Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
2.6.35 is not ready for prime time
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours

Goto page 1, 2  Next  
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Kernel & Hardware
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
curmudgeon
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 08 Aug 2003
Posts: 1744

PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 11:25 am    Post subject: 2.6.35 is not ready for prime time Reply with quote

TWO different machines, identical behavior.

KDM comes up, and everything appears normal. The instant a single key is pressed in the password field, the machine goes dead (screen black, network connections down, does not respond to pings). After rebooting, there is no indication in the logs of what happened.

2.6.34 did not have this problem.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PaulBredbury
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 14 Jul 2005
Posts: 7310

PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 11:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah, but which patchset? 2.6.35.4? Be specific.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
toralf
Developer
Developer


Joined: 01 Feb 2004
Posts: 3943
Location: Hamburg

PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 11:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

2.6.35.1-4 runs fine here with KDE 4.4.5 at a 32bit x86 ThinkPad with integrated Intel graphic card. Did you tested the kernel with a straight xdm login (or even startx) ?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
curmudgeon
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 08 Aug 2003
Posts: 1744

PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 12:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

PaulBredbury wrote:
Yeah, but which patchset? 2.6.35.4? Be specific.


I meant the stable one, "of course" (implied, but I do admit, not obvious).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PaulBredbury
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 14 Jul 2005
Posts: 7310

PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 12:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

curmudgeon wrote:
the stable one

You're still being ridiculously vague. Gentoo patchset, or vanilla, or what? We're not mind-readers. I use pf, for example.

Also, the stable one today might be different to the stable one tomorrow. So, state a proper version number.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Naib
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 21 May 2004
Posts: 6073
Location: Removed by Neddy

PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 12:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

werks4me
_________________
#define HelloWorld int
#define Int main()
#define Return printf
#define Print return
#include <stdio>
HelloWorld Int {
Return("Hello, world!\n");
Print 0;
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
curmudgeon
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 08 Aug 2003
Posts: 1744

PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 1:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

PaulBredbury wrote:
Gentoo patchset, or vanilla, or what?


gentoo-sources-2.6.35-r4

None of the vanilla-sources on the 2.6.35 series are stable on any architecture.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Veldrin
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 27 Jul 2004
Posts: 1945
Location: Zurich, Switzerland

PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 1:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

neither are gentoo-sources.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
curmudgeon
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 08 Aug 2003
Posts: 1744

PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 1:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

toralf wrote:
Did you tested the kernel with a straight xdm login (or even startx) ?


Hadn't tried that before (and didn't get very far with it). Much to my surprise, the same thing happens at the console - the first key pressed to type in the username borks the system, although this time I do get a very long stack trace (of which I can only see the tail end).

I don't know any way of capturing that, but "cpu_idle" stood out several times.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
curmudgeon
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 08 Aug 2003
Posts: 1744

PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 1:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Veldrin wrote:
neither are gentoo-sources.


What do you call x86 here?

Code:

$ grep KEYWORDS /usr/portage/sys-kernel/gentoo-sources/gentoo-sources-2.6.35-r4.ebuild
KEYWORDS="~alpha ~amd64 ~arm ~hppa ~ia64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~sh ~sparc x86"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Veldrin
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 27 Jul 2004
Posts: 1945
Location: Zurich, Switzerland

PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 1:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

yep - missed that one - *shame on me*
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
toralf
Developer
Developer


Joined: 01 Feb 2004
Posts: 3943
Location: Hamburg

PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 1:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

[quote="curmudgeon"]
toralf wrote:
the first key pressed to type in the username borks the system, although this time I do get a very long stack trace (of which I can only see the tail end).

I don't know any way of capturing that, ....
Make a photo and attach it onto a Gentoo bugzilla report.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Anon-E-moose
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 6252
Location: Dallas area

PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 1:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I run the zen sources 2.6.35 with X 1.9.0 and it has been rock solid.

What version of X, which video card and driver version?
_________________
UM780, 6.12 zen kernel, gcc 13, openrc, wayland
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
curmudgeon
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 08 Aug 2003
Posts: 1744

PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 2:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Anon-E-moose wrote:
What version of X, which video card and driver version?


All stable versions (I only care about it working).

x11-base/xorg-server-1.7.7-r1

Intel Corporation 82Q963/Q965 Integrated Graphics Controller

x11-drivers/xf86-video-intel-2.9.1
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Anon-E-moose
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 6252
Location: Dallas area

PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 2:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

post /var/log/Xorg.0.log please
_________________
UM780, 6.12 zen kernel, gcc 13, openrc, wayland
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
curmudgeon
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 08 Aug 2003
Posts: 1744

PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 3:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

toralf wrote:
Make a photo and attach it onto a Gentoo bugzilla report.


OK, I tried that (but I had a lot of trouble getting a decent picture. Is this good enough to be useful?

https://bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=245638
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
toralf
Developer
Developer


Joined: 01 Feb 2004
Posts: 3943
Location: Hamburg

PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 3:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

curmudgeon wrote:
Is this good enough to be useful?
https://bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=245638
No, I'm afraid.
To give the devs a good starting point, prabably you should increase the font size within /etc/conf.d/consolefont and then try it again.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
drescherjm
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 05 Jun 2004
Posts: 2792
Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA

PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 3:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Neither 2.6.35 (gentoo sources or vanilla-sources) or 2.6.36-rc (git) will work on my i7 machine. Well to be exact it does work however it turns my 3.0GHz i7 so slow that typing is like a 300 baud modem..

https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-838842-highlight-.html

And the problem persists with all power management disabled in the bios.

