Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
Roy is gone... Should I Leave Gentoo
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next  
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Gentoo Chat
View previous topic :: View next topic  

What OS Should I Use
Stick With Gentoo: Things will straighten out
73%
 73%  [ 126 ]
FreeBSD
7%
 7%  [ 12 ]
Fedora
1%
 1%  [ 2 ]
Debian
0%
 0%  [ 1 ]
Ubuntu
5%
 5%  [ 9 ]
Sabayon
1%
 1%  [ 3 ]
Stick With Gentoo: Switch to Paludis and other 3rd party overlays
8%
 8%  [ 14 ]
Another Distro
2%
 2%  [ 4 ]
Total Votes : 171

Author Message
Paapaa
l33t
l33t


Joined: 14 Aug 2005
Posts: 955
Location: Finland

PostPosted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 9:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

AllenJB wrote:
Because Distrowatch is such a reliable souce of information...

How about this:

http://www.desktoplinux.com/news/NS9488592005.html

Quote:
For personal use, Ubuntu once more easily led the pack, at 55.4 percent. Here, though, the community Linuxes, such as Debian (22.2 percent), Gentoo (10.2 percent), Knoppix (7.1 percent), and PCLinuxOS (5.4 percent) become significant players. It was also interesting to see that the commercially supported, community Linux distributions -- Novell's openSUSE (19.5 percent) and Red Hat's Fedora (16.7 percent) -- are, like Ubuntu, important distributions both in the office and at home.

_________________
Paludis, the way packages are meant to be managed.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
d2_racing
Bodhisattva
Bodhisattva


Joined: 25 Apr 2005
Posts: 13047
Location: Ste-Foy,Canada

PostPosted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 1:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah Gentoo in third place :)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
vermaden
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 27 Jul 2005
Posts: 168
Location: pl_PL.lodz

PostPosted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 8:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Matteo Azzali wrote:
Also, saying that it's time to move to BSD because of 10 slides in pdf
babbling about a rewrited system.... :roll: (makes me think about HURD).
Maybe in 2-3 years when that rewrited kernel will start to be stable
the thing could be reconsidered, not actually, and surely not for users.


This statement shows how small your knowledge about FreeBSD is, and that you never had ANY experiences with this UNIX.

Rewrited system? HURD? Please, did we read the same PDF file?

FreeBSD 7 has been STABLE for months, providing performance, scalability and reliability that Linux can currently only dream of.

Surely not for users? Dont tell me that you recommend Gentoo for users, dont you?

Have you forgotten you roots soldier? All Gentoo concepts and design are based on FreeBSD's design, Portage = slower Ports, init system = FreeBSD's RC (imported from NetBSD), USE flags = WITH_*/WITHOUT_* ...

You generally do not understand that bashing FreeBSD you are curently bashing Gentoo.

If FreeBSD would not exist then Gentoo would never happen.

Nobody forces you to use FreeBSD, but stop spreading FUD if you dont know shit.
_________________
"If 386BSD had been available when I started on Linux, Linux would probably never had happened." Linus Torvalds
vermaden's: links spreadbsd
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
UberLord
Retired Dev
Retired Dev


Joined: 18 Sep 2003
Posts: 6835
Location: Blighty

PostPosted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 8:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

vermaden wrote:
This statement shows how small your knowledge about FreeBSD is, and that you never had ANY experiences with this UNIX.
...
FreeBSD 7 has been STABLE for months, providing performance, scalability and reliability that Linux can currently only dream of.


fud fud fud fud fud fud

FreeBSD-7-BETA3 was just released last monday, so it's not even STABLE yet.
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2007-November/038388.html

Also, my servers, which run the hardened stable branch of Gentoo/Linux have been providing my and me company reliant, scalable and secure computing for years. There is no need to dream.
Heck, you can secure a Windows system if you know what you're doing.

Quote:
All Gentoo concepts and design are based on FreeBSD's design, Portage = slower Ports, init system = FreeBSD's RC (imported from NetBSD)


When I first started using Gentoo, baselayout (aka the init system) looked nothing like the BSD rc system. It's more like a sysv system as it uses init.d.
Now that you mention it, OpenRC will support BSD like rc init script templates which means that if Gentoo uses OpenRC instead of baselayout-2 then Gentoo will become more BSD like if you will.
_________________
Use dhcpcd for all your automated network configuration needs
Use dhcpcd-ui (GTK+/Qt) as your System Tray Network tool
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
vermaden
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 27 Jul 2005
Posts: 168
Location: pl_PL.lodz

PostPosted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 8:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

UberLord wrote:
fud fud fud fud fud fud


yeah, right, while true ;do echo fud ;done ...

