Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
The glibc 2.6 thread
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours

Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next  
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Unsupported Software
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Vlad.Sharp
Guru
Guru


Joined: 08 Dec 2004
Posts: 337
Location: Cambridgeshire, UK

PostPosted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 6:10 pm    Post subject: The glibc 2.6 thread Reply with quote

Ok, so after having installed Fedora Core 7 from the network the other day, I noticed that it was using glibc 2.6. The "stable" final version was released on 1st June, and glibc 2.6 is still masked in portage - so I decided to create this thread about issues that need workarounds while using glibc 2.6 in gentoo (I've heard there are a couple of workarounds needed, not sure of the links to sources.)

I will be installing gentoo again using Gcc 4.2 and Glibc 2.6, so please join me in my quest for a better gentoo on glibc 2.6 via this support thread! :roll:

Please post issues you encounter with glibc 2.6 - bugs and workarounds (and patches would be nice :P)


(P.S. I'm not trying to say that gentoo sucks because it doesn't have the latest and greatest glibc - that's a matter of extensive testing... So let's test it so that it can be unmasked!)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Master Shake
l33t
l33t


Joined: 10 Apr 2005
Posts: 755
Location: Wilmington, Delaware

PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I too am giving gcc 4.2 and glibc 2.6 a shot. However I took a look at the ebuild and it said something to the effect of not to keyword and to wait for 2.6.1. Anyone know the reason for that?
_________________
System Specs:
64-bit gentoo linux
Q6600 @ 3.2Ghz
P35 Chipset
4 Gigs 800mhz 4-4-4-12
Nvidia GeForce 8800 GTX @ 630mhz
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Master Shake
l33t
l33t


Joined: 10 Apr 2005
Posts: 755
Location: Wilmington, Delaware

PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 3:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

First thing that i've found is that emacs segfaults...I'll see if recompiling it helps...
_________________
System Specs:
64-bit gentoo linux
Q6600 @ 3.2Ghz
P35 Chipset
4 Gigs 800mhz 4-4-4-12
Nvidia GeForce 8800 GTX @ 630mhz
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Vlad.Sharp
Guru
Guru


Joined: 08 Dec 2004
Posts: 337
Location: Cambridgeshire, UK

PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 7:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

While doing emerge -e system, the *expected* gzip, cpio (etc.) failures occur. Errors about the glibc futimens.

There are patches available, and they're in the Palgene overlay: http://palgene-overlay.googlecode.com/svn/experimental/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ishiki
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 31 Aug 2005
Posts: 86

PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 8:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

And where can I find what's new in glibc 2.6 ?
I can't find any changelog for it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Vlad.Sharp
Guru
Guru


Joined: 08 Dec 2004
Posts: 337
Location: Cambridgeshire, UK

PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 9:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I found a changelog on their cvs repository - doesn't seem to be much though: http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/~checkout~/libc/NEWS?rev=1.176&content-type=text/plain&cvsroot=glibc&only_with_tag=glibc-2_6

Quote:
Version 2.6

* New Linux interfaces: epoll_pwait, sched_getcpu.

* New generic interfaces: strerror_l.

* nscd can now cache the services database. Implemented by Ulrich Drepper.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rion
Guru
Guru


Joined: 12 Oct 2006
Posts: 383
Location: Minsk, Belarus

PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 9:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ishiki wrote:
And where can I find what's new in glibc 2.6 ?
I can't find any changelog for it.
thats what i found http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/~checkout~/libc/NEWS?rev=1.176&content-type=text/plain&cvsroot=glibc&only_with_tag=glibc-2_6
but strangely, on homepage its still 2.5
_________________
rion-overlay


Last edited by Rion on Tue Jun 05, 2007 9:19 am; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ishiki
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 31 Aug 2005
Posts: 86

PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 9:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Vlad.Sharp and Rion, I'd like to thank you both.

I don't see any reason why I should upgrade to 2.6...
And I'm curious why it is a major release, and not something like 2.5.3, but that's another story.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
StringCheesian
l33t
l33t


Joined: 21 Oct 2003
Posts: 887

PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 9:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Master Shake wrote:
However I took a look at the ebuild and it said something to the effect of not to keyword and to wait for 2.6.1. Anyone know the reason for that?

Yeah, this:
glibc-2.6.ebuild wrote:
KEYWORDS="" #DO NOT KEYWORD; WAIT FOR 2.6.1

I'm curious about that too.

I think this is the glibc mailing list:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-alpha/
But I don't see anything about there being something wrong with the 2.6 release. Nothing in bugs.gentoo.org either.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Vlad.Sharp
Guru
Guru


Joined: 08 Dec 2004
Posts: 337
Location: Cambridgeshire, UK

PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 9:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ishiki wrote:
Vlad.Sharp and Rion, I'd like to thank you both.

I don't see any reason why I should upgrade to 2.6...
And I'm curious why it is a major release, and not something like 2.5.3, but that's another story.


I'm curious why they haven't put up a bigger NEWS file - because if you look at their changelog, it's pretty big (taken from http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/~checkout~/libc/ChangeLog?rev=1.10664&content-type=text/plain&cvsroot=glibc ). However it seems like it's mainly bug fixes. Now too I am wondering why it's supposed to be experimental and new?

StringCheesian wrote:
Master Shake wrote:
However I took a look at the ebuild and it said something to the effect of not to keyword and to wait for 2.6.1. Anyone know the reason for that?

Yeah, this:
glibc-2.6.ebuild wrote:
KEYWORDS="" #DO NOT KEYWORD; WAIT FOR 2.6.1

I'm curious about that too.

I think this is the glibc mailing list:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-alpha/
But I don't see anything about there being something wrong with the 2.6 release. Nothing in bugs.gentoo.org either.


I suppose that's policy :P I mean, gcc 4.2.0 has some major issues (like the xorg error) - these will only be officially fixed in gcc 4.2.1. So I guess it's *safer* to wait for a minor release that irons out any remaining large bugs...


Last edited by Vlad.Sharp on Tue Jun 05, 2007 9:35 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mbar
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 19 Jan 2005
Posts: 1990
Location: Poland

PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 11:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

PL locale is kinda broken in glibc 2.6, same symptoms as here: https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-3971453.html#3971453
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kernelOfTruth
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 20 Dec 2005
Posts: 6111
Location: Vienna, Austria; Germany; hello world :)

PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 7:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

fails on hardened:

(patch fails)

Quote:
* Applying Gentoo Glibc Patchset 2.6-1.1 ...
* 0010_all_glibc-ssp-compat.patch ... [ ok ]
* 0030_all_glibc-respect-env-CPPFLAGS.patch ... [ ok ]
* 1030_all_glibc-manual-no-perl.patch ... [ ok ]
* 1040_all_2.3.3-localedef-fix-trampoline.patch ... [ ok ]
* 1060_all_glibc-cvs-getcwd-path-max.patch ... [ ok ]
* 1075_all_glibc-section-comments.patch ... [ ok ]
* 1090_all_glibc-2.3.6-fix-pr631.patch ... [ ok ]
* 1100_all_glibc-2.3.3-china.patch ... [ ok ]
* 1120_all_glibc-2.5-strict-aliasing.patch ... [ ok ]
* 1130_all_glibc-2.4-undefine-__i686.patch ... [ ok ]
* 1510_all_glibc-hppa-no-asm-elf-header.patch ... [ ok ]
* 1530_all_glibc-m68k-sys-user.patch ... [ ok ]
* 3000_all_2.3.6-dl_execstack-PaX-support.patch ... [ ok ]
* 3010_all_2.3.3_pre20040117-pt_pax.patch ... [ ok ]
* 3020_all_glibc-tests-sandbox-libdl-paths.patch ... [ ok ]
* 4010_all_2.3.5-hardened-iconvconfig-unnest.patch ... [ ok ]
* 5063_all_glibc-dont-build-timezone.patch ... [ ok ]
* 5070_all_cross-compile-nptl.patch ... [ ok ]
* 6001_all_alpha-glibc-2.4-xstat.patch ... [ ok ]
* 6015_all_alpha-glibc-2.5-no-page-header.patch ... [ ok ]
* 6016_all_alpha-glibc-2.5-no-asm-elf-header.patch ... [ ok ]
* 6220_all_glibc-2.4-arm-cirrus-ep93xx-maverick-crunch-fpu.patch ... [ ok ]
* 6230_all_arm-glibc-2.5-no-page-header.patch ... [ ok ]
* 6400_all_sh-glibc-2.3.2-fpscr_values.patch ... [ ok ]
* 6415_all_sh-glibc-2.5-no-asm-user-header.patch ... [ ok ]
* 6416_all_sh-glibc-2.5-no-asm-elf-header.patch ... [ ok ]
* 6605_all_glibc-2.4-fpu-cw-mips.patch ... [ ok ]
* 6645_all_glibc-mips_shn_undef-hack.patch ... [ ok ]
* Done with patching
* Patching to get working PIE binaries on PIE (hardened) platforms
* Applying glibc-2.5-hardened-pie.patch ... [ ok ]
* Applying glibc-2.5-hardened-configure-picdefault.patch ... [ ok ]
* Applying glibc-2.5-hardened-inittls-nosysenter.patch ...

* Failed Patch: glibc-2.5-hardened-inittls-nosysenter.patch !
* ( /usr/portage/sys-libs/glibc/files/2.5/glibc-2.5-hardened-inittls-nosysenter.patch )
*
* Include in your bugreport the contents of:
*
* /var/tmp/paludis/sys-libs/glibc-2.6/temp//glibc-2.5-hardened-inittls-nosysenter.patch-9287.out


!!! ERROR in sys-libs/glibc-2.6:
!!! In epatch at line 2567
!!! Failed Patch: glibc-2.5-hardened-inittls-nosysenter.patch!

!!! Call stack:
!!! * epatch (/var/tmp/paludis/sys-libs/glibc-2.6/temp/loadsaveenv:2567)
!!! * toolchain-glibc_src_unpack (/var/tmp/paludis/sys-libs/glibc-2.6/temp/loadsaveenv:5066)
!!! * src_unpack (/var/tmp/paludis/sys-libs/glibc-2.6/temp/loadsaveenv:4409)
!!! * ebuild_f_unpack (/usr/libexec/paludis/src_unpack.bash:44)
!!! * ebuild_main (/usr/libexec/paludis/ebuild.bash:363)
!!! * main (/usr/libexec/paludis/ebuild.bash:381)

die trap: exiting with error.

Install error:
* In program paludis -i1 =sys-libs/glibc-2.6::gentoo:
* When performing install action from command line:
* When executing install task:
* When installing 'sys-libs/glibc-2.6':
* Install error: Install failed for 'sys-libs/glibc-2.6::gentoo'


Resume command: paludis --log-level qa --preserve-world --dl-deps-default discard --install '=sys-libs/glibc-2.6::gentoo'

_________________
https://github.com/kernelOfTruth/ZFS-for-SystemRescueCD/tree/ZFS-for-SysRescCD-4.9.0
https://github.com/kernelOfTruth/pulseaudio-equalizer-ladspa

Hardcore Gentoo Linux user since 2004 :D
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Master Shake
l33t
l33t


Joined: 10 Apr 2005
Posts: 755
Location: Wilmington, Delaware

PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 8:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

try ebuild /usr/portage/sys-libs/glibc/glibc-2.6.ebuild digest and see what happens.
_________________
System Specs:
64-bit gentoo linux
Q6600 @ 3.2Ghz
P35 Chipset
4 Gigs 800mhz 4-4-4-12
Nvidia GeForce 8800 GTX @ 630mhz
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kernelOfTruth
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 20 Dec 2005
Posts: 6111
Location: Vienna, Austria; Germany; hello world :)

PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 8:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Master Shake wrote:
try ebuild /usr/portage/sys-libs/glibc/glibc-2.6.ebuild digest and see what happens.


still broken, thanks
_________________
https://github.com/kernelOfTruth/ZFS-for-SystemRescueCD/tree/ZFS-for-SysRescCD-4.9.0
https://github.com/kernelOfTruth/pulseaudio-equalizer-ladspa

Hardcore Gentoo Linux user since 2004 :D
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Vlad.Sharp
Guru
Guru


Joined: 08 Dec 2004
Posts: 337
Location: Cambridgeshire, UK

PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 8:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Seems like a couple of things have changed in the source after all :P

I don't know about filing a bug, but perhaps asking Kevin Quinn about the issue might be the *best* thing to do? http://overlays.gentoo.org/dev/kevquinn (And yes, the glibc 2.6 failure is what put me off hardened this time round)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Master Shake
l33t
l33t


Joined: 10 Apr 2005
Posts: 755
Location: Wilmington, Delaware

PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 10:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

app-arch/cpio-2.7-r1 fails with this:

Code:
In file included from ./fcntl.h:25,
                 from utimens.c:28:
/usr/include/sys/stat.h:370: error: conflicting types for 'futimens'
utimens.h:2: error: previous declaration of 'futimens' was here
utimens.c: In function 'utimens':
utimens.c:169: warning: passing argument 2 of 'futimens' from incompatible pointer type
utimens.c:169: error: too many arguments to function 'futimens'
make[3]: *** [utimens.o] Error 1
make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
make[3]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/app-arch/cpio-2.7-r1/work/cpio-2.7/lib'
make[2]: *** [all] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/app-arch/cpio-2.7-r1/work/cpio-2.7/lib'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/app-arch/cpio-2.7-r1/work/cpio-2.7'
make: *** [all] Error 2

!!! ERROR: app-arch/cpio-2.7-r1 failed.
Call stack:
  ebuild.sh, line 1615:   Called dyn_compile
  ebuild.sh, line 972:   Called qa_call 'src_compile'
  ebuild.sh, line 44:   Called src_compile
  cpio-2.7-r1.ebuild, line 30:   Called die


I tested cpio-2.7-r2 also...no luck.
_________________
System Specs:
64-bit gentoo linux
Q6600 @ 3.2Ghz
P35 Chipset
4 Gigs 800mhz 4-4-4-12
Nvidia GeForce 8800 GTX @ 630mhz
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Vlad.Sharp
Guru
Guru


Joined: 08 Dec 2004
Posts: 337
Location: Cambridgeshire, UK

PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 11:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Master Shake wrote:
/usr/include/sys/stat.h:370: error: conflicting types for 'futimens'
utimens.h:2: error: previous declaration of 'futimens' was here
utimens.c: In function 'utimens':
utimens.c:169: warning: passing argument 2 of 'futimens' from incompatible pointer type
utimens.c:169: error: too many arguments to function 'futimens'


You can find a patched version of cpio in the palgene overlay ( http://palgene-overlay.googlecode.com/svn/experimental/ ) - it works fine :)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Master Shake
l33t
l33t


Joined: 10 Apr 2005
Posts: 755
Location: Wilmington, Delaware

PostPosted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 5:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Seems like anything that has to do with archiving is failing to build...cpio, tar, gzip...I'll have to get those patched versions. BTW mozilla-firefox (2.0.0.4) is crashing like crazy on me now. Anyone else experiencing this?
_________________
System Specs:
64-bit gentoo linux
Q6600 @ 3.2Ghz
P35 Chipset
4 Gigs 800mhz 4-4-4-12
Nvidia GeForce 8800 GTX @ 630mhz
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Vlad.Sharp
Guru
Guru


Joined: 08 Dec 2004
Posts: 337
Location: Cambridgeshire, UK

PostPosted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 5:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Master Shake wrote:
Seems like anything that has to do with archiving is failing to build...cpio, tar, gzip...I'll have to get those patched versions. BTW mozilla-firefox (2.0.0.4) is crashing like crazy on me now. Anyone else experiencing this?


No, mozilla-firefox runs fine here. 2.0.4, from source. What are your C[XX]FLAGS/LDFLAGS? (and you compiler, I'm using gcc 4.2).

Have you tried as a new user with a clean profile directory?

Edit: This is a brand new stage1, so that could possibly help it to run cleanly.


Last edited by Vlad.Sharp on Wed Jun 06, 2007 8:55 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
irondog
l33t
l33t


Joined: 07 Jul 2003
Posts: 715
Location: Voor mijn TV. Achter mijn pc.

PostPosted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 8:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Master Shake wrote:
BTW mozilla-firefox (2.0.0.4) is crashing like crazy on me now. Anyone else experiencing this?
I had the same. I downgraded to 2.5 and it disappeared. I upgraded to 2.6 again an Firefox was crashing again.
So, Firefox was not very solid when I upgraded to 2.6. I was able to reproduce this several times on (x86).

I'm using Gentoo stable amd64 built from scratch right now and use some unstable packages (linux-hdrs 2.6.21 / gcc 4.2 / glibc 2.6 / kde). Firefox is stable like hell.

I don't know what did the trick. Maybe it's an x86 specific problem, maybe it's useful to rebuild some libs / apps after upgrading to 2.6.
For me switching from an old x86 installation to a brand new stage1 amd64 (gcc 4.2 / glibc 2.6) installation made the firefox crashes disappear.

If you're lucky and if you're not the "while `true`; do emerge -e world; done" kind of person you should be able to downgrade fairly easily from 2.6 to 2.5 :)
_________________
Alle dingen moeten onzin zijn.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
unK
l33t
l33t


Joined: 06 Feb 2007
Posts: 769

PostPosted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 9:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Master Shake wrote:
mozilla-firefox (2.0.0.4) is crashing like crazy on me now. Anyone else experiencing this?

Yep. It segfaults at start or when loading pages containing flash animations or using xml (I only suppose, eg. it crashes when I try to load Gentoo Wiki :o )

However, I modified eclass mozcoreconfig a bit (just commented out line witch the strip-flags command), and it can be because of this. But Swiftfox is build with even more agressive cflags than mine and works flawlessly, so I decided to use Swiftfox for now. Btw, mozilla-firefox-bin from portage seems to be pretty stable too.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Master Shake
l33t
l33t


Joined: 10 Apr 2005
Posts: 755
Location: Wilmington, Delaware

PostPosted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 10:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well glad I'm not the only one. I've been trying to do an emerge -e world for a day now, keeps halting on errors...i should really use a script or something. I'm using x86, unfortunately I don't have the option to test out an amd64 platform as I have a core duo, not a core 2 duo. I hope its just conflicting library's at the moment. I'll also try deleting .mozilla and see if that does anything. Someone asked about my cflags, their not aggressive at all, I think its the standard that gentoo ships with. Here's my emerge --info:
Code:
Portage 2.1.2.7 (default-linux/x86/2007.0, gcc-4.2.0, glibc-2.6-r0, 2.6.20-gentoo-r8 i686)
=================================================================
System uname: 2.6.20-gentoo-r8 i686 Genuine Intel(R) CPU           T2500  @ 2.00GHz
Gentoo Base System release 1.12.9
Timestamp of tree: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 22:00:01 +0000
dev-java/java-config: 1.3.7, 2.0.32
dev-lang/python:     2.4.4-r4
dev-python/pycrypto: 2.0.1-r5
sys-apps/sandbox:    1.2.17
sys-devel/autoconf:  2.13, 2.61
sys-devel/automake:  1.4_p6, 1.5, 1.6.3, 1.7.9-r1, 1.8.5-r3, 1.9.6-r2, 1.10
sys-devel/binutils:  2.16.1-r3
sys-devel/gcc-config: 1.3.16
sys-devel/libtool:   1.5.22
virtual/os-headers:  2.6.21
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86"
AUTOCLEAN="yes"
CBUILD="i686-pc-linux-gnu"
CFLAGS="-O2 -march=prescott -pipe"
CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gnu"
CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/share/X11/xkb"
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/env.d /etc/env.d/java/ /etc/gconf /etc/revdep-rebuild /etc/splash /etc/terminfo"
CXXFLAGS="-O2 -march=prescott -pipe"
DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles"
FEATURES="distlocks metadata-transfer sandbox sfperms strict"
GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://distfiles.gentoo.org http://distro.ibiblio.org/pub/linux/distributions/gentoo"
MAKEOPTS="-j3"
PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages"
PORTAGE_RSYNC_OPTS="--recursive --links --safe-links --perms --times --compress --force --whole-file --delete --delete-after --stats --timeout=180 --exclude=/distfiles --exclude=/local --exclude=/packages --filter=H_**/files/digest-*"
PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp"
PORTDIR="/usr/portage"
PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/usr/local/portage"
SYNC="rsync://rsync.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage"
USE="X a52 aalib acl alsa automount berkdb bitmap-fonts branding bzip2 cairo cdr cli cracklib crypt cups dbus dri dvd emacs emerald ffmpeg firefox flac fortran gdbm glibc-omitfp glitz gnome gpm gstreamer gtk hal iconv ipv6 isdnlog ithreads java jpeg libg++ midi mmx mmxext mp3 mpeg mudflap ncurses nls nptl nptlonly nsplugin nvidia ogg openal opengl openmp oss pam pcre perl png pppd python quicktime rar readline reflection samba session spl sse sse2 sse3 ssl tcpd truetype-fonts type1-fonts unicode win32codecs wmf wmp x264 x86 xml xorg xv xvid zlib" ALSA_CARDS="hda-intel" ALSA_PCM_PLUGINS="adpcm alaw asym copy dmix dshare dsnoop empty extplug file hooks iec958 ioplug ladspa lfloat linear meter mulaw multi null plug rate route share shm softvol" ELIBC="glibc" INPUT_DEVICES="mouse keyboard synaptics evdev" KERNEL="linux" LCD_DEVICES="bayrad cfontz cfontz633 glk hd44780 lb216 lcdm001 mtxorb ncurses text" USERLAND="GNU" VIDEO_CARDS="nvidia"
Unset:  CTARGET, EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS, INSTALL_MASK, LANG, LC_ALL, LDFLAGS, LINGUAS, PORTAGE_COMPRESS, PORTAGE_COMPRESS_FLAGS, PORTAGE_RSYNC_EXTRA_OPTS

_________________
System Specs:
64-bit gentoo linux
Q6600 @ 3.2Ghz
P35 Chipset
4 Gigs 800mhz 4-4-4-12
Nvidia GeForce 8800 GTX @ 630mhz
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Vlad.Sharp
Guru
Guru


Joined: 08 Dec 2004
Posts: 337
Location: Cambridgeshire, UK

PostPosted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 10:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

unK wrote:
Master Shake wrote:
mozilla-firefox (2.0.0.4) is crashing like crazy on me now. Anyone else experiencing this?

Yep. It segfaults at start or when loading pages containing flash animations or using xml (I only suppose, eg. it crashes when I try to load Gentoo Wiki :o )

However, I modified eclass mozcoreconfig a bit (just commented out line witch the strip-flags command), and it can be because of this. But Swiftfox is build with even more agressive cflags than mine and works flawlessly, so I decided to use Swiftfox for now. Btw, mozilla-firefox-bin from portage seems to be pretty stable too.


I just installed the latest netscape-flash, preliminary testing yields good results... Gentoo-wiki doesn't crash either. I haven't modified my firefox ebuild at all.

Here's my emerge --info:
Code:
Portage 2.1.2.9 (default-linux/x86/2007.0/desktop, gcc-4.2.0, glibc-2.6-r0, 2.6.21-viper2-rsbac i686)
=================================================================
System uname: 2.6.21-viper2-rsbac i686 Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 2.00GHz
Gentoo Base System release 2.0.0_alpha3
Timestamp of tree: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 22:30:01 +0000
ccache version 2.4 [enabled]
dev-java/java-config: 1.3.7, 2.0.9999
dev-lang/python:     2.5.1-r2
dev-python/pycrypto: 2.0.1-r5
dev-util/ccache:     2.4-r7
sys-apps/sandbox:    1.2.18.1
sys-devel/autoconf:  2.13, 2.61
sys-devel/automake:  1.4_p6, 1.5, 1.6.3, 1.7.9-r1, 1.8.5-r3, 1.9.6-r2, 1.10
sys-devel/binutils:  2.17.50.0.16
sys-devel/gcc-config: 1.3.16
sys-devel/libtool:   1.5.23b
virtual/os-headers:  2.6.21
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86 ~x86"
AUTOCLEAN="yes"
CBUILD="i686-pc-linux-gnu"
CFLAGS="-O2 -march=native -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer -fweb -ftracer -falign-functions=64 -Wno-error"
CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gnu"
CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/kde/3.5/env /usr/kde/3.5/share/config /usr/kde/3.5/shutdown /usr/share/X11/xkb /usr/share/config"
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/env.d /etc/env.d/java/ /etc/gconf /etc/revdep-rebuild /etc/terminfo /etc/texmf/web2c"
CXXFLAGS="-O2 -march=native -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer -fweb -ftracer -falign-functions=64 -Wno-error -fvisibility-inlines-hidden"
DISTDIR="/usr/portage-distfiles"
FEATURES="ccache distlocks metadata-transfer sandbox sfperms strict"
GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://ftp-stud.fht-esslingen.de/pub/Mirrors/gentoo/ http://ftp.snt.utwente.nl/pub/os/linux/gentoo http://mirror.switch.ch/ftp/mirror/gentoo/ "
LANG="en_GB.UTF-8"
LC_ALL="en_GB.UTF-8"
LDFLAGS="-Wl,-O1 -Wl,--sort-common -s -Wl,--hash-style=gnu -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,-znow"
LINGUAS="en_GB de ru ja"
MAKEOPTS="-j2"
PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages"
PORTAGE_RSYNC_OPTS="--recursive --links --safe-links --perms --times --compress --force --whole-file --delete --delete-after --stats --timeout=180 --exclude=/distfiles --exclude=/local --exclude=/packages --filter=H_**/files/digest-*"
PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp"
PORTDIR="/usr/portage"
PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/usr/portage/local/layman/d /usr/portage/local/layman/xeffects /usr/portage/local/layman/java-overlay /usr/portage/local/layman/java-experimental /usr/portage/local/layman/custom-kernels /usr/portage/local/layman/vmware /usr/portage/local/layman/berkano /usr/local/portage /usr/portage/local/palgene"
SYNC="rsync://rsync.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage"
USE="X a52 aac acl acpi alsa async avahi berkdb bitmap-fonts branding bzip2 cairo caps cdr cjk cli cracklib crypt cups d dbus djvu dri dts dvd dvdr dvdread eds emboss encode esd evo exif expat fam ffmpeg fftw firefox flac gadu gcj gdbm gif glitz gmp gnome gnutls gphoto2 gpm graphviz gs gstreamer gtk hal iconv innodb ipv6 isdnlog jabber java javascript jce jpeg jpeg2k kde kdeenablefinal kdehiddenvisibility kerberos lame lcms ldap libg++ libnotify lua mad midi mikmod mmap mmx mono mp3 mpeg msn mudflap multislot mysql ncurses newspr nls nptl nptlonly nsplugin ogg openexr opengl openmp oss pam pcre pdf perl pike png postgres ppds pppd python qt qt3 qt3support qt4 quicktime readline reflection ruby samba sdl session skey socks5 spell spl sqlite sqlite3 sse sse2 ssl startup-notification subversion svg tango tcl tcpd tetex threads tiff tk truetype truetype-fonts type1 type1-fonts unicode usb vim-syntax vorbis win32codecs x86 xcb xcomposite xine xinerama xml xorg xprint xscreensaver xv yahoo zlib" ALSA_CARDS="hda-intel" ALSA_PCM_PLUGINS="adpcm alaw asym copy dmix dshare dsnoop empty extplug file hooks iec958 ioplug ladspa lfloat linear meter mulaw multi null plug rate route share shm softvol" ELIBC="glibc" INPUT_DEVICES="mouse evdev synaptics vmmouse keyboard" KERNEL="linux" LCD_DEVICES="bayrad cfontz cfontz633 glk hd44780 lb216 lcdm001 mtxorb ncurses text" LINGUAS="en_GB de ru ja" USERLAND="GNU" VIDEO_CARDS="nvidia vesa vmware v4l"
Unset:  CTARGET, EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS, INSTALL_MASK, PORTAGE_COMPRESS, PORTAGE_COMPRESS_FLAGS, PORTAGE_RSYNC_EXTRA_OPTS


@Master Shake the only **major** difference between my setup and your setup that I can see is your binutils, but since you haven't got any LDFLAGS it shouldn't matter?

Very strange.[/code]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Master Shake
l33t
l33t


Joined: 10 Apr 2005
Posts: 755
Location: Wilmington, Delaware

PostPosted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 11:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

@Vlad.Sharp: no idea man. It could be that i haven't recompiled everything yet. As of right now I have about 140 more packages to go.

I may get laughed at for this but I've noticed myspace slowing down alot because of the flash ads and flash music playing on people's pages. It works fine (by works I mean the scroll isn't hella laggy) when I'm at someone's pictures page. Any suggestions? Or should i see if this irons out after i re-emerge everything.
_________________
System Specs:
64-bit gentoo linux
Q6600 @ 3.2Ghz
P35 Chipset
4 Gigs 800mhz 4-4-4-12
Nvidia GeForce 8800 GTX @ 630mhz
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Vlad.Sharp
Guru
Guru


Joined: 08 Dec 2004
Posts: 337
Location: Cambridgeshire, UK

PostPosted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 8:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Master Shake wrote:
@Vlad.Sharp: no idea man. It could be that i haven't recompiled everything yet. As of right now I have about 140 more packages to go.

I may get laughed at for this but I've noticed myspace slowing down alot because of the flash ads and flash music playing on people's pages. It works fine (by works I mean the scroll isn't hella laggy) when I'm at someone's pictures page. Any suggestions? Or should i see if this irons out after i re-emerge everything.


Oh be assured, that's not so funny - the ads are annoying. Have you tried Adblock Plus? https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1865
NoScript is also a great addon if you're willing to take the time to configure it for the websites you visit and trust: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/722

Are you still rebuilding the system?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Unsupported Software All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Page 1 of 5

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum