View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
john.newman Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 17 Oct 2009 Posts: 85
|
Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2011 5:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
i'm baaaaaack
i forgot how awful binary distributions really are. Plus the pulse audio thing in ubuntu is STILL totally botched. enough of that.
I apolgize for the snide comments in my last post, I was PISSED OFF. So far no compile errors. I take it back ok? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Hypnos Advocate
Joined: 18 Jul 2002 Posts: 2889 Location: Omnipresent
|
Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2011 6:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
I've been using Gentoo since 2002.
I've never seriously considered switching to a binary distro, as the same fundamental problems I encountered prior to 2002 remain: no easy infrastructure to control your toolchain by building from source (important for any developer), and ABI breakage without any too like revdep-rebuild.
Along the way I would get annoyed with some aspects of Gentoo, but they resolved themselves in time and with shifts in my computing philosophy. Two examples:
1) I switched to Paludis when that was ready for all maintenance tasks because it supported repo-level USE flag and keyword wildcards, git repos , and depclean worked. I haven't looked back, though I understand that Portage is now feature equivalent.
2) I switched from GNOME to XFCE, as GNOME had become an unmanageable mess. This is was less Gentoo's fault and more the fault of upstream which has no concept of good architecture. Then, I excised gconf and gstreamer from my XFCE setup -- wonderful.
However, two things still concern me:
1) No community Wiki -- how dysfunctional is the Gentoo leadership that such a simple and valuable task can't get done?
2) It's dangerous to have USE flags in the system set that could prevent revdep-rebuild from working. For example, if you change the "kerberos" USE flag in openssl and re-emerged, that would break wget if that is built with the "ssl" USE flag. If you then try revdep-rebuild, you wouldn't be able to download the source tarballs. (Of course, any competent Gentoo user could boot with rescue CD/USB stick and chroot ...) _________________ Personal overlay | Simple backup scheme |
|
Back to top |
|
|
XQYZ Apprentice
Joined: 19 Jul 2009 Posts: 231 Location: Europe
|
Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2011 7:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hypnos wrote: | any competent Gentoo user could boot with rescue CD/USB stick and chroot ...) |
chroot and try to use the broken wget from within a chroot?
I'd say any experienced Gentoo user would just go ahead and download the source tarball using another program or would already have the tarball. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Hypnos Advocate
Joined: 18 Jul 2002 Posts: 2889 Location: Omnipresent
|
Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2011 4:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
XQYZ wrote: | chroot and try to use the broken wget from within a chroot? |
I guess what I had in mind was boot from rescue disk, download the tarball and copy it into the system tree, then chroot into the system and rebuild. Or, copy over binaries from your backups if they are handy. But try these on a remote system ...
Quote: | I'd say any experienced Gentoo user would just go ahead and download the source tarball using another program or would already have the tarball. |
ssh, elinks, wget/curl and firefox (via xulrunner) all rely on OpenSSL . So either you happen to have a GnuTLS-based package (e.g., Webkit-based browser) or non-encrypted software on hand, or your plan ahead for this breakage and download the tarball beforehand. On a remote system you must certainly plan ahead.
Perhaps the most elegant solution is to use the "static" USE flag for the system set, though you'll have to remember to update static packages manually or have a clever script as revdep-rebuild wouldn't catch them anymore. _________________ Personal overlay | Simple backup scheme |
|
Back to top |
|
|
disi Veteran
Joined: 28 Nov 2003 Posts: 1354 Location: Out There ...
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
NeddySeagoon Administrator
Joined: 05 Jul 2003 Posts: 54421 Location: 56N 3W
|
Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2011 5:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
john.newman,
Welcome back, we knew you would come, it was just a question of when. _________________ Regards,
NeddySeagoon
Computer users fall into two groups:-
those that do backups
those that have never had a hard drive fail. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ppurka Advocate
Joined: 26 Dec 2004 Posts: 3256
|
Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2011 5:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
disi wrote: | We should update the topic to: "5 years Gentoo is enough!" | Or, "1 years of gentoo is enough to get you hooked permanently!" _________________ emerge --quiet redefined | E17 vids: I, II | Now using kde5 | e is unstable :-/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ezfranca n00b
Joined: 20 Jun 2005 Posts: 9 Location: Brazil
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2011 7:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This thread will never die [2]
I am a quiet 7 years user of gentoo and I just can use any other distro.