2.6.34 gentoo-sources on the same machine works fine.
_________________
John

My gentoo overlay
Instructons for overlay
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kernelOfTruth
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 20 Dec 2005
Posts: 6111
Location: Vienna, Austria; Germany; hello world :)

PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 3:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

toralf wrote:
curmudgeon wrote:
Is this good enough to be useful?
https://bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=245638
No, I'm afraid.
To give the devs a good starting point, prabably you should increase the font size within /etc/conf.d/consolefont and then try it again.


++

at least it's somewhat readable:

both machines are laptops ?

try to disable wireless lan

just use google: [url=http://lmgtfy.com/?q=bad%3A+scheduling+from+the+idle+thread!] *click* [/url]

unfortunately there's no instant fix for this - try googling some more (gotta to work now)
_________________
https://github.com/kernelOfTruth/ZFS-for-SystemRescueCD/tree/ZFS-for-SysRescCD-4.9.0
https://github.com/kernelOfTruth/pulseaudio-equalizer-ladspa

Hardcore Gentoo Linux user since 2004 :D
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Naib
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 21 May 2004
Posts: 6073
Location: Removed by Neddy

PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 3:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

drescherjm wrote:
Neither 2.6.35 (gentoo sources or vanilla-sources) or 2.6.36-rc (git) will work on my i7 machine. Well to be exact it does work however it turns my 3.0GHz i7 so slow that typing is like a 300 baud modem..

https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-838842-highlight-.html

And the problem persists with all power management disabled in the bios.

2.6.34 gentoo-sources on the same machine works fine.


goo to know, my i7 parts due today/tomorrow so need to rebuild kernel. I will downgrade to 24 for now
_________________
#define HelloWorld int
#define Int main()
#define Return printf
#define Print return
#include <stdio>
HelloWorld Int {
Return("Hello, world!\n");
Print 0;
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
toralf
Developer
Developer


Joined: 01 Feb 2004
Posts: 3943
Location: Hamburg

PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 3:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

drescherjm wrote:
Well to be exact it does work however it turns my 3.0GHz i7 so slow that typing is like a 300 baud modem..
Interesting - I observed this with my ThinkPad T400 (Core2 Duo) with an early 2.6.36-rc1 version, but it disappears with a later release candidate and therefore I ignored it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
curmudgeon
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 08 Aug 2003
Posts: 1744

PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 3:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

kernelOfTruth wrote:
both machines are laptops ?

try to disable wireless lan


No, both machines are desktops. One is a P4 and the other is a Core 2.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Naib
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 21 May 2004
Posts: 6073
Location: Removed by Neddy

PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 8:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

drescherjm wrote:
Neither 2.6.35 (gentoo sources or vanilla-sources) or 2.6.36-rc (git) will work on my i7 machine. Well to be exact it does work however it turns my 3.0GHz i7 so slow that typing is like a 300 baud modem..

https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-838842-highlight-.html

And the problem persists with all power management disabled in the bios.

2.6.34 gentoo-sources on the same machine works fine.


The i7 re-introduces hyperthreading, which results in 8 virtual cores. do you have hyperthreading enabled or disabled in your kernel?
_________________
#define HelloWorld int
#define Int main()
#define Return printf
#define Print return
#include <stdio>
HelloWorld Int {
Return("Hello, world!\n");
Print 0;
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
drescherjm
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 05 Jun 2004
Posts: 2792
Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA

PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 8:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Enabled, I see all 8 cores. This works on 2.6.34. I can try disabling that this evening (3 or so hours from now) and see if that fixes the issue.
_________________
John

My gentoo overlay
Instructons for overlay
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
alexdu
n00b
n00b


Joined: 25 Oct 2005
Posts: 49
Location: Moscow, Russia

PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 10:29 pm    Post subject: Re: 2.6.35 is not ready for prime time Reply with quote

curmudgeon wrote:
The instant a single key is pressed in the password field, the machine goes dead (screen black, network connections down, does not respond to pings).

I'd like to note two things.
1. (I guess you did it) It's time to migrate from "< > ATA/ATAPI/MFM/RLL support (DEPRECATED)" to "<*> Serial ATA and Parallel ATA drivers". It's easy - just reconfig you kernel, then update your bootloader config (e.g. grub.conf) and /etc/fstab in favour of change ALL /dev/hd. devices to /dev/sd. devices.
If something goes wrong - you need to reboot from a LiveCD. Also your old kernels which use /dev/hd. devices now became useless.

2. (It's your case I belive) You should (try) "adjust" the version of udev you use. There are 3 options here:
- use udev-149, mask udev-151-r4 (if you have ATA (PATA - just another name) disk and using deprecated ATA drivers)
- use udev-151-r4, add USE flag "devfs-compat" (if you have ATA (PATA) disk and using new PATA drivers)
- use udev-160 (if you have ATA (PATA) disk and using new PATA drivers)

Also, It's good idea to use kernel 2.6.35+, since, for example, 2.6.34 not working with old ATA /dev/hda drivers and udev-151-r4, but works with the new drivers and udev-151-r4 :)

It was tested on: vanilla-sources, x86 arch, Intel Celeron and PIIMMX. I do believe neither amd64 arch nor SATA disks aren't effected.

I do hope this will help.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Kernel & Hardware All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum