| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Genewb
Apprentice
Joined: 09 Jan 2007
Posts: 165
|
 Posted: Thu Nov 27, 2008 10:30 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| cneil wrote: | | Genewb wrote: | | cruzki123 wrote: | | had anyone put -fgraphite in his CFLAGS? |
On that note, has anyone reading managed/does anyone reading know how to enable graphite? |
Here's a list of changes in gcc-4.4:
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.4/changes.html
It mentions Graphite and how to enable it. That said, you may also want to read this thread on the GCC Mailing List:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2008-10/msg00191.html
The developers were discussing the Graphite options and the possibility of renaming them. I don't know if they ever did or not. |
Thanks for the pointers.
Unfortunately it seems the configure script doesn't like the live version of polylib (gloog), which is the only one in portage:
| Quote: |
checking for version 0.10 of PPL... yes
checking for correct version of CLooG... no
|
_________________
I don't give a darn about "experience", just functional copyleft software. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rhill
Retired Dev
Joined: 22 Oct 2004
Posts: 1629
Location: sk.ca
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2008 8:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
the ebuild doesn't have graphite support so you'll get an error if you try to use it. i won't be adding support any time soon, considering one of the library dependencies is only available through a live git repo and all it seems to be good for right now is making the compiler explode. no work is being done to fix the problems for 4.4 since only regression fixes can be applied at this stage. graphite is a new feature and therefore cannot regress.
_________________
by design, by neglect
for a fact or just for effect |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Spasswolf
n00b
Joined: 31 Mar 2008
Posts: 5
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
zorry
Developer
Joined: 30 Mar 2008
Posts: 380
Location: Umeå The north part of scandinavia
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2008 12:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
Wher to fund the ecj-4.4.jar file?
Going to star testing gcc 4.4 for the hardened overaly
EDIT:
Thanx dirtyepic for the help.
_________________
gcc version 6.1.0 (Gentoo Hardened 6.1.0 p1.1) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
zorry
Developer
Joined: 30 Mar 2008
Posts: 380
Location: Umeå The north part of scandinavia
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2008 10:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
We have started to test gcc 4.4 on or hardened overlay.
_________________
gcc version 6.1.0 (Gentoo Hardened 6.1.0 p1.1) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
zorry
Developer
Joined: 30 Mar 2008
Posts: 380
Location: Umeå The north part of scandinavia
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2008 11:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Any one got this?
* QA Notice: Package has poor programming practices which may compile
* fine but exhibit random runtime failures.
* /var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-4.4.0_alpha20081205/work/gcc-4.4-20081205/libgcc/../gcc/unwind-dw2-fde.c:326: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules
_________________
gcc version 6.1.0 (Gentoo Hardened 6.1.0 p1.1) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Basso Buffo
n00b
Joined: 19 Oct 2007
Posts: 24
Location: North Carolina, USA
|
| Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2008 2:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
In trying to build ImageMagick 6.4.7.5 using GCC 4.4 SVN snapshot, I get the following error:
| Code: | coders/pnm.c: In function 'ReadPNMImage':
coders/pnm.c:1015: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <http://bugs.gentoo.org/> for instructions.
make[1]: *** [coders/coders_pnm_la-pnm.lo] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/media-gfx/imagemagick-6.4.7.5/work/ImageMagick-6.4.7-5'
make: *** [all] Error 2 |
I had a look at the GCC bugzilla, but it looks like they expect bugreports with much more detailed internal knowledge of GCC than I have.
(The line of code that makes GCC barf is just a 'case' statement in a select block.)
| Code: | $ gcc --version
gcc () 4.4.0-pre9999 built 20081210 (Gentoo SVN ebuild) rev. 142656
Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
zorry
Developer
Joined: 30 Mar 2008
Posts: 380
Location: Umeå The north part of scandinavia
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 12, 2008 8:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
[tracker] GCC 4.4 porting
_________________
gcc version 6.1.0 (Gentoo Hardened 6.1.0 p1.1) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
rhill
Retired Dev
Joined: 22 Oct 2004
Posts: 1629
Location: sk.ca
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2008 3:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
PS. anyone posting bugs without patches will be eaten. 
_________________
by design, by neglect
for a fact or just for effect |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
poly_poly-man
Advocate
Joined: 06 Dec 2006
Posts: 2477
Location: RIT, NY, US
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2008 3:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
godd... I still can't trust 4.3.x....
/me crawls back into a whole and starts using egcs...
_________________
iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAA
avatar: new version of logo - see topic 838248. Potentially still a WiP. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Genewb
Apprentice
Joined: 09 Jan 2007
Posts: 165
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| dirtyepic wrote: | | the ebuild doesn't have graphite support so you'll get an error if you try to use it. i won't be adding support any time soon, considering one of the library dependencies is only available through a live git repo and all it seems to be good for right now is making the compiler explode. no work is being done to fix the problems for 4.4 since only regression fixes can be applied at this stage. graphite is a new feature and therefore cannot regress. |
Ah, I was under the impression it was in some sort of usable state.
Thanks for your prevention of wasted effort.
_________________
I don't give a darn about "experience", just functional copyleft software. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
alex.blackbit
Advocate
Joined: 26 Jul 2005
Posts: 2397
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 15, 2008 6:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
the package tries to overwrite /usr/lib64/security/classpath.security.
i guess this only happens, because i have the gcj useflag enabled.
should i use this? | Code: | | FEATURES="-collision-protect" emerge gcc:4.4-svn |
or should something in the ebuild be changed? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kernelOfTruth
Watchman
Joined: 20 Dec 2005
Posts: 6111
Location: Vienna, Austria; Germany; hello world :)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
alex.blackbit
Advocate
Joined: 26 Jul 2005
Posts: 2397
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 15, 2008 7:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| emerge is running. but... this isn't a long term solution. how can this be solved in the end? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
zorry
Developer
Joined: 30 Mar 2008
Posts: 380
Location: Umeå The north part of scandinavia
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 15, 2008 11:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| alex.blackbit wrote: | | emerge is running. but... this isn't a long term solution. how can this be solved in the end? |
see sys-devel/gcc - gcj stuff not slotted
_________________
gcc version 6.1.0 (Gentoo Hardened 6.1.0 p1.1) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
alex.blackbit
Advocate
Joined: 26 Jul 2005
Posts: 2397
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2008 12:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Code: | | FEATURES="-protect-owned" emerge gcc:4.4-svn |
is what was needed to get it done.
i didn't measure it, but it took _VERY_ long to emerge, for sure longer than 4.3.x. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ComaWhite
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 07 Oct 2008
Posts: 125
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2008 5:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Anyone know the status of 4.4.0 on using it like which compiles and doesn't? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
yoshi314
l33t
Joined: 30 Dec 2004
Posts: 850
Location: PL
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Basso Buffo
n00b
Joined: 19 Oct 2007
Posts: 24
Location: North Carolina, USA
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 2:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
xulrunner fails to build with GCC 4.4, but I am not cool enough nor competent enough to come up with a patch; hence I haven't entered it into bugs.gentoo.org.
The same issue also appears in any Mozilla product which is built with USE="-xulrunner", which causes the xulrunner source to be built-into the app. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
rsa4046
l33t
Joined: 07 Feb 2005
Posts: 660
Location: The Big H, a bit SSW
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 2:51 pm Post subject: Re: Getting gcc-4.4 |
|
|
| Fred Krogh wrote: | I have a Fortran code that works just fine with gfortran-4.1.2, and gets the wrong result with gfortran-4.3.2. It also gives the wrong result on a Ubuntu system with gfortran 4.2.4. I'd like to give gfortran-4.4 a try, but don't know how to get it. My thanks for a pointer (and perhaps instructions if the installation procedure is not obvious).
Fred |
Have you tried intel's compiler (ifort, dev-lang/ifc-10.1.018)? I've found this far better than gfortran; my experience has been very good with ifort compared to gfortran, which often won't run or even compile the same code.
_________________
I love gentoo, but I am certainly no guru, despite what it says above. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
keet
Guru
Joined: 09 Sep 2008
Posts: 571
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 9:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I'd like to try this, and I added the dirtyepic overlay to my list, but my system still doesn't find any ebuild higher than gcc-4.3.1-r1. I have "sys-devel/gcc" in my package.keywords file. I've probably overlooked something obvious, but I don't know what. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
asturm
Developer
Joined: 05 Apr 2007
Posts: 8956
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 9:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Which results gives you equery l -p -o sys-devel/gcc? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
keet
Guru
Joined: 09 Sep 2008
Posts: 571
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 9:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Code: |
[ Searching for package 'gcc' in 'sys-devel' among: ]
* installed packages
[I--] [ ] sys-devel/gcc-4.1.2 (4.1)
[I--] [ ] sys-devel/gcc-config-1.4.0-r4 (0)
* Portage tree (/usr/portage)
[-P-] [M ] sys-devel/gcc-2.95.3-r9 (2.95)
[-P-] [M ] sys-devel/gcc-2.95.3-r10 (2.95)
[-P-] [M ] sys-devel/gcc-3.1.1-r2 (3.1)
[-P-] [M ] sys-devel/gcc-3.2.2 (3.2)
[-P-] [M ] sys-devel/gcc-3.2.3-r4 (3.2)
[-P-] [ ~] sys-devel/gcc-3.3.6-r1 (3.3)
[-P-] [ ] sys-devel/gcc-3.4.6-r2 (3.4)
[-P-] [M-] sys-devel/gcc-4.0.4 (4.0)
[-P-] [ ~] sys-devel/gcc-4.1.0-r1 (4.1)
[-P-] [ ~] sys-devel/gcc-4.2.3 (4.2)
[-P-] [ ~] sys-devel/gcc-4.2.4 (4.2)
[-P-] [M ] sys-devel/gcc-4.3.0 (4.3)
[-P-] [ ~] sys-devel/gcc-4.3.1 (4.3)
[-P-] [ ~] sys-devel/gcc-4.3.1-r1 (4.3)
[-P-] [ ~] sys-devel/gcc-4.3.2 (4.3)
[-P-] [ ~] sys-devel/gcc-4.3.2-r1 (4.3)
[-P-] [ ] sys-devel/gcc-config-1.3.16 (0)
[-P-] [M ] sys-devel/gcc-config-1.4.1 (0)
[-P-] [M~] sys-devel/gcc-nios2-5.1 (nios2-elf-3.4)
[-P-] [M-] sys-devel/kgcc64-3.4.6 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-3.4)
[-P-] [M-] sys-devel/kgcc64-4.1.2 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-4.1)
[-P-] [M-] sys-devel/kgcc64-4.2.4 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-4.2)
[-P-] [M ] sys-devel/kgcc64-4.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-4.3)
[-P-] [M ] sys-devel/kgcc64-4.3.2 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-4.3)
* overlay tree (/usr/portage/local/layman/desktop-effects /usr/portage/local/layman/kde-testing /usr/portage/local/layman/gnome /usr/portage/local/layman/berkano /usr/portage/local/layman/dirtyepic /usr/local/portage)
[--O] [M ] sys-devel/gcc-4.3.3_pre9999 (4.3-svn)
[--O] [M ] sys-devel/gcc-4.4.0_pre9999 (4.4-svn)
|
Edit: I have another question as well: Which version of glibc should I upgrade to? Should I let it go all the way to 2.9, or should I limit it to 2.7 or 2.8 instead?
Edit again: According to this thread, it seems like I should limit it to 2.7, or as low as I can. https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-717450-highlight-gcc.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
keet
Guru
Joined: 09 Sep 2008
Posts: 571
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 30, 2008 12:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
| genstorm wrote: | | Which results gives you equery l -p -o sys-devel/gcc? |
I feel like I'm missing something simple, but I know not what. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Xake
Guru
Joined: 11 Feb 2004
Posts: 588
Location: Göteborg, the rainy part of scandinavia
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 30, 2008 11:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
| keet wrote: | | genstorm wrote: | | Which results gives you equery l -p -o sys-devel/gcc? |
I feel like I'm missing something simple, but I know not what. |
You may ave keyworded it, but have you unmasked it?
If you do not know how to unmask it, are you sure gcc-4.4 is something for you? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Unsupported Software