I tried to change, but I just cant.
I am happy with it. It is like a marriage: You can have bad times, leave the house for some days, but at the end of the week, you miss it and come back again, being happy until the next argue _________________ []'s
eZ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
FizzyWidget Veteran
Joined: 21 Nov 2008 Posts: 1133 Location: 127.0.0.1
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2011 8:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
if i keep getting all these issues with gentoo i may as well quit it, its a great distro, but so many packages have been messed up lately, and i've just been hit with the system not booting issue on a fresh install!!!!! _________________ I know 43 ways to kill with a SKITTLE, so taste my rainbow bitch. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
john.newman Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 17 Oct 2009 Posts: 85
|
Posted: Wed May 25, 2011 2:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
things have been perfect here. NO broken packages.
A few months ago, i have no idea why i was getting so many problems. It was almost as if I had ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~amd64" in my make.conf or something (I did not ) .. This time around I've been using package.use most of the time instead of setting the flag globally. Seems to be a little more sensible. The more I think about it, the more I think I had something set wrong. It was smooth like this until one day - emerge just failed nearly everytime. Now i clean out, come back to the same portage snapshot, and nothing fails.
I have no intention of leaving again, no where better to go.. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Chiitoo Administrator
Joined: 28 Feb 2010 Posts: 2595 Location: Here and Away Again
|
Posted: Wed May 25, 2011 3:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
ppurka wrote: | disi wrote: | We should update the topic to: "5 years Gentoo is enough!" | Or, "1 years of gentoo is enough to get you hooked permanently!" |
Closing my 1 year-mark of Gentoo, and Linux in general. I think I already am hooked, badly. :S
And honestly, I have not had any real trouble that I couldn't more or less easily handle myself and I have not had any reasons to go back to windoze, really. And this is a desktop computer used all the time I'm awake normally, for everything. Be it gaming, internet browsing, compiling stuff, usually all that is happening at the same time and my motherboard or CPU, or something else seems to actually be performing a lot under what they should and still I manage to have no issues that I could not live it...
I really sometimes wonder what the problems are about that people tout about when it comes to Gentoo. I don't seem to have them and for sure many others do not, either. That, or they solve them without giving up.
Hm, I better stop right here before I go on and on and... _________________ Kindest of regardses. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
insilica n00b
Joined: 13 May 2011 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Wed May 25, 2011 9:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Gentoo is By far, the best distribution I ever used...
I've been on Debian & Debian flavoured distributions, RedHat flavoured (centos/fedora), SUSE, Arch for a little while and freebsd. Maybe this is premature but having used gentoo for 1month I don't think I want to try anything else, running very smoothly on a now almost 6 year old core2. But I have to say for my headless server I prefer freebsd.
It took me 4 days to get the system up, thats a complete workstation, but I had tremendous feeling of satisfaction when it was done and felt a little giddy
The one thing I find lets gentoo down is the documentation, I found myself referring to Arch documentation sometimes. Once I'm settled into gentoo I will try to contribute some updates to the manual . But if the boat sinks I'm jumping back into Arch!
http://www.dedoimedo.com/computers/linux-world-map.html
I like the fact that now I reside in "The forbidden land of Gentoo", far north |
|
Back to top |
|
|
FizzyWidget Veteran
Joined: 21 Nov 2008 Posts: 1133 Location: 127.0.0.1
|
Posted: Wed May 25, 2011 11:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
I agree it is the best i have used, and i have gone through a few of them :p
It's just the fact that lately whether i use stable or arch every other time i have emerge --sync and then updated packages something crops up, its just annoying.
