Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
New graphics card (ATI)
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours

 
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Kernel & Hardware
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
tomtomp
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 10 Oct 2011
Posts: 89

PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 8:11 am    Post subject: New graphics card (ATI) Reply with quote

Hi, I bought new raphics card (ATI HD 6950) I installed it and all went well, but now when I run glx gears I get:
Code:

34169 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6833.714 FPS
34427 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6885.330 FPS
34324 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6864.661 FPS


I was getting about 8000 on my old ati hd 3870... also CPU is being heavily used, shouldnt the GPU process it?

+ fgl_glxgears
Code:

Using GLX_SGIX_pbuffer
14665 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2933.000 FPS
15379 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3075.800 FPS

here is my Xorg:
Code:


#Section "InputDevice"
#   Identifier  "Mouse0"
#   Driver      "mouse"
#   Option       "Protocol" "auto"
#   Option       "Device" "/dev/input/mice"
#   Option       "ZAxisMapping" "4 5 6 7"
#EndSection
#Section "Monitor"
#   Identifier   "Monitor0"
#   VendorName   "SAM"
#   ModelName    "SAMSUNG"
#   HorizSync    26.0 - 76.0
#   VertRefresh  23.0 - 61.0
#EndSection

Section "ServerLayout"
   Identifier     "X.org Configured"
   Screen      0  "Screen0" 1920 0
   Screen         "aticonfig-Screen[0]-1" 0 0
   InputDevice    "Evdev Mouse" "CorePointer"
   InputDevice    "Keyboard0" "CoreKeyboard"
EndSection

Section "Files"
   ModulePath   "/usr/lib/xorg/modules"
   FontPath     "/usr/share/fonts/misc/"
   FontPath     "/usr/share/fonts/TTF/"
   FontPath     "/usr/share/fonts/OTF/"
   FontPath     "/usr/share/fonts/Type1/"
   FontPath     "/usr/share/fonts/100dpi/"
   FontPath     "/usr/share/fonts/75dpi/"
EndSection

Section "Module"
   Load  "glx"
   Load  "dbe"
   Load  "extmod"
   Load  "record"
EndSection

Section "InputDevice"
   Identifier  "Keyboard0"
   Driver      "kbd"
EndSection

Section "InputDevice"
   Identifier  "Evdev Mouse"
   Driver      "evdev"
   Option       "Name" "Corsair Corsair Vengeance M90 Mouse"
   Option       "evBits" "+1-2"
   Option       "keyBits" "~272-287"
   Option       "relBits" "~0-2 ~6 ~8"
   Option       "Pass" "3"
   Option       "CorePointer"
EndSection

Section "Monitor"
   Identifier   "aticonfig-Monitor[0]-0"
   Option       "VendorName" "ATI Proprietary Driver"
   Option       "ModelName" "Generic Autodetecting Monitor"
   Option       "DPMS" "true"
EndSection

Section "Monitor"
   Identifier   "aticonfig-Monitor[0]-1"
   Option       "VendorName" "ATI Proprietary Driver"
   Option       "ModelName" "Generic Autodetecting Monitor"
   Option       "DPMS" "true"
EndSection

Section "Monitor"
   Identifier   "0-DFP1"
   Option       "VendorName" "ATI Proprietary Driver"
   Option       "ModelName" "Generic Autodetecting Monitor"
   Option       "DPMS" "true"
   Option       "PreferredMode" "1920x1080"
   Option       "TargetRefresh" "60"
   Option       "Position" "0 0"
   Option       "Rotate" "normal"
   Option       "Disable" "false"
EndSection

Section "Monitor"
   Identifier   "0-DFP2"
   Option       "VendorName" "ATI Proprietary Driver"
   Option       "ModelName" "Generic Autodetecting Monitor"
   Option       "DPMS" "true"
   Option       "PreferredMode" "1920x1080"
   Option       "TargetRefresh" "60"
   Option       "Position" "0 0"
   Option       "Rotate" "normal"
   Option       "Disable" "false"
EndSection

Section "Device"

        ### Available Driver options are:-
        ### Values: <i>: integer, <f>: float, <bool>: "True"/"False",
        ### <string>: "String", <freq>: "<f> Hz/kHz/MHz",
        ### <percent>: "<f>%"
        ### [arg]: arg optional
        #Option     "NoAccel"               # [<bool>]
        #Option     "SWcursor"              # [<bool>]
        #Option     "Dac6Bit"               # [<bool>]
        #Option     "Dac8Bit"               # [<bool>]
        #Option     "BusType"               # [<str>]
        #Option     "CPPIOMode"             # [<bool>]
        #Option     "CPusecTimeout"         # <i>
        #Option     "AGPMode"               # <i>
        #Option     "AGPFastWrite"          # [<bool>]
        #Option     "AGPSize"               # <i>
        #Option     "GARTSize"              # <i>
        #Option     "RingSize"              # <i>
        #Option     "BufferSize"            # <i>
        #Option     "EnableDepthMoves"      # [<bool>]
        #Option     "EnablePageFlip"        # [<bool>]
        #Option     "NoBackBuffer"          # [<bool>]
        #Option     "DMAForXv"              # [<bool>]
        #Option     "FBTexPercent"          # <i>
        #Option     "DepthBits"             # <i>
        #Option     "PCIAPERSize"           # <i>
        #Option     "AccelDFS"              # [<bool>]
        #Option     "IgnoreEDID"            # [<bool>]
        #Option     "CustomEDID"            # [<str>]
        #Option     "DisplayPriority"       # [<str>]
        #Option     "PanelSize"             # [<str>]
        #Option     "ForceMinDotClock"      # <freq>
        #Option     "ColorTiling"           # [<bool>]
        #Option     "VideoKey"              # <i>
        #Option     "RageTheatreCrystal"    # <i>
        #Option     "RageTheatreTunerPort"    # <i>
        #Option     "RageTheatreCompositePort"    # <i>
        #Option     "RageTheatreSVideoPort"    # <i>
        #Option     "TunerType"             # <i>
        #Option     "RageTheatreMicrocPath"    # <str>
        #Option     "RageTheatreMicrocType"    # <str>
        #Option     "ScalerWidth"           # <i>
        #Option     "RenderAccel"           # [<bool>]
        #Option     "SubPixelOrder"         # [<str>]
        #Option     "ClockGating"           # [<bool>]
        #Option     "VGAAccess"             # [<bool>]
        #Option     "ReverseDDC"            # [<bool>]
        #Option     "LVDSProbePLL"          # [<bool>]
        #Option     "AccelMethod"           # <str>
        #Option     "DRI"                   # [<bool>]
        #Option     "ConnectorTable"        # <str>
        #Option     "DefaultConnectorTable"    # [<bool>]
        #Option     "DefaultTMDSPLL"        # [<bool>]
        #Option     "TVDACLoadDetect"       # [<bool>]
        #Option     "ForceTVOut"            # [<bool>]
        #Option     "TVStandard"            # <str>
        #Option     "IgnoreLidStatus"       # [<bool>]
        #Option     "DefaultTVDACAdj"       # [<bool>]
        #Option     "Int10"                 # [<bool>]
        #Option     "EXAVSync"              # [<bool>]
        #Option     "ATOMTVOut"             # [<bool>]
        #Option     "R4xxATOM"              # [<bool>]
        #Option     "ForceLowPowerMode"     # [<bool>]
        #Option     "DynamicPM"             # [<bool>]
        #Option     "NewPLL"                # [<bool>]
        #Option     "ZaphodHeads"           # <str>
   Identifier  "Card0"
   Driver      "fglrx"
   Option       "UseFastTLS" "2"
   Option       "Monitor-DFP1" "0-DFP1"
   BusID       "PCI:1:0:0"
EndSection

Section "Device"
   Identifier  "aticonfig-Device[0]-0"
   Driver      "fglrx"
   Option       "UseFastTLS" "2"
   BusID       "PCI:1:0:0"
EndSection

Section "Device"
   Identifier  "aticonfig-Device[0]-1"
   Driver      "fglrx"
   Option       "UseFastTLS" "2"
   Option       "Monitor-DFP2" "0-DFP2"
   BusID       "PCI:1:0:0"
   Screen      1
EndSection

Section "Screen"
   Identifier "Screen0"
   Device     "Card0"
   SubSection "Display"
      Viewport   0 0
      Depth     1
   EndSubSection
   SubSection "Display"
      Viewport   0 0
      Depth     4
   EndSubSection
   SubSection "Display"
      Viewport   0 0
      Depth     8
   EndSubSection
   SubSection "Display"
      Viewport   0 0
      Depth     15
   EndSubSection
   SubSection "Display"
      Viewport   0 0
      Depth     16
   EndSubSection
   SubSection "Display"
      Viewport   0 0
      Depth     24
   EndSubSection
EndSection

Section "Screen"
   Identifier "aticonfig-Screen[0]-0"
   Device     "aticonfig-Device[0]-0"
   Monitor    "aticonfig-Monitor[0]-0"
   DefaultDepth     24
   SubSection "Display"
      Viewport   0 0
      Depth     24
   EndSubSection
EndSection

Section "Screen"
   Identifier "aticonfig-Screen[0]-1"
   Device     "aticonfig-Device[0]-1"
   DefaultDepth     24
   SubSection "Display"
      Viewport   0 0
      Depth     24
   EndSubSection
EndSection

I am not too good at configuring it, all help welcomed ;) .

glxinfo | grep rendering:
Code:

direct rendering: Yes


Is theese fps normal? I tried playing Skyrim in wine but on lowest it had realy low fps :(
Thanx for any help :)

ps: I will try unmerge ad reemerge ati-drivers in the meanwhile :D

pps: lspci -v -s 01:00.0
Code:

01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Device 6719 (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
   Subsystem: PC Partner Limited Device 186b
   Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 47
   Memory at e0000000 (64-bit, prefetchable) [size=256M]
   Memory at f5000000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=128K]
   I/O ports at b000 [size=256]
   [virtual] Expansion ROM at f4000000 [disabled] [size=128K]
   Capabilities: <access denied>
   Kernel driver in use: fglrx_pci
   Kernel modules: fglrx
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
j_c_p
Guru
Guru


Joined: 30 Aug 2003
Posts: 319
Location: France - Colmar

PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 8:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hello,

Quote:
I bought new raphics card (ATI HD 6950)


Sorry, an Nvidia card would have been a better buy.
Have fun with your card (well, sort of :lol: ).
_________________
Lian Li PC60 - AMD FX 8300 - Asrock 990FX EXTREME9 - Gigabyte GTX960 G1 Gaming 4Go
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tomtomp
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 10 Oct 2011
Posts: 89

PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 8:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Heh... right :D
I still think ATI is better than NVIDIA , they just supported linux first.

ps: I looked at test of this Graphics card on phoronix and they got better results than me...
pps: I dont think system is fully using GPU because graphical programs (opengl) are using loads of CPU... any ideas?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Veldrin
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 27 Jul 2004
Posts: 1945
Location: Zurich, Switzerland

PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 11:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

please post the output of glxinfo | grep render ; eselect opengl list

V.
_________________
read the portage output!
If my answer is too concise, ask for an explanation.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tomtomp
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 10 Oct 2011
Posts: 89

PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 11:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here:
Code:

direct rendering: Yes
OpenGL renderer string: AMD Radeon HD 6900 Series
    GL_KTX_buffer_region, GL_NV_blend_square, GL_NV_conditional_render,
Available OpenGL implementations:
  [1]   ati *
  [2]   xorg-x11
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gusar
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 09 Apr 2005
Posts: 2665
Location: Slovenia

PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 12:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

tomtomp wrote:
I still think ATI is better than NVIDIA

Not when it comes to Linux. And especially not with wine.

That said, have you checked the wine appdb if there are maybe some magic incantations to get Skyrim working optimally?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DaggyStyle
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 22 Mar 2006
Posts: 5941

PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 12:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

j_c_p wrote:
Hello,

Quote:
I bought new raphics card (ATI HD 6950)


Sorry, an Nvidia card would have been a better buy.
Have fun with your card (well, sort of :lol: ).


brilliant idea! why wouldn't you pay for his new nVidia card then?

frankly, if you don't have anything useful to contribute to a topic, don't.
it is disrespectful.
_________________
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the former - Albert Einstein
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Veldrin
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 27 Jul 2004
Posts: 1945
Location: Zurich, Switzerland

PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 12:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for the reply - I was wonder, whether opengl was properly configured, and it is.

Quote:
Is theese fps normal? I tried playing Skyrim in wine but on lowest it had realy low fps
Thanx for any help


Please note, that neither glxgears, nor fglrx_gears are valid benchmarking tools. IMO they give you a reasonable idea if opengl is working, and being accelerated via graphics card.

In addition wine offers only a limited implementation of directx. IIRC Skyrim is a pretty recent game, just I am not sureprised, that is runs slow.
On a sidenote: I recently tried guildwars on wine, and to play it properly, I had to drop to directx8 and disable any shaders. Otherwise I had some severe graphic issues. (using the latest fglrx/ati-drivers on a HD6870)


@Gusar: From experience NVIDIA using the binary drivers works better and more stable on Linux than ATI with their binary blob. Using the open source drivers it seems the other way around. What are you basing you statement on?


V
_________________
read the portage output!
If my answer is too concise, ask for an explanation.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
j_c_p
Guru
Guru


Joined: 30 Aug 2003
Posts: 319
Location: France - Colmar

PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 12:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

DaggyStyle wrote:
j_c_p wrote:
Hello,

Quote:
I bought new raphics card (ATI HD 6950)


Sorry, an Nvidia card would have been a better buy.
Have fun with your card (well, sort of :lol: ).


brilliant idea! why wouldn't you pay for his new nVidia card then?

frankly, if you don't have anything useful to contribute to a topic, don't.
it is disrespectful.

With the price of an ATI HD 6950 card, you can buy another card from Nvidia which performs better under Linux (and Wine) ... that's the state of the ATI cards, and, it's not a brilliant idea to choose a better card for the same price, it's the way to process.
It looks like you are a little bit on the other side of OS : Linux is not Windows, and the best cards aren't the same !
_________________
Lian Li PC60 - AMD FX 8300 - Asrock 990FX EXTREME9 - Gigabyte GTX960 G1 Gaming 4Go
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DaggyStyle
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 22 Mar 2006
Posts: 5941

PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 1:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

j_c_p wrote:
DaggyStyle wrote:
j_c_p wrote:
Hello,

Quote:
I bought new raphics card (ATI HD 6950)


Sorry, an Nvidia card would have been a better buy.
Have fun with your card (well, sort of :lol: ).


brilliant idea! why wouldn't you pay for his new nVidia card then?

frankly, if you don't have anything useful to contribute to a topic, don't.
it is disrespectful.

With the price of an ATI HD 6950 card, you can buy another card from Nvidia which performs better under Linux (and Wine) ... that's the state of the ATI cards, and, it's not a brilliant idea to choose a better card for the same price, it's the way to process.
It looks like you are a little bit on the other side of OS : Linux is not Windows, and the best cards aren't the same !

where did I wrote that ATI are better than nVidia? you need to read better.

I don't care less he got ATI, you think that he made the wrong choice or pbp ratio, he has a problem, he came here for help, your post didn't helped a bit, it was more of a "Ha Ha!" post, that is disrespectful.

speaking of OS side, "Ha Ha" posts can be seen on daily basis on windows boards written by wannabe kids who think they know it all because they can operate windows better than the average user but they are rarely seen on linux forums.
_________________
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the former - Albert Einstein
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
j_c_p
Guru
Guru


Joined: 30 Aug 2003
Posts: 319
Location: France - Colmar

PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 1:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

DaggyStyle wrote:
j_c_p wrote:
DaggyStyle wrote:
j_c_p wrote:
Hello,

Quote:
I bought new raphics card (ATI HD 6950)


Sorry, an Nvidia card would have been a better buy.
Have fun with your card (well, sort of :lol: ).


brilliant idea! why wouldn't you pay for his new nVidia card then?

frankly, if you don't have anything useful to contribute to a topic, don't.
it is disrespectful.

With the price of an ATI HD 6950 card, you can buy another card from Nvidia which performs better under Linux (and Wine) ... that's the state of the ATI cards, and, it's not a brilliant idea to choose a better card for the same price, it's the way to process.
It looks like you are a little bit on the other side of OS : Linux is not Windows, and the best cards aren't the same !

where did I wrote that ATI are better than nVidia? you need to read better.

I don't care less he got ATI, you think that he made the wrong choice or pbp ratio, he has a problem, he came here for help, your post didn't helped a bit, it was more of a "Ha Ha!" post, that is disrespectful.

speaking of OS side, "Ha Ha" posts can be seen on daily basis on windows boards written by wannabe kids who think they know it all because they can operate windows better than the average user but they are rarely seen on linux forums.

Your post didn't helped a bit : yours is certainly better, as I can read, you add nothing except quoting me and say "blabla blabla ...".
I understand better the number of your interventions in the Gentoo forums.
Thanks for all, that's very useful for tomtomp.

Quote:
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the former - Albert Einstein

_________________
Lian Li PC60 - AMD FX 8300 - Asrock 990FX EXTREME9 - Gigabyte GTX960 G1 Gaming 4Go
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tomtomp
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 10 Oct 2011
Posts: 89

PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 3:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Great... flameware :D , now realy, I think its because the drivers arent optimized yet (I hope :D )
In the meantime, anyone have some tricks for better performance?

ps: could any forummaster clear it here a bit? :D
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gusar
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 09 Apr 2005
Posts: 2665
Location: Slovenia

PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 3:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Veldrin wrote:
@Gusar: From experience NVIDIA using the binary drivers works better and more stable on Linux than ATI with their binary blob. Using the open source drivers it seems the other way around. What are you basing you statement on?

It's well known that for a long time the wine devs were only testing on the nvidia blob. It's because all other drivers were in such a state that the devs couldn't know whether the issue was in the driver or in their wine code. With the nvidia blob though, they could be sure the issue was in wine. This has changed quite a bit over time, but still, for wine the nvidia blob is king and fglrx still has lots of issues. The nvidia blob is also king when it comes to hardware video decoding (VDPAU), the second place being held by Intel (VAAPI), the fglrx situation being, in a word, ugh.

Now when we come to the open drivers... on both sides the open driver is quite a bit slower than the blobs, 3x-5x slower depending on game, sometimes even more. The big issue for nouveau is no reclocking support (switching the card to a higher performance level). It's coming for not-Fermi cards in kernel 3.4, but even with reclocking nouveau will reach at most 60% of the blob's performance. The open ati driver does have some reclocking support (different profiles, including dynamic switching), but you can read around, like say at the Phoronix forums, that it's not really it either - power consumption being high even on the lowest level (and this level being too low for smooth compositing), flickering during dynamic switches and such. So there's a lot of work needed in this area for both drivers.

tl;dr - for wine gaming, go nvidia blob.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DaggyStyle
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 22 Mar 2006
Posts: 5941

PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 5:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

j_c_p wrote:
DaggyStyle wrote:
j_c_p wrote:
DaggyStyle wrote:
j_c_p wrote:
Hello,

Quote:
I bought new raphics card (ATI HD 6950)


Sorry, an Nvidia card would have been a better buy.
Have fun with your card (well, sort of :lol: ).


brilliant idea! why wouldn't you pay for his new nVidia card then?

frankly, if you don't have anything useful to contribute to a topic, don't.
it is disrespectful.

With the price of an ATI HD 6950 card, you can buy another card from Nvidia which performs better under Linux (and Wine) ... that's the state of the ATI cards, and, it's not a brilliant idea to choose a better card for the same price, it's the way to process.
It looks like you are a little bit on the other side of OS : Linux is not Windows, and the best cards aren't the same !

where did I wrote that ATI are better than nVidia? you need to read better.

I don't care less he got ATI, you think that he made the wrong choice or pbp ratio, he has a problem, he came here for help, your post didn't helped a bit, it was more of a "Ha Ha!" post, that is disrespectful.

speaking of OS side, "Ha Ha" posts can be seen on daily basis on windows boards written by wannabe kids who think they know it all because they can operate windows better than the average user but they are rarely seen on linux forums.

Your post didn't helped a bit : yours is certainly better, as I can read, you add nothing except quoting me and say "blabla blabla ...".
I understand better the number of your interventions in the Gentoo forums.
Thanks for all, that's very useful for tomtomp.

Quote:
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the former - Albert Einstein


your not even worth it, I contributed enough and will continue, your contribution is still questioned.

btw, the sentence from my sig you've quoted was written to people such as you and the fact that you are unable to comprehend it only strengthen the validity of the sentence.

enjoy the rest of your staying at Gentoo's forums.

tomtomp, there is no flamewar, read the posts.
_________________
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the former - Albert Einstein
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NeddySeagoon
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 05 Jul 2003
Posts: 54831
Location: 56N 3W

PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 6:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

tomtomp,

Start off with a simple one display install and optimise that.
When it works, add in the second and then the third.

Unplug the second and third displays and test. You should not need to change xorg.conf.
When it detects just one display, it should be quite happy.

If one display does not JustWork, post the content of /var/log/Xorg.0.log
That file tells what xorg actually did when it started. xorg.conf tells what you asked it to do.
_________________
Regards,

NeddySeagoon

Computer users fall into two groups:-
those that do backups
those that have never had a hard drive fail.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Kernel & Hardware All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum