View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
walterguo Apprentice
Joined: 15 Jul 2005 Posts: 155
|
Posted: Tue Nov 04, 2008 4:44 pm Post subject: >kvm-74 is quite slower than kvm-69 |
|
|
I used to work with kvm-69 emerged from sajinet overly. It worked well. But After I upgraded to kvm 74 (now kvm77), I find that the speed is quite slow, and thereis no USE qemu any more.
I am wondering what happended.
Any Idea? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nurachi Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 16 May 2008 Posts: 92 Location: Paris
|
Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2008 4:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
I use KVM-77 without noticeable problem. The recent versions (2.6.25-2.6.27) of the kernel have a lot of new options related to virtualisation that greatly help to improve its use, see VIRTIO_BLK,VIRTIO_PCI, VIRTIO_NET, VIRTIO_BALLOON.
The old qemu commands are installed by the new official KVM package. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bbgermany Veteran
Joined: 21 Feb 2005 Posts: 1844 Location: Oranienburg/Germany
|
Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2008 7:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
I can confirm, kvm-77 with kernel drivers of 2.6.27-gentoo-r2 is really fast. Windows Server 2008 installed within 25min. XP with all Updates within 30min. Only Fedora Core was taking ages to install (could be the problem of my inet conn ).
bb _________________ Desktop: Ryzen 5 5600G, 32GB, 2TB, RX7600
Notebook: Dell XPS 13 9370, 16GB, 1TB
Server #1: Ryzen 5 Pro 4650G, 64GB, 16.5TB
Server #2: Ryzen 4800H, 32GB, 22TB |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|