View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
curmudgeon Veteran

Joined: 08 Aug 2003 Posts: 1744
|
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 11:25 am Post subject: 2.6.35 is not ready for prime time |
|
|
TWO different machines, identical behavior.
KDM comes up, and everything appears normal. The instant a single key is pressed in the password field, the machine goes dead (screen black, network connections down, does not respond to pings). After rebooting, there is no indication in the logs of what happened.
2.6.34 did not have this problem. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
PaulBredbury Watchman


Joined: 14 Jul 2005 Posts: 7310
|
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 11:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, but which patchset? 2.6.35.4? Be specific. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
toralf Developer


Joined: 01 Feb 2004 Posts: 3943 Location: Hamburg
|
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 11:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
2.6.35.1-4 runs fine here with KDE 4.4.5 at a 32bit x86 ThinkPad with integrated Intel graphic card. Did you tested the kernel with a straight xdm login (or even startx) ? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
curmudgeon Veteran

Joined: 08 Aug 2003 Posts: 1744
|
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 12:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
PaulBredbury wrote: | Yeah, but which patchset? 2.6.35.4? Be specific. |
I meant the stable one, "of course" (implied, but I do admit, not obvious). |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
PaulBredbury Watchman


Joined: 14 Jul 2005 Posts: 7310
|
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 12:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
curmudgeon wrote: | the stable one |
You're still being ridiculously vague. Gentoo patchset, or vanilla, or what? We're not mind-readers. I use pf, for example.
Also, the stable one today might be different to the stable one tomorrow. So, state a proper version number. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Naib Watchman


Joined: 21 May 2004 Posts: 6073 Location: Removed by Neddy
|
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 12:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
werks4me _________________ #define HelloWorld int
#define Int main()
#define Return printf
#define Print return
#include <stdio>
HelloWorld Int {
Return("Hello, world!\n");
Print 0; |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
curmudgeon Veteran

Joined: 08 Aug 2003 Posts: 1744
|
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 1:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
PaulBredbury wrote: | Gentoo patchset, or vanilla, or what? |
gentoo-sources-2.6.35-r4
None of the vanilla-sources on the 2.6.35 series are stable on any architecture. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Veldrin Veteran


Joined: 27 Jul 2004 Posts: 1945 Location: Zurich, Switzerland
|
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 1:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
neither are gentoo-sources. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
curmudgeon Veteran

Joined: 08 Aug 2003 Posts: 1744
|
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 1:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
toralf wrote: | Did you tested the kernel with a straight xdm login (or even startx) ? |
Hadn't tried that before (and didn't get very far with it). Much to my surprise, the same thing happens at the console - the first key pressed to type in the username borks the system, although this time I do get a very long stack trace (of which I can only see the tail end).
I don't know any way of capturing that, but "cpu_idle" stood out several times. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
curmudgeon Veteran

Joined: 08 Aug 2003 Posts: 1744
|
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 1:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Veldrin wrote: | neither are gentoo-sources. |
What do you call x86 here?
Code: |
$ grep KEYWORDS /usr/portage/sys-kernel/gentoo-sources/gentoo-sources-2.6.35-r4.ebuild
KEYWORDS="~alpha ~amd64 ~arm ~hppa ~ia64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~sh ~sparc x86"
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Veldrin Veteran


Joined: 27 Jul 2004 Posts: 1945 Location: Zurich, Switzerland
|
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 1:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yep - missed that one - *shame on me* |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
toralf Developer


Joined: 01 Feb 2004 Posts: 3943 Location: Hamburg
|
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 1:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="curmudgeon"] toralf wrote: | the first key pressed to type in the username borks the system, although this time I do get a very long stack trace (of which I can only see the tail end).
I don't know any way of capturing that, .... | Make a photo and attach it onto a Gentoo bugzilla report. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Anon-E-moose Watchman


Joined: 23 May 2008 Posts: 6252 Location: Dallas area
|
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 1:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I run the zen sources 2.6.35 with X 1.9.0 and it has been rock solid.
What version of X, which video card and driver version? _________________ UM780, 6.12 zen kernel, gcc 13, openrc, wayland |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
curmudgeon Veteran

Joined: 08 Aug 2003 Posts: 1744
|
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 2:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Anon-E-moose wrote: | What version of X, which video card and driver version? |
All stable versions (I only care about it working).
x11-base/xorg-server-1.7.7-r1
Intel Corporation 82Q963/Q965 Integrated Graphics Controller
x11-drivers/xf86-video-intel-2.9.1 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Anon-E-moose Watchman


Joined: 23 May 2008 Posts: 6252 Location: Dallas area
|
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 2:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
post /var/log/Xorg.0.log please _________________ UM780, 6.12 zen kernel, gcc 13, openrc, wayland |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
curmudgeon Veteran

Joined: 08 Aug 2003 Posts: 1744
|
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 3:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
toralf wrote: | Make a photo and attach it onto a Gentoo bugzilla report. |
OK, I tried that (but I had a lot of trouble getting a decent picture. Is this good enough to be useful?
https://bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=245638 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
toralf Developer


Joined: 01 Feb 2004 Posts: 3943 Location: Hamburg
|
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 3:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
No, I'm afraid.
To give the devs a good starting point, prabably you should increase the font size within /etc/conf.d/consolefont and then try it again. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
drescherjm Advocate

Joined: 05 Jun 2004 Posts: 2792 Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
|
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 3:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Neither 2.6.35 (gentoo sources or vanilla-sources) or 2.6.36-rc (git) will work on my i7 machine. Well to be exact it does work however it turns my 3.0GHz i7 so slow that typing is like a 300 baud modem..
https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-838842-highlight-.html
And the problem persists with all power management disabled in the bios.
2.6.34 gentoo-sources on the same machine works fine. _________________ John
My gentoo overlay
Instructons for overlay |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
kernelOfTruth Watchman


Joined: 20 Dec 2005 Posts: 6111 Location: Vienna, Austria; Germany; hello world :)
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Naib Watchman


Joined: 21 May 2004 Posts: 6073 Location: Removed by Neddy
|
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 3:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
drescherjm wrote: | Neither 2.6.35 (gentoo sources or vanilla-sources) or 2.6.36-rc (git) will work on my i7 machine. Well to be exact it does work however it turns my 3.0GHz i7 so slow that typing is like a 300 baud modem..
https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-838842-highlight-.html
And the problem persists with all power management disabled in the bios.
2.6.34 gentoo-sources on the same machine works fine. |
goo to know, my i7 parts due today/tomorrow so need to rebuild kernel. I will downgrade to 24 for now _________________ #define HelloWorld int
#define Int main()
#define Return printf
#define Print return
#include <stdio>
HelloWorld Int {
Return("Hello, world!\n");
Print 0; |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
toralf Developer


Joined: 01 Feb 2004 Posts: 3943 Location: Hamburg
|
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 3:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
drescherjm wrote: | Well to be exact it does work however it turns my 3.0GHz i7 so slow that typing is like a 300 baud modem.. | Interesting - I observed this with my ThinkPad T400 (Core2 Duo) with an early 2.6.36-rc1 version, but it disappears with a later release candidate and therefore I ignored it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
curmudgeon Veteran

Joined: 08 Aug 2003 Posts: 1744
|
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 3:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kernelOfTruth wrote: | both machines are laptops ?
try to disable wireless lan |
No, both machines are desktops. One is a P4 and the other is a Core 2. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Naib Watchman


Joined: 21 May 2004 Posts: 6073 Location: Removed by Neddy
|
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 8:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
drescherjm wrote: | Neither 2.6.35 (gentoo sources or vanilla-sources) or 2.6.36-rc (git) will work on my i7 machine. Well to be exact it does work however it turns my 3.0GHz i7 so slow that typing is like a 300 baud modem..
https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-838842-highlight-.html
And the problem persists with all power management disabled in the bios.
2.6.34 gentoo-sources on the same machine works fine. |
The i7 re-introduces hyperthreading, which results in 8 virtual cores. do you have hyperthreading enabled or disabled in your kernel? _________________ #define HelloWorld int
#define Int main()
#define Return printf
#define Print return
#include <stdio>
HelloWorld Int {
Return("Hello, world!\n");
Print 0; |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
drescherjm Advocate

Joined: 05 Jun 2004 Posts: 2792 Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
|
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 8:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Enabled, I see all 8 cores. This works on 2.6.34. I can try disabling that this evening (3 or so hours from now) and see if that fixes the issue. _________________ John
My gentoo overlay
Instructons for overlay |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
alexdu n00b

Joined: 25 Oct 2005 Posts: 49 Location: Moscow, Russia
|
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 10:29 pm Post subject: Re: 2.6.35 is not ready for prime time |
|
|
curmudgeon wrote: | The instant a single key is pressed in the password field, the machine goes dead (screen black, network connections down, does not respond to pings). |
I'd like to note two things.
1. (I guess you did it) It's time to migrate from "< > ATA/ATAPI/MFM/RLL support (DEPRECATED)" to "<*> Serial ATA and Parallel ATA drivers". It's easy - just reconfig you kernel, then update your bootloader config (e.g. grub.conf) and /etc/fstab in favour of change ALL /dev/hd. devices to /dev/sd. devices.
If something goes wrong - you need to reboot from a LiveCD. Also your old kernels which use /dev/hd. devices now became useless.
2. (It's your case I belive) You should (try) "adjust" the version of udev you use. There are 3 options here:
- use udev-149, mask udev-151-r4 (if you have ATA (PATA - just another name) disk and using deprecated ATA drivers)
- use udev-151-r4, add USE flag "devfs-compat" (if you have ATA (PATA) disk and using new PATA drivers)
- use udev-160 (if you have ATA (PATA) disk and using new PATA drivers)
Also, It's good idea to use kernel 2.6.35+, since, for example, 2.6.34 not working with old ATA /dev/hda drivers and udev-151-r4, but works with the new drivers and udev-151-r4
It was tested on: vanilla-sources, x86 arch, Intel Celeron and PIIMMX. I do believe neither amd64 arch nor SATA disks aren't effected.
I do hope this will help. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|