View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
darkeye Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 02 Mar 2004 Posts: 105
|
Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 12:09 pm Post subject: fusion-icon - an elusive ebuild? |
|
|
I'm trying to get fusion-icon emerged, but I can't seem to find a corresponding ebuild anywhere. it's not in the main gentoo portage, and all the overlay references I find, like desktop-effect, xeffects & the like are non-existent by now.
is there an ebuild that available currently for fusion-icon? why is it not in the main portage tree? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
skoff n00b
Joined: 16 Nov 2006 Posts: 21
|
Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 3:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
desktop-effects - it is there. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
darkeye Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 02 Mar 2004 Posts: 105
|
Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 7:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
skoff wrote: | desktop-effects - it is there. |
hm, where and how? this is what I see:
Code: |
# layman -L | grep desk
* stuart-desktop [Subversion] (source: http://overlays.gentoo.org...)
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
skoff n00b
Joined: 16 Nov 2006 Posts: 21
|
Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 8:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
desktop-effects [Git ] (source: git://git.overlays.gentoo....)
It may be that it had to be added to layman manually - I know I´ve done this once or twice. I´ll see if I can find out, but it definitely is current (and fusion-icon works fine). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
darkeye Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 02 Mar 2004 Posts: 105
|
Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 9:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
skoff wrote: | desktop-effects [Git ] (source: git://git.overlays.gentoo....)
It may be that it had to be added to layman manually - I know I´ve done this once or twice. I´ll see if I can find out, but it definitely is current (and fusion-icon works fine). |
interesting - dektop-effects is actually marked as non-offical, so it doesn't show up on layman -L
but it's there well, strange behaviour |
|
Back to top |
|
|
skoff n00b
Joined: 16 Nov 2006 Posts: 21
|
Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 9:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Does layman -a desktop-effects work for you? If not, then you have to add it manually, which I can´t find how to do at the moment. Somewhere on the forums lies the answer... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
darkeye Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 02 Mar 2004 Posts: 105
|
Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 9:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
skoff wrote: | Does layman -a desktop-effects work for you? If not, then you have to add it manually, which I can´t find how to do at the moment. Somewhere on the forums lies the answer... |
yes, it does. it's just strange that there's no option to layman that it would actually list these unoffical overlays, one has to open the overlay list XML file and see manually (actually desktop-effects is the very first in the file but adding it worked fine.. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pilla Bodhisattva
Joined: 07 Aug 2002 Posts: 7729 Location: Underworld
|
Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 9:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Moved from Desktop Environments to Unsupported Software. _________________ "I'm just very selective about the reality I choose to accept." -- Calvin |
|
Back to top |
|
|
uaeb n00b
Joined: 28 May 2008 Posts: 27
|
Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 11:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
darkeye wrote: | skoff wrote: | Does layman -a desktop-effects work for you? If not, then you have to add it manually, which I can´t find how to do at the moment. Somewhere on the forums lies the answer... |
yes, it does. it's just strange that there's no option to layman that it would actually list these unoffical overlays, one has to open the overlay list XML file and see manually (actually desktop-effects is the very first in the file but adding it worked fine.. |
layman -Lk |
|
Back to top |
|
|
darkeye Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 02 Mar 2004 Posts: 105
|
Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 6:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
oh, I see. from the documentation, it wasn't clear to me what this does:
Code: |
-k, --nocheck Do not check overlay definitions and do not issue a
warning if description or contact information are
missing.
|
thanks for letting me know! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cuchumino Guru
Joined: 24 Nov 2004 Posts: 428
|
Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 2:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
why doesn't that ebuild appear again? Will it appear on a later date? or is it something I screwed up?
I have that same problem as posted above. It appears in portage (fusion-icon that is), but no ebuild available. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jonnevers Veteran
Joined: 02 Jan 2003 Posts: 1594 Location: Gentoo64 land
|
Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 2:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cuchumino wrote: | why doesn't that ebuild appear again? Will it appear on a later date? or is it something I screwed up?
I have that same problem as posted above. It appears in portage (fusion-icon that is), but no ebuild available. |
fusion-icon is not in portage. it only resides in the desktop-effects overlay.
i think this is because it never had any real release but has always need to be pulled from git (aka a 9999 ebuild). I could be wrong though... as it looks like there is at least a 0.1 release (also in desktop-effects). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cuchumino Guru
Joined: 24 Nov 2004 Posts: 428
|
Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 3:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I found my mistake. from [url="http://gentoo-wiki.com/TIP_Overlays"]this[/url] wiki link, it says....
Quote: | For layman versions prior to 1.2.0 use:
echo "source /usr/portage/local/layman/make.conf" >> /etc/make.conf
For layman versions 1.2.0 and later use:
echo "source /usr/local/portage/layman/make.conf" >> /etc/make.conf |
I was using the first link instead of the second, and i had layman 1.2.0. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|