UberLord wrote:
FreeBSD-7-BETA3 was just released last monday, so it's not even STABLE yet.
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2007-November/038388.html

You did not understood.

not STABLE branch of FreeBSD, stable = reliable/not crashing etc (of course a random crash will occur, same as in Linux world), check FreeBSD mailing lists or some bigger FreeBSD forums, many people used it months before the RELEASE process started and they were very happy about stability and performance, especially in *SQL databases.
_________________
"If 386BSD had been available when I started on Linux, Linux would probably never had happened." Linus Torvalds
vermaden's: links spreadbsd
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
UberLord
Retired Dev
Retired Dev


Joined: 18 Sep 2003
Posts: 6835
Location: Blighty

PostPosted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 9:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The FreeBSD project do not think it stable, otherwise they would mark it as so - no matter what you or others may think.
_________________
Use dhcpcd for all your automated network configuration needs
Use dhcpcd-ui (GTK+/Qt) as your System Tray Network tool
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
vermaden
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 27 Jul 2005
Posts: 168
Location: pl_PL.lodz

PostPosted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 10:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

UberLord wrote:
The FreeBSD project do not think it stable, otherwise they would mark it as so - no matter what you or others may think.


As for your formalism about FreeBSD Project branches, FreeBSD 7 IS already in 7-STABLE branch if you like it so much, so YES it is STABLE.

FreeBSD Release process is to release a major release bump about 2 years, no matter how stable the code is between releases.

Actually FreeBSD CURRENT is like Linux RC releases, and STABLE is like stable Linux releases, like 2.6.23 for example.
_________________
"If 386BSD had been available when I started on Linux, Linux would probably never had happened." Linus Torvalds
vermaden's: links spreadbsd
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
UberLord
Retired Dev
Retired Dev


Joined: 18 Sep 2003
Posts: 6835
Location: Blighty

PostPosted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 10:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Obviously your world view of CVS branching, tagging and the BETA keyword differ from mine.

But if you claim it's STABLE, please point me to a STABLE iso I can download right now?
_________________
Use dhcpcd for all your automated network configuration needs
Use dhcpcd-ui (GTK+/Qt) as your System Tray Network tool
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
vermaden
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 27 Jul 2005
Posts: 168
Location: pl_PL.lodz

PostPosted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 11:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

UberLord wrote:
Obviously your world view of CVS branching, tagging and the BETA keyword differ from mine.

But if you claim it's STABLE, please point me to a STABLE iso I can download right now?


You just do not know FreeBSD branching process.

Code:
                   [8CURRENT-8CURRENT-8CURRENT-8CURRENT-8CURRENT][8STABLE...]
[7CURRENT-7CURRENT][7STABLE-7STABLE-7STABLE-7STABLE-7STABLE-7STABLE-7STABLE-7STABLE-...-7STABLE-7STABLE-...]
       \                    \        \        \        \       \        \                    \
    snapshot               BETA1    BETA2    BETA3     RC1     RC2     RELEASE   ...   7.1-RELEASE ...


FreeBSD 7 CURRENT has been branched as 7 STABLE on 11 Oct 2007, on 19 Oct 2007 BETA1 has been released to ftp.
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/7.0R/schedule.html

So BETA* and RC* are just snapshots from STABLE branch from some exact time.
_________________
"If 386BSD had been available when I started on Linux, Linux would probably never had happened." Linus Torvalds
vermaden's: links spreadbsd
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
UberLord
Retired Dev
Retired Dev


Joined: 18 Sep 2003
Posts: 6835
Location: Blighty

PostPosted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 11:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

vermaden wrote:
Quote:
But if you claim it's STABLE, please point me to a STABLE iso I can download right now?


You just do not know FreeBSD branching process.


I know very well the FreeBSD branching process.
Just because they have created a STABLE branch for 7, does not magically make 7 STABLE.

Bah, I'm fed up arguing. Bottom line - if something is STABLE there whould be a STABLE RELEASE otherwise it's just posturing - which is exactly what you're doing.
_________________
Use dhcpcd for all your automated network configuration needs
Use dhcpcd-ui (GTK+/Qt) as your System Tray Network tool
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
d2_racing
Bodhisattva
Bodhisattva


Joined: 25 Apr 2005
Posts: 13047
Location: Ste-Foy,Canada

PostPosted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 12:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

vermaden wrote:

If FreeBSD would not exist then Gentoo would never happen.


Portage is from the ports of FreeBSD.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
vermaden
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 27 Jul 2005
Posts: 168
Location: pl_PL.lodz

PostPosted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 3:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

First you scream about fud which is totally bullshit.

Then you stick to BETA keyword as hard as you can and want link for STABLE.

Then you claim that you know FreeBSD branching process greatly but you did not knew very basic things such as that BETA are just snapshots from STABLE branch.

And when all your complaints are destroyed by arguments you scream for RELEASE saying that STABLE is not stable.

And you say that you are "fed up arguing"?

Get real kid and provide ANY REAL arguments instead of all this bullshit.

d2_racing wrote:
Portage is from the ports of FreeBSD.


O RLY?
_________________
"If 386BSD had been available when I started on Linux, Linux would probably never had happened." Linus Torvalds
vermaden's: links spreadbsd
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
steveL
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 13 Sep 2006
Posts: 5153
Location: The Peanut Gallery

PostPosted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 4:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't know about anyone else, but I find the way you have gone straight to swearing at people quite offensive, vermaden. There was no need for it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nixnut
Bodhisattva
Bodhisattva


Joined: 09 Apr 2004
Posts: 10974
Location: the dutch mountains

PostPosted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 4:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

vermaden wrote:
...

People, please keep it friendly and to the point. Read the forum guidelines in case you don't understand what kind of behaviour we won't tolerate for very long.
_________________
Please add [solved] to the initial post's subject line if you feel your problem is resolved. Help answer the unanswered

talk is cheap. supply exceeds demand
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
vermaden
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 27 Jul 2005
Posts: 168
Location: pl_PL.lodz

PostPosted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 4:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

steveL wrote:
I don't know about anyone else, but I find the way you have gone straight to swearing at people quite offensive, vermaden. There was no need for it.


Sorry, I did not started ...
_________________
"If 386BSD had been available when I started on Linux, Linux would probably never had happened." Linus Torvalds
vermaden's: links spreadbsd
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kasumi_Ninja
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 18 Feb 2006
Posts: 1825
Location: The Netherlands

PostPosted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 4:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

vermaden wrote:
steveL wrote:
I don't know about anyone else, but I find the way you have gone straight to swearing at people quite offensive, vermaden. There was no need for it.


Sorry, I did not started ...


This comment shows you missed the point. It isn't about 'who started' it's about the way you communicate. And quite frankly I agree with steveL and find your tone unnecessary rude.
_________________
Please add [solved] to the initial post's subject line if you feel your problem is resolved. Help answer the unanswered
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bill Cosby
Guru
Guru


Joined: 22 Jan 2005
Posts: 430
Location: Aachen, Germany

PostPosted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 4:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

@vermaden,
I agree.
_________________
The Creature from Jekyll Island.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
UberLord
Retired Dev
Retired Dev


Joined: 18 Sep 2003
Posts: 6835
Location: Blighty

PostPosted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 5:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

vermaden wrote:
And you say that you are "fed up arguing"?


Yes. Would it help if I asked FreeBSD releng team if 7 is stable, or would you argue with them too?
_________________
Use dhcpcd for all your automated network configuration needs
Use dhcpcd-ui (GTK+/Qt) as your System Tray Network tool
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kensai
Guru
Guru


Joined: 09 Mar 2004
Posts: 569
Location: Puerto Rico

PostPosted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 6:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

UberLord, Yeah, I know what you are talking about:
Quote:
FreeBSD-STABLE is our development branch from which major releases are made. Changes go into this branch at a different pace, and with the general assumption that they have first gone into FreeBSD-CURRENT for testing. This is still a development branch, however, and this means that at any given time, the sources for FreeBSD-STABLE may or may not be suitable for any particular purpose. It is simply another engineering development track, not a resource for end-users.

So yeah, FreeBSD-Stable is not recommended for new users as it might break. I have used STABLE withouth problems, but some unstable changes to the code goes there for testing from time to time.

All in all, FREEBSD-STABLE is not STABLE is "FREEBSD-STABLE".
_________________
Gentoo: Gigabyte: nFORCE 2: nVIDIA GeForce 6600: AMD Athlon XP 3200+
Leaving the above specs to immortalize the first system I Installed Gentoo on!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TheNewOsiris
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 18 Dec 2006
Posts: 91

PostPosted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 6:15 pm    Post subject: Broken Portage/Devs Leaving Reply with quote

Well, if portage/emerge is giving you troubles, mate, you could always switch (at least temporarily) to Paludis or Pkgcore. At the moment paludis is quite a bit ahead of portage and pkgcore in regards to features, speed/performance, repositories, config files, and coding practices. However, this is, of course, inclined to change in the future as gentoo/portage/emerge devs re-organize themselves.

And yes it is possible that Roy won't maintain baselayout2. But guess what, my friend. The very nature of opensource allows other talented and intelligent people to raise dead projects if need be.

Cheers.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
UberLord
Retired Dev
Retired Dev


Joined: 18 Sep 2003
Posts: 6835
Location: Blighty

PostPosted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 10:55 pm    Post subject: Re: Broken Portage/Devs Leaving Reply with quote

TheNewOsiris wrote:
And yes it is possible that Roy won't maintain baselayout2.


Well, it's been forked off into OpenRC.
If Gentoo, or other distros use it then good, if not then they'll use something else.

Quote:
But guess what, my friend. The very nature of opensource allows other talented and intelligent people to raise dead projects if need be.


Or start new ones. OSS constantly changes, and so do the people involved.
_________________
Use dhcpcd for all your automated network configuration needs
Use dhcpcd-ui (GTK+/Qt) as your System Tray Network tool
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TheNewOsiris
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 18 Dec 2006
Posts: 91

PostPosted: Sat Nov 24, 2007 1:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
OSS constantly changes, and so do the people involved.


Couldn't have said it any better my self. :)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dagger
Retired Dev
Retired Dev


Joined: 11 Jun 2003
Posts: 765
Location: UK

PostPosted: Tue Nov 27, 2007 11:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I will glagly give FreeBSD 7.0 a try when stable become stable :)

So far it didn't impress me, maybe because I never had enough time to play with it.
_________________
95% of all computer errors occur between chair and keyboard (TM)
Join the FSF as an Associate Member!
Post under CC license.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
d2_racing
Bodhisattva
Bodhisattva


Joined: 25 Apr 2005
Posts: 13047
Location: Ste-Foy,Canada

PostPosted: Tue Nov 27, 2007 12:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dagger wrote:
I will glagly give FreeBSD 7.0 a try when stable become stable :)


It will give me time to read the massive handbook of FreeBSD :)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Simba7
l33t
l33t


Joined: 22 Jan 2007
Posts: 706
Location: Billings, MT, USA

PostPosted: Wed Nov 28, 2007 2:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jeez.. I mention FreeBSD and all of a sudden a massive sh*tstorm engulfs the entire board.. Grrr..

FreeBSD does do some things better, and Gentoo Linux does other things better. I am not bashing either one and am looking forward to building a solid firewall with Gentoo. I currently have one built with FreeBSD 7.0-BETA1.

The definition of "Stable" in my world would mean "doesn't crash or degrade while subject to massive traffic", meaning for a firewall, if someone pulls a DDoS attack, it doesn't go down. It takes it and says "GIVE ME MORE, YOU WUSS!!"

The main reason I wanted to try out Gentoo for this project is because of support for a specific card, the 3Com 3c515-TX. This ISA card is supported in OpenBSD and NetBSD, but I'm more suited for FreeBSD. The major turn off was the FreeBSD boards saying "Just put in a different card". This DOESN'T solve my problem. I wanted to use THIS card, not some other. After all, I have 6 of them. That's when I looked at my Gentoo box and thought "Hmmmm.." and decided to try it out on my router/firewall.

Plus, I'm a little skiddish on running x.0 on anything production. I learned the hard way with 5.0 and 6.0. I usually wait until .1 or .2 comes out. That would be considered "STABLE", not "RELEASE".

Oh, and the FreeBSD 7.x branch probably won't become stable until at least 7.2. THAT could be considered FreeBSD-STABLE, not FreeBSD-RELEASE. But keep your CVS up to date if you bump into problems.

How long have you been using FreeBSD, vermaden?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Gentoo Chat All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Page 4 of 5

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum