View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
sgao Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 22 Apr 2006 Posts: 149
|
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 4:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I am seeing this problem with opera:
Quote: | $ opera
/opt/opera/lib/opera/9.51/opera: Symbol `_ZTV6QFrame' has different size in shared object, consider re-linking
Segmentation fault |
I've tried removing and re-emerging. But the problem remains. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sgao Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 22 Apr 2006 Posts: 149
|
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 4:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The problem is fixed by emerging with "qt-static". |
|
Back to top |
|
|
gmtongar Apprentice
Joined: 21 Mar 2004 Posts: 224 Location: Kristiansand, Norway
|
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 4:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
emerged opera on a new system:
Code: |
usr/share/opera/ini/pluginpath.ini: FAILED
usr/share/opera/skin/standard_skin.zip: OK
usr/share/opera/skin/windows_skin.zip: OK
usr/share/opera/opera6.adr: OK
usr/share/opera/search.ini: OK
usr/share/opera/lngcode.txt: OK
usr/share/opera/html40_entities.dtd: OK
usr/share/opera/svg-mo.dat: OK
usr/share/opera/svg-mobd.dat: OK
usr/share/opera/svg-sa.dat: OK
usr/share/opera/svg-sabd.dat: OK
usr/share/opera/svg-se.dat: OK
usr/share/opera/svg-sebd.dat: OK
usr/share/opera/encoding.bin: OK
usr/share/doc/opera/LICENSE: OK
usr/share/doc/opera/LGPL: OK
usr/share/man/man1/opera.1: OK
usr/share/pixmaps/opera.xpm: OK
usr/lib/opera/9.51/missingsyms.so: OK
usr/lib/opera/9.51/spellcheck.so: OK
usr/lib/opera/9.51/opera: OK
usr/lib/opera/9.51/works: OK
usr/lib/opera/9.51/operaplugincleaner: OK
usr/lib/opera/9.51/operapluginwrapper: OK
etc/opera6rc.fixed: OK
etc/opera6rc: OK
opera: OK
md5sum: WARNING: 1 of 230 computed checksums did NOT match
|
gmtongar _________________ "Did you understand the music, Yoko. Or was it all in vain" - r.waters |
|
Back to top |
|
|
defenderBG l33t
Joined: 20 Jun 2006 Posts: 817
|
Posted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 1:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
If it is about the warning... read better while installing. Look at the ebuild:
einfo "It is safe to ignore warnings about failed checksums"
einfo "and about files that would be ignored ..." |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bpaddock Apprentice
Joined: 04 Nov 2005 Posts: 195 Location: Franklin, PA
|
Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2008 2:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
defenderBG wrote: | gmtongar wrote: |
It seems as well that your plugins are running wild. Check if there are some plugins that are in your path twice.
|
|
Code: |
Plugin Path=
/opt/Acrobat5/Browsers/intellinux [Does not exist]
/opt/netscape/plugins
/usr/lib/netscape/plugins [Does not exist]
/opt/opera/lib/opera/plugins
/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins
/usr/X11R6/lib/mozilla/plugins [Does not exist]
|
Quote: |
ERROR: ld.so: object 'libjvm.so' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be preloaded: ignored.
ERROR: ld.so: object 'libawt.so' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be preloaded: ignored.
set a java re and this problem will case to exist. |
Nothing else has worked to keep Opera from locking up,
so I figured I enable Java, but no mater what Java path
I set Opera to, it will not validate the Java Path.
This is the Java Junk currently on my machine, what
am I missing to make Opera happy?:
# eselect java-vm list
Available Java Virtual Machines:
[1] emul-linux-x86-java-1.6
[2] sun-jdk-1.6 system-vm
# eselect java-nsplugin list
Available 32-bit Java browser plugins
[1] emul-linux-x86-java-1.6 current
Available 64-bit Java browser plugins
# locate libjvm
/opt/sun-jdk-1.6.0.07/jre/lib/amd64/server/libjvm.so
/opt/emul-linux-x86-java-1.6.0.07/lib/i386/client/libjvm.so
/opt/emul-linux-x86-java-1.6.0.07/lib/i386/server/libjvm.so
What would be a valid Opera Java path? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
gary Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 11 Jan 2004 Posts: 110 Location: Auburn, CA
|
Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2008 7:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi, all.
Had to jump in here. I have the same errors as bpaddock, to wit:
Code: | ERROR: ld.so: object 'libjvm.so' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be preloaded: ignored.
ERROR: ld.so: object 'libawt.so' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be preloaded: ignored. |
My Opera config shows no Java runtime environment, in spite of the fact that I can get several paths to verify. If I attempt to enable java using one of those paths, it simply disables itself.
This is on a new amd64 install, BTW, and I am using 64-bit Opera.
My symptoms are not as quite as drastic as gmtongar's. My opera works...OK, except when a java applet tries to run, then it freezes for a minute or so, then gives up trying to load the applet and tries to carry on.
My basic java setup looks like this:
Code: | $ java-config -L
The following VMs are available for generation-2:
1) Sun 32bit JRE 1.6.0.07 [emul-linux-x86-java-1.6]
2) Sun JDK 1.5.0.16 [sun-jdk-1.5]
*) Sun JDK 1.6.0.07 [sun-jdk-1.6]
$ eselect java-nsplugin list
Available 32-bit Java browser plugins
[1] emul-linux-x86-java-1.6 current |
I do have one specific question regarding setup: I have not emerged Firefox (because I do not use it). Could that be affecting things?
I think bpaddock has asked the key questions in the post previous to this one - what would be an appropriate java path, and/or what's missing?
Any ideas would certainly be appreciated! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
defenderBG l33t
Joined: 20 Jun 2006 Posts: 817
|
Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2008 11:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
bpaddock wrote: | ERROR: ld.so: object 'libjvm.so' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be preloaded: ignored.
ERROR: ld.so: object 'libawt.so' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be preloaded: ignored. |
Apperantly you are trying to use 64bit opera? I had the same problem. It just failed to work. Try using the 32 bit one (ia32). That solved it for me. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bpaddock Apprentice
Joined: 04 Nov 2005 Posts: 195 Location: Franklin, PA
|
Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2008 2:04 pm Post subject: Re: opera 9.51 |
|
|
gmtongar wrote: | I just upgraded opera 9.51 from 9.50 ... and it freezes all the time. I thought 9.50 was bad, but this is even worse... Anyone got an idea of what's wrong? Didn't have much probl with 9.27 ...
the 9.50 series was suppose to be fast, but is it too fast for gentoo (sorry, couldn't resist that one ...). |
In private email to me Opera CTO wrote:
Quote: |
> It's probably the Flash plugin, which is binary code that Opera don't
> control. Try disabling plugins altogether (F12) and see if things get
> better.
>
> Cheers,
>
> -h&kon
> Håkon Wium Lie CTO °þe®ª
> http://people.opera.com/howcome
|
Turning off Plugins in F12 did stop the lock ups. Also stopped *all* of the plugins
from working. Would like to keep the PDF plugin working. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Cyker Veteran
Joined: 15 Jun 2006 Posts: 1746
|
Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2008 4:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's most likely Flash - Flash 9 and 10 like to crash and make both my Firefox and Opera browsers lock up, sometimes requiring a kill -9.
I'm not sure how to block individual plugins, although you can tell the apps handler to not use nthe flash plugin to handle swfs. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bloedie Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 03 Jul 2006 Posts: 88 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2008 4:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
opera works fine for me with
flashplayer-plugin Version 9.0 r48
All other flashversions locked up opera a lot.
Cu.
Bloedie |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bpaddock Apprentice
Joined: 04 Nov 2005 Posts: 195 Location: Franklin, PA
|
Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2008 10:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Cyker wrote: | It's most likely Flash - Flash 9 and 10 like to crash and make both my Firefox and Opera browsers lock up, sometimes requiring a kill -9.
I'm not sure how to block individual plugins, although you can tell the apps handler to not use nthe flash plugin to handle swfs. |
http://linux.slashdot.org/linux/08/08/17/1649232.shtml
says that we are not alone in our Flash problems. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|