View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
shaumux Veteran
Joined: 13 May 2005 Posts: 1013 Location: Hamburg
|
Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2007 10:43 am Post subject: Should i regenerate xorg.conf after xorg-server-1.3.0 emerge |
|
|
Ok sao i finally got xorg-server compile so
do i need regenerate xorg.conf?
Thnx |
|
Back to top |
|
|
NeddySeagoon Administrator
Joined: 05 Jul 2003 Posts: 54578 Location: 56N 3W
|
Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2007 11:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
shaumux,
No. xorg.conf should not have changed. There may be some updates to it in etc-update.
If you use a binary blob driver (ATI or nvidia) you may need to rebuild them against the new X server. _________________ Regards,
NeddySeagoon
Computer users fall into two groups:-
those that do backups
those that have never had a hard drive fail. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
shaumux Veteran
Joined: 13 May 2005 Posts: 1013 Location: Hamburg
|
Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2007 12:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
k thnx
but i already regenerated xorg.conf i made a back up of the old one for comapring both and to find any changes it may have
i couldnot find any major changes but there is one change i would like to point out
New one
Code: | Section "Device"
### Available Driver options are:-
### Values: <i>: integer, <f>: float, <bool>: "True"/"False",
### <string>: "String", <freq>: "<f> Hz/kHz/MHz"
### [arg]: arg optional
#Option "NoAccel" # [<bool>]
#Option "SWcursor" # [<bool>]
#Option "ColorKey" # <i>
#Option "CacheLines" # <i>
#Option "Dac6Bit" # [<bool>]
#Option "DRI" # [<bool>]
#Option "NoDDC" # [<bool>]
#Option "ShowCache" # [<bool>]
#Option "XvMCSurfaces" # <i>
#Option "PageFlip" # [<bool>]
Option "XAANoOffscreenPixmaps" "true"
Option "DRI" "true"
Option "RenderAccel" "true"
Identifier "Card0"
Driver "intel"
VendorName "Intel Corporation"
BoardName "82845G/GL[Brookdale-G]/GE Chipset Integrated Graphics Device"
BusID "PCI:0:2:0"
EndSection |
Old one
Code: | Section "Device"
### Available Driver options are:-
### Values: <i>: integer, <f>: float, <bool>: "True"/"False",
### <string>: "String", <freq>: "<f> Hz/kHz/MHz"
### [arg]: arg optional
#Option "NoAccel" # [<bool>]
#Option "SWcursor" # [<bool>]
#Option "ColorKey" # <i>
#Option "CacheLines" # <i>
#Option "Dac6Bit" # [<bool>]
#Option "DRI" # [<bool>]
#Option "NoDDC" # [<bool>]
#Option "ShowCache" # [<bool>]
#Option "XvMCSurfaces" # <i>
#Option "PageFlip" # [<bool>]
Option "XAANoOffscreenPixmaps" "true"
Option "DRI" "true"
Option "RenderAccel" "true"
Identifier "Card0"
Driver "i810"
VendorName "Intel Corporation"
BoardName "82845G/GL[Brookdale-G]/GE Chipset Integrated Graphics Device"
BusID "PCI:0:2:0"
EndSection |
see the Driver part the names are different
i dunno if it coz of xorg-server
i also updated my driver xf86-video-i810 from 1.6 to 2.0
but that shouldn't change the driver name should it? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
NeddySeagoon Administrator
Joined: 05 Jul 2003 Posts: 54578 Location: 56N 3W
|
Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2007 3:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
shaumux,
No, the drive name should not change. I've never heard of an driver called intel, thats not to say it doesn't exit.
i810 is famous though. _________________ Regards,
NeddySeagoon
Computer users fall into two groups:-
those that do backups
those that have never had a hard drive fail. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
shaumux Veteran
Joined: 13 May 2005 Posts: 1013 Location: Hamburg
|
Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2007 3:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
its not that i am having any trouble or anything with this, i just thought i might share it if anybody wants i can post logs with both the drivers i have tested with both of them works same
they r working identically |
|
Back to top |
|
|
shaumux Veteran
Joined: 13 May 2005 Posts: 1013 Location: Hamburg
|
Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2007 3:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
k i found out why is it like that
just looked into the logs and found the module directory
which was /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/
wherfe i found that i810 was a symlink to intel so they r the same.
maybe they changed things in the new version. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|