Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
Nouveau overlay
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours

Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next  
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Unsupported Software
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
dracula1985
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 13 May 2005
Posts: 299
Location: Vicenza (Italy)

PostPosted: Mon Sep 24, 2007 12:20 pm    Post subject: Nouveau overlay Reply with quote

Since one or two weeks ago the nouveau overlay ask for a password when syncing.
Obliviously I don't know this password, and I can't find it searching on the web, so I can't sync the overlay...
_________________
Marco

"Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth." --Oscar Wilde.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DtZ
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 09 Sep 2005
Posts: 124

PostPosted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 6:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Same problem here. So far I haven't found any solution, so I just moved all ebuilds to /usr/local/portage and removed the overlay.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ghutzl
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 29 May 2005
Posts: 123
Location: Germany

PostPosted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 7:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It is working again. I had the same problem yesterday and sent Hanno a mail about it. I got a reply today saying he was having problems with his apache installation recently, but it should be fixed now. I could add the nouveau overlay today.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dracula1985
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 13 May 2005
Posts: 299
Location: Vicenza (Italy)

PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 8:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Today I rebuild x11-drm and I see this:
Code:
--------------------------- ACCESS VIOLATION SUMMARY ---------------------------
LOG FILE = "/var/log/sandbox/sandbox-x11-base_-_x11-drm-99999999-15116.log"
open_wr:   /usr/src/linux-2.6.23-git4/null.gcda
open_wr:   /usr/src/linux-2.6.23-git4/null.gcda
open_wr:   /usr/src/linux-2.6.23-git4/null.gcda
open_wr:   /usr/src/linux-2.6.23-git4/null.gcda
open_wr:   /usr/src/linux-2.6.23-git4/null.gcda
open_wr:   /usr/src/linux-2.6.23-git4/null.gcda
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


I don't know if it's related to today's kernel change...
_________________
Marco

"Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth." --Oscar Wilde.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
hirakendu
Guru
Guru


Joined: 24 Jan 2007
Posts: 386
Location: san diego

PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 8:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

yeah, always use `FEATURES=-sandbox emerge <whatever>' if using a shiney new kernel and <whatever> is a package needing kernel sources to compile kernel modules.
_________________
Helium Sources || Gentoo Minimal Livecd
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tarpman
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 04 Nov 2004
Posts: 1083
Location: Victoria, BC, Canada

PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 10:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

hirakendu wrote:
yeah, always use `FEATURES=-sandbox emerge <whatever>' if using a shiney new kernel and <whatever> is a package needing kernel sources to compile kernel modules.

Why?

I've never had to do that, until 2.6.23 came along...
_________________
Saving the world, one kilobyte at a time.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
hirakendu
Guru
Guru


Joined: 24 Jan 2007
Posts: 386
Location: san diego

PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 10:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

does it work? anyway, i always get those sandbox access control violations with bleeding edge kernels (since 2.6.19, which is when i started playing with rc kernels) so just a temporary workaround.
_________________
Helium Sources || Gentoo Minimal Livecd
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dracula1985
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 13 May 2005
Posts: 299
Location: Vicenza (Italy)

PostPosted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 7:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

hirakendu wrote:
yeah, always use `FEATURES=-sandbox emerge <whatever>' if using a shiney new kernel and <whatever> is a package needing kernel sources to compile kernel modules.


I never had to do this when I changed kernel...

Now the problem is another, when I select 2.6.23-git4 from grub, I have a black screen...
I used the .config file from my gentoo-sources-2.6.22-r8, so I think there was a change on some keyworkds and something really important get lost...

Looking at the access violations, maybe it's a real kernel problem...
_________________
Marco

"Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth." --Oscar Wilde.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
hirakendu
Guru
Guru


Joined: 24 Jan 2007
Posts: 386
Location: san diego

PostPosted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 7:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

those access control violations - they usually disappeared as i observed the kernel became mainstream.

about the black screen - are you talking about X or the initial text mode in which the kernel and boot messages appear ? if its the latter, may be you missed some vesa/framebuffer things in drivers->graphics section. although in that case, you get the plain text mode. in worst case, may be your kernel is not booting at all :(. ps : why are you using ~2.6.24 ?
_________________
Helium Sources || Gentoo Minimal Livecd
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dracula1985
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 13 May 2005
Posts: 299
Location: Vicenza (Italy)

PostPosted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 10:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

hirakendu wrote:
about the black screen - are you talking about X or the initial text mode in which the kernel and boot messages appear ? if its the latter, may be you missed some vesa/framebuffer things in drivers->graphics section. although in that case, you get the plain text mode. in worst case, may be your kernel is not booting at all :(. ps : why are you using ~2.6.24 ?