The main reason it's pissed me off is i had my laptop running sweet, but then the hard drive died, so i had to replace it, hence a full re-install (which is never nice, or short ), and now it seems i am hitting the /oprnrc/sysinit/init issue that a lot of other people are having, maybe it was my time to hit an issue. _________________ I know 43 ways to kill with a SKITTLE, so taste my rainbow bitch. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Randy Andy Veteran
Joined: 19 Jun 2007 Posts: 1148 Location: /dev/koelsch
|
Posted: Wed May 25, 2011 4:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi all.
Before i come to Gentoo in the year 2007, i tried about 30 different distros (mostly binarys), before i got an idea how much more freedom, power and control you can get,
if you're using the source to build your own packages from.
In gentoo, i found the source based distro, which can do this more comfortable with maximum of control, than any other distro i've ever seen.
That's why i can't imagine to change this distro anytime.
Some guys in this thread asked how old your system is, so i get interested to look for, on the pc im just working on, which the youngest of my gentoo boxes.
A little history:
Code: |
ls -lt /etc/kernels/
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 73628 25. Mai 17:53 config-kernel-x86_64-2.6.39-gentoo
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 72029 10. Mai 20:50 config-kernel-x86_64-2.6.38-gentoo-r5
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 69861 22. Jan 15:24 config-kernel-x86_64-2.6.36-gentoo-r4
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 69872 22. Jan 15:22 config-kernel-x86_64-2.6.36-gentoo-r5
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 69872 22. Jan 15:19 config-kernel-x86_64-2.6.36-gentoo-r6
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 71125 22. Jan 15:18 config-kernel-x86_64-2.6.37-gentoo_ohne_BKL
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 68561 2. Jul 2010 config.x86_64-2.6.34-gentoo-r1_AK3
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 68561 2. Jul 2010 config.x86_64-2.6.34-gentoo-r1_AK2
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 68459 29. Jun 2010 config.x86_64-2.6.34-gentoo-r1_AK1
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 68857 7. Jun 2010 Andy-config-x86_64-2.6.34-gentoo-A1
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 74646 10. Mai 2010 kernel-config-x86_64-2.6.33-gentoo-r2
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 74628 11. Apr 2010 kernel-config-x86_64-2.6.33-gentoo-r1
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 74625 20. Mär 2010 kernel-config-x86_64-2.6.33-gentoo
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 72132 24. Feb 2010 kernel-config-x86_64-2.6.32-gentoo-r7
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 72132 21. Feb 2010 kernel-config-x86_64-2.6.32-gentoo-r6
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 72132 12. Feb 2010 kernel-config-x86_64-2.6.32-gentoo-r5
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 72268 30. Jan 2010 kernel-config-x86_64-2.6.32-gentoo-r3
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 73771 24. Jan 2010 kernel-config-x86_64-2.6.32-gentoo-r2
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 73771 31. Dez 2009 kernel-config-x86_64-2.6.32-gentoo-r1
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 73568 28. Dez 2009 kernel-config-x86_64-2.6.32-gentoo
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 72129 15. Nov 2009 kernel-config-x86_64-2.6.31-gentoo-r6
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 72129 6. Nov 2009 kernel-config-x86_64-2.6.31-gentoo-r5
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 71811 29. Okt 2009 kernel-config-x86_64-2.6.31-gentoo-r4
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 71811 14. Okt 2009 kernel-config-x86_64-2.6.31-gentoo-r3
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 71811 8. Okt 2009 kernel-config-x86_64-2.6.31-gentoo-r2
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 68129 30. Sep 2009 kernel-config-x86_64-2.6.31-gentoo-r1
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 68016 10. Sep 2009 kernel-config-x86_64-2.6.31-gentoo
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 73184 7. Sep 2009 kernel-config-x86_64-2.6.30-gentoo-r6
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 72814 29. Aug 2009 kernel-config-x86_64-2.6.30-gentoo-r5
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 72415 23. Jul 2009 kernel-config-x86_64-2.6.30-gentoo-r4
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 72381 21. Jul 2009 kernel-config-x86_64-2.6.30-gentoo-r3
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 72381 6. Jul 2009 kernel-config-x86_64-2.6.30-gentoo-r2
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 72381 21. Jun 2009 kernel-config-x86_64-2.6.30-gentoo-r1
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 71514 27. Mai 2009 kernel-config-x86_64-2.6.29-gentoo-r5
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 71673 19. Mai 2009 kernel-config-x86_64-2.6.29-gentoo-r4
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 71662 6. Mai 2009 kernel-config-x86_64-2.6.29-gentoo-r3
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 70579 30. Apr 2009 kernel-config-x86_64-2.6.29-gentoo-r2
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 70634 5. Apr 2009 kernel-config-x86_64-2.6.29-gentoo-r1
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 72467 25. Mär 2009 kernel-config-x86_64-2.6.29-gentoo
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 68479 20. Mär 2009 kernel-config-x86_64-2.6.28-gentoo-r4
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 68479 9. Mär 2009 kernel-config-x86_64-2.6.28-gentoo-r3
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 68479 18. Feb 2009 kernel-config-x86_64-2.6.28-gentoo-r2
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 73281 5. Feb 2009 kernel-config-x86_64-2.6.28-gentoo-r1
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 72503 25. Dez 2008 kernel-config-x86_64-2.6.28-gentoo
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 69541 23. Dez 2008 kernel-config-x86_64-2.6.27-gentoo-r7
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 69541 25. Nov 2008 kernel-config-x86_64-2.6.27-gentoo-r4
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 69512 1. Nov 2008 kernel-config-x86_64-2.6.27-gentoo-r2
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 69509 16. Okt 2008 kernel-config-x86_64-2.6.27-gentoo
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 69655 22. Aug 2008 kernel-config-x86_64-2.6.26-gentoo-r1
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 69652 17. Jul 2008 kernel-config-x86_64-2.6.26-gentoo
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 67496 7. Jul 2008 kernel-config-x86_64-2.6.25-gentoo-r6
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 67436 13. Jun 2008 kernel-config-x86_64-2.6.25-gentoo-r4
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 67473 14. Mai 2008 kernel-config-x86_64-2.6.25-gentoo-r3
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 69640 7. Mai 2008 kernel-config-x86_64-2.6.25-gentoo-r2
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 69642 4. Mai 2008 kernel-config-x86_64-2.6.25-gentoo-r1
|
Beware: You could be hooked on compiling
Regards, Andy. _________________ If you want to see a Distro done right, compile it yourself! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
FizzyWidget Veteran
Joined: 21 Nov 2008 Posts: 1133 Location: 127.0.0.1
|
Posted: Wed May 25, 2011 4:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
after sorting out the boot issue, gentoo has a repreive
My list is probably the typical type
Redhat
Mandriva
slackware
Gentoo _________________ I know 43 ways to kill with a SKITTLE, so taste my rainbow bitch. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
stfish n00b
Joined: 09 Jun 2011 Posts: 7
|
Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2011 4:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have come back to Gentoo after a year or so away. I may not stay. I do not have time to untangle obtuse and outdated documentation. Packages are not being maintained --- a badly defective stage3 tarball gets released and three weeks later is not fixed?? Seriously???!
I love the flexibility and I think portage is the best package manager out there, but I have doubts about the current state of Gentoo affairs. _________________ Sarah Fish |
|
Back to top |
|
|
davidm Guru
Joined: 26 Apr 2009 Posts: 557 Location: US
|
Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2011 10:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
stfish wrote: | I have come back to Gentoo after a year or so away. I may not stay. I do not have time to untangle obtuse and outdated documentation. Packages are not being maintained --- a badly defective stage3 tarball gets released and three weeks later is not fixed?? Seriously???!
I love the flexibility and I think portage is the best package manager out there, but I have doubts about the current state of Gentoo affairs. |
I have found the documentation to be pretty good. There are some issues with some packages. Often minor. As a relative noob I have also noticed there are often subtle things which MUST be done or else you will see some breakage. Sometimes these things aren't communicated in an obvious manner and a new person might simply think the ebuild is broke when really they simply need to add a use flag or run an update utility. This is one thing to watch out for. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sprotte Apprentice
Joined: 18 Oct 2004 Posts: 217 Location: Kiel, Germany
|
Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2011 12:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | Or, "1 years of gentoo is enough to get you hooked permanently!" |
Very true. I'm considering coming back to Gentoo after my couple-years stay with Ubuntu, just because I don't like to be told what I should use, and having problems using anything else. The rigid attempt to appeal to super-n00bs and basically lock down the system is alienating me slowly but surely. If I don't like the decisions Canonical makes anymore, what's the point of continued use?
On the other hand, I remember very well why I left Gentoo. Having to go through the kernel configuration options is something I don't want to subject myself to, especially since they changed all the time. Having to compare and edit config files after updates is another thing that turned me off. Ideally I want that stuff hidden from me. Compiling time would probably still be an issue for me with my current hardware - I like having Gnome (2.x style panels anyway), OpenOffice, the Ubuntu software installation tool, and the auto updater that usually requires no interference from me whatsoever.
Unfortunately, Canonical is moving into a direction that looks a bit too corporate super-integrated black-boxy hands-off for my taste. I'm still using Lucid Lynx and have no intention to upgrade
Ubuntu 9.x or SuSE 9.x style distributions appeal to me, but it seems they don't last and there are always things I want to change, which breaks the supposed house rules of that distro to some degree. I'm just not the typical / intended Ubuntu user.
Gentoo with a less painful kernel upgrade frontend and a mostly automated / semi-intelligent config file diff thingy, as well as a more graphical installation / configuration tool would be nice. That's still a world of difference from Ubuntu-style "we know what's good for you" distros.
Damn, maybe I should try Debian. Or FreeBSD again (I hope they have proper 3D hardware support by now). Yeah, I know I'm just making excuses. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dol-sen Retired Dev
Joined: 30 Jun 2002 Posts: 2805 Location: Richmond, BC, Canada
|
Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2011 12:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, there is a graphical installer. It is a port of the anaconda installer that was done this past summer as one of the GSOC projects. It is not in the mainstream livedvd yet, but is available.
Kernel config is not that difficult. Once you have a config, when you upgrade, copy your config to the new sources. Then run "make oldconfig" which updates the config asking you about any new config options not in the previous one, deletes any not used anymore. Also one of the devs has just made an "eclean-kernel" app to help clean out old kernels and sources.
Another thing is that there have been a number of advances in portage/ebuilds that are making things usually upgrade even smoother, including auto-unmasking and some auto-use capability as well. _________________ Brian
Porthole, the Portage GUI frontend irc@freenode: #gentoo-guis, #porthole, Blog
layman, gentoolkit, CoreBuilder, esearch... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mac Tzu n00b
Joined: 13 May 2007 Posts: 44 Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2011 6:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
d2_racing wrote: | In fact, Arch seems to be pretty good.
I will test Sabayon when I find the time at work too. |
I have to say that I personally moved from Arch about o.e year ago. It is great distro but if you need to make any custom packages it becomes a hassle to keep them updated , nothing compares to the eligance of portage.
My only gripe with Gentoo that there is no clear choice on system optimizations. I am not a programmer or dev I just love Nix. But over time I have had a friend recommend certain options that I should move to like OpenRc, as needed lib linking and unstable portage 2.2 +. These have all no been add to main portage tree. But they are great additions to my system and I would have had no idea about had I not been told. I feel that it would be simply impossible for me to trawl through all to forums to what is state of the art for the distro.
I would great to a single info ponit for user to look at with optimal desktop system configuration. Then we would be able to make informed choices about my system.
If this already exists please point me in the right direction. I am also happy to supply man-hours to assist for what there worth.
Any thoughts from any other gentoo users ? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ppurka Advocate
Joined: 26 Dec 2004 Posts: 3256
|
Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2011 9:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sprotte wrote: | Gentoo with a less painful kernel upgrade frontend | Usually you just need to copy the old config and do "make oldconfig". To start with a fresh config, there's always "Pappy's kernel seeds" and the debian hcl page. Quote: | and a mostly automated / semi-intelligent config file diff thingy, | Ever tried cfg-update? It's a nifty little tool that does probably over 95% of config updates automatically over time. _________________ emerge --quiet redefined | E17 vids: I, II | Now using kde5 | e is unstable :-/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sprotte Apprentice
Joined: 18 Oct 2004 Posts: 217 Location: Kiel, Germany
|
Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2011 5:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Right, I know about make oldconfig, I probably just got burned a little when too many of the config options changed and I didn't know what the heck half of them did, and I also remember reading that oldconfig would not work anymore. Trying to make my machine run as a WLAN access point might have contributed to my frustration, that was a horrible experience. The kernel seeds look like a good idea, though.
I would still prefer not having to deal with make *config at all, tbh I don't care if my kernel image is 1 MB or 10 MB. I'm not interested in ricing.
cfg-update - IIRC I was using etc-update. Maybe there were some improvements on that front, I'll try cfg-update next time I install Gentoo. I just thought it was unnecessary to make me manually update the network configuration file every time despite absolutely no changes to my settings. Basically I thought this type of tool could be a little more intelligent.
The Genaconda installer looks like a great idea, it would be a HUGE help and motivation for me (and maybe other people like me) if there was an ISO image with it. It just helps you get over that initial blank screen. This might just get me to install Gentoo again - in a VM, that is. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mac Tzu n00b
Joined: 13 May 2007 Posts: 44 Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2011 6:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sprotte wrote: | Quote: | Or, "1 years of gentoo is enough to get you hooked permanently!" |
Very true. I'm considering coming back to Gentoo after my couple-years stay with Ubuntu, just because I don't like to be told what I should use, and having problems using anything else. The rigid attempt to appeal to super-n00bs and basically lock down the system is alienating me slowly but surely. If I don't like the decisions Canonical makes anymore, what's the point of continued use?
On the other hand, I remember very well why I left Gentoo. Having to go through the kernel configuration options is something I don't want to subject myself to, especially since they changed all the time. Having to compare and edit config files after updates is another thing that turned me off. Ideally I want that stuff hidden from me. Compiling time would probably still be an issue for me with my current hardware - I like having Gnome (2.x style panels anyway), OpenOffice, the Ubuntu software installation tool, and the auto updater that usually requires no interference from me whatsoever.
Unfortunately, Canonical is moving into a direction that looks a bit too corporate super-integrated black-boxy hands-off for my taste. I'm still using Lucid Lynx and have no intention to upgrade
Ubuntu 9.x or SuSE 9.x style distributions appeal to me, but it seems they don't last and there are always things I want to change, which breaks the supposed house rules of that distro to some degree. I'm just not the typical / intended Ubuntu user.
Gentoo with a less painful kernel upgrade frontend and a mostly automated / semi-intelligent config file diff thingy, as well as a more graphical installation / configuration tool would be nice. That's still a world of difference from Ubuntu-style "we know what's good for you" distros.
Damn, maybe I should try Debian. Or FreeBSD again (I hope they have proper 3D hardware support by now). Yeah, I know I'm just making excuses. |
Hi Sprotte,
I sympathize with your Kernel Issue my resolution is the make oldconfig. But have you tried using the genkernel ?. It is designed for your needs by the sounds of things. It almost totally hands free kernel auto config.
What do you think about that ? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
wim-x Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 26 Nov 2004 Posts: 110 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2011 7:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hypnos wrote: | 1) No community Wiki -- how dysfunctional is the Gentoo leadership that such a simple and valuable task can't get done? |
The Official Gentoo Wiki is running beta now at http://wiki.gentoo.org. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Hypnos Advocate
Joined: 18 Jul 2002 Posts: 2889 Location: Omnipresent
|
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2011 2:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
wim-x wrote: | Hypnos wrote: | 1) No community Wiki -- how dysfunctional is the Gentoo leadership that such a simple and valuable task can't get done? |
The Official Gentoo Wiki is running beta now at http://wiki.gentoo.org. |
Yes! See my sig for one of my Wiki articles. _________________ Personal overlay | Simple backup scheme |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|