View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
asturm Developer
Joined: 05 Apr 2007 Posts: 8938
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
AaronPPC Guru
Joined: 29 May 2005 Posts: 522 Location: Tucson, AZ
|
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 7:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mattes,
Did you:
Code: | # ebuild nvidia-drivers-180.06.ebuild digest |
_________________ --Aaron |
|
Back to top |
|
|
asturm Developer
Joined: 05 Apr 2007 Posts: 8938
|
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 7:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Must be the case, otherwise portage would complain at the very beginning. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
zyko l33t
Joined: 01 Jun 2008 Posts: 620 Location: Munich, Germany
|
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 7:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | * Cannot find $EPATCH_SOURCE! Value for $EPATCH_SOURCE is: |
You need to copy the files directory too, not just the ebuild. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
yngwin Retired Dev
Joined: 19 Dec 2002 Posts: 4572 Location: Suzhou, China
|
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 7:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've added the nVidia 180.08 drivers and settings to berkano overlay, and updated the live mplayer ebuild there with vdpau patches. Happy testing! _________________ "Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves." - Abraham Lincoln
Free Culture | Defective by Design | EFF |
|
Back to top |
|
|
FallenWizard n00b
Joined: 04 Sep 2007 Posts: 51 Location: Vienna / Austria
|
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 8:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yngwin wrote: | I've added the nVidia 180.08 drivers and settings to berkano overlay, and updated the live mplayer ebuild there with vdpau patches. Happy testing! |
nice, thank you |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ok Guru
Joined: 11 Jul 2006 Posts: 390 Location: germany
|
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 8:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mattes wrote: | Hi,
I've copied the 177.80 ebuild to my overlay (and renamed it of course), but it doesnt work:
Code: | >> Emerging (1 of 2) x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-180.06 to /
....
* Cannot find $EPATCH_SOURCE! Value for $EPATCH_SOURCE is:
*
* /usr/local/portage/x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers/files/NVIDIA_glx-defines.patch
* ( NVIDIA_glx-defines.patch )
|
the same with 188.08. Anybody any Ideas?
Regrads |
You have forgotten to copy the /usr/portage/x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers/files/ directory.
EDIT: I was too slow |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Cr0t l33t
Joined: 27 Apr 2002 Posts: 944 Location: USA
|
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 11:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
AaronP wrote: | Cr0t wrote: | My entire system slows down when I have firefox open. |
Does running glxinfo in a terminal speed it up again? It's possible that Firefox is slowly eating up all of your video memory, and running glxinfo will free some of it up by forcing Firefox's pixmaps into system memory. | I didn't try it. I just went back to the old version. _________________ cya |
|
Back to top |
|
|
furanku l33t
Joined: 08 May 2003 Posts: 905 Location: Hamburg, Germany
|
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 12:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yngwin wrote: | I've added the nVidia 180.08 drivers and settings to berkano overlay, and updated the live mplayer ebuild there with vdpau patches. Happy testing! |
Thanks. Using the ebuilds from the berkano overlay for nvidia-driver and mplayer I get a
Code: | Starting playback...
VDec: vo config request - 720 x 576 (preferred colorspace: Planar YV12)
VDec: using Planar YV12 as output csp (no 0)
Movie-Aspect is 1.78:1 - prescaling to correct movie aspect.
VO: [vdpau] 720x576 => 1024x576 Planar YV12
Error at libvo/vo_vdpau.c:179
|
each time I try to play a video. Video window opens for a fraction of a second, audio starts to play before mplayer quits with the error message above.
The same error is reported by a gentoo user in the nvidia forums, and reported to be solved by using the ebuild from this thread. Now I'm a bit confused, as I thought it would be that ebuild that made it into the berkano overlay?! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
yngwin Retired Dev
Joined: 19 Dec 2002 Posts: 4572 Location: Suzhou, China
|
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 12:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Did you reboot and load the new nvidia drivers? _________________ "Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves." - Abraham Lincoln
Free Culture | Defective by Design | EFF |
|
Back to top |
|
|
furanku l33t
Joined: 08 May 2003 Posts: 905 Location: Hamburg, Germany
|
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 12:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yngwin wrote: | Did you reboot and load the new nvidia drivers? |
Yes. Just in this moment I'm trying to copy the ebuild from this thread into /usr/local/portage, rebuild nvidia-drivers and mplayer-9999-r20, reboot and try again. Will be back in a few minutes ...
... OK, that did not help. Error message and symptoms remain the same.
System is Code: | 2.6.27-gentoo-r3-default #1 SMP PREEMPT Thu Nov 20 01:15:04 CET 2008 x86_64 AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4200+ AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux |
Card is Code: | nVidia Corporation G70 [GeForce 7300 GT] (rev a1) |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Schwinni Apprentice
Joined: 02 Sep 2004 Posts: 214 Location: quadrant1.earth. germany.wuerzburg
|
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 2:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
@ yngwin
Since you added the vdpau use flag to the mplayer ebuild, I suggest adding it to the nvidia-drivers ebuild also:
Code: | --- nvidia-drivers-180.08.ebuild.old 2008-11-20 15:10:23.468199370 +0100
+++ nvidia-drivers-180.08.ebuild 2008-11-20 15:03:27.495417070 +0100
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
LICENSE="NVIDIA"
SLOT="0"
KEYWORDS="-* ~amd64 ~x86"
-IUSE="acpi custom-cflags gtk multilib kernel_linux"
+IUSE="acpi custom-cflags gtk multilib kernel_linux vdpau"
RESTRICT="strip"
EMULTILIB_PKG="true"
@@ -430,18 +430,20 @@
fi
#vdpau
- if [[ -f usr/include/vdpau/vdpau.h ]]; then
- dodir /usr/include/vdpau
- insinto /usr/include/vdpau
- doins usr/include/vdpau/*.h
-
- for vdpau_lib in libvdpau_nvidia.so libvdpau.so libvdpau_trace.so; do
- if [[ -f usr/${pkglibdir}/${vdpau_lib}.${PV} ]]; then
- dolib.so usr/${pkglibdir}/${vdpau_lib}.${PV}
- dosym ${vdpau_lib}.${PV} /usr/${inslibdir}/${vdpau_lib}.1
- dosym ${vdpau_lib}.1 /usr/${inslibdir}/${vdpau_lib}
- fi
- done
+ if use vdpau ; then
+ if [[ -f usr/include/vdpau/vdpau.h ]]; then
+ dodir /usr/include/vdpau
+ insinto /usr/include/vdpau
+ doins usr/include/vdpau/*.h
+
+ for vdpau_lib in libvdpau_nvidia.so libvdpau.so libvdpau_trace.so; do
+ if [[ -f usr/${pkglibdir}/${vdpau_lib}.${PV} ]]; then
+ dolib.so usr/${pkglibdir}/${vdpau_lib}.${PV}
+ dosym ${vdpau_lib}.${PV} /usr/${inslibdir}/${vdpau_lib}.1
+ dosym ${vdpau_lib}.1 /usr/${inslibdir}/${vdpau_lib}
+ fi
+ done
+ fi
fi
}
|
Best regards
Chris |
|
Back to top |
|
|
weaksauce Apprentice
Joined: 17 Nov 2005 Posts: 204 Location: NYC
|
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 2:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't know if it's the 06 vs. 08 or something, but others are complaining (mostly on nvidia forums) about not being able to play mkv files, but I played them just fine. In fact, although I only tried 4 movies, they were all mkv, all 1080p, and all using -vc ffh264 and -vo vdpau (edited mplayer now defaults to this as well) and all worked flawlessly. I even used arrow keys to jump around the movies and had no issues. Had no sound sync issues or graphical artifacts (I do get artifacts sometimes with the coreavc driver).
I'm sure I'll run in to a glitch now that I've said this, but my first impressions are, needless to say, quite positive. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
loftwyr l33t
Joined: 29 Dec 2004 Posts: 970 Location: 43°38'23.62"N 79°27'8.60"W
|
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 4:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
In order to use the VBDPAU for decoding, you have to use -vc ffh264vdpau. Anything else doesn't use the acceleration. _________________ My emerge --info
Have you run revdep-rebuild lately? It's in gentoolkit and it's worth a shot if things don't work well.
Celebrating 5 years of Gentoo-ing. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
weaksauce Apprentice
Joined: 17 Nov 2005 Posts: 204 Location: NYC
|
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 4:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That's what I meant. (I'm not sitting in front of my desktop, but I just remoted in and saw you're right. I knew I would get that wrong!)
[EDIT]: Also, the reason I mentioned that they're 1080p, is that if I don't use coreavc, I haven't gotten 1080p to be viewable. It begins jumping around after only a few seconds if I'm using x264. This hardware-accelerated playback is great! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mattes Apprentice
Joined: 23 Jul 2008 Posts: 258 Location: München, Bavaria, Germany
|
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 5:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hello,
files are in place:
Code: |
pwd
/usr/local/portage/x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers
nvidia-drivers # ls files/
insgesamt 104K
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4,0K 19. Nov 18:36 .
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4,0K 20. Nov 18:01 ..
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 61 6. Jul 2006 09nvidia
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 733 27. Aug 2006 libGL.la-r2
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1,5K 20. Sep 2007 nvidia
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 639 22. Jan 2008 nvidia-169.07
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 437 6. Jul 2006 NVIDIA_glx-defines.patch
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 380 6. Jul 2006 NVIDIA_glx-glheader.patch
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 602 25. Sep 2006 NVIDIA_glx-makefile.patch
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 669 7. Jul 2007 NVIDIA_i2c-hwmon.patch
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 22K 18. Apr 2008 NVIDIA_kernel-169.12-2286310.diff
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 18K 8. Mai 2008 NVIDIA_kernel-173.08-2404825.diff
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 19K 29. Mai 16:44 NVIDIA_kernel-173.14.05-2419292.diff
|
Code: |
>>> Unpacking source...
/var/tmp/portage/x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-180.08-r1/distdir/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-180.08-pkg0.run: line 2: !DOCTYPE: No such file or directory
/var/tmp/portage/x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-180.08-r1/distdir/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-180.08-pkg0.run: line 3: syntax error near unexpected token `newline'
/var/tmp/portage/x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-180.08-r1/distdir/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-180.08-pkg0.run: line 3: `"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd">'
/var/tmp/portage/x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-180.08-r1/temp/environment: line 3879: cd: /var/tmp/portage/x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-180.08-r1/work/NVIDIA-Linux-x 86-180.08-pkg0: No such file or directory
* Applying NVIDIA_glx-defines.patch ...
* Failed Patch: NVIDIA_glx-defines.patch !
* ( /usr/local/portage/x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers/files/NVIDIA_glx-defines.patch )
*
* Include in your bugreport the contents of:
*
* /var/tmp/portage/x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-180.08-r1/temp/NVIDIA_glx-defines.patch-11438.out
*
* ERROR: x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-180.08-r1 failed.
* Call stack:
* ebuild.sh, line 49: Called src_unpack
* environment, line 3881: Called epatch 'src_unpack'
* environment, line 1673: Called die
* The specific snippet of code:
* die "Failed Patch: ${patchname}!";
* The die message:
* Failed Patch: NVIDIA_glx-defines.patch!
*
* If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call stack if relevant.
* A complete build log is located at '/var/log/portage/x11-drivers:nvidia-drivers-180.08-r1:20081120-170927.log'.
* The ebuild environment file is located at '/var/tmp/portage/x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-180.08-r1/temp/environment'.
