View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
slev0 n00b
Joined: 03 Nov 2010 Posts: 3
|
Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2010 3:23 am Post subject: DNSSEC not working, not logging with net-dns/bind-9.7.1_p2 |
|
|
I've been on Google all day, and I'm starting to give up hope.
I have named configured correctly, so far as I can tell, based on http://www.isc.org/community/blog/201007/using-root-dnssec-key-bind-9-resolvers
/etc/bind/bind.keys:
Code: | /* IANA root pubkey */
managed-keys {
"." initial-key 257 3 8
"AwEAAagAIKlVZrpC6Ia7gEzahOR+9W29euxhJhVVLOyQbSEW0O8gcCjF
FVQUTf6v58fLjwBd0YI0EzrAcQqBGCzh/RStIoO8g0NfnfL2MTJRkxoX
bfDaUeVPQuYEhg37NZWAJQ9VnMVDxP/VHL496M/QZxkjf5/Efucp2gaD
X6RS6CXpoY68LsvPVjR0ZSwzz1apAzvN9dlzEheX7ICJBBtuA6G3LQpz
W5hOA2hzCTMjJPJ8LbqF6dsV6DoBQzgul0sGIcGOYl7OyQdXfZ57relS
Qageu+ipAdTTJ25AsRTAoub8ONGcLmqrAmRLKBP1dfwhYB4N7knNnulq
QxA+Uk1ihz0=";
}; |
/etc/bind/named.conf (relevant options only):
Code: | options {
bindkeys-file "/etc/bind/bind.keys";
dnssec-enable yes;
dnssec-validation yes;
};
logging {
channel dnssec_log {
file "/tmp/dnssec++.log" size 20m;
print-time yes;
print-category yes;
print-severity yes;
severity debug 3;
};
category dnssec { dnssec_log; };
}; |
I noticed the root cache was out of date, and updated that. The master key is taken from http://data.iana.org/root-anchors/ . Nothing is ever logged to dnssec++.log, unless I enable dnssec-lookaside pointing to dlv.isc.org-- if I do that, the log fills with errors immediately, and I can't resolve a thing.
I've confirmed I can retrieve DNSKEY records and such using dig. My DNS setup-- caching/recursive plus a small, local authoritative zone --works great other than this. I'm using a configuration based closely on /usr/portage/net-dns/bind/files/named.conf-r4 . I have no idea what to do next.
Has anyone ever actually gotten DNSSEC working under Gentoo with BIND? I can't find any evidence of it anywhere.
Oh, and I'm testing with http://test.dnssec-or-not.org/ . I think the total absence of DNSSEC activity in the log is damning enough, anyway. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
darkphader Veteran
Joined: 09 May 2002 Posts: 1225 Location: Motown
|
Posted: Fri Nov 05, 2010 2:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Saw your post, but sorry I've long since switched from bind to nsd and unbound (with a side trip for a couple of years through djbdns). I followed http://www.unbound.net/documentation/howto_anchor.html and DNSSEC just worked. Much simpler than I thought it would be. _________________ WYSIWYG - What You See Is What You Grep |
|
Back to top |
|
|
slev0 n00b
Joined: 03 Nov 2010 Posts: 3
|
Posted: Fri Nov 05, 2010 3:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
darkphader wrote: | Saw your post, but sorry I've long since switched from bind to nsd and unbound (with a side trip for a couple of years through djbdns). I followed http://www.unbound.net/documentation/howto_anchor.html and DNSSEC just worked. Much simpler than I thought it would be. |
The last time I checked in with Unbound, it was authoritative-only, or at least not-recursive. Can Unbound handle recursion/caching yet, or is it ever planned to? That's my primary use; so far, I'm not bothering to sign my local authority, because it's visible on this LAN and nowhere else in the world. (Or so I hope.)
I'm perfectly willing to switch at this point; BIND configuration drives me nuts. It's the Sendmail of DNS. I use it partly because employers have, so I try to keep my hand in. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
darkphader Veteran
Joined: 09 May 2002 Posts: 1225 Location: Motown
|
Posted: Fri Nov 05, 2010 3:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
NSD is authoritative only, Unbound is recursive, does caching. _________________ WYSIWYG - What You See Is What You Grep |
|
Back to top |
|
|
slev0 n00b
Joined: 03 Nov 2010 Posts: 3
|
Posted: Fri Nov 05, 2010 3:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
darkphader wrote: | NSD is authoritative only, Unbound is recursive, does caching. |
I will definitely check out Unbound. Thanks! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|