I think the kernel didn't boot at all, because waiting some time X doesn't appears...

I'm using ~2.6.24 because I need b43 drivers for my bcm4318, with old bcm43xx I have the power control issue so I can get it work only for few seconds...
And b43 aren't in <=2.6.23
_________________
Marco

"Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth." --Oscar Wilde.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
hirakendu
Guru
Guru


Joined: 24 Jan 2007
Posts: 386
Location: san diego

PostPosted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 7:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

so there are power control issues even with ndiswrapper and win32 drivers? does this mac80211 (bcm43xx_mac80211) driver also not end the power control issues ?

anyway, waiting for atleast an rc would be better. there is a gaping open merge window atm as you know :D. (ps : are you using x86 or x86_64 ? and what processor ?)

btw, any idea if this b43 driver will be backported? (cos i am still in 2.6.22 dreamland :p.)
_________________
Helium Sources || Gentoo Minimal Livecd
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dracula1985
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 13 May 2005
Posts: 299
Location: Vicenza (Italy)

PostPosted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 8:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

hirakendu wrote:
so there are power control issues even with ndiswrapper and win32 drivers? does this mac80211 (bcm43xx_mac80211) driver also not end the power control issues ?

It's what I read here: https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-4259069.html#4259069
With ndiswrapper it works fine, but I don't want to use ndiswrapper.

hirakendu wrote:
anyway, waiting for atleast an rc would be better. there is a gaping open merge window atm as you know :D. (ps : are you using x86 or x86_64 ? and what processor ?)

x86_64 on an AMD athlon64 3000+ socket 939.

hirakendu wrote:
btw, any idea if this b43 driver will be backported? (cos i am still in 2.6.22 dreamland :p.)

I already asked if a port is possible: https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-4352984.html#4352984
_________________
Marco

"Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth." --Oscar Wilde.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
b33fc0d3
Retired Dev
Retired Dev


Joined: 22 Jun 2006
Posts: 128

PostPosted: Sat Oct 20, 2007 2:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

hirakendu wrote:
btw, any idea if this b43 driver will be backported? (cos i am still in 2.6.22 dreamland :p.)


Have a look at https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-600890-highlight-.html. But the network stack from .22->.23/.24 is too big for there ever to be a backport for b43.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dracula1985
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 13 May 2005
Posts: 299
Location: Vicenza (Italy)

PostPosted: Fri Oct 26, 2007 11:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Returning back to original topic, since some days I have a problem with 2 ebuilds storeds on the nouveau overlay:

x11-libs/libdrm-9999
x11-base/x11-drm-99999999

This is the output for libdrm:
Code:
>>> Emerging (1 of 1) x11-libs/libdrm-9999 to /
 * checking ebuild checksums ;-) ...                                                                              [ ok ]
 * checking auxfile checksums ;-) ...                                                                             [ ok ]
 * checking miscfile checksums ;-) ...                                                                            [ ok ]
>>> Unpacking source...
 * git clone start -->
 *    repository: git://anongit.freedesktop.org/git/xorg/lib/libdrm
Initialized empty Git repository in /usr/portage/distfiles/git-src/libdrm/
fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly
fetch-pack from 'git://anongit.freedesktop.org/git/xorg/lib/libdrm' failed.
 *
 * ERROR: x11-libs/libdrm-9999 failed.
 * Call stack:
 *            ebuild.sh, line 1687:  Called dyn_unpack
 *            ebuild.sh, line  803:  Called qa_call 'src_unpack'
 *            ebuild.sh, line   44:  Called src_unpack
 *            ebuild.sh, line 1369:  Called x-modular_src_unpack
 *     x-modular.eclass, line  287:  Called x-modular_unpack_source
 *   libdrm-9999.ebuild, line   23:  Called git_src_unpack
 *           git.eclass, line  280:  Called git_fetch
 *           git.eclass, line  195:  Called die
 * The specific snippet of code:
 *              ${EGIT_FETCH_CMD} ${EGIT_OPTIONS} "${EGIT_REPO_URI}" ${EGIT_PROJECT} \
 *                      || die "${EGIT}: can't fetch from ${EGIT_REPO_URI}."
 *  The die message:
 *   git.eclass: can't fetch from git://anongit.freedesktop.org/git/xorg/lib/libdrm.
 *
 * If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call stack if relevant.
 * A complete build log is located at '/var/tmp/portage/x11-libs/libdrm-9999/temp/build.log'.
 *


And x11-drm exits with this message:
Code:
!!! A file listed in the Manifest could not be found: /usr/portage/local/layman/nouveau/x11-base/x11-drm/files/makefile.patch

_________________
Marco

"Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth." --Oscar Wilde.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dracula1985
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 13 May 2005
Posts: 299
Location: Vicenza (Italy)

PostPosted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 9:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I sent a mail to Pekka Paalanen and he solved the problems.
_________________
Marco

"Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth." --Oscar Wilde.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JohnY
Guru
Guru


Joined: 26 Jul 2002
Posts: 305

PostPosted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 7:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The compile problems are still as dracula1985 mentioned ....

JohnY
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fb
l33t
l33t


Joined: 08 Dec 2003
Posts: 636
Location: New Zealand

PostPosted: Thu Nov 01, 2007 12:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I still have the "git" problem with libdrm-9999, strangely enough
x11-drm was OK (this is my first attempt at installing nouveau).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JohnY
Guru
Guru


Joined: 26 Jul 2002
Posts: 305

PostPosted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 6:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

mesa-9999 just came down and is compiling now: Sunday 1:30 EST 4 November.

JohnY



edit: 1:37pm compile fails though....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PeterH
n00b
n00b


Joined: 09 Nov 2005
Posts: 31

PostPosted: Tue Nov 06, 2007 9:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

fb wrote:
I still have the "git" problem with libdrm-9999, strangely enough
x11-drm was OK (this is my first attempt at installing nouveau).


I have this problem as well. Anybody know of a solution?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dracula1985
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 13 May 2005
Posts: 299
Location: Vicenza (Italy)

PostPosted: Tue Nov 06, 2007 4:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I sent another mail to Pekka Paalanen and now the problem has been solved.
_________________
Marco

"Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth." --Oscar Wilde.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JohnY
Guru
Guru


Joined: 26 Jul 2002
Posts: 305

PostPosted: Wed Nov 07, 2007 2:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Everything compiles now. Getting a fatal error inserting nouveau.ko (a lot of unknown symbols) after removing the old drm and nvidia binary and switching to 'eselect opengl set xorg-x11'.

Still investigating.... Nouveau overlay has bumped to version 38.

JohnY
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dracula1985
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 13 May 2005
Posts: 299
Location: Vicenza (Italy)

PostPosted: Wed Nov 07, 2007 8:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

JohnY wrote:
Everything compiles now. Getting a fatal error inserting nouveau.ko (a lot of unknown symbols) after removing the old drm and nvidia binary and switching to 'eselect opengl set xorg-x11'.

Still investigating.... Nouveau overlay has bumped to version 38.

JohnY


No problems here, everything build and works fine.
_________________
Marco

"Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth." --Oscar Wilde.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JohnY
Guru
Guru


Joined: 26 Jul 2002
Posts: 305

PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 7:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Got it straightened.... x11-drm's drm.ko was put in a different dir than the pre-nouveau drm.ko. Renamed the old one, copied the new one to the same dir and it all worked. Woot!



JohnY
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fb
l33t
l33t


Joined: 08 Dec 2003
Posts: 636
Location: New Zealand

PostPosted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 2:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

JohnY wrote:
Got it straightened.... x11-drm's drm.ko was put in a different dir than the pre-nouveau drm.ko. Renamed the old one, copied the new one to the same dir and it all worked. Woot!



JohnY
Can you give me some details? I have the same error but I cannot seem to find
where the old modules were and where I should copy my modules.
When I do "locate drm.ko" I get only the file in /lib/module/kernel-version/x11-drm/drm.ko.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JohnY
Guru
Guru


Joined: 26 Jul 2002
Posts: 305

PostPosted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 6:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sure.

First I used find:

Code:
find // -name dro.ko -print

because it finds the file in real time, I think locate depends on a database updated by a cron job.
In my case there was one drm.lo here: '/lib/modules/2.6.23-gentoo/kernel/drivers/char/drm/' (the older one) and one drm.ko here: '/lib/modules/2.6.23-gentoo/x11-drm/' (the one built from the nouveau overlay ). I renamed the older one and copied the newer one to the older one's location. Then rmmod drm.ko and modprobe drm.ko and restart X.

Does that help?

JohnY
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Unsupported Software All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum