstream. We don't just remove them for that reason, do we? I don't have issues with the developers not wanting it around: But I know that that's not the reason it's being dropped.
_________________
Beetle B.

Please update the table of equivalents.
A Firefox guide.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bobnoxous
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 03 May 2005
Posts: 240

PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 8:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Presentation is important. If you had asked why it's being removed instead of saying it sucks that it's being removed, the responses probably would've been more polite as well. But, sometimes people respond abrasively anyway.

There are many people on these forums, and many do not have good interpersonal skills. If you recognize that people tend to take the written word in the most negative light possible (defense mechanism, I guess), and phrase your comments with that in mind, you'll generally get back more positive responses.

In any case, try to have a bit of a thick skin. You did get the answers you need.
_________________
"The problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so sure of themselves while wiser people are so full of doubt."
- Bertrand Russell
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Beetle B.
Guru
Guru


Joined: 01 Mar 2003
Posts: 524

PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 10:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
If you had asked why it's being removed instead of saying it sucks that it's being removed, the responses probably would've been more polite as well.


I didn't ask because I knew quite well why it was being removed - which is why I was requesting someone volunteer to maintain it. (Requesting, not demanding).

Quote:
In any case, try to have a bit of a thick skin. You did get the answers you need.


Indeed I did. The answers didn't bother me much - I've been on this forum for a while. I merely wanted to highlight the fact that when what is considered one of the most beginner-friendly[1] Linux distribution forums has a developer responding the way he/she did, there's a problem. Imagine if someone new to Gentoo got such answers.

I remember some years ago we had many people switching from Debian to Gentoo just because the Debian forums were not exactly friendly - to the point that people on the Debian forums were getting worried and highlighted the issue (can't find the corresponding thread on the Gentoo forums - probably late 2003). Let's not turn into Debian.

[1]Beginner-friendly refers to the forums, not Gentoo.
_________________
Beetle B.

Please update the table of equivalents.
A Firefox guide.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Carlo
Developer
Developer


Joined: 12 Aug 2002
Posts: 3356

PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 10:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Beetle B. wrote:
What, pray tell, made you think I was whining? Do you know what "This sucks" means?

Your begging that someone should maintain it. That's different to a friendly question why a package gets removed from the repository.

Beetle B. wrote:
There are probably no shortage of packages in Portage that are not maintained upstream. We don't just remove them for that reason, do we?

Abandoned software gets dropped sooner or later - and the rule of thumb is: the sooner the better. Exception is, when there're a lot of other packages depending on it and/or one or more developers decide that it's worth taking upstream responsibilities (Gtk+ 1.x would be an example).

Beetle B. wrote:
I don't have issues with the developers not wanting it around: But I know that that's not the reason it's being dropped.

What do you think the reason is!? We simply don't want vulnerable software in the repository.
_________________
Please make sure that you have searched for an answer to a question after reading all the relevant docs.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Beetle B.
Guru
Guru


Joined: 01 Mar 2003
Posts: 524

PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 11:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Your begging that someone should maintain it. That's different to a friendly question why a package gets removed from the repository.


Is the world binary? If it's not a friendly question, it's then whining?

Quote:
What do you think the reason is!?


"Most packages which are listed under the Last Rites section are in need of some love and care and can remain in the tree if proper maintainership is established."

That was my assumption, as stated in the GWN.

Quote:
We simply don't want vulnerable software in the repository.


Masking?
_________________
Beetle B.

Please update the table of equivalents.
A Firefox guide.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PaulBredbury
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 14 Jul 2005
Posts: 7310

PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 11:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Masking would be reasonable if there were no alternative programs to use instead.

However, Mozilla does have alternatives - see /usr/portage/www-client/*
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gergan Penkov
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 17 Jul 2004
Posts: 1464
Location: das kleinste Kuhdorf Deutschlands :)

PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 11:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Beetle B. wrote:
Quote:
If you had asked why it's being removed instead of saying it sucks that it's being removed, the responses probably would've been more polite as well.


I didn't ask because I knew quite well why it was being removed - which is why I was requesting someone volunteer to maintain it. (Requesting, not demanding).

Quote:
In any case, try to have a bit of a thick skin. You did get the answers you need.


Indeed I did. The answers didn't bother me much - I've been on this forum for a while. I merely wanted to highlight the fact that when what is considered one of the most beginner-friendly[1] Linux distribution forums has a developer responding the way he/she did, there's a problem. Imagine if someone new to Gentoo got such answers.

I remember some years ago we had many people switching from Debian to Gentoo just because the Debian forums were not exactly friendly - to the point that people on the Debian forums were getting worried and highlighted the issue (can't find the corresponding thread on the Gentoo forums - probably late 2003). Let's not turn into Debian.

[1]Beginner-friendly refers to the forums, not Gentoo.

There are distributions which have the resources to patch such badly written software for ages and their names are redhat, suse and probably debian, they could not update to newer versions as these are server binary distributions and have more or less to keep the ABI-versions...
You are using gentoo, which does not rely on ABI-staleness for the most part of it as it has the tools to resolve the problems, because of this, no one is willing to patch some dead fish.
You should be pleased to hear that your problem should have appeared earlier (a year ago) if the security policies were followed to the point...
If you still want to make a zombie from your pc - google for the mozilla-binary and use it ...
_________________
"I knew when an angel whispered into my ear,
You gotta get him away, yeah
Hey little bitch!
Be glad you finally walked away or you may have not lived another day."
Godsmack
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Carlo
Developer
Developer


Joined: 12 Aug 2002
Posts: 3356

PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 12:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Beetle B. wrote:
"Most packages which are listed under the Last Rites section are in need of some love and care and can remain in the tree if proper maintainership is established."

Nice words these are. In general not even wrong - they mean you are asked to step up and not to urge others to do so.

Beetle B. wrote:
Quote:
We simply don't want vulnerable software in the repository.

Masking?

Masking is a temporary solution and means no support either. Put the ebuild in your overlay and maintain it yourself, if you're so keen after it, despite the known vulnerabilities.
_________________
Please make sure that you have searched for an answer to a question after reading all the relevant docs.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mikegpitt
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 22 May 2004
Posts: 3224

PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 3:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The only problem I see with seamonkey is that there appears to be very few themes for it. I hope as the project matures this problem lessens. I liked using mozilla on my desktop (firefox on laptop), but now I'm not sure if I should keep the old buggy version of mozilla or upgrade and have it look ugly.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Beetle B.
Guru
Guru


Joined: 01 Mar 2003
Posts: 524

PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 3:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Nice words these are. In general not even wrong - they mean you are asked to step up and not to urge others to do so.


I'm sorry, but that's not what it means. Plain English - the statement does not limit who is being asked to maintain it. They just wanted someone.

And that's beside the point. It implies that they felt it would be nice to keep it around in Portage, but they can't do it and were asking someone to maintain it - as opposed to saying that the package was hazardous and they want it removed. I won't accept blame for the assumptions I made.
_________________
Beetle B.

Please update the table of equivalents.
A Firefox guide.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jonnevers
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 02 Jan 2003
Posts: 1594
Location: Gentoo64 land

PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 4:15 pm    Post subject: Re: Mozilla to be removed from Portage Reply with quote

Beetle B. wrote:
As per the Gentoo Weekly Newsletter.

This sucks - someone please volunteer to maintain it.

why? I've had USE="firefox -mozilla" for months now. you volunteer to maintain it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
EzInKy
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 1742
Location: Kentucky

PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 4:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

mikegpitt wrote:
The only problem I see with seamonkey is that there appears to be very few themes for it. I hope as the project matures this problem lessens. I liked using mozilla on my desktop (firefox on laptop), but now I'm not sure if I should keep the old buggy version of mozilla or upgrade and have it look ugly.


Upgrade. I doubt Multizilla, the kitchen sink of extensions, will be supporting the old code base either.
_________________
Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mikegpitt
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 22 May 2004
Posts: 3224

PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 10:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

EzInKy wrote:
mikegpitt wrote:
The only problem I see with seamonkey is that there appears to be very few themes for it. I hope as the project matures this problem lessens. I liked using mozilla on my desktop (firefox on laptop), but now I'm not sure if I should keep the old buggy version of mozilla or upgrade and have it look ugly.


Upgrade. I doubt Multizilla, the kitchen sink of extensions, will be supporting the old code base either.
I actually chose the opposite for now. All I need is the Orbit theme for seamonkey working and I think I will make the switch.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
oot
n00b
n00b


Joined: 03 Nov 2003
Posts: 49

PostPosted: Sat Apr 14, 2007 5:53 pm    Post subject: disgruntled, and i'm armed Reply with quote

Way off topic, butt it still looks like a good place to put this.
I found this thread with search terms "seamonkey sucks". i also think it sucks.
I was hoping to find some tips n tricks to make seamonkey less sucky.
--If that sort of whining offends youse, see the 'thick skin' suggestion above.
I have mozilla working great. But now that it's put to pasture, we all must eventually look to another browser.

I stopped posting to this forum long ago because of the pissiness and short tempers.
Tho it is a wealth of information, and there are people here well deserving of the status of guru,
there are other 'gurus' that easily see fit to belittle and put the less knowlegable in our places.
After reading this thread, i think i'm finally going to start checking into another distro.
Maybe i'll go back to slackware. When i used it b4, there weren't as many choices 'out o the box', but it just worked.
And no need for regular visits to a support forum.
It is really sweet to have portage grab the tarballs and apply patches, but i guess i can go back to doing it myself.
Seems like every time i search here anymore, i have to wade thru big headed posts digging into a guy that just wants a simple answer.
For those that feel the need to do that, we're not all 733t like you.
Everyone that is trying to enjoy the freedom of this distro doesn't have the vast knowlege and experience as you.
The way i interpret the original post (and are my sentiments, too) ;
'I liked mozilla. Seamonkey is not my cup o tea. I don't have the resources to keep mozilla active. Could any of youse?'
-Pardon me, Beetle B., if i'm off the mark.
But it didn't sound like whining to me. I can't see where he might have been begging for anything.
And for the inevitable snotty reply about my leaving gentoo-- scroo ya. Right in the face. Enjoy your distro, guru.
There's always ubuntu, mepis, knoppix, slackware, suse...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
txboy
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 01 Apr 2004
Posts: 86
Location: La Isla - Cádiz (Spain)

PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2007 1:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Torangan wrote:
If you really need it and seamonkey doesn't help you - maintain it yourself?
I got bitten by this removal as well as I use monodevelop which had a runtime dependency on mozilla. First I hacked it to work with seamonkey, then I created a local ebuild for the latest version which I happily found to not require it anymore. Now seamonkey is gone as well as the hack and I'm happy. Took some of my time in between but well, such is life. Gentoo at least makes such things easy to do.

Today I've installed monodevelop in my system, using kde as desktop.
When running, it gives me the error I put below.
I've installed seamonkey too but doesn't solve the problem.
Could you please tell me how to get it working without mozilla ?

Thank you very much in advance. ;)

Code:
grep: /etc/gre.d/*.conf: No existe el fichero o el directorio
which: no mozilla in (/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/opt/bin:/usr/i686-pc-linux-gnu/gcc-bin/4.1.1:/usr/i686-pc-linux-gnu/arm-softfloat-linux-gnu/gcc-bin/4.1.1:/usr/i686-pc-linux-gnu/arm-softfloat-linux-gnueabi/gcc-bin/4.1.1:/opt/blackdown-jdk-1.4.2.03/bin:/opt/blackdown-jdk-1.4.2.03/jre/bin:/usr/kde/3.5/bin:/usr/qt/3/bin:/usr/qt/3-embedded/bin:/usr/games/bin)
QPainter::begin: Cannot paint null pixmap
QPainter::end: Missing begin() or begin() failed
QPainter::begin: Cannot paint null pixmap
QPainter::end: Missing begin() or begin() failed
QPainter::begin: Cannot paint null pixmap
QPainter::end: Missing begin() or begin() failed
QPainter::begin: Cannot paint null pixmap
QPainter::end: Missing begin() or begin() failed
QPainter::begin: Cannot paint null pixmap
QPainter::end: Missing begin() or begin() failed
QPainter::begin: Cannot paint null pixmap
QPainter::end: Missing begin() or begin() failed
QPainter::begin: Cannot paint null pixmap
QPainter::end: Missing begin() or begin() failed
QPainter::begin: Cannot paint null pixmap
QPainter::end: Missing begin() or begin() failed
QPainter::begin: Cannot paint null pixmap
QPainter::end: Missing begin() or begin() failed
QPainter::begin: Cannot paint null pixmap
QPainter::end: Missing begin() or begin() failed
QPainter::begin: Cannot paint null pixmap
QPainter::end: Missing begin() or begin() failed
QPainter::begin: Cannot paint null pixmap
QPainter::end: Missing begin() or begin() failed
QPainter::begin: Cannot paint null pixmap
QPainter::end: Missing begin() or begin() failed
QPainter::begin: Cannot paint null pixmap
QPainter::end: Missing begin() or begin() failed
QPainter::begin: Cannot paint null pixmap
QPainter::end: Missing begin() or begin() failed
QPainter::begin: Cannot paint null pixmap
QPainter::end: Missing begin() or begin() failed
QPainter::begin: Cannot paint null pixmap
QPainter::end: Missing begin() or begin() failed
QPainter::begin: Cannot paint null pixmap
QPainter::end: Missing begin() or begin() failed
QPainter::begin: Cannot paint null pixmap
QPainter::end: Missing begin() or begin() failed
QPainter::begin: Cannot paint null pixmap
QPainter::end: Missing begin() or begin() failed
QPainter::begin: Cannot paint null pixmap
QPainter::end: Missing begin() or begin() failed
QPainter::begin: Cannot paint null pixmap
QPainter::end: Missing begin() or begin() failed
QPainter::begin: Cannot paint null pixmap
QPainter::end: Missing begin() or begin() failed
QPainter::begin: Cannot paint null pixmap
QPainter::end: Missing begin() or begin() failed
QPainter::begin: Cannot paint null pixmap
QPainter::end: Missing begin() or begin() failed
QPainter::begin: Cannot paint null pixmap
QPainter::end: Missing begin() or begin() failed
QPainter::begin: Cannot paint null pixmap
QPainter::end: Missing begin() or begin() failed
QPainter::begin: Cannot paint null pixmap
QPainter::end: Missing begin() or begin() failed
QPainter::begin: Cannot paint null pixmap
QPainter::end: Missing begin() or begin() failed
QPainter::begin: Cannot paint null pixmap
QPainter::end: Missing begin() or begin() failed
QPainter::begin: Cannot paint null pixmap
QPainter::end: Missing begin() or begin() failed
QPainter::begin: Cannot paint null pixmap
QPainter::end: Missing begin() or begin() failed
QPainter::begin: Cannot paint null pixmap
QPainter::end: Missing begin() or begin() failed
QPainter::begin: Cannot paint null pixmap
QPainter::end: Missing begin() or begin() failed
QPainter::begin: Cannot paint null pixmap
QPainter::end: Missing begin() or begin() failed
QPainter::begin: Cannot paint null pixmap
QPainter::end: Missing begin() or begin() failed
QPainter::begin: Cannot paint null pixmap
QPainter::end: Missing begin() or begin() failed
QPainter::begin: Cannot paint null pixmap
QPainter::end: Missing begin() or begin() failed
QPainter::begin: Cannot paint null pixmap
QPainter::end: Missing begin() or begin() failed
QPainter::begin: Cannot paint null pixmap
QPainter::end: Missing begin() or begin() failed
QPainter::begin: Cannot paint null pixmap
QPainter::end: Missing begin() or begin() failed
QPainter::begin: Cannot paint null pixmap
QPainter::end: Missing begin() or begin() failed
QPainter::begin: Cannot paint null pixmap
QPainter::end: Missing begin() or begin() failed
QPainter::begin: Cannot paint null pixmap
QPainter::end: Missing begin() or begin() failed
QPainter::begin: Cannot paint null pixmap
QPainter::end: Missing begin() or begin() failed
QPainter::begin: Cannot paint null pixmap
QPainter::end: Missing begin() or begin() failed
** Message: Bad encoding for '/home/txboy/educaci\xf3n'
Consider using MONO_EXTERNAL_ENCODINGS

Stacktrace:

  at (wrapper managed-to-native) Gnome.Icon.gnome_icon_lookup_sync (intptr,intptr,intptr,intptr,int,int&) <0x00004>
  at (wrapper managed-to-native) Gnome.Icon.gnome_icon_lookup_sync (intptr,intptr,intptr,intptr,int,int&) <0xffffffff>
  at Gnome.Icon.LookupSync (Gtk.IconTheme,Gnome.ThumbnailFactory,string,string,Gnome.IconLookupFlags,Gnome.IconLookupResultFlags&) <0x0009c>
  at MonoDevelop.Core.Gui.Utils.FileIconLoader.GetPixbufForFile (string,int) <0x00223>
  at MonoDevelop.Ide.Gui.Pads.FileListItem..ctor (string) <0x00107>
  at MonoDevelop.Ide.Gui.Pads.FileScout.OnDirChanged (string) <0x00124>
  at MonoDevelop.Ide.Gui.Pads.FileScout..ctor () <0x002b1>
  at (wrapper runtime-invoke) System.Object.runtime_invoke_void (object,intptr,intptr,intptr) <0xffffffff>
  at (wrapper managed-to-native) System.Reflection.MonoCMethod.InternalInvoke (object,object[]) <0x00004>
  at (wrapper managed-to-native) System.Reflection.MonoCMethod.InternalInvoke (object,object[]) <0xffffffff>
  at System.Reflection.MonoCMethod.Invoke (object,System.Reflection.BindingFlags,System.Reflection.Binder,object[],System.Globalization.CultureInfo) <0x00090>
  at System.Reflection.MonoCMethod.Invoke (System.Reflection.BindingFlags,System.Reflection.Binder,object[],System.Globalization.CultureInfo) <0x0001c>
  at System.Reflection.ConstructorInfo.Invoke (object[]) <0x00035>
  at System.Activator.CreateInstance (System.Type,bool) <0x0011d>
  at System.Activator.CreateInstance (System.Type) <0x0000c>
  at MonoDevelop.Core.AddIns.AddIn.CreateObject (string) <0x00022>
  at MonoDevelop.Ide.Codons.PadCodon.CreatePad () <0x000a8>
  at MonoDevelop.Ide.Codons.PadCodon.BuildItem (object,System.Collections.ArrayList,MonoDevelop.Core.AddIns.ConditionCollection) <0x00014>
  at MonoDevelop.Core.AddIns.DefaultAddInTreeNode.BuildChildItems (object) <0x00167>
  at MonoDevelop.Core.AddIns.AddInService.GetTreeItems (string,System.Type) <0x00066>
  at MonoDevelop.Ide.Gui.DefaultWorkbench.InitializeLayout (MonoDevelop.Ide.Gui.IWorkbenchLayout) <0x00061>
  at MonoDevelop.Ide.Gui.Workbench.Initialize (MonoDevelop.Core.IProgressMonitor) <0x0009a>
  at MonoDevelop.Ide.Gui.IdeApp.Initialize (MonoDevelop.Core.IProgressMonitor) <0x0011d>
  at MonoDevelop.Ide.Gui.IdeStartup.Run (string[]) <0x00b71>
  at MonoDevelop.Core.AddIns.AddInService.StartApplication (string,string[]) <0x0017c>
  at MonoDevelop.Startup.SharpDevelopMain.Main (string[]) <0x00039>
  at (wrapper runtime-invoke) System.Object.runtime_invoke_int_string[] (object,intptr,intptr,intptr) <0xffffffff>

Native stacktrace:

        /usr/bin/mono [0x815f09b]
        /usr/bin/mono [0x8129ed8]
        [0xb7f5d440]
        /usr/lib/libfam.so.0 [0xb3aa5a52]
        /usr/lib/libfam.so.0 [0xb3a9f829]
        /lib/ld-linux.so.2 [0xb7f6bbe5]
        /lib/ld-linux.so.2 [0xb7f6bcf1]
        /lib/ld-linux.so.2 [0xb7f6f932]
        /lib/ld-linux.so.2 [0xb7f6b832]
        /lib/ld-linux.so.2 [0xb7f6f209]
        /lib/libdl.so.2 [0xb7d1ee3d]
        /lib/ld-linux.so.2 [0xb7f6b832]
        /lib/libdl.so.2 [0xb7d1f2dc]
        /lib/libdl.so.2(dlopen+0x41) [0xb7d1ed71]
        /usr/lib/libgmodule-2.0.so.0(g_module_open+0x162) [0xb7f344e2]

Debug info from gdb:

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1210988864 (LWP 23818)]
[New Thread -1269822576 (LWP 23909)]
[New Thread -1268769904 (LWP 23908)]
[New Thread -1264346224 (LWP 23907)]
[New Thread -1263293552 (LWP 23906)]
[New Thread -1262240880 (LWP 23903)]
[New Thread -1261114480 (LWP 23902)]
[New Thread -1260061808 (LWP 23898)]
[New Thread -1258943600 (LWP 23895)]
[New Thread -1257698416 (LWP 23894)]
[New Thread -1219695728 (LWP 23832)]
[New Thread -1213936752 (LWP 23831)]
0xb7f5d410 in ?? ()
  12 Thread -1213936752 (LWP 23831)  0xb7f5d410 in ?? ()
  11 Thread -1219695728 (LWP 23832)  0xb7f5d410 in ?? ()
  10 Thread -1257698416 (LWP 23894)  0xb7f5d410 in ?? ()
  9 Thread -1258943600 (LWP 23895)  0xb7f5d410 in ?? ()
  8 Thread -1260061808 (LWP 23898)  0xb7f5d410 in ?? ()
  7 Thread -1261114480 (LWP 23902)  0xb7f5d410 in ?? ()
  6 Thread -1262240880 (LWP 23903)  0xb7f5d410 in ?? ()
  5 Thread -1263293552 (LWP 23906)  0xb7f5d410 in ?? ()
  4 Thread -1264346224 (LWP 23907)  0xb7f5d410 in ?? ()
  3 Thread -1268769904 (LWP 23908)  0xb7f5d410 in ?? ()
  2 Thread -1269822576 (LWP 23909)  0xb7f5d410 in ?? ()
  1 Thread -1210988864 (LWP 23818)  0xb7f5d410 in ?? ()
0xb7f5d410 in ?? ()

Thread 12 (Thread -1213936752 (LWP 23831)):
#0  0xb7f5d410 in ?? ()
#1  0xb7a4c3b8 in ?? ()
#2  0x081f0190 in ?? ()
#3  0x00000000 in ?? ()

Thread 11 (Thread -1219695728 (LWP 23832)):
#0  0xb7f5d410 in ?? ()
#1  0xb74ce1b8 in ?? ()
#2  0x0000002d in ?? ()
#3  0x00000000 in ?? ()

Thread 10 (Thread -1257698416 (LWP 23894)):
#0  0xb7f5d410 in ?? ()
#1  0xb5090140 in ?? ()
#2  0x081f0190 in ?? ()
#3  0xb5090118 in ?? ()
#4  0xb7e86568 in accept () from /lib/libpthread.so.0
#5  0x08100069 in ?? ()
#6  0x00000035 in ?? ()
#7  0x00000000 in ?? ()

Thread 9 (Thread -1258943600 (LWP 23895)):
#0  0xb7f5d410 in ?? ()
#1  0xb4f600cc in ?? ()
#2  0x0000002d in ?? ()
#3  0x00000000 in ?? ()

Thread 8 (Thread -1260061808 (LWP 23898)):
#0  0xb7f5d410 in ?? ()
#1  0xb4e4efa0 in ?? ()
#2  0x00000051 in ?? ()
#3  0x00000000 in ?? ()

Thread 7 (Thread -1261114480 (LWP 23902)):
#0  0xb7f5d410 in ?? ()
#1  0xb4d4dc24 in ?? ()
#2  0x00000023 in ?? ()
#3  0x00000000 in ?? ()

Thread 6 (Thread -1262240880 (LWP 23903)):
#0  0xb7f5d410 in ?? ()
#1  0xb4c3b1c0 in ?? ()
#2  0x081f0190 in ?? ()
#3  0xb4c3b1a4 in ?? ()
#4  0xb7e86b36 in ?? () from /lib/libpthread.so.0
#5  0x080fec96 in ?? ()
#6  0xb4c3b1ac in ?? ()
#7  0xb4c3b1a4 in ?? ()
#8  0x00000000 in ?? ()

Thread 5 (Thread -1263293552 (LWP 23906)):
#0  0xb7f5d410 in ?? ()
#1  0xb4b39ff0 in ?? ()
#2  0x081f0190 in ?? ()
#3  0xb4b39fc8 in ?? ()
#4  0xb7e866e8 in recvfrom () from /lib/libpthread.so.0
#5  0x08100c6b in ?? ()
#6  0x00000037 in ?? ()
#7  0x004bd010 in ?? ()
#8  0x00001000 in ?? ()
#9  0x00000000 in ?? ()

Thread 4 (Thread -1264346224 (LWP 23907)):
#0  0xb7f5d410 in ?? ()
#1  0xb4a390e8 in ?? ()
#2  0x00000021 in ?? ()
#3  0x00000000 in ?? ()

Thread 3 (Thread -1268769904 (LWP 23908)):
#0  0xb7f5d410 in ?? ()
#1  0xb46010e8 in ?? ()
#2  0x0000000b in ?? ()
#3  0x00000000 in ?? ()

Thread 2 (Thread -1269822576 (LWP 23909)):
#0  0xb7f5d410 in ?? ()
#1  0xb45001e0 in ?? ()
#2  0x081f0190 in ?? ()
#3  0xb45001c4 in ?? ()
#4  0xb7e86b36 in ?? () from /lib/libpthread.so.0
#5  0x080fec96 in ?? ()
#6  0xb45001cc in ?? ()
#7  0xb45001c4 in ?? ()
#8  0x00000000 in ?? ()

Thread 1 (Thread -1210988864 (LWP 23818)):
#0  0xb7f5d410 in ?? ()
#0  0xb7f5d410 in ?? ()


=================================================================
Got a SIGSEGV while executing native code. This usually indicates
a fatal error in the mono runtime or one of the native libraries
used by your application.
=================================================================
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
c0r0
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 25 Jun 2006
Posts: 81
Location: Jakarta -Indonesia

PostPosted: Fri May 18, 2007 12:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

wow seamonkey is great, i just want my box to be stable and i use seamonkey. it's better than firefox, in performance i think. firefox, hang more often than not
_________________
- Laughter, The Best Medicine -
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
abdullah
n00b
n00b


Joined: 16 May 2007
Posts: 33
Location: My Chair, My Computing room, My house, NSW, Australia

PostPosted: Fri May 18, 2007 11:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

WOW interesting thread...

Never had a problem with Firefox, but then only use it for UNI as they
don't allow the use of Opera... Opera is my default browser, which has
only ever hickuped when i ran out of HDD space...

Simple fact is that yes mozilla is gone get over it, it was just a port of
netscape (eeewww) personally I only had it in coz of the deps on it, which
are now gone...

txboy

If you read his full post you would see that he said at the end of it...
Quote:
...then I created a local ebuild for the latest version which I happily
found to not require it anymore. Now seamonkey is gone as well as the hack
and I'm happy. Took some of my time in between but well, such is life. Gentoo at least
makes such things easy to do.


Perhaps you should instead ask him to post the e-build or start a new thread
asking for help with your problem with a program and not hijack another persons
thread...

This whole thread was started when someone decided to let off steam about the fact that
thier favorite dinosaur was at last being put down and was not in fact a support thread...
_________________
laa 'llaaha 'illallah
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Other Things Gentoo All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum