| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Which kernel u found to be the fastest |
| gentoo-gaming 2.4.20-r3 |
|
16% |
[ 21 ] |
| gentoo-sources 2.4.20-r5 |
|
17% |
[ 22 ] |
| development-sources 2.5.67+ |
|
23% |
[ 29 ] |
| other if so specify |
|
42% |
[ 53 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 125 |
|
| Author |
Message |
russianpirate
Veteran
Joined: 26 Sep 2004
Posts: 1167
Location: Detroit, MI
|
 Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 9:51 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| omg WOW.. those r high fps |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jengu
Guru
Joined: 28 Oct 2004
Posts: 384
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2005 9:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
| glxgears is a pretty worthless benchmark for any modern card. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Farner
n00b
Joined: 14 Feb 2005
Posts: 45
Location: Malmö, Sweden
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2005 1:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ATI x850xt
| Code: |
49558 frames in 5.0 seconds = 9911.600 FPS
49481 frames in 5.0 seconds = 9896.200 FPS
49549 frames in 5.0 seconds = 9909.800 FPS
49555 frames in 5.0 seconds = 9911.000 FPS
49544 frames in 5.0 seconds = 9908.800 FPS
|
_________________
Workstation: CPU: AMD64 3500+ (250*10=2500MHz) MEMORY: 1024MB GFX: Ati Radeon x850xt (Core: 550MHz MEM: 1.2GHz) OS: Gentoo x86_64 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
simkin
Apprentice
Joined: 25 Jun 2003
Posts: 164
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2005 1:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The cheapest card in the store, 48...
ATI Radeon 9250 (9200 Pro)
Kernel 2.6.13-ck1 | ati-drivers 8.14.13-r5
AMD64 3000+ | 1x 512 mb ram
~ 1450 fps in glxgears
Not tweaked in any way, I only play Wesnoth  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
andrew_wiggin
n00b
Joined: 21 Apr 2005
Posts: 59
Location: Israel
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2005 3:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
P4 2.6 , 9600PRO , 2.6.12-nitro5
~3000 FPS in glx gears |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Rüpel
Guru
Joined: 06 Nov 2002
Posts: 316
Location: Berlin/Germany
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2005 6:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Athlon XP 2600+, 1GB RAM, Radeon 9800 Pro, 2.6.11-gentoo-r9
~4500 fps in glxgears
~844 fps in fgl_glxgears
_________________
:wq |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
russianpirate
Veteran
Joined: 26 Sep 2004
Posts: 1167
Location: Detroit, MI
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2005 7:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Farner wrote: | ATI x850xt
| Code: |
49558 frames in 5.0 seconds = 9911.600 FPS
49481 frames in 5.0 seconds = 9896.200 FPS
49549 frames in 5.0 seconds = 9909.800 FPS
49555 frames in 5.0 seconds = 9911.000 FPS
49544 frames in 5.0 seconds = 9908.800 FPS
|
|
If you dont have wi**ows you're crazy! With that card, I would even dual boot. You can play any game on the market (probably even UT2007 next year)..  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
blackhat006
n00b
Joined: 11 Feb 2005
Posts: 28
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2005 8:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dell c510
kernel 2.6.10
ATI Radeon Mobility M6 LY
Intel 1.7 Ghz
| Code: | 541 frames in 5.0 seconds = 108.200 FPS
552 frames in 5.0 seconds = 110.400 FPS
554 frames in 5.0 seconds = 110.800 FPS
551 frames in 5.0 seconds = 110.200 FPS
554 frames in 5.0 seconds = 110.800 FPS
552 frames in 5.0 seconds = 110.400 FPS
553 frames in 5.0 seconds = 110.600 FPS
|
heheh funny if I use the ati in opengl I lose the direct rendering but win 60-70 fps.
any ideas how can this numbers be improved?? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Farner
n00b
Joined: 14 Feb 2005
Posts: 45
Location: Malmö, Sweden
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2005 3:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| russianpirate wrote: | | Farner wrote: | ATI x850xt
| Code: |
49558 frames in 5.0 seconds = 9911.600 FPS
49481 frames in 5.0 seconds = 9896.200 FPS
49549 frames in 5.0 seconds = 9909.800 FPS
49555 frames in 5.0 seconds = 9911.000 FPS
49544 frames in 5.0 seconds = 9908.800 FPS
|
|
If you dont have wi**ows you're crazy! With that card, I would even dual boot. You can play any game on the market (probably even UT2007 next year).. |
Hehe Yes I do have windows. But not because of the games, just because we have Visualbasic dot net in my school  Im thinking of downgrading to a 6600gt from nvidia or something because I never play :p. I did play alot when I bought it ofcource, but not now. :\
_________________
Workstation: CPU: AMD64 3500+ (250*10=2500MHz) MEMORY: 1024MB GFX: Ati Radeon x850xt (Core: 550MHz MEM: 1.2GHz) OS: Gentoo x86_64 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ldoe3000
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 19 Jul 2005
Posts: 78
Location: Portland, OR
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2005 2:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
Idle system
| Code: |
51343 frames in 5.0 seconds = 10268.600 FPS
51269 frames in 5.0 seconds = 10253.800 FPS
51319 frames in 5.0 seconds = 10263.800 FPS
51274 frames in 5.0 seconds = 10254.800 FPS
51264 frames in 5.0 seconds = 10252.800 FPS
|
While compiling Firefox 1.0.6-r1
| Code: |
23041 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4608.200 FPS
18941 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3788.200 FPS
18961 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3792.200 FPS
18316 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3663.200 FPS
18469 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3693.800 FPS
|
_________________
Athlon64 3500+ MSI Neo2 Platinum
2X74 WD Raptor Raid 0
2X512MB Crucial Ballistix
ATI x800XT PE (8.18.6)
SB Audigy 2 ZS
Dell 24" Widescreen LCD
Dual boot: Gentoo x86_64 2.6.13-r4 , Windows XP x64 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Aynjell
Veteran
Joined: 28 Jun 2004
Posts: 1117
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2005 6:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
| russianpirate wrote: | | Farner wrote: | ATI x850xt
| Code: |
49558 frames in 5.0 seconds = 9911.600 FPS
49481 frames in 5.0 seconds = 9896.200 FPS
49549 frames in 5.0 seconds = 9909.800 FPS
49555 frames in 5.0 seconds = 9911.000 FPS
49544 frames in 5.0 seconds = 9908.800 FPS
|
|
If you dont have wi**ows you're crazy! With that card, I would even dual boot. You can play any game on the market (probably even UT2007 next year).. |
I'm pretty linux only and I have a recent card, though his is more recent... my 6800 is still up there.
