GLSA Advocate
![Advocate Advocate](/images/ranks/rank-G-1-advocate.gif)
Joined: 12 May 2004 Posts: 2663
|
Posted: Sun May 24, 2009 3:26 pm Post subject: [ GLSA 200905-04 ] GnuTLS: Multiple vulnerabilities |
|
|
Gentoo Linux Security Advisory
Title: GnuTLS: Multiple vulnerabilities (GLSA 200905-04)
Severity: normal
Exploitable: remote
Date: May 24, 2009
Bug(s): #267774
ID: 200905-04
Synopsis
Multiple vulnerabilities in GnuTLS might result in a Denial of Service,
spoofing or the generation of invalid keys.
Background
GnuTLS is an Open Source implementation of the TLS 1.0 and SSL 3.0
protocols.
Affected Packages
Package: net-libs/gnutls
Vulnerable: < 2.6.6
Unaffected: >= 2.6.6
Architectures: All supported architectures
Description
The following vulnerabilities were found in GnuTLS:
- Miroslav Kratochvil reported that lib/pk-libgcrypt.c does not
properly handle corrupt DSA signatures, possibly leading to a
double-free vulnerability (CVE-2009-1415). - Simon Josefsson
reported that GnuTLS generates RSA keys stored in DSA structures when
creating a DSA key (CVE-2009-1416). - Romain Francoise reported
that the _gnutls_x509_verify_certificate() function in
lib/x509/verify.c does not perform time checks, resulting in the
"gnutls-cli" program accepting X.509 certificates with validity times
in the past or future (CVE-2009-1417).
Impact
A remote attacker could entice a user or automated system to process a
specially crafted DSA certificate, possibly resulting in a Denial of
Service condition. NOTE: This issue might have other unspecified impact
including the execution of arbitrary code. Furthermore, a remote
attacker could spoof signatures on certificates and the "gnutls-cli"
application can be tricked into accepting an invalid certificate.
Workaround
There is no known workaround at this time.
Resolution
All GnuTLS users should upgrade to the latest version:
Code: | # emerge --sync
# emerge --ask --oneshot --verbose ">=net-libs/gnutls-2.6.6" |
References
CVE-2009-1415
CVE-2009-1416
CVE-2009-1417
Last edited by GLSA on Tue Dec 01, 2009 4:28 am; edited 2 times in total |
|