| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
rrbrussell
n00b
Joined: 21 Jun 2004
Posts: 64
|
 Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 8:08 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| I know that the @preserved-rebuild set does not work correctly in some cases. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mike Hunt
Watchman
Joined: 19 Jul 2009
Posts: 5287
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 1:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
| d2_racing wrote: | So maybe, we will have a portage 2.3 in 2010 then  |
... or sys-apps/portage-2.2_rc2010
| rrbrussell wrote: | | I know that the @preserved-rebuild set does not work correctly in some cases. |
I've been using portage-2.2 since it first came out, a looong time ago, before it was package masked and never had any issues at all with it.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
d2_racing
Bodhisattva
Joined: 25 Apr 2005
Posts: 13047
Location: Ste-Foy,Canada
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 2:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
In fact, portage 2.2 is pretty good, it's not stable as they want or some feature are not 100% without bugs, so they wait.
It's impossible to have a program that 100% of the code is bug free. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
piwacet
Guru
Joined: 30 Dec 2004
Posts: 486
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 10:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Has the parallel-portage feature been back-ported to stable portage? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
piwacet
Guru
Joined: 30 Dec 2004
Posts: 486
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2010 2:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Yes, it apparently has. Yay for gentoo! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Gentoo Chat