you don't gotta be a hardcore gamer to make the games you do play be enjoyable. Also, with these results, are you guys getting anything noticable in regards to actual gameplay? How do you do in Doom 3? I half half the ram speed of most of these cards and run 9000+ with 24bpp... in fact here's the specifics:
45788 frames in 5.0 seconds = 9157.518 FPS
46175 frames in 5.0 seconds = 9234.936 FPS
41879 frames in 5.0 seconds = 8375.666 FPS
46040 frames in 5.0 seconds = 9207.925 FPS
46287 frames in 5.0 seconds = 9257.246 FPS
46139 frames in 5.0 seconds = 9227.676 FPS
45995 frames in 5.0 seconds = 9198.935 FPS
46474 frames in 5.0 seconds = 9294.798 FPS
This is on a dual screen setup using Xinerama in KDE with a few daemons running (syslog-ng, webfs, acpid, etc). both are at 1280x1024@75hz.
I also play Doom 3 at 1280x1024 on High with 8xAF and 2xQ AA, and play at playable speeds 30-40+.
Lastly, I also noticed that unlike nVidia cards, ATI cards still work to whatever extent even when the CPU is maxed out. I would go ATI for my next card if the next gen card was decent and or they stopped working for Microsoft... oh well, nvidia also worked for microsoft, so hate everyone, eh?
_________________
CPU: 3800+ X2 (2.5Ghz)
GPU: eVGA 7600GT (640/1700)
MOBO: DFI SLI-DR (Surprisingly good!)
RAM: 2 x OCZ Gold 1024 DDR500 3-4-3-7 (2048)
HDD: Western Digital Raptor |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
InsaneHamster
Guru
Joined: 02 May 2003
Posts: 435
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2006 4:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
i recently re-installed gentoo on my acer 4005 laptop (yes its the ferrari)
(~amd64 (2005.1 profile) 2.6.15-gentoo-sources ati-drivers-8.20.3)
x86_64
anyways i now for somereason get ~4745 in glxgears
before highest was like 3800~ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Septor
Apprentice
Joined: 01 Sep 2004
Posts: 150
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
InsaneHamster
Guru
Joined: 02 May 2003
Posts: 435
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2006 10:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i understand it is NOT a benchmark tool. however after 5-6 installs previously always getting 3800~ in it......
then again this entire fglrxglears doesnt work, never worked once for me .
or what ever the command is
so what are we as linux ati users supposed to use to benchmark ? (other then games time demos ) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Septor
Apprentice
Joined: 01 Sep 2004
Posts: 150
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2006 1:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
Benchmarks are meant to help you determine performance levels for applications that you use. If you play quake, benchmark quake, if you play xbill, benchmark that... After all, what good is a benchmark on someone else's machine if you don't even have that game/application?
And if you don't have fgl_glxgears working you should get that fixed... http://rage3d.com/board/forumdisplay.php?f=88 is a good spot to get help with that. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
InsaneHamster
Guru
Joined: 02 May 2003
Posts: 435
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2006 1:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Septor wrote: | Benchmarks are meant to help you determine performance levels for applications that you use. If you play quake, benchmark quake, if you play xbill, benchmark that... After all, what good is a benchmark on someone else's machine if you don't even have that game/application?
And if you don't have fgl_glxgears working you should get that fixed... http://rage3d.com/board/forumdisplay.php?f=88 is a good spot to get help with that. |
i will read over it now. however not once have i had this command work (gentoo). yet ati specific drivers fully work !!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
_droop_
l33t
Joined: 30 May 2004
Posts: 957
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2006 2:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ati 9550.
~900 fps in glxgears with ati dri free driver (xorg 7.0).
sufficiant to play nwn, FREE... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jkay
Apprentice
Joined: 31 Dec 2002
Posts: 214
Location: thatched-roof cottages
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2006 12:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Radeon 9800xt, ATI proprietary driver 8.20.8
fgl_glxgears = 945fps
normal glxgears = 4733fps
Could someone tell me why the gears application uses 100% cpu when it tests gfx card render power? 8p ... makes little sense to me. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Gamers & Players
