View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Hellzone Apprentice
Joined: 23 May 2003 Posts: 167
|
Posted: Sun May 25, 2003 10:15 pm Post subject: Apache 2 |
|
|
Ok so i've written into my /etc/make.conf USE="apache2" but still when i try and emerge apache it installs 1.3!? whats going on? i want apache 2.045 as it has a lot of fixes.
-james |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Durenunde n00b
Joined: 22 May 2003 Posts: 26 Location: N.Ireland
|
Posted: Sun May 25, 2003 11:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
you need to make sure you have
Quote: | ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~X86" |
uncommented and in your make.conf aswell and it should emerge for ya _________________ mmmm, pizza |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Hellzone Apprentice
Joined: 23 May 2003 Posts: 167
|
Posted: Mon May 26, 2003 9:10 am Post subject: Re: |
|
|
Yup i have exactly that in my make.conf but still it doesn't emerge.
-james |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dolbz Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 29 Mar 2003 Posts: 138 Location: Nuneaton,UK
|
Posted: Mon May 26, 2003 11:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
Durenunde wrote: | you need to make sure you have
Quote: | ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~X86" |
|
Or even ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86"
not sure if the capitalisation makes a difference but as far as I can tell it does. Just something to try.
Dolbz |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Troy n00b
Joined: 27 May 2003 Posts: 23 Location: Oklahoma
|
Posted: Tue May 27, 2003 4:41 pm Post subject: Try the full path |
|
|
If you are typing
then you are likely to get apache 1.3. Try using the full path to the ebuild script:
Code: | emerge /usr/portage/net-www/apache/apache-2.0.45.ebuild |
Troy _________________ And the glory of the LORD shall be revealed, and all flesh shall see it together: for the mouth of the LORD hath spoken it.
Isaiah 40.5 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Durenunde n00b
Joined: 22 May 2003 Posts: 26 Location: N.Ireland
|
Posted: Tue May 27, 2003 5:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dolbz wrote: | Durenunde wrote: | you need to make sure you have
Quote: | ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~X86" |
|
Or even ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86"
not sure if the capitalisation makes a difference but as far as I can tell it does. Just something to try.
Dolbz |
yep sorry was writing off the top of my head
also remember to uncomment the line there as well or it won't accept it either take away the # at the beginning _________________ mmmm, pizza |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Narada Guru
Joined: 12 Dec 2002 Posts: 300 Location: London, UK
|
Posted: Tue May 27, 2003 5:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
To get apache 2.0.45 you can do one of two things. You can either use the testing tree once only which will get you the very latest apache.
Code: | ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=~x86 emerge apache |
Or you can specify a version yourself which does not require the full absolute path to the ebuild.
Code: | ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=~x86 emerge =apache-2.0.45 |
There is no need to put ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=~x86 in /etc/make.conf unless you wish to migrate your entire system to the testing tree permanently and upgrade all packages to testing versions. _________________ http://dhruba.name/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
panserg Apprentice
Joined: 16 Apr 2003 Posts: 188
|
Posted: Tue May 27, 2003 6:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Are there any serious reasons to consider Apache 2 as unstable on Gentoo? Is something wrong with Apache 2 itself or its ebuild? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dev-null-devil Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 12 May 2003 Posts: 93
|
Posted: Wed May 28, 2003 6:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
I belive that apache 1.3 is more secure. Since apache 2 is quite new and when I installed it I just got alot of problems. But i guess that's just a bad childhood memory. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Durenunde n00b
Joined: 22 May 2003 Posts: 26 Location: N.Ireland
|
Posted: Wed May 28, 2003 7:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
dev-null-devil wrote: | I belive that apache 1.3 is more secure. Since apache 2 is quite new and when I installed it I just got alot of problems. But i guess that's just a bad childhood memory. |
I believe you are right there, I've read up on a few security breaches in apache that have required attention though they are fixed fairly fast I must say, once found. I had no problems installing apache2 on windows but had a few problems installing it on gentoo, I reverted back to 1.3 also after a couple of failed tries. Hopefully soon it will be out of experimental. _________________ mmmm, pizza |
|
Back to top |
|
|
MetalGod Bodhisattva
Joined: 10 Mar 2003 Posts: 816 Location: Portugal
|
Posted: Wed May 28, 2003 10:34 am Post subject: Apache 2.0.46 |
|
|
I dont like apache 2 but good news 2.0.46 is out _________________ ex: Gentoo Linux Developer: amd64 media-optical sound gnome
ex: Portuguese Moderator
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
God Doesn't Play Dice |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dev-null-devil Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 12 May 2003 Posts: 93
|
Posted: Wed May 28, 2003 4:59 pm Post subject: Re: Apache 2.0.46 |
|
|
MetalGOD wrote: | I dont like apache 2 but good news 2.0.46 is out |
Hehe, i got the announce mail just when i saw your message. Maybe it's worth to try? Who knows, it might be better? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
panserg Apprentice
Joined: 16 Apr 2003 Posts: 188
|
Posted: Wed May 28, 2003 8:09 pm Post subject: Re: Apache 2.0.46 |
|
|
dev-null-devil wrote: | MetalGOD wrote: | I dont like apache 2 but good news 2.0.46 is out |
Hehe, i got the announce mail just when i saw your message. Maybe it's worth to try? Who knows, it might be better? |
First what I Like in Apache 2 - it's faster on both single requests and multi-user bulk load. I did some tests in my LAN with the content that worked on both apache 2 and apache. Apache 2 was about 25% faster and with growing connections it degraded not so fast.
Among features I need first of all filtering in modules as well as SSL and WebDAV. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|