Anyone here moved away from Arch Linux?

jc0481 · n00b Joined: 10 Oct 2009 Posts: 5

I am just curious to know if someone has moved away from Arch and towards Gentoo or vice versa.
I am caught in the middle right now. I plan on purchasing a laptop early next year and not sure whether or not to install Arch Linux or Gentoo Linux.

Not sure which one will best be suited for a laptop. By the way I have been to the Arch Linux forums and they have mostly complained about how long it takes to compile and set up a system like Gentoo.

If you can tell me a story on why you switched to either Gentoo or Arch. That would help in my decision. Thank you for your time.

Naib · Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 9:11 am Post subject:

Both have their pro's and con's.
My desktop has stayed Gentoo since I switched to it in 2003 and unless it /really/ stalls in dev I shall stay.
I have had another box go from Arch -> Gentoo simply because Arch and its binary nature is ANAL sometimes (there are a few threads here and on the arch forums where I have mentions some stupid decisions arch have chosen)
Likewise I have Arch on my eeepc (since it makes sense there)
_________________

d2_racing · Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 1:37 pm Post subject:

Hi, what kind of laptop do you use ?

I have a thinkpad T61 and it's working pretty good with Gentoo.

I used Arch linux a long time ago, but I prefer Gentoo because of the idea of choice. I can build what I want with Gentoo and I didn't had that with Arch.

ziggysquatch · Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 2:04 pm Post subject:

When I used my laptop all the time, I had Gentoo installed on it and it was great. Now that I don't use the laptop as much, I put Arch on it because Arch is quicker to update in a hurry.

d2_racing · Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 3:20 pm Post subject:

In fact, it's true.

jc0481 · n00b Joined: 10 Oct 2009 Posts: 5

ziggysquatch · Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 6:58 pm Post subject:

I agree with trying them both out and seeing which one you like better. With Arch I missed the USE flags right away... still do, but it is worth it for me for updates. When I used the laptop for school I could update gentoo while in class so the compile times weren't too much of a problem.

d2_racing · Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 7:08 pm Post subject:

Laptop are almost always slower then a desktop for the same amount of price.

yngwin · Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 11:01 pm Post subject:

While I've never left Gentoo since I started using it, I have from time to time given Arch a go, especially on a laptop. But I've given up and returned to using Gentoo every time. In terms of stability it is like ~arch on Gentoo. Sometimes things break. The problem with Arch is that there is no straightforward way to downgrade, and certainly not anything officially supported. They don't have multiple versions of a package in their repositories like we have on Gentoo.

Then there is also the issue of no useflags, which is one of Gentoo's power features, and a lower number of packages available. Yes, AUR is useful, but the build tool is considerably slower than portage. And if I end up compiling multiple packages from source anyway, I might as well use Gentoo...

If you are looking for a binary distro (because it's quicker to update), I suggest you give Sabayon a try.
_________________
"Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves." - Abraham Lincoln
Free Culture | Defective by Design | EFF

slonocode · Apprentice Joined: 03 Jun 2002 Posts: 273

d2_racing · Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 2:58 am Post subject:

I use the desktop profile and I disable qt3support,qt4 and kde if I want to use Gnome or Xfce.

cach0rr0 · Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 6:16 am Post subject:

slonocode · Apprentice Joined: 03 Jun 2002 Posts: 273

Assuming that arch binaries are compiled with support for just about everything I am more interested in what you would leave out and how you would find that useful for desktop use. For instance what do you gain by leaving out qt and kde support?

david_e · Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 6:18 pm Post subject:

I moved from Arch to Gentoo as I found that, installation apart, Arch is almost as time-consuming as Gentoo, if you take into account the time that you have to spend actively working to maintain your system (ie. not background compiling). Also Arch is not as flexible as Gentoo and cannot mach Gentoo QA. On the other hand Arch has a much simpler architecture so it's quite easy to tune it.

In any case I don't see any reason to prefer Arch over Gentoo: the only downside of Gentoo is that it can be really time-consuming, but Arch is not really much better from this point of view. So if maintenance time is a concern I would go for something else like Fedora (I am using it on my new laptop and I am quite happy with that, but will stick with Gentoo for my desktop).

regomodo · Guru Joined: 25 Mar 2008 Posts: 445

I switched to Arch after failing to get the Arduino IDE running ( I wrote a fair chunk of the wiki page for it) and one dev telling me to fix the Firefox code because 2 versions in a row were segfaulting for me.

d2_racing · Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 7:02 pm Post subject:

AaronPPC · Guru Joined: 29 May 2005 Posts: 522 Location: Tucson, AZ

I use Gentoo on my desktop and Arch on my laptop. Arch is very impressive with a great community. However, I can't say I love some of its configs and pacman still has some green in it. I think in a year to two it can be a truly great distro.

Gentoo is my first love though and portage is too good so it will remain on my desktop and stay my everyday OS.
_________________
--Aaron

d2_racing · Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 9:33 pm Post subject:

Arch has done a great job since version 0.1. I used a long time ago yaourt, it's a replacement for pacman.

aidanjt · Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 9:41 pm Post subject:

slonocode · Apprentice Joined: 03 Jun 2002 Posts: 273

aidanjt · Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 10:09 pm Post subject:

slonocode · Apprentice Joined: 03 Jun 2002 Posts: 273

aidanjt · Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 10:32 pm Post subject:

ArmorSuit · n00b Joined: 30 Jun 2009 Posts: 31

I switched to Arch from OpenSuse when I discovered I could build up my system to whatever I wanted, instead of chiseling out cruft from existing distro. But then...

Then I discovered Gentoo and USE flags.....

I tried installing Arch recently, when I needed quick lightweight install on a PC, but pacman now seems lightyears behind emerge. It was also broken in a way, packages that error'd on download would not be repeated so I had to hunt down missing libs, plus installing KDE for instance, where you manually select KDE packages, requires you to pass through entire selection process again, and again, and again after each such error.

There is nothing like the USE flags.

Compile times? Yeah, it's a pain installing on new machine, especially on an older one, but once installed, the updates can compile in the background, you don't ever notice them (set proper NICENESS, a fast mirror, portage download speed, etc... for best results).

d2_racing · Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:37 pm Post subject: