View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Cheyenne n00b
Joined: 05 Jan 2005 Posts: 33
|
Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2011 5:16 pm Post subject: What is the current status of Clustered File systems |
|
|
I need to set up a clustered file system, and was wondering what the possible selections are available?
I've done a search on gfs(2) and ocfs(2) w.r.t gentoo and while I have found "hits", most of the results have been folks asking the question, with a few that have indicated that they were able to cobble something together, but without details.
So...
What clustered filesystems are people recommending out there (if any) for gentoo's use? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ianw1974 Guru
Joined: 18 Oct 2006 Posts: 387 Location: UK and Poland
|
Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2011 9:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Maybe GlusterFS? It's available in portage as well. Very nice in fact, have used it. _________________ Ian Walker
Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
Linux Systems Limited | Masternode Monitoring |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Claer n00b
Joined: 11 Feb 2003 Posts: 22
|
Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2011 2:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ceph and moosefs are also in portage.
Ceph is kernel based while gluster and moose are based on fuse.
I didn't test any (I don't have the use ... yet;)) but heard good things of moose over gluster (more reliable). gluster is more deployed. _________________ May the BLU be with you |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Cheyenne n00b
Joined: 05 Jan 2005 Posts: 33
|
Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2011 2:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ceph, ClusterFS and Moosefs are all distributed filesystems, where you have a set of file servers that clients connect to.
The situation that I have is a SAN with fiber connections that is being shared between two systems, and sharing the LUN(s) between the systems. No need for file traffic going across the network (though locking does go across the network). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|