| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
equilibrium
Apprentice
Joined: 29 Jun 2003
Posts: 213
Location: UK
|
 Posted: Mon Aug 04, 2003 10:10 pm Post subject: gftp slow tranfer rate LAN |
 |
|
I have noticed in gftp my transfer rate seems very slow. I get about 500k/sec thru a 100mbit LAN  but on windows using flashfxp I get 2500k/sec. Are there any options I need to change etc???
_________________
kernel 4.15.17-1-equk | i3wm | github |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
devon
l33t
Joined: 23 Jun 2003
Posts: 943
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 04, 2003 10:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Are you using the same machine both times? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
equilibrium
Apprentice
Joined: 29 Jun 2003
Posts: 213
Location: UK
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 04, 2003 10:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yep transfering from the same machine to the same machine.
_________________
kernel 4.15.17-1-equk | i3wm | github |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
devon
l33t
Joined: 23 Jun 2003
Posts: 943
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 04, 2003 10:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Just to make sure I understand  , you have a dual-boot system running both Gentoo and Windows. When you download/upload a file from that machine to a FTP server, you get different results.
What does "dmesg | egrep eth" say? Do you see a lot of errors when you do a "ifconfig"? Is it possible for you to paste the exact output of your FTP transfer? E.g. "12345 bytes transfered in 9.8 seconds (123 Bytes/sec)" (Numbers do not match up, I just made something up  ) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
equilibrium
Apprentice
Joined: 29 Jun 2003
Posts: 213
Location: UK
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 04, 2003 10:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yer I have a dual boot machine atm, but only because some windows progs won't work in linux . I tried the two commands you suggested and didn't get any errors.
| Code: | # dmesg | egrep eth
Shorewall:logdrop:DROP:IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=00:01:03:27:16:3a:00:09:5b:3b:07:6e:08:00 SRC=210.103.215.100 DST=192.168.0.10 LEN=48 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=114 ID=24000 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=2887 DPT=135 WINDOW=64240 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0
eth0: no IPv6 routers present
Shorewall:logdrop:DROP:IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:00:09:5b:3b:07:6e:08:00 SRC=192.168.0.1 DST=192.168.0.255 LEN=72 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=254 ID=4653 PROTO=UDP SPT=520 DPT=520 LEN=52
Shorewall:logdrop:DROP:IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:00:09:5b:3b:07:6e:08:00 SRC=192.168.0.1 DST=192.168.0.255 LEN=72 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=254 ID=4667 PROTO=UDP SPT=520 DPT=520 LEN=52
Shorewall:logdrop:DROP:IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:00:09:5b:3b:07:6e:08:00 SRC=192.168.0.1 DST=192.168.0.255 LEN=72 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=254 ID=4668 PROTO=UDP SPT=520 DPT=520 LEN=52
Shorewall:logdrop:DROP:IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:00:09:5b:3b:07:6e:08:00 SRC=192.168.0.1 DST=192.168.0.255 LEN=72 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=254 ID=4669 PROTO=UDP SPT=520 DPT=520 LEN=52
Shorewall:logdrop:DROP:IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=00:01:03:27:16:3a:00:09:5b:3b:07:6e:08:00 SRC=62.81.192.210 DST=192.168.0.10 LEN=60 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=55 ID=20657 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=54292 DPT=443 WINDOW=5840 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0
Shorewall:logdrop:DROP:IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=00:01:03:27:16:3a:00:09:5b:3b:07:6e:08:00 SRC=62.81.192.210 DST=192.168.0.10 LEN=60 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=55 ID=20658 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=54292 DPT=443 WINDOW=5840 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0
Shorewall:logdrop:DROP:IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:00:09:5b:3b:07:6e:08:00 SRC=192.168.0.1 DST=192.168.0.255 LEN=72 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=254 ID=4670 PROTO=UDP SPT=520 DPT=520 LEN=52
Shorewall:logdrop:DROP:IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:00:09:5b:3b:07:6e:08:00 SRC=192.168.0.1 DST=192.168.0.255 LEN=72 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=254 ID=4671 PROTO=UDP SPT=520 DPT=520 LEN=52 |
| Code: | # ifconfig
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:01:03:27:16:3A
inet addr:192.168.0.10 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::201:3ff:fe27:163a/10 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:174 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:145 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
RX bytes:207785 (202.9 Kb) TX bytes:14800 (14.4 Kb)
Interrupt:18 Base address:0xc000
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
RX packets:6 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:6 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:300 (300.0 b) TX bytes:300 (300.0 b) |
bit of a long spammy message
_________________
kernel 4.15.17-1-equk | i3wm | github |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
equilibrium
Apprentice
Joined: 29 Jun 2003
Posts: 213
Location: UK
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 04, 2003 10:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
transferred a small screenshot image to the system and it seemed to do it at a slightly faster speed than it norm does the bigger files
| Code: | 200 Port command ok.
STOR /F/pics/screenshot.png
150 Opening BINARY data connection for F:\pics\screenshot.png
226 Transfer finished successfully. Data connection closed.
Successfully transferred /home/equil/screenshot.png at 1384.26 KB/s |
would free memory etc maybe make difference ?? as when the transfer rate was low I think my free mem was very low also, atm with its going at 1384.26 KB/s but I've just restarted from windows into linux.
_________________
kernel 4.15.17-1-equk | i3wm | github |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
neuron
Advocate
Joined: 28 May 2002
Posts: 2371
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 05, 2003 12:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hmm.. wild guess, hdparm -t /dev/hda gives poor results?
tried other clients than gftp? (lftp console for example, I can use flashfxp through wine/gfp, but to be honest, I find lftp WAY better than both of em ) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
equilibrium
Apprentice
Joined: 29 Jun 2003
Posts: 213
Location: UK
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 05, 2003 4:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ok /me emerge's lftp 
| Code: | # hdparm -tT /dev/hda
/dev/hda:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.20 seconds =656.41 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.39 seconds = 46.04 MB/sec
# hdparm -tT /dev/hdb
/dev/hdb:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.19 seconds =673.68 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.20 seconds = 53.56 MB/sec |
hda is my windows drive and hdb is my linux drive. I dunno if they are poor results but seem pretty fast to me 
both are WD80Gb SE's
_________________
kernel 4.15.17-1-equk | i3wm | github |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
neuron
Advocate
Joined: 28 May 2002
Posts: 2371
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 05, 2003 4:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| yeah, hd speed is defenatly not an issue |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Networking & Security
