| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
dark.elixir
n00b
Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 13
|
 Posted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 9:22 pm Post subject: Compiz Fusion 0.6.0 is OUT!!! |
 |
|
Hi everyone!!!
At last... I've got a decent computer and it has been a few days since I installed Gentoo... I'm willing to try Compiz-Fusion and I just found out that yesterday they released the first stable version (0.6.0). I have a GeForce 8800 GTS 320 MB video card and an ASUS P5N-E SLI motherboard.
I was hoping someone could help me install the new Compiz Fusion 0.6.0. I know I can install the old version through Xeffects, and honestly... I haven't tried it yet. Do you know when is the new versions going to be available in the portage? (at least through Xeffexts). Thanks
Update [Sources] (Compiz 0.6.2 Already available in portage):
http://xorg.freedesktop.org/archive/individual/app/compiz-0.6.2.tar.gz
http://xorg.freedesktop.org/archive/individual/app/compiz-0.6.0.tar.gz
UPDATE (Compiz Fusion 0.6.0):
http://releases.compiz-fusion.org/0.6.0/
Last edited by dark.elixir on Sun Oct 21, 2007 10:15 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sadako
Advocate
Joined: 05 Aug 2004
Posts: 3792
Location: sleeping in the bathtub
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dark.elixir
n00b
Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 13
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 9:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I hadn't noticed that the compiz package in portage was Compiz Fusion... but since it's the same version... I guess I'll just..... emerge compiz  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dark.elixir
n00b
Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 13
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
bunder
Bodhisattva
Joined: 10 Apr 2004
Posts: 5934
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 12:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Moved from Desktop Environments to Unsupported Software.
_________________
| Neddyseagoon wrote: | | The problem with leaving is that you can only do it once and it reduces your influence. |
banned from #gentoo since sept 2017 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Cadynum
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 15 Apr 2007
Posts: 122
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 1:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Any way of getting this without installing gconf?
_________________
How many Microsoft Programmers does it take to screw in a lightbulb? A: It cannot be done. You will need to upgrade your house. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
piwacet
Guru
Joined: 30 Dec 2004
Posts: 486
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 2:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
| seems the xeffects overlay has it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dark.elixir
n00b
Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 13
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 2:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Has anyone tested the newer version with the lates nvidia-drivers and a GeForce 8800 GTS? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Erlend
Guru
Joined: 26 Dec 2004
Posts: 493
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
zAfi
Apprentice
Joined: 08 Aug 2006
Posts: 220
Location: Austria
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 12:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| bunder wrote: | | Moved from Desktop Environments to Unsupported Software. |
I think this is absolutely not understandable as portages' Compiz IS Compiz-Fusion right now, so I think "Desktop Environments" is the place to be for this question.
_________________
Gentoo 2008.0/desktop | Kernel: 2.6.27-tuxonice | Arch: amd64 | KDE 3.5.9 | WU Wien |
----------
Share your kernel information @ http://klive.cpushare.com/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jonnevers
Veteran
Joined: 02 Jan 2003
Posts: 1594
Location: Gentoo64 land
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 1:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| zAfi wrote: | | bunder wrote: | | Moved from Desktop Environments to Unsupported Software. |
I think this is absolutely not understandable as portages' Compiz IS Compiz-Fusion right now, so I think "Desktop Environments" is the place to be for this question. |
I don't get why these haven't been moved over. I guess lack of maintainer? but xeffects severed it's ties to gentoo :-/
i don't understand why compiz-fusion isn't in Portage's main tree either. It has had a full rc release and now a full stable release... there isn't much more needed to hit the entry point into portage.
we have compiz... but not compiz-fusion. so we have jack squat. just nonsensical.
there are serious issues using xeffects in whole, modified gtk+ modified qt, etc, etc, etc. it'd be nice to have this in portage so we can maintain a more consistent tree. it'd be nice to not have to use an overlay for STABLE SOFTWARE. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jdmancuso
n00b
Joined: 24 Oct 2007
Posts: 1
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 2:39 pm Post subject: compiz-fusion in tree |
|
|
Hmm....
=-=-=
emerge --sync
emerge portage
emerge -p compiz-fusion
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild N ] x11-wm/compiz-0.6.2 USE="-dbus -debug -gnome -kde -svg"
[ebuild N ] x11-libs/compiz-bcop-0.6.0
[ebuild U ] x11-themes/emerald-themes-0.5.2 [0.2.1]
[ebuild N ] x11-plugins/compiz-fusion-plugins-main-0.6.0
[ebuild N ] x11-libs/libcompizconfig-0.6.0
[ebuild N ] dev-python/compizconfig-python-0.6.0.1
[ebuild N ] x11-plugins/compiz-fusion-plugins-extra-0.6.0
[ebuild N ] x11-apps/ccsm-0.6.0
[ebuild N ] x11-wm/compiz-fusion-0.6.0 USE="-gnome -kde"
=-=
Is it just me or does it look like this got added? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sadako
Advocate
Joined: 05 Aug 2004
Posts: 3792
Location: sleeping in the bathtub
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 3:05 pm Post subject: Re: compiz-fusion in tree |
|
|
| jdmancuso wrote: | Hmm....
=-=-=
emerge --sync
emerge portage
emerge -p compiz-fusion
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild N ] x11-wm/compiz-0.6.2 USE="-dbus -debug -gnome -kde -svg"
[ebuild N ] x11-libs/compiz-bcop-0.6.0
[ebuild U ] x11-themes/emerald-themes-0.5.2 [0.2.1]
[ebuild N ] x11-plugins/compiz-fusion-plugins-main-0.6.0
[ebuild N ] x11-libs/libcompizconfig-0.6.0
[ebuild N ] dev-python/compizconfig-python-0.6.0.1
[ebuild N ] x11-plugins/compiz-fusion-plugins-extra-0.6.0
[ebuild N ] x11-apps/ccsm-0.6.0
[ebuild N ] x11-wm/compiz-fusion-0.6.0 USE="-gnome -kde"
=-=
Is it just me or does it look like this got added? |
Yeah, I just synced and I have it available now, and I'm not using any related overlays.
See?
If you whine about it enough the devs do take notice.
_________________
"You have to invite me in" |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jonnevers
Veteran
Joined: 02 Jan 2003
Posts: 1594
Location: Gentoo64 land
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 5:07 pm Post subject: Re: compiz-fusion in tree |
|
|
| Hopeless wrote: | See?
If you whine about it enough the devs do take notice. |
I don't think I'd phrase this like you did but yes, it very exciting to not have to use xeffects anymore.
[edit] i spoke to soon...  
this has been working since day one just fine on my amd64. gentoo devs WAKE THE HELL UP. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sadako
Advocate
Joined: 05 Aug 2004
Posts: 3792
Location: sleeping in the bathtub
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 5:15 pm Post subject: Re: compiz-fusion in tree |
|
|
| jonnevers wrote: | | Hopeless wrote: | See?
If you whine about it enough the devs do take notice. |
I don't think I'd phrase this like you did but yes, it very exciting to not have to use xeffects anymore.
[edit] i spoke to soon...
this has been working since day one just fine on my amd64. gentoo devs WAKE THE HELL UP. |
Isn't it standard to only keyword a new package ~x86, and let the arch teams deal with adding the other keywords?
Just give them a little more time (after all, you've waited this long).
_________________
"You have to invite me in" |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jonnevers
Veteran
Joined: 02 Jan 2003
Posts: 1594
Location: Gentoo64 land
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 5:23 pm Post subject: Re: compiz-fusion in tree |
|
|
| Hopeless wrote: | Isn't it standard to only keyword a new package ~x86, and let the arch teams deal with adding the other keywords?
Just give them a little more time (after all, you've waited this long).
|
compiles fine here on amd64 with package.keywords set to **. I'm sure someone will jump in and give concrete examples against what I'm about to say but after using the amd64 ARCH for years; if it's good enough for ~x86 it's good enough for ~amd64. look at the convergence work on the kernel merging i386 and x86_64 into a single x86. (obviously different programming levels). most is needless separation but that is a very different topic. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
i92guboj
Bodhisattva
Joined: 30 Nov 2004
Posts: 10315
Location: Córdoba (Spain)
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 5:35 pm Post subject: Re: compiz-fusion in tree |
|
|
| jonnevers wrote: | | Hopeless wrote: | Isn't it standard to only keyword a new package ~x86, and let the arch teams deal with adding the other keywords?
Just give them a little more time (after all, you've waited this long).
|
compiles fine here on amd64 with package.keywords set to **. I'm sure someone will jump in and give concrete examples against what I'm about to say but after using the amd64 ARCH for years; if it's good enough for ~x86 it's good enough for ~amd64. look at the convergence work on the kernel merging x86 and x86_64 into a single x86. (obviously different programming levels). most is needless separation but that is a very different topic. |
That's usually true. In fact, I always always accept the (~)x86 keyword on an amd64 installation. As always, do it at your own risk, You gotta keep the pieces when something -rarely- breaks because of this. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nicoleef
n00b
Joined: 28 Aug 2003
Posts: 27
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 6:09 am Post subject: compiz-fusion 0.6 |
|
|
Hi, i install like a month ago, compiz-fusion following the wiki, using layman overlay,
and today i saw in the compiz website the release of the new version, and i want to update my overlay using layman
but i get the following error:
| Code: |
$ layman -a xeffects
* Running command "/usr/bin/svn co "svn://svn.gentoo-xeffects.org/xeffects/trunk/" "/usr/layman/xeffects""...
svn: Can't connect to host 'svn.gentoo-xeffects.org': Connection refused
* Failed to add overlay "xeffects".
* Error was: Adding the overlay failed!
|
I think is down or something.
Doing my normal day emerge --sync and emerge -up world i saw compiz-fusion 0.6 OMG!
BUT i need to put other packages in order to emerge, this is my package.keywords file:
| Code: |
dev-python/compizconfig-python
x11-wm/compiz
x11-wm/compiz-fusion
x11-plugins/compiz-fusion-plugins-main
x11-plugins/compiz-fusion-plugins-extra
x11-plugins/compiz-fusion-plugins-unsupported
x11-wm/emerald
x11-themes/emerald-themes
x11-apps/ccsm
x11-libs/libcompizconfig
x11-libs/compizconfig-backend-gconf
x11-libs/compizconfig-backend-kconfig
x11-libs/compiz-bcop
x11-apps/fusion-icon **
=gnome-extra/avant-window-navigator-9999 **
x11-plugins/compiz-extra
x11-apps/compiz-settings **
app-portage/layman
x11-libs/libwnck
x11-libs/gtk+ **
dev-libs/glib **
x11-libs/pango **
|
as you can saw i need to add the 4 last ones in order to do an emerge -u compiz-fusion, i dont know if this cause me troubles cuz "gtk+ glib and pango" are important libs.  
_________________
Gentoo Linux - Kernel 2.6.22-r5, Gnome, Compiz-Fusion,Conky, etc...
LAPTOP:
HP Pavillion zt3000>Intel Centrino 1.5Ghz>512Mb Ram DDR>60GB HD 7,200rpms
Ati Radeon 9200 32MbDDR>Integrated Sound Card>Intel 2200BG WLAN
PC1:
Coming Soon. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
danyer
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 25 Nov 2004
Posts: 86
Location: Bucharest, Romania/EU
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 10:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | x11-libs/libwnck
x11-libs/gtk+ **
dev-libs/glib **
x11-libs/pango ** |
Yeah, yesterday I emerged compiz-fusion and I didn't need those.
Today, at an emerge -uNDav world, it complains that compiz-0.6.2 wants a newer libwnck which in turns wants a newer gtk+... at this point I removed compiz.
So please, can the man/woman who changed the compiz ebuild to revert it back to yesterday state? It was so nice, while it lasted
Dan. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
zAfi
Apprentice
Joined: 08 Aug 2006
Posts: 220
Location: Austria
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 3:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| bunder wrote: | | Moved from Desktop Environments to Unsupported Software. |
Well, time to move it back, isn't it? ^^
EDIT: and finally time to test compiz-fusion! 
_________________
Gentoo 2008.0/desktop | Kernel: 2.6.27-tuxonice | Arch: amd64 | KDE 3.5.9 | WU Wien |
----------
Share your kernel information @ http://klive.cpushare.com/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nixnut
Bodhisattva
Joined: 09 Apr 2004
Posts: 10974
Location: the dutch mountains
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 3:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Moved from Unsupported Software to Desktop Environments.
_________________
Please add [solved] to the initial post's subject line if you feel your problem is resolved. Help answer the unanswered
talk is cheap. supply exceeds demand |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
webhawg
Apprentice
Joined: 18 Oct 2002
Posts: 293
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 3:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I followed this how-to a while back and it worked perfectly. However, I'm having issues updating to the latest version in portage. Any ideas on how to fix it? I've tried masking as the message suggestions, but I don't think that's the problem.
| Code: |
# emerge compiz-fusion -Dup
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies -
!!! Multiple versions within a single package slot have been
!!! pulled into the dependency graph:
('ebuild', '/', 'x11-wm/compiz-0.5.2', 'merge') pulled in by
('installed', '/', 'x11-wm/emerald-0.5.2', 'nomerge')
('installed', '/', 'x11-wm/compiz-0.6.2', 'nomerge') pulled in by
('ebuild', '/', 'x11-libs/compizconfig-backend-gconf-0.6.0', 'merge')
('ebuild', '/', 'x11-libs/libcompizconfig-0.6.0', 'merge')
('ebuild', '/', 'x11-plugins/compiz-fusion-plugins-main-0.6.0', 'merge')
It may be possible to solve this problem by using package.mask to
prevent one of those packages from being selected. However, it is also
possible that conflicting dependencies exist such that they are
impossible to satisfy simultaneously. If such a conflict exists in the
dependencies of two different packages, then those packages can not be
installed simultaneously.
For more information, see MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man page
or refer to the Gentoo Handbook.
... done!
[ebuild U ] x11-libs/compiz-bcop-0.6.0 [0.5.2]
[ebuild UD] x11-wm/compiz-0.5.2 [0.6.2] USE="gtk%* -fuse%"
[ebuild U ] x11-libs/libcompizconfig-0.6.0 [0.5.2]
[ebuild U ] x11-plugins/compiz-fusion-plugins-main-0.6.0 [0.5.2] USE="jpeg%*"
[ebuild U ] dev-python/compizconfig-python-0.6.0.1 [0.5.2]
[ebuild U ] x11-plugins/compiz-fusion-plugins-extra-0.6.0 [0.5.2]
[ebuild U ] x11-libs/compizconfig-backend-gconf-0.6.0 [0.5.2]
[ebuild U ] x11-apps/ccsm-0.6.0 [0.5.2]
|
It's wanting to downgrade compiz. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Eduardo Garcia
n00b
Joined: 25 Oct 2007
Posts: 4
Location: Porto Alegre, Brazil
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 4:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| webhawg wrote: | I followed this how-to a while back and it worked perfectly. However, I'm having issues updating to the latest version in portage. Any ideas on how to fix it? I've tried masking as the message suggestions, but I don't think that's the problem.
| Code: |
# emerge compiz-fusion -Dup
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies -
!!! Multiple versions within a single package slot have been
!!! pulled into the dependency graph:
('ebuild', '/', 'x11-wm/compiz-0.5.2', 'merge') pulled in by
('installed', '/', 'x11-wm/emerald-0.5.2', 'nomerge')
('installed', '/', 'x11-wm/compiz-0.6.2', 'nomerge') pulled in by
('ebuild', '/', 'x11-libs/compizconfig-backend-gconf-0.6.0', 'merge')
('ebuild', '/', 'x11-libs/libcompizconfig-0.6.0', 'merge')
('ebuild', '/', 'x11-plugins/compiz-fusion-plugins-main-0.6.0', 'merge')
It may be possible to solve this problem by using package.mask to
prevent one of those packages from being selected. However, it is also
possible that conflicting dependencies exist such that they are
impossible to satisfy simultaneously. If such a conflict exists in the
dependencies of two different packages, then those packages can not be
installed simultaneously.
For more information, see MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man page
or refer to the Gentoo Handbook.
... done!
[ebuild U ] x11-libs/compiz-bcop-0.6.0 [0.5.2]
[ebuild UD] x11-wm/compiz-0.5.2 [0.6.2] USE="gtk%* -fuse%"
[ebuild U ] x11-libs/libcompizconfig-0.6.0 [0.5.2]
[ebuild U ] x11-plugins/compiz-fusion-plugins-main-0.6.0 [0.5.2] USE="jpeg%*"
[ebuild U ] dev-python/compizconfig-python-0.6.0.1 [0.5.2]
[ebuild U ] x11-plugins/compiz-fusion-plugins-extra-0.6.0 [0.5.2]
[ebuild U ] x11-libs/compizconfig-backend-gconf-0.6.0 [0.5.2]
[ebuild U ] x11-apps/ccsm-0.6.0 [0.5.2]
|
It's wanting to downgrade compiz. |
First, try to sync and emerge portage. If it didn't solve, unmerge compiz before emerge compiz-fusion. Anyway, why would you use compiz alone when you have "fusion" version? 
I've had problems with beryl when I installed compiz-fusion and had to unmerge some packages until it works.
[]'s
_________________
Eduardo L. Garcia
"Only the dead ones will see the end of the war." - Plato |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sadako
Advocate
Joined: 05 Aug 2004
Posts: 3792
Location: sleeping in the bathtub
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 4:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If compiz-fusion was the only reason you used the xeffects overlay, then you all should probably remove it and rebuild the packages you used from the overlay to get back in sync with the official portage tree.
_________________
"You have to invite me in" |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
webhawg
Apprentice
Joined: 18 Oct 2002
Posts: 293
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 5:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Hopeless wrote: | | If compiz-fusion was the only reason you used the xeffects overlay, then you all should probably remove it and rebuild the packages you used from the overlay to get back in sync with the official portage tree. |
Yes, I used the xeffects overlay just to get compiz-fusion. And now I want to remove it just as you said. But how do I do it? Remove the overlay in make.conf?
Here's what I get when I unmerged compiz and tried to emerge compiz-fusion...
| Code: |
# emerge compiz-fusion -Dup
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies -
!!! Multiple versions within a single package slot have been
!!! pulled into the dependency graph:
('ebuild', '/', 'x11-wm/compiz-0.5.2', 'merge') pulled in by
('installed', '/', 'x11-wm/emerald-0.5.2', 'nomerge')
('ebuild', '/', 'x11-wm/compiz-0.6.2', 'merge') pulled in by
('ebuild', '/', 'x11-libs/compizconfig-backend-gconf-0.6.0', 'merge')
('ebuild', '/', 'x11-libs/libcompizconfig-0.6.0', 'merge')
('ebuild', '/', 'x11-plugins/compiz-fusion-plugins-main-0.6.0', 'merge')
It may be possible to solve this problem by using package.mask to
prevent one of those packages from being selected. However, it is also
possible that conflicting dependencies exist such that they are
impossible to satisfy simultaneously. If such a conflict exists in the
dependencies of two different packages, then those packages can not be
installed simultaneously.
For more information, see MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man page
or refer to the Gentoo Handbook.
... done!
[ebuild U ] x11-libs/compiz-bcop-0.6.0 [0.5.2]
[ebuild N ] x11-wm/compiz-0.6.2 USE="gnome svg -dbus -debug -kde"
[ebuild N ] x11-wm/compiz-0.5.2 USE="gnome gtk svg -dbus -fuse -kde"
[ebuild U ] x11-libs/libcompizconfig-0.6.0 [0.5.2]
[ebuild U ] x11-plugins/compiz-fusion-plugins-main-0.6.0 [0.5.2] USE="jpeg%*"
[ebuild U ] dev-python/compizconfig-python-0.6.0.1 [0.5.2]
[ebuild U ] x11-plugins/compiz-fusion-plugins-extra-0.6.0 [0.5.2]
[ebuild U ] x11-libs/compizconfig-backend-gconf-0.6.0 [0.5.2]
[ebuild U ] x11-apps/ccsm-0.6.0 [0.5.2]
[ebuild U ] x11-wm/compiz-fusion-0.6.0 [0.5.2]
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Desktop Environments