* This ebuild is from an overlay: '/usr/local/portage/'
*
|
Code: |
cat /usr/local/portage/x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers/files/NVIDIA_glx-defines.patch
diff -ur NVIDIA_GLX-1.0-4191/usr/include/GL/glx.h NVIDIA_GLX-1.0-4191.new/usr/include/GL/glx.h
--- NVIDIA_GLX-1.0-4191/usr/include/GL/glx.h 2002-12-09 21:26:55.000000000 +0100
+++ NVIDIA_GLX-1.0-4191.new/usr/include/GL/glx.h 2003-01-30 18:20:23.000000000 +0100
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
typedef XID GLXPixmap;
typedef XID GLXDrawable;
typedef XID GLXPbuffer;
+typedef XID GLXPbufferSGIX;
typedef XID GLXWindow;
typedef XID GLXFBConfigID;
|
Code: |
cat /var/tmp/portage/x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-180.08-r1/temp/NVIDIA_glx-defines.patch-11438.out
***** NVIDIA_glx-defines.patch *****
====================================
PATCH COMMAND: patch -p0 -g0 -E --no-backup-if-mismatch < /usr/local/portage/x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers/files/NVIDIA_glx-defines.patch
====================================
can't find file to patch at input line 4
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff -ur NVIDIA_GLX-1.0-4191/usr/include/GL/glx.h NVIDIA_GLX-1.0-4191.new/usr/include/GL/glx.h
|--- NVIDIA_GLX-1.0-4191/usr/include/GL/glx.h 2002-12-09 21:26:55.000000000 +0100
|+++ NVIDIA_GLX-1.0-4191.new/usr/include/GL/glx.h 2003-01-30 18:20:23.000000000 +0100
--------------------------
No file to patch. Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
====================================
PATCH COMMAND: patch -p1 -g0 -E --no-backup-if-mismatch < /usr/local/portage/x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers/files/NVIDIA_glx-defines.patch
====================================
can't find file to patch at input line 4
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff -ur NVIDIA_GLX-1.0-4191/usr/include/GL/glx.h NVIDIA_GLX-1.0-4191.new/usr/include/GL/glx.h
|--- NVIDIA_GLX-1.0-4191/usr/include/GL/glx.h 2002-12-09 21:26:55.000000000 +0100
|+++ NVIDIA_GLX-1.0-4191.new/usr/include/GL/glx.h 2003-01-30 18:20:23.000000000 +0100
--------------------------
No file to patch. Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
====================================
PATCH COMMAND: patch -p2 -g0 -E --no-backup-if-mismatch < /usr/local/portage/x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers/files/NVIDIA_glx-defines.patch
====================================
can't find file to patch at input line 4
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff -ur NVIDIA_GLX-1.0-4191/usr/include/GL/glx.h NVIDIA_GLX-1.0-4191.new/usr/include/GL/glx.h
|--- NVIDIA_GLX-1.0-4191/usr/include/GL/glx.h 2002-12-09 21:26:55.000000000 +0100
|+++ NVIDIA_GLX-1.0-4191.new/usr/include/GL/glx.h 2003-01-30 18:20:23.000000000 +0100
--------------------------
No file to patch. Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
====================================
PATCH COMMAND: patch -p3 -g0 -E --no-backup-if-mismatch < /usr/local/portage/x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers/files/NVIDIA_glx-defines.patch
====================================
can't find file to patch at input line 4
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff -ur NVIDIA_GLX-1.0-4191/usr/include/GL/glx.h NVIDIA_GLX-1.0-4191.new/usr/include/GL/glx.h
|--- NVIDIA_GLX-1.0-4191/usr/include/GL/glx.h 2002-12-09 21:26:55.000000000 +0100
|+++ NVIDIA_GLX-1.0-4191.new/usr/include/GL/glx.h 2003-01-30 18:20:23.000000000 +0100
--------------------------
No file to patch. Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
====================================
PATCH COMMAND: patch -p4 -g0 -E --no-backup-if-mismatch < /usr/local/portage/x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers/files/NVIDIA_glx-defines.patch
====================================
can't find file to patch at input line 4
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff -ur NVIDIA_GLX-1.0-4191/usr/include/GL/glx.h NVIDIA_GLX-1.0-4191.new/usr/include/GL/glx.h
|--- NVIDIA_GLX-1.0-4191/usr/include/GL/glx.h 2002-12-09 21:26:55.000000000 +0100
|+++ NVIDIA_GLX-1.0-4191.new/usr/include/GL/glx.h 2003-01-30 18:20:23.000000000 +0100
--------------------------
No file to patch. Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
|
The 180.08-r1.ebuild is the Schwinni ebuild
Regrads |
|
Back to top |
|
|
agent_jdh Veteran
Joined: 08 Aug 2002 Posts: 1783 Location: Scotland
|
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 5:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
furanku wrote: | yngwin wrote: | Did you reboot and load the new nvidia drivers? |
Yes. Just in this moment I'm trying to copy the ebuild from this thread into /usr/local/portage, rebuild nvidia-drivers and mplayer-9999-r20, reboot and try again. Will be back in a few minutes ...
... OK, that did not help. Error message and symptoms remain the same.
System is Code: | 2.6.27-gentoo-r3-default #1 SMP PREEMPT Thu Nov 20 01:15:04 CET 2008 x86_64 AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4200+ AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux |
Card is Code: | nVidia Corporation G70 [GeForce 7300 GT] (rev a1) |
|
I might be wrong, but I don't think your card supports the video acceleration method that these drivers provide. I've got a 7600GT, and I'm in no rush to try the new driver, as it doesn't look like it'll bring me anything. Even some of the 8000-series cards do not have the hardware required.
EDIT - http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=123095
So definitely not supported. _________________ Jingle Jangle Jewellery |
|
Back to top |
|
|
furanku l33t
Joined: 08 May 2003 Posts: 905 Location: Hamburg, Germany
|
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 5:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
agent_jdh wrote: | I might be wrong, but I don't think your card supports the video acceleration method that these drivers provide. I've got a 7600GT, and I'm in no rush to try the new driver, as it doesn't look like it'll bring me anything. Even some of the 8000-series cards do not have the hardware required.
EDIT - http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=123095
So definitely not supported. |
Ahh ... OK, thanks for the information.
I know it's beta stuff in heavy development and want to thank all for thier efforts and work, but wouldn't a simple message about missing hardware support and a fallback to unaccelerted software decoding be a better solution? I know that's "upstream" ... maybe one should implement a short warning in the ebuild, that missing hardware acceleration breaks the default mplayer video output driver?
OK, now that's a bug: I tried to get a working default video driver for mplayer again, so I unset the vdpau use flag, and now I get
Code: | Unknown parameter: --disable-vdpau
*
* ERROR: media-video/mplayer-9999-r20 failed.
...
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
yngwin Retired Dev
Joined: 19 Dec 2002 Posts: 4572 Location: Suzhou, China
|
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 6:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
furanku wrote: | OK, now that's a bug: I tried to get a working default video driver for mplayer again, so I unset the vdpau use flag, and now I get
Code: | Unknown parameter: --disable-vdpau
*
* ERROR: media-video/mplayer-9999-r20 failed.
...
|
|
Sync again. That's already fixed. _________________ "Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves." - Abraham Lincoln
Free Culture | Defective by Design | EFF |
|
Back to top |
|
|
furanku l33t
Joined: 08 May 2003 Posts: 905 Location: Hamburg, Germany
|
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 7:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yngwin wrote: |
Sync again. That's already fixed. |
Thanks again for the help! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Schwinni Apprentice
Joined: 02 Sep 2004 Posts: 214 Location: quadrant1.earth. germany.wuerzburg
|
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 9:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mattes, I think your downloaded files are broken.
Do a
Code: | rm /usr/portage/distfiles/NVIDIA-* |
and remerge again. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hirakendu Guru
Joined: 24 Jan 2007 Posts: 386 Location: san diego
|
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2008 9:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
I got a small issue. Minefield (firefox-trunk) segfaults when I use 180.08. It is fine with 177.82 and also when 'eselect opengl set xorg-x11'. Can anyone reproduce this issue by using firefox trunk (, i.e.,
Code: | wget http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/latest-trunk/firefox-3.1b2pre.en-US.linux-i686.tar.bz2
tar -xjpf firefox-3.1b2pre.en-US.linux-i686.tar.bz2
cd firefox
./firefox-bin
dmesg | tail |
).
Just to make sure, I just renamed and ebuild digest'ed the 177.80 ebuild. (Also added the vdpau section, but segfaults even without it.) The only other reason I can think of is I am running a slightly old system (gentoo 2007.0 : gcc 4.1, glibc 2.5, xorg-7.2). _________________ Helium Sources || Gentoo Minimal Livecd |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tonglebeak Guru
Joined: 23 Mar 2006 Posts: 362
|
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2008 12:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I must say that plasma runs much better now.
The funny thing is that now glxgears dropped from 6000fps to 4800. 896MB GTX260 :\
Smooth scrolling in firefox is still very choppy...anyway to fix that? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Schwinni Apprentice
Joined: 02 Sep 2004 Posts: 214 Location: quadrant1.earth. germany.wuerzburg
|
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2008 1:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hirakendu wrote: | The only other reason I can think of is I am running a slightly old system (gentoo 2007.0 : gcc 4.1, glibc 2.5, xorg-7.2). |
Or you grabbed a snapshot with errors. That can happen when using the trunk. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hvengel Guru
Joined: 19 Sep 2004 Posts: 515
|
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2008 8:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Just installed 180.08. Big improvement. I was seeing artifacts when moving windows with 177.80 and 180.08 fixed that problem. Also most stuff seem snappier like moving windows and scrolling text. It is definitely worth the effort to install this new driver. I can't comment on stability yet. